「how to use」の検索結果

Draft a single Threads post or a multi-post thread using a 2026 Threads hook formula (warm contrarian, data-point, build-in-public, quote-post, mini-list, relatable, listicle, story, curiosity-gap, how-I teardown), picked by goal (replies, reposts, likes, quotes). Respects the 500-char limit and one-hashtag cap, runs the humanizer pass, and publishes via Publora, which auto-splits long content into a thread. Not for auditing a draft (use threads-humanizer) or hook teardown (use threads-hook-extractor).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Authoritative reference for working with the released Wandelbots NOVA API v2 in the wandelbots-nova Python SDK. Use whenever a task touches the NOVA API, the generated `wandelbots_api_client` models (`nova.api.models.*`), motion planning requests (`plan_trajectory`, `MotionGroupSetup`, `LimitSet`, `LimitsOverride`), robot limits, or torque/velocity/acceleration/jerk limits. Reach for this skill before guessing field names or assuming a field exists — the installed client reflects the RELEASED API, while nightly specs may contain unreleased fields. Especially relevant for controller-reported limits (e.g. KUKA torque) and any "does field X exist / how is it forwarded to the planner?" question.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when opening, merging, or releasing a PR for imp - branching off main, `gh pr create`, enabling auto-merge, writing the PR body or a CHANGELOG entry, cutting a tagged release (version bump + CHANGELOG + tag + GitHub release). Symptoms - "PR stuck BLOCKED", "my last commit didn't land on main", "which check is required", "how do I cut a release", "auto-merge merged too early", "check-release failed", "STALE.md blocks git pull". Do NOT use for build/test mechanics (building-and-testing) or perf measurement / baseline refresh (benchmark-cuda).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when a question is about *structure* rather than text - who calls or launches a symbol, where it is defined, what a change would reach, whether something is dead, how a request gets from the API to a kernel. Triggers on "who calls", "who launches this kernel", "where is X defined", "what breaks if I change", "is this still used", "is this dead", "trace the path from X to Y", "blast radius", "what depends on this header". Do NOT use for free-text search (`rg` is better and cheaper) or to open a file whose path you already know.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Reviews startup financial models for investor readiness: validates unit economics, stress-tests runway scenarios, and benchmarks metrics against stage-appropriate targets. Use the full review, about 10–15 minutes, when the user provides a financial model (Excel, CSV, or a model pasted as text) and asks for review, validation, runway analysis, or unit-economics scoring. For a single money question with figures to compute, such as 'how long do I have?' or 'is a 4x burn multiple bad?', use its shorter quick check, so the answer comes from the calculator and dated benchmarks, not mental arithmetic.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

How to write a Grafema batch-mode plugin that reads the graph and filesystem, then writes new edges/nodes directly to RFDB. Use when: (1) need to add project-specific edges that generic analyzers can't produce, (2) need to read config files (JSON/YAML) and trace values into code, (3) implementing framework-specific resolvers (Django settings, Express routes, pipeline configs). Covers: grafema.config.yaml plugin config, RFDB field naming (src/dst NOT source/target), addEdges/addNodes API, RFDBServerBackend connection pattern.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Pattern for adding derived edge types in the Grafema Rust orchestrator (main.rs). Use when: (1) need to create new graph edges derived from existing edges (e.g., MODULE-level DEPENDS_ON from IMPORTS_FROM), (2) Datalog joins on large edge sets time out, (3) adding enrichment steps that combine data from multiple resolver outputs, (4) need to understand how resolver outputs flow through the orchestrator pipeline.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Fix Playwright automation failures against code-server (VS Code in browser). Use when: (1) trust dialog blocks all clicks — "monaco-dialog-modal-block intercepts pointer events", (2) button:has-text() finds wrong buttons behind modal dialog, (3) keyboard shortcuts don't work — Meta vs Control inconsistency, (4) VS Code extension activity bar icon not found by aria-label, (5) panels show placeholder text despite extension being "Connected". Covers trust dialog dismissal, keyboard shortcut hybrid mode, extension panel selectors, and database connection verification for Grafema extension.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

This skill should be used when the user asks to "make an explainer video", "turn this into a short explainer", "write a script and storyboard for a product video", "produce a how-it-works/onboarding video", "sync narration and captions", or "build a 30–90s animated explainer". Covers script→storyboard→scene build→narration/caption sync→edit→polish.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

When the user wants help with pricing decisions, packaging, monetization strategy, or subscription models. Also use when the user mentions 'pricing', 'price', 'monetization', 'freemium', 'Van Westendorp', 'how much should I charge', 'pricing tiers', 'good-better-best', 'SaaS pricing', 'subscription model', 'free vs paid', 'packaging', 'pricing page', 'annual vs monthly', or is deciding between free and paid models. Make sure to use this whenever someone is making ANY pricing decision — even questions like 'should I charge for this?' or 'is freemium right for us?' or 'my conversion rate is low, is it the price?' are pricing strategy questions. Covers value-based pricing, tier structure, price psychology, and competitor benchmarking.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

How to use the Appwrite CLI well. Covers when to use appwrite.config.json vs `appwrite client`, pull/push vs one-shot service calls, type-safe SDK and model generation, query flags, CI auth, Cloud regional endpoints, function/site variables, and traps that `--help` will not mention. Does not catalog commands — run `appwrite <command> --help` for flags. Use whenever running `appwrite`, deploying or pulling functions/sites/tables, generating application code from a table schema, initializing or linking a project, scripting Appwrite, or when the user mentions the Appwrite CLI, appwrite.config.json, `appwrite generate`, `appwrite types`, or `appwrite client`.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Evaluate a local skill with the terum-skills CLI — hygiene, trigger evals and execution cases against a baseline, billed to the user's own Claude Code — after confirming the cost, and show the result as a Markdown board. Use when the user asks to eval, test, score or benchmark a skill, or to see whether an edit made it better.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Reference for the `odu` runner — how to invoke a full pipeline, a single recipe, or a platform-pinned node, and how to attach to a live run, from a project whose CI odu runs. Trigger when the user asks to "run CI", "run the pipeline", "re-run a check", or names a specific recipe by `<recipe>@<platform>`.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

REQUIRED before writing code for any feature touching auth, payments, credentials, tokens, sessions, file upload, user data, untrusted input, deserialization, network endpoints, or data deletion. Scope by that surface, not the task label — a research/experimental/local-only feature with none of it doesn't need this. Invoke it, record answers inline in the design doc or PR description, then write the code. Skipping this is how auth bypass, token leakage, and delete-the-wrong-record bugs ship. If the feature touches any of those surfaces and this hasn't run, the design is incomplete — do not proceed to implementation.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Discover what Cowork can do for YOUR specific role and tasks, for mapping your daily work to Cowork capabilities. Use when exploring what Cowork offers, for planning your Cowork adoption, during onboarding and role discovery, when figuring out where to start, or when the user says "what can cowork do", "what is cowork", "show me cowork features", "how can cowork help me", "what should I use cowork for", or "cowork capabilities".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

See the difference between Chat and Cowork with a live side-by-side comparison for understanding why Cowork is built differently. Use when evaluating AI tools, for comparing chat versus agent capabilities, during an AI tool decision, when switching from ChatGPT or Claude Chat, or when the user says "what is different about cowork", "cowork vs chat", "why not just use chatgpt", "show me the difference", "compare chat and cowork", or "why should I use cowork instead of chat".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Shows you how to use Cowork's parallel workers to run multiple tasks at the same time instead of one after another — dramatically cutting the time on batch work. For processing large batches of files or research tasks, when running multiple independent analyses simultaneously, or during a performance optimization session. Use when the user says "speed up", "parallel workers", "batch task", "process multiple files", "why is cowork so slow", "faster", "do several things at once", or "can cowork multitask".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

A 15-minute guided setup that teaches Cowork who you are, how you work, and what tools you use — so every result feels tailored instead of generic. Use when setting up Cowork for the first time, for personalizing your workspace preferences, during onboarding after your first session, when configuring your tools and context, or when the user says "set up cowork", "configure cowork", "why is cowork giving me generic results", "cowork setup", "personalize cowork", "make cowork know me", "cowork feels like chatgpt", or "how do I get better results from cowork".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when evidence needs grading before anyone reasons from it — the user asks "how reliable is this?", "grade this source", "check this report", "can I trust this article?", "is this corroborated?", or hands over a URL, a pasted report or a Liberty91 event ahead of an ACH or assessment. The Quality of Information Check from the CIA Tradecraft Primer, adapted for vendor and press CTI reporting. Resolves each document to its originating source, splits it into claims, and grades every claim on two written elements, access level (how the source knows) and claim support (what backs the statement), with a stated rationale, using a fixed rubric with hard caps. The grade is not an Admiralty rating. Five outlets citing one vendor report count as one source; anything that cannot be traced to a primary is capped, not guessed. Returns a graded claim table, gaps, a deception screen and JSON. /ach, /threat-assessment and /writing-assessments run it first by default.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

This skill should be used when the model's ROLE_TYPE is orchestrator and needs to delegate tasks to specialist sub-agents. Provides scientific delegation framework ensuring world-building context (WHERE, WHAT, WHY) while preserving agent autonomy in implementation decisions (HOW). Use when planning task delegation, structuring sub-agent prompts, or coordinating multi-agent workflows.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

"Apply Giddens' structuration theory to analyze the duality of structure — how social structures are both the medium and outcome of the practices they organize. Use this skill when the user needs to bridge agency and structure in organizational or social analysis, explain how routines reproduce or transform institutional patterns, analyze the recursive relationship between action and structure, or when they ask 'do people shape institutions or do institutions shape people', 'how are these routines maintained', or 'where does change come from if structures constrain action'.".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

"Apply sustainability frameworks (triple bottom line, SDGs, ESG, circular economy) to evaluate whether strategies balance economic, social, and environmental dimensions. Use this skill when the user needs to assess ESG performance, design circular economy strategies, align business models with SDGs, or when they ask 'is this strategy truly sustainable', 'how do we measure ESG impact', 'what does a circular business model look like', or 'how do we avoid greenwashing'.".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

"Apply Upper Echelons Theory (Hambrick and Mason, 1984) to analyze how top management team characteristics — demographics, experiences, values — shape strategic choices and organizational outcomes. Use this skill when the user needs to evaluate TMT composition effects on strategy, predict strategic direction from leadership profiles, assess whether managerial discretion enables or constrains executive influence, or when they ask 'does leadership background matter for strategy', 'how does TMT composition affect decisions', or 'why did this management team make that choice'.".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

"Apply Institutional Theory (DiMaggio and Powell, 1983) to analyze how coercive, mimetic, and normative isomorphic pressures shape organizational structures and practices. Use this skill when the user needs to explain why organizations in the same field look alike, evaluate whether a practice was adopted for legitimacy vs efficiency, analyze regulatory or social pressures on strategy, or when they ask 'why do all firms in this industry do the same thing', 'is this best practice or just conformity', or 'how do regulations shape our structure'.".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。