2,164 件 ・ 関連度順
概要と使いどころ
Create AI-powered podcasts with text-to-speech, music, and audio editing. Tools: Kokoro TTS, DIA TTS, Chatterbox, AI music generation, media merger. Capabilities: multi-voice conversations, background music, intro/outro, full episodes. Use for: podcast production, audiobooks, voice content...
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Browser automation for AI agents via inference.sh. Navigate web pages, interact with elements using @e refs, take screenshots, record video. Capabilities: web scraping, form filling, clicking, typing, drag-drop, file upload, JavaScript execution. Use for: E2E testing, web research, automat...
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Meta-skill que orquestra todos os agentes do ecossistema. Scan automatico de skills, match por capacidades, coordenacao de workflows multi-skill e registry management.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Plan and execute a comprehensive red team engagement covering reconnaissance through post-exploitation using MITRE ATT&CK-aligned TTPs to evaluate an organization's detection and response capabilities.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Simulates man-in-the-middle attacks using Ettercap, mitmproxy, and Bettercap in authorized environments to intercept, analyze, and modify network traffic for testing encryption enforcement, certificate validation, and detection capabilities.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Build comprehensive threat actor profiles using open-source intelligence (OSINT) techniques to document adversary motivations, capabilities, infrastructure, and TTPs for proactive defense.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
使用状态绑定的最小 Tool Surface、exact Action Gateway、来源可追踪的 MissionSpec 与 Verification Manifest、宿主无关 Flight Progression Engine、可选且无权威的 App Server continuation、顺序持久 Wave、一层原生 Agent、困难后强制战术指导、证据型 Capability Profile、显式 Manual Verification、不可变宿主 Evidence、恢复检查点和仅本地 Git，治理复杂 Codex 开发。用户要求飞控接管、继续、自主开发、修复或完成多步骤软件项目，需要有界并行子代理，或实现前必须建立文档工程时使用。
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
This skill should be used when creating cost estimates and quotations for software development projects. Use this skill when you have an RFQ (Request for Quotation), project requirements, or a project description and need to create a comprehensive estimate with WBS, effort calculations, cost breakdowns, and ROI analysis. Supports Japanese (default) and English, with systematic work breakdown, effort estimation, and markdown-formatted estimate documents.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
This skill should be used when creating RFQ (Request for Quotation) documents for software development projects to send to vendors. Use this skill when you have received vague requirements from clients and need to structure them into clear, comprehensive RFQs that enable vendors to provide accurate estimates. Supports Japanese (default) and English, with systematic requirements elicitation, clarification, and markdown-formatted output.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Prepare comprehensive meeting assets including agendas, reference materials, decision logs, and action items. Use when user says "prepare meeting", "create agenda", "meeting prep", "会議準備", or needs bilingual (Japanese/English) meeting documentation for cross-regional teams. Triggers include requests for decision log templates, action item tracking, or compiling reference materials from project estimates and specs.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Generate AI-powered BPO service proposals for Japanese companies in the US market. Use when creating outsourcing proposals with AI service menus, ROI estimation, implementation roadmaps, and bilingual (JA/EN) proposal documents for 在米日系企業向けAI実装.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
This skill should be used when creating bug/defect reports during system testing. Use this skill when you discover a bug, need to document test failures, or want to create comprehensive bug tickets with proper reproduction steps, severity assessment, and environment details. Guides users through interactive questioning to gather all necessary information and generates professional bug ticket documents in Markdown format. Supports Japanese (default) and English.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Transform client hearing sheets and meeting notes into structured requirements documents. Use when converting raw hearing data (Japanese/English) into formal requirements, generating traceability matrices, identifying gaps/ambiguities, and mapping requirements to WBS items. Triggers include "hearing to requirements", "meeting notes to specs", "requirements traceability", "gap analysis for requirements", or requests involving hearing sheet analysis.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
IDS/IPS detection content for a CVE — Snort/Suricata-compatible rules, YARA signatures, ProjectDiscovery Nuclei templates, traffic-filter rules. Capability-aware: skips families when the binary is not installed (no Snort = no Snort output). Use when deploying defences for a CVE without a patch, augmenting SAST with active detection, or feeding the SOC engineering pipeline.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Work through which package to add for a capability, and what each option costs — maintenance, licence, bundle weight, transitive risk, and whether the platform already does it. Use when someone needs a library for a job and has not picked one yet, when weighing two candidates, or when a package looks convenient but unmaintained.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Hand a research run over as a file — read `rs_open action=capabilities` for the formats this build writes, choose between `md`, `docx`, a self-contained `html`, the `ris`/`bib`/`enw` library exports and `tex`, pick `draft=watermark` while working or `draft=clean` to hand it over, and read `build/build.json` for what was built from which bytes. Use when a document is finished enough to leave the run, when a citation style or an export has to be chosen, or when a build refuses.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when implementing a new function, adding a feature, fixing a bug, refactoring with test coverage, or writing a new test. Enforces strict outside-in red-green-refactor TDD with one-failure-per-turn discipline, predict-the-failure-before-every-run checks, hardcode-first minimum changes, triangulation, and property-based testing for large input spaces. Triggers on explicit TDD requests and on any task phrased as "implement", "add", "write a function", "build a feature", or "fix a bug" in a test-capable codebase. Reports red/green validation evidence.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Helps users discover and install agent skills when they ask questions like "how do I do X", "find a skill for X", "is there a skill that can...", or express interest in extending capabilities. This skill should be used when the user is looking for functionality that might exist as an installable skill.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Create a free remote development host on Oracle Cloud (Always Free) end to end — install and authenticate the OCI CLI, provision VCN/subnet/NSG/instance with capacity retries, then apply a hardened Ubuntu 22.04 Ansible stack (Tailscale-only SSH, ufw, fail2ban, mosh, persistent tmux, Caddy tailnet web previews, on-host verification suite) and tear it down again. Use when the user says "free remote dev environment", "Oracle Cloud free tier dev box", "OCI Always Free VPS", "give me a cloud dev machine for free", "provision a dev host on Oracle", or asks to move a Tailscale-only dev host setup to Oracle Cloud. Covers OCI CLI bootstrap, the Tailscale cutover, verification, costs, and teardown.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Load for footer settings, templates, social/legal links, copyright, tenant customization, instance governance locks, footer HAL capabilities, or footer admin UI/API changes; not for generic page layout footers.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Set up bundle IDs, capabilities, signing certificates, provisioning profiles, and encrypted signing sync with the asc cli. Use when onboarding a new app, rotating signing assets, or sharing them across a team.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Knowledge base from the FAA System Safety Handbook (Dec 30, 2000). Use for system safety as a specialty within systems engineering: the five-step safety risk management process (mandated by FAA Order 8040.4 and the AMS), the severity-by-likelihood risk matrix and acceptance bands, the Safety Order of Precedence, system-description models (5M, SHEL(L)), the hazard-analysis activities (PHL/PHA/RHA/SSHA/SHA/O&SHA/HHA), integrated system hazard analysis, the analysis techniques (FTA, FMEA/FMECA, Fault Hazard, Common Cause, Sneak Circuit, Energy Trace), closed-loop hazard tracking (Safety Action Record), and the specialty domains the handbook covers — acquisition-lifecycle safety and contracting (OSA/CSA/SSPP/ISSPP), software safety (control-capability ranking, SHCM, DO-178B), test & evaluation safety, facilities safety, commercial launch safety (AST licensing, expected casualty, MPL/DAMP), system safety training, and Operational Risk Management (ORM) with human/organizational factors. Scope limits: this is a year-2000 FAA how-to; it predates the modern FAA/ICAO Safety Management System (SMS) and Just Culture regulatory frameworks, and many cited orders, advisory circulars, and launch-licensing rules have since been restructured. It is FAA/NAS-centric, leans on MIL-STD-882C, and does not define the SE life-cycle processes themselves (use nasa-npr-7123 / dau-se-guidebook) or reproduce third-party standard text (MIL-STD-882, DO-178B, ISO/IEC/IEEE).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Knowledge base from the DoD Systems Engineering Guidebook (OUSD R&E, February 2022). Use for the DoD SE process model — the 16 SE processes (8 technical management + 8 technical) mapped to ISO/IEC/IEEE 15288, the event-driven technical reviews and audits across the Major Capability Acquisition life cycle (ASR, SRR, SFR, PDR, CDR, SVR/FCA, PRR, PCA), the Systems Engineering Plan (SEP), risk/issue/opportunity management, TPMs and leading indicators, system-of-systems and digital engineering, and the 24 design considerations (RAM, system safety, HSI, system security engineering, MOSA, supportability, etc.). Acquisition-program oriented: thin on detailed cost estimating, contracting law, and non-DoD or commercial life cycles.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Knowledge base from DoD Architecture Framework (DoDAF) 2.02 — Volume II: Architectural Data and Models. Use for DoDAF viewpoints, DM2 meta-model, capability modeling, operational architecture, systems architecture, services architecture, data/information modeling, standards compliance, project/portfolio integration, and fit-for-purpose model selection. Does not cover DoDAF Volume I (policy/governance) or Volume III (enterprise-level guidance); also does not substitute for the live DISR or DARS registries.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。