3,004 件 ・ 関連度順
概要と使いどころ
AI SDK for Python (the `ai` package). Use for Python model calls (LLMs, image, video, speech, embedding, transcription, reranking, or evaluation), agents, model interaction tests, tool calling, subagents, approvals, durable execution, telemetry, AI SDK UI backends, and custom providers.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Guide for creating high-quality MCP (Model Context Protocol) servers that enable LLMs to interact with external services through well-designed tools. Use when building MCP servers to integrate external APIs or services, whether in Python (FastMCP) or Node/TypeScript (MCP SDK).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Create or update Claude skills optimized for Skillmark benchmarks. Use for new skills, skill scripts, references, benchmark optimization, extending Claude's capabilities.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Test for regulatory compliance: GDPR/CMP consent verification, Google Consent Mode v2, Global Privacy Control (GPC), CCPA/US state opt-out, EU AI Act Article 50 transparency, Better Ads Standards, and cookie-inventory auditing. Covers automated consent-flow testing, third-party script blocking before consent, and cookie drift detection. Use when: "GDPR test," "compliance," "CMP test," "cookie consent," "consent mode," "CCPA," "GPC," "AI Act," "Better Ads," "privacy banner." Not for: WCAG/axe-core test authoring — use accessibility-testing. Not for: OWASP/vuln scanning — use security-testing. Not for: evaluating your LLM feature's quality or safety — use ai-system-testing. Related: accessibility-testing, security-testing, ai-system-testing, ci-cd-integration.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use AI to write NEW test code from specs, PRDs, user stories, code diffs, bug reports, or OpenAPI specs. Staged pipeline: requirements extraction → risk analysis → coverage matrix → scenario generation → oracle design → test code → human review, with guardrails against hallucinated APIs and weak assertions. Use when: "generate tests from spec," "tests from PRD," "tests from user story," "auto-generate test cases," "AI write tests for me." Not for: testing AI/LLM features in your product — use ai-system-testing. Not for: auditing a pre-existing test suite you did not just generate — use ai-qa-review (Step 7 here only reviews tests THIS pipeline produced). Related: playwright-automation, unit-testing, api-testing, qa-project-context.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Goal-driven E2E testing where a browser agent (Playwright MCP / computer-use) reads a natural-language goal and explores the app via the accessibility tree to assert outcomes — no pre-written script. Covers when intent-driven beats scripted, making agent runs deterministic (pinned model, temperature 0, seeded data, bounded steps, explicit success assertion, snapshot-not-pixel), cost/latency control, the accessibility-tree-first interaction model, CI gating, and graduating a stable run into a scripted Playwright test. Use when: "agentic browser test," "goal-driven browser test," "let an agent explore the app," "natural-language E2E," "browser agent smoke test," "Playwright MCP test." Not for: Writing/maintaining deterministic scripted Playwright tests — that is playwright-automation. Testing your product's OWN LLM features — that is ai-system-testing. Related: playwright-automation, ai-system-testing, exploratory-testing, test-reliability, qa-project-context.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Design and execute structured exploratory testing sessions. Covers Session-Based Test Management (SBTM), charter writing, heuristic-based exploration (HICCUPS, FEW HICCUPS), bug discovery patterns, note-taking templates, and conversion of findings to automated tests. Use when: "exploratory testing," "SBTM," "manual testing," "bug hunting," "test charter," "heuristic testing." Not for: an AI browser agent autonomously exploring the app from a natural-language goal — use agentic-browser-testing. Not for: testing your product's own AI/LLM features — use ai-system-testing. Related: test-planning, ai-bug-triage, risk-based-testing, agentic-browser-testing.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
This skill should be used when the user says "/council", "council", "deliberate", "multi-perspective decision", "트레이드오프 분석", "위원회 소집", "여러 관점으로 검토", or wants deep multi-perspective deliberation with tradeoff mapping. Combines tribunal (structured adversarial review), agent-council (external LLM opinions), dev-scan (community sentiment), and step-back (meta-level review) into a unified decision-making committee. Uses Agent Teams for real peer-to-peer debate with iterative step-back moderation loop.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use for "interrogate", "adversarial review", "multi-model review", "challenge this", "stress test this code", "find blind spots", or "tear this apart". Multiple LLM reviewers challenge changes from independent angles.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Continue is an open-source AI code assistant for VS Code, JetBrains and the terminal (the cn CLI) that works with any LLM: Claude, GPT, Gemini, Ollama and other local models. Use when a user asks to configure Continue with config.yaml, add chat or tab autocomplete models, write rules or custom prompts, connect MCP servers, run cn headless in scripts, or migrate from config.json. Continue was acquired by Cursor in June 2026: the release from that month is final and the Hub is offline, so the skill covers local, self-configured use.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Browser Use is an open-source Python library that lets an LLM agent drive a real browser to navigate sites, fill forms, click and extract data from a plain-English task. Use when the user wants an AI agent to automate a website, scrape pages that need clicking or login, return structured data from the web, add browser tools to a coding agent, or run browser agents locally or in the cloud.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Aider is an open-source terminal AI pair programmer that edits files in your git repository with an LLM and commits each change. Use when a user asks to run Aider, let an AI refactor or fix code from the command line, script Aider with --message, auto-run lint and tests after edits, or point Aider at Claude, GPT, Gemini, DeepSeek or a local model.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Integrate Claude AI into applications with the Anthropic SDK. Use when a user asks to add Claude to an app, use Claude for text generation, build a chatbot with Claude, use Claude's long context window, implement tool use with Claude, stream Claude responses, use Claude for code generation, document analysis, or reasoning tasks. Covers Messages API, streaming, tool use, vision, system prompts, extended thinking, and batch processing.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Model Context Protocol expert for building MCP servers, tools, resources, and client integrationsUse when "mcp server, model context protocol, claude code extension, building ai tools, tool definition, mcp transport, stdio transport, sse transport, resource provider, prompt template, mcp, model-context-protocol, claude-code, ai-tools, llm-integration, anthropic, server, protocol" mentioned.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when adapting large language models to specific tasks, domains, or behaviors - covers LoRA, QLoRA, PEFT, instruction tuning, and full fine-tuning strategiesUse when ", " mentioned.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Expert in Claude Code hooks - user-defined shell commands that execute at specific points in Claude Code's lifecycle. Provides guaranteed automation that doesn't rely on the LLM "remembering" to do something. Essential for enterprise workflows, code quality enforcement, and deterministic behavior in agentic coding. Use when "claude code hooks, automate claude, block tool use, pre tool use, post tool use, session start hook, claude lifecycle, claude-code, automation, hooks, lifecycle, cli, workflow, devtools" mentioned.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Every product will be AI-powered. The question is whether you'll build it right or ship a demo that falls apart in production. This skill covers LLM integration patterns, RAG architecture, prompt engineering that scales, AI UX that users trust, and cost optimization that doesn't bankrupt you. Use when "keywords, file_patterns, code_patterns, " mentioned.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Implement comprehensive safety guardrails for LLM applications including content moderation (OpenAI Moderation API), jailbreak prevention, prompt injection defense, PII detection, topic guardrails, and output validation. Essential for production AI applications handling user-generated content. Use when ", guardrails, content-moderation, prompt-injection, jailbreak-prevention, pii-detection, nemo-guardrails, openai-moderation, llama-guard, safety" mentioned.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Testing and benchmarking LLM agents including behavioral testing, capability assessment, reliability metrics, and production monitoring—where even top agents achieve less than 50% on real-world benchmarksUse when "agent testing, agent evaluation, benchmark agents, agent reliability, test agent, testing, evaluation, benchmark, agents, reliability, quality" mentioned.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Inter-agent communication patterns including message passing, shared memory, blackboard systems, and event-driven architectures for LLM agentsUse when "agent communication, message passing, inter-agent, blackboard, agent events, multi-agent, communication, message-passing, events, coordination" mentioned.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Building AI-powered personalization systems: recommendation engines, collaborative filtering, content-based filtering, user preference learning, cold-start solutions, and LLM-enhanced personalized experiences. Use when "recommendation system, personalization, collaborative filtering, content-based filtering, user preferences, recommend, suggestions, for you, similar items, you might like, " mentioned.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Comprehensive patterns for building AI-powered code generation tools, code assistants, automated refactoring, code review, and structured output generation using LLMs with function calling and tool use. Use when "code generation, AI code assistant, function calling, structured output, code review AI, automated refactoring, tool use, code completion, agent code, " mentioned.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Expert in designing and building autonomous AI agents. Masters tool use, memory systems, planning strategies, and multi-agent orchestration. Use when "build agent, AI agent, autonomous agent, tool use, function calling, multi-agent, agent memory, agent planning, langchain agent, crewai, autogen, claude agent sdk, ai-agents, langchain, autogen, crewai, tool-use, function-calling, autonomous, llm, orchestration" mentioned.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Audit experiment integrity against the evidence ledger. At L2 (repo + result files present) a fresh cross-model reviewer reads the eval code line-by-line for fake/derived ground truth, score self-normalization, phantom results (a paper number with no backing file/key), dead/uncalled metric code, verified-scope inflation, method-described ≠ method-evaluated drift, synthesized-looking results, placeholder/fake data still wired into a released result, code-output ≠ reported-number mismatch, and missing reproducibility artifacts (an empirical/agent/LLM paper shipping neither code nor the prompts/configs its results need) — every finding span-anchored to a ledger claim_id. At L0/L1 (PDF / source only) the same patterns are surfaced as info-level 'could-not-verify' signals where the ledger gives an anchor (observability_level_required:2) — NEVER a fraud verdict from a PDF. The reviewer PROPOSES findings; tools/adjudicate_findings.py computes the verdict. Detect-only. Triggers: "experiment forensics", "audit the results", "check the eval code", "实验诚实度".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。