「gate」の検索結果

Investigate a specific Codex CLI session by session ID — correlate the local rollout transcript (`~/.codex/sessions/YYYY/MM/DD/rollout-*-<SESSION_ID>.jsonl`) with the router's production logs to understand what Codex rendered vs. what the upstream served on the /v1/responses path. Use when given a session ID and asked "why did X render?" (missing thinking, missing routing marker, wrong model, tool-call weirdness) for a Codex conversation routed through the router.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

PAO workflow for scanning, drafting, and presenting community responses with human review gate

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Defensive CI/CD patterns: semver validation, token checks, retry logic, draft detection — earned from v0.8.22

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Scans a live Kubernetes environment with `mirrord dump` to find an identifier mirrord can filter traffic on: a header, a `baggage` or `tracestate` member, a tenant or user id, a trace id (W3C, B3, X-Ray, Google, Jaeger), a JWT claim, a cookie, a path segment, or a JSON body field that is present on every hop of a request chain, unique to one developer's traffic, and settable by that developer. Runs mirror-only dumps on each service, sends a tagged probe request at the edge or observes real traffic, scores the candidates, and produces the matching `http_filter` (regex, jq on headers, path, method, body, or combinations) plus a per-hop report of where each identifier is dropped. Installs the mirrord CLI through a package manager when it is missing. Use when the user asks what to filter on, whether the cluster already propagates a request id or trace context, how to isolate their own requests on a shared staging cluster, how to filter on a JWT or cookie with mirrord, or wants to inspect live traffic with mirrord dump. Changes no application code: propagation gaps go to the mirrord-header-propagation skill.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Client-side request-signing and anti-bot token reversal for bug bounty — when a request carries a sign/sig/hmac/token/nonce/timestamp/X-Sensor header that Burp Repeater cannot replay, recover the signer just enough to reproduce the request outside the client. Packet-first staging (capture real request → prove replay works → only reverse if replay fails) across the locate→recover→runtime→validation→replay spine. Covers tracing backward from the signature field (writer→builder→entry→source), isolating user-mutable sign inputs (timestamp/nonce/deviceId/body) vs constants (secret key), hooking fetch/XHR in DevTools, JS deobfuscation basics (webpack/wasm/JSVMP), and the bounty payoff: reach the protected API to then hunt IDOR/auth/business-logic. Use when Burp/mitmproxy replay of a signed or anti-bot-gated request fails and you suspect a client-computed field is blocking you.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Meme coin and token security audit — rug pull detection (honeypot, hidden mint, fee manipulation, LP lock bypass), Solana SPL token analysis (freeze authority, mint authority, metadata mutability), Token-2022 extension risks (transfer hooks, permanent delegate), DEX liquidity pool attacks (sandwich amplification, LP drain, bonding curve exploits), pump.fun/Raydium/Jupiter integration risks, token_scanner.py automation, and real exploit examples from 2024-2025. Use for any token audit, rug pull assessment, meme coin security review, or pre-investment due diligence.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Security audit of Model Context Protocol (MCP) servers — tool poisoning, prompt injection via tool descriptions and results, unscoped/over-privileged tools, path traversal in file tools, command injection in shell/exec tools, SSRF in fetch tools, secret leakage through tool output, missing approval gates on state-changing actions, confused-deputy and rug-pull tool redefinition, token passthrough, and unsafe stdio/HTTP transport config. Covers auditing both first-party and third-party MCP servers (Python FastMCP, Node MCP SDK) and their client configs (Claude Desktop, Cursor, Cline, Windsurf, Zed). Use when reviewing, hardening, or hunting bugs in an MCP server, an agent's tool integrations, or a mcpServers config block. 中文触发词：MCP审计、工具投毒、提示注入、智能体安全、MCP服务器漏洞

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use the Crabbox wrapper for OpenClaw remote validation across Linux, macOS, Windows, and WSL2, including delegated Blacksmith Testbox proof. Report the actual provider and id.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Delegate focused coding, research, review, or verification work to a bounded DevSpace subagent. Use when a task benefits from separate context, a specialist perspective, or a follow-up with the same worker.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Inspect or rewrite prose that sounds formulaic while preserving source facts, voice, and format. Use for de-slopping, humanizing, prose audits, or a final writing-quality gate. Do not use it as an authorship detector or to evade disclosure requirements.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Build or change anything under app/web_ui with Kiln's house controls and styles only. Invoke before touching any .svelte file, and before writing a task that names a screen, dialog, card, form, button, header or progress state. Produces a component plan, a sibling-screen comparison, a gate run and a handback a reviewer can verify without looking at pixels.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Kiln's code conventions and per-area gotchas, plus a diff gate that enforces the mechanical ones. Invoke before writing or changing any Python, TypeScript or Svelte code in the Kiln repo (libs/core, libs/server, app/desktop, app/web_ui), and when reviewing such a change. Covers comments, startup and entry points, globals and module state, config reads, module layering, library-vs-app rules and async I/O.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Compose one publication-grade multi-panel figure. Start from a one-line claim plus immutable data Artifact Version references, or inspect an existing figure and draft its outline directly. Plan a 12-column panel outline, delegate one worker per panel, compose and inspect the result, then run at most three adversarial review rounds while regenerating only affected panels. For a standalone plot use `figure-style`; for whole-paper figure ordering use `paper-narrative`.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Inspect Open-Science's JavaScript control REPL, discover managed Project files, Sessions, and Agent Frames, and safely feature-gate host.* calls with host.capabilities(). Use when an Agent needs to discover available host APIs, locate an Artifact or Upload Version, diagnose a Session, or read a Frame transcript in the current Project.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Bug bounty report writing for H1/Bugcrowd/Intigriti/Immunefi — report templates, human tone guidelines, impact-first writing, CVSS 3.1 scoring, title formula, impact statement formula, severity decision guide, downgrade counters, pre-submit checklist. Validation gates and the submittability/always-rejected decision are owned by triage-validation; this skill owns the written report itself (templates, tone, formulas). Use after validating a finding and before submitting. Never use "could potentially" — prove it or don't report.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Meme coin and token security audit — rug pull detection (honeypot, hidden mint, fee manipulation, LP lock bypass), Solana SPL token analysis (freeze authority, mint authority, metadata mutability), Token-2022 extension risks (transfer hooks, permanent delegate), DEX liquidity pool attacks (sandwich amplification, LP drain, bonding curve exploits), pump.fun/Raydium/Jupiter integration risks, and real exploit examples from 2024-2025. Use for any token audit, rug pull assessment, meme coin security review, or pre-investment due diligence.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Hunting skill for xxe vulnerabilities. Built from 10 public bug bounty reports including SVG-upload XXE, Office-doc (PPTX/DOCX) XXE, SOAP XXE, SAML AssertionConsumer XXE, blind OOB XXE via DTD callback, parameter-entity XXE, XXE-to-LFI, XXE-to-SSRF, and XXE-to-RCE chains (Adobe Commerce CosmicSting CVE-2024-34102). Use when hunting XXE on any target — emphasis on OOB-Or-It-Didn't-Happen Gate for blind cases.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Hunt MFA / 2FA bypass — 7 distinct patterns. (1) MFA not enforced on sensitive endpoints (password change, email change accept without MFA challenge), (2) MFA-step skip via direct navigation to post-login URL, (3) MFA-token replay (same code accepted twice), (4) brute-force the 6-digit OTP without rate limit (10^6 attempts at server speed), (5) race condition on OTP validation, (6) recovery-code dump via /api/me, (7) backup factor downgrade (SMS factor with no rate limit). Plus the chain: cookie theft + password oracle + no step-up = ATO without MFA challenge. Detection: trace auth flow in Burp, find every state transition, check if MFA is middleware-gated vs per-endpoint, check OTP entropy and rate limit on OTP-validate. Validate: attacker session reaching post-MFA state. Use when hunting auth bypass, MFA flows, chaining primitives toward ATO.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Hunt CAPTCHA Bypass — 6 distinct patterns: (1) CAPTCHA field simply omitted from the request (server-side validation absent), (2) CAPTCHA token replayed from a solved challenge (no single-use enforcement), (3) CAPTCHA response accepted on a different endpoint than it was solved on (no binding to action/session), (4) static or predictable CAPTCHA values accepted (e.g. '0', 'null', empty string), (5) audio/accessibility CAPTCHA trivially solvable programmatically, (6) CAPTCHA only enforced after N failures (first N requests bypass it). Detection: intercept a successful form submission, remove the CAPTCHA field entirely, replay — if it still succeeds, server-side validation is absent. Medium severity standalone; High when it removes the only rate-limit gate protecting a login, registration, or payment endpoint.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Reverse-engineer the hook formula from a viral LinkedIn post URL. Returns which of the 20 canonical 2026 formulas it uses (anaphora, R.I.P., year-pivot, time-anchor, curiosity-gap, contrarian, comment-gate, emotional cold-open, named-gratitude, and 11 more), why it worked, and a blank template. Use to learn from a competitor's post, not to write your own (use linkedin-post-writer).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Quality gate. 5 parallel agents review changes. All must pass.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Compute the EXACT sub-transaction impact of a rollup rule in TRES Finance — every filter applied — and flag genuine problems (zero matches, overlap, config mistakes) before the rule is created. Two modes. Mode A: a pre-create quality gate invoked by the tres-rollup-rules skill to vet proposed candidate rules. Mode B: standalone review of a rule someone submitted or of existing PENDING rules. Trigger this skill when the user says "review this rollup rule", "what would this rollup rule actually match", "preview the rollup impact", "how many transactions would this rule catch", "is this rollup rule valid", "validate my rollup rule", "check my pending rollup rules", or "review the rollup requests". Do NOT use this to design or propose new rollups — that is tres-rollup-rules. This skill only measures impact and flags issues; it never executes mutations.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

This skill should be used when the user asks to "analyze network traffic with Wireshark", "capture packets for troubleshooting", "filter PCAP files", "follow TCP/UDP streams", "detect network anomalies", "investigate suspicious traffic", or "perform protocol analysis". It provides comprehensive techniques for network packet capture, filtering, and analysis using Wireshark.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

This skill should be used when establishing comprehensive QA testing processes for any software project. Use when creating test strategies, writing test cases following Google Testing Standards, executing test plans, tracking bugs with P0-P4 classification, calculating quality metrics, or generating progress reports. Includes autonomous execution capability via master prompts and complete documentation templates for third-party QA team handoffs. Implements OWASP security testing and achieves 90% coverage targets.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。