「fact」の検索結果

Write a blameless incident postmortem under postmortems/ following the Google SRE shape — evidence-based timeline, trigger vs root cause vs symptom, contributing factors, what went well, and owned+dated+verifiable action items. Read when asked to write a postmortem, do an incident review, run a root cause analysis, write up the outage, retro on the outage, or when the user says we had an incident and wants it documented. Do NOT read to frame a proposal (use frame-a-proposal), write a spec (use write-a-spec), record a decision (use record-a-decision), or review a design (use review-a-design) — a postmortem documents an incident that already happened, it does not propose, specify, decide, or critique future work.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Reviews whether a design is SOUND — solving the right problem, derived from its stated goals and constraints — and emits ranked, evidence-backed findings, not edits. Read when asked to 'review this design', 'is this design sound', 'pressure-test this proposal', 'do a design review', 'does this solve the right problem', 'poke holes in this spec', 'should we build this', or to critique a proposal / spec / ADR / architecture or product decision. Do NOT read when the user wants to AUTHOR one of these — routing a new proposal is frame-a-proposal, a spec is write-a-spec, a decision record is record-a-decision, a postmortem is write-a-postmortem. Do NOT read for code review of a diff, or to fact-check individual claims (that is a correctness pass, a different job).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Experimental workflow for reviewing configured repositories' pull requests. Use for manual or scheduled PR triage, approval, or merge decisions.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Experimental workflow for auditing recurring feedback, telemetry, errors, and brittle delivery paths to find systemic fixes. Use for periodic or requested cross-source lookbacks, not routine single-item intake.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Experimental workflow for collecting and triaging product feedback, product telemetry, runtime errors, and issue reports. Use when scanning configured signal sources and applying separate fix, reply, or close rules.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Experimental workflow for monitoring explicitly authorized delivery tasks and reporting stalled work. Use for scheduled ship follow-through.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Experimental workflow for babysitting one explicitly authorized pull or merge request. Use to monitor its live review state and checks, fix actionable in-scope findings, and apply separate reply, approval, merge, and soak gates.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Experimental workflow for summarizing work that still needs human judgment across configured pull requests, issues, feedback, errors, and delivery signals. Use for a human decision queue or bounded review.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Experimental workflow for finding and resuming interrupted coding runs. Use after an agent host restart or an interrupted automation.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

AI-assisted pair programming with multiple modes (driver/navigator/switch), real-time verification, quality monitoring, and comprehensive testing. Supports TDD, debugging, refactoring, and learning sessions. Features automatic role switching, continuous code review, security scanning, and performance optimization with truth-score verification.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Cut and maintain Observal release branches, prepare alpha, beta, RC, stable, and patch releases, backport merged main PRs, inspect release status, verify published artifacts, and recover failed release operations. Use for Observal maintainer release tasks and release-process changes, not for installing or upgrading an existing Observal deployment.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

The art-route layer of the Forge skills. route_media.py is the one command that generates an image or an image-to-video clip - through the paid API of any provider whose key is configured (OpenAI, Google Gemini, xAI, BytePlus ModelArk, fal.ai; the configured key is the owner's consent), else through the user's own signed-in Codex or Grok CLI - and prints one JSON line with the route, artifact, sha256 and cost estimate; with no route it answers no-route (codeart2d is then the last resort). Also the capability check (forge_doctor), API key configuration, the spend ledger, resume and Codex image adoption. Use when a Forge skill sends a generation here, for the capability check, or when the user asks about keys, routes or spend. Not for planning, processing or QA of sprites, video frames or maps (generate2dsprite, video2dsprite, generate2dmap) or for code-drawn art (codeart2d).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Applies Anthropic's official brand colors and typography to any sort of artifact that may benefit from having Anthropic's look-and-feel. Use it when brand colors or style guidelines, visual formatting, or company design standards apply.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Starter: interpret a council run's verdict artifacts — quorum, dissent, cross-lab validity, and what to do next

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Decompose large tasks across parallel agents — use for migrations, multi-file refactors, or batch work

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Run a full build-and-ship pipeline from a spec — use for hands-off project generation

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Pull 16 fast decisions out of the user with 4 sets of 4 open questions, then present an implementation plan. Only for risky changes, large product decisions, or large refactors. Run when the user types /4x4. Agents may suggest it in one line but never start it on their own.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Clarify a feature, change, or refactor through questions, then write a build prompt for another agent. Use for /ask-then-build or requests to ask questions before producing an implementation prompt.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Research technology and advanced-manufacturing investments using Serenity-inspired supply-chain bottleneck analysis. Use for theme scans, company thesis challenges, candidate comparisons, or learning this method. Prioritize A-shares unless another market is requested. Return research priorities, dated evidence, profit implications, and conditions that would change the judgment.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Activate when creating new modules, refactoring class hierarchies, introducing design patterns, or making changes spanning 3+ files in the APM CLI codebase.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use this skill to run a four-panel adversarial advisory review on any pull request that touches the OpenAPM specification artifact (docs/src/content/docs/specs/openapm-*.md), its inline / sidecar JSON Schemas (docs/src/content/docs/specs/schemas/*.schema.json), or the conformance fixture seed (tests/fixtures/spec-conformance/**). The panel fans out to four spec-ecosystem reviewers (swagger-openapi-editor, oci-distribution-editor, pkgmgr-registry-contract-editor, w3c-tag-architect), each running in its own agent thread, and a spec-editor synthesizer that produces a fold-now / defer-v0.1.1 / defer-v0.2 / reject list plus a ship decision keyed off a 1..10 shocked_meter scale. The orchestrator is the sole writer to the PR: ONE consolidated comment, no verdict labels, no merge gating. The panel is advisory -- it surfaces findings, prioritizes folds, and renders a ship recommendation that the maintainer weighs.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Activate for changes to project positioning, release communication, community-facing artifacts, or breaking-change decisions in microsoft/apm. Triggers on README, MANIFESTO, PRD, CHANGELOG, release workflows, and issue templates.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use this skill to write the PR description (PR body) for any pull request opened against microsoft/apm. Produces one self-sufficient GitHub-Flavored Markdown artifact: TL;DR, Problem (WHY), Approach (WHAT), Implementation (HOW), 1-3 validated mermaid diagrams, explicit trade-offs, validation evidence, and a How-to-test section -- with every WHY-claim backed by a verbatim quote from PROSE or Agent Skills. Activate when the user asks to "write a PR description", "draft a PR body", "open a PR", "fill in the PR template", or any equivalent.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Coordinate Lark/Feishu CLI tasks from Codex. Use when a request involves Feishu/Lark docs, wiki, Drive files, Sheets, Base, Calendar, Minutes, IM, Mail, Tasks, Contacts, Slides, whiteboards, approvals, attendance, or when a Lark URL/token must be read, edited, summarized, routed, or turned into a real work artifact.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。