2,698 件 ・ 関連度順
概要と使いどころ
Add durable end-to-end tests for user/API-visible behavior. Detect or scaffold the E2E framework, write tests, run the app, and store evidence. Use for E2E, Playwright/Cypress, regression tests, or quality gates. Not exploratory QA.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Static code review of the active diff: trace changed paths and report concrete P1/P2/P3 correctness, security, or spec bugs with file:line evidence. Use for code review or bug checks. Not runtime QA.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Runtime QA of a change: start the app, test acceptance criteria and edge cases, and report evidence. Use for "test this", "QA", "does it work", exploratory checks, or post-review runtime verification. Not static code review.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Break a single epic into implementable story files. Reads the epic, its GDD, governing ADRs, and control manifest. Each story embeds its GDD requirement TR-ID, ADR guidance, acceptance criteria, story type, and test evidence path. Run after /create-epics for each epic.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use for every task that plans, writes, edits, debugs, tests, refactors, reviews, or maintains code. Apply to professional repositories, scripts, apps, services, prototypes, beginner work, vibe coding, and bounded code changes inside large systems. Choose the fewest clear lines, files, paths, states, and abstractions that correctly implement the requested behavior. Do not invent fallbacks, compatibility paths, defensive layers, or future scale without evidence. Do not use for ordinary conversation, emotional support, prose, translation, summarization, social-media content, or general research or technical discussion that is not part of planning, changing, or reviewing code. Never weaken real security, integrity, concurrency, compatibility, privacy, accessibility, legal, or regulatory requirements.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
When something breaks in production: triage the severity, gather evidence, identify root cause, deploy a fix or mitigation, and write a post-mortem. Provides a calm, structured process for high-stress moments.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Assessing standards, regulatory controls, and legal-document coverage with cited evidence and proposed wording. Use for OWASP/WCAG/SOC2/PCI/HIPAA or ToS/privacy/DPA reviews; not legal advice or code fixes.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Find similar design-registration candidates from a product image using Nexscope. Use for image-based design patent candidate screening with region, jurisdiction, Locarno and legal-status filters. Returns evidence for review, never an infringement or freedom-to-operate verdict.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Analyze live crypto K-line, price-volume, market-structure, and derivatives evidence, then turn it into a conditional trading plan with exact entry, invalidation, targets, position sizing, leverage, and three risk tiers. Use when a user wants both market analysis and an actionable risk-managed plan, asks whether or how to trade a coin, or requests entry/stop/target/size levels. Do not use for placing orders, managing an existing account, or guaranteeing returns.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Score an ecommerce URL for SEO + GEO readiness and AI citation visibility. Triggers on "geo score", "SEO + GEO score", "check ecommerce GEO", "Amazon/Shopify GEO", "GEO readiness audit". Covers product pages, store pages, marketplace listings, category pages, and homepages, scored from crawlable evidence (not live AI polling).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Design a practitioner inquiry cycle from research question through data collection to evidence-informed action. Use when starting action research, teacher-led investigation, or professional inquiry.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Select evidence-based study strategies matched to material type, learning goal, and student habits. Use when advising students on revision techniques, homework, or independent study approaches.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Map a scoped topic across three coexisting horizons — current system under strain (H1), preferred future (H3), and transition innovations sorted as H2+ or H2- — to understand change dynamics and identify responsible next actions.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Review the week using accumulated session evidence — retrieval rates, hint depths, calibration accuracy, transfer and unassisted results. The learner identifies patterns and sets a strategy goal. Use weekly or after a multi-session period.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Design a single-point rubric with one criterion and open columns for evidence. Use for student self-assessment, peer feedback, teacher formative feedback, or pre-task planning. Works with any learning target, with or without a band system.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Structure a decision or design challenge through multiple perspectives before committing to action. Use as a synthesis step after scoping, mapping, and dilemma navigation when a group needs a wiser next step.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Surface beliefs, assumptions, stories, and values shaping a system. Use when deeper mental models need examining with care and evidence.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Present project-design pathway options and orchestrate regenerative projects using backwards design, PBL, SEEDS, compassionate systems action, or civic/service pathways.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Define the scope and purpose of a complex inquiry before mapping or futures work begins. Use when a class or group needs to agree what they are investigating, who it matters to, and at what scale.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Present pathway options and orchestrate place-based curriculum design from a local place, curriculum requirement, or community issue. Use when place should become a primary text for learning.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Identify and navigate genuine dilemmas in curriculum, school, or community contexts — tensions between competing goods that cannot be solved, only navigated. Produces a structured dilemma map with both poles named and both/and possibilities.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Coordinates UDL and differentiation tools through a universal-first hierarchy: barrier removal before targeted differentiation before individualised accommodation. Use when planning accessible learning.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Map a complex topic by placing factors on hexagonal tiles where adjacency signals a claimed relationship. Use when students need to surface hidden connections in a system before analysis or action.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Build students' capacity to compare accounts across multiple historical sources — identifying agreements, contradictions, and gaps. Use when students treat individual documents as complete answers rather than partial perspectives.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。