3,009 件 ・ 関連度順
概要と使いどころ
Inter-agent communication patterns including message passing, shared memory, blackboard systems, and event-driven architectures for LLM agentsUse when "agent communication, message passing, inter-agent, blackboard, agent events, multi-agent, communication, message-passing, events, coordination" mentioned.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Building AI-powered personalization systems: recommendation engines, collaborative filtering, content-based filtering, user preference learning, cold-start solutions, and LLM-enhanced personalized experiences. Use when "recommendation system, personalization, collaborative filtering, content-based filtering, user preferences, recommend, suggestions, for you, similar items, you might like, " mentioned.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Implement comprehensive safety guardrails for LLM applications including content moderation (OpenAI Moderation API), jailbreak prevention, prompt injection defense, PII detection, topic guardrails, and output validation. Essential for production AI applications handling user-generated content. Use when ", guardrails, content-moderation, prompt-injection, jailbreak-prevention, pii-detection, nemo-guardrails, openai-moderation, llama-guard, safety" mentioned.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Comprehensive patterns for building AI-powered code generation tools, code assistants, automated refactoring, code review, and structured output generation using LLMs with function calling and tool use. Use when "code generation, AI code assistant, function calling, structured output, code review AI, automated refactoring, tool use, code completion, agent code, " mentioned.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Audit experiment integrity against the evidence ledger. At L2 (repo + result files present) a fresh cross-model reviewer reads the eval code line-by-line for fake/derived ground truth, score self-normalization, phantom results (a paper number with no backing file/key), dead/uncalled metric code, verified-scope inflation, method-described ≠ method-evaluated drift, synthesized-looking results, placeholder/fake data still wired into a released result, code-output ≠ reported-number mismatch, and missing reproducibility artifacts (an empirical/agent/LLM paper shipping neither code nor the prompts/configs its results need) — every finding span-anchored to a ledger claim_id. At L0/L1 (PDF / source only) the same patterns are surfaced as info-level 'could-not-verify' signals where the ledger gives an anchor (observability_level_required:2) — NEVER a fraud verdict from a PDF. The reviewer PROPOSES findings; tools/adjudicate_findings.py computes the verdict. Detect-only. Triggers: "experiment forensics", "audit the results", "check the eval code", "实验诚实度".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Transparent, itemized impressions of AI-generated WRITING STYLE — the repo's ONLY non-integrity track. Two passes: a deterministic defensive-hedge density screen (tools/check_ai_style.py, AIS-DEFENSIVE-HEDGE) plus a fresh cross-model GROSS-cases-only semantic pass over the 13 AIS-* style tells (broken narrative arc, LLM phrase tics, jargon-stuffing, invented codenames, clause/formula walls, gratuitous pseudocode, bullet overuse, bold-module spam, restatement loops, focus drift, single-style figures, appendix dumping). Every finding is named, LOCATED, span-anchored to the evidence ledger (claims.json), carries not_integrity_finding:true + false_positive_risk:high + an fp_case, and gets ZERO verdict weight: the adjudicator forces it to info, excludes it from overall_verdict, and renders it in a SEPARATE report section. NOT an AI-text classifier — no scores, no "this is AI-written", no authorship probability; a paper can be CLEAN_GIVEN_EVIDENCE and still list many. Emits ai-style-impressions.findings.json; computes NO verdict; if a tell is actually substantive it routes to the integrity auditor. Triggers: "AI style", "vibe check", "writing fingerprint", "AI 文风", "vibe paper".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Synthesize the single strongest EVIDENCE-BOUND reviewer case to reject a paper, built ONLY from the evidence ledger (claims.json) + the other auditors' confirmed findings — never free-floating LLM critique. Two fresh cross-model codex threads: an attack writes the ~200-word rejection paragraph (every accusation tagged to an existing claim_id/finding_id), a defense decomposes it and rules each point against the anchored evidence. MEMO-ONLY: emits adversarial-case-builder.memo.md (fed to the adjudicator via --memo) and carries NO verdict weight — tools/adjudicate_findings.py lists it in ZERO_WEIGHT_SKILLS and caps it at info. Honest-null allowed (the paper may survive). Run LAST. Detect-only. Adapted from ARIS kill-argument. Triggers: "adversarial case", "strongest objection", "rejection memo", "kill argument", "最强拒稿点".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Check for Faster-Whisper (preferred - 4-5x faster) workflow skill. Use this skill when the user needs Transform audio recordings into professional Markdown documentation with intelligent summaries using LLM integration and the operator should preserve the upstream workflow, copied support files, and provenance before merging or handing off.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Check for Faster-Whisper (preferred - 4-5x faster) workflow skill. Use this skill when the user needs Transform audio recordings into professional Markdown documentation with intelligent summaries using LLM integration and the operator should preserve the upstream workflow, copied support files, and provenance before merging or handing off.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
AI Engineering Toolkit workflow skill. Use this skill when the user needs 6 production-ready AI engineering workflows: prompt evaluation (8-dimension scoring), context budget planning, RAG pipeline design, agent security audit (65-point checklist), eval harness building, and product sense coaching and the operator should preserve the upstream workflow, copied support files, and provenance before merging or handing off.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
ActiveCampaign Automation via Rube MCP workflow skill. Use this skill when the user needs Automate ActiveCampaign tasks via Rube MCP (Composio): manage contacts, tags, list subscriptions, automation enrollment, and tasks. Always search tools first for current schemas and the operator should preserve the upstream workflow, copied support files, and provenance before merging or handing off.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Advanced Evaluation workflow skill. Use this skill when the user needs This skill should be used when the user asks to "implement LLM-as-judge", "compare model outputs", "create evaluation rubrics", "mitigate evaluation bias", or mentions direct scoring, pairwise comparison, position bias, evaluation pipelines, or automated quality assessment and the operator should preserve the upstream workflow, copied support files, and provenance before merging or handing off.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
ActiveCampaign Automation via Rube MCP workflow skill. Use this skill when the user needs Automate ActiveCampaign tasks via Rube MCP (Composio): manage contacts, tags, list subscriptions, automation enrollment, and tasks. Always search tools first for current schemas and the operator should preserve the upstream workflow, copied support files, and provenance before merging or handing off.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Improve and rewrite user prompts to reduce ambiguity and improve LLM output quality. Use when a user asks to optimize, refine, clarify, or rewrite a prompt for better results, or when the request is about prompt optimization or prompt rewriting.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Query, filter, and transform Markdown structurally with mq — a jq-like CLI for Markdown. Use to extract headings/sections/code-blocks/links from .md files, build a table of contents, pull code blocks of a given language, slice or reshape LLM prompt/output Markdown, or batch-transform docs. Triggers on "extract sections from this markdown", "get all the code blocks", "jq for markdown", "mq", or any structural query over Markdown that grep/Read can't do cleanly.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Analyzes an AI/ML publication — paper, preprint, article, technical blog post — and extracts what an enterprise AI engineer should do about it. Use when someone supplies a URL or document on RAG, embeddings, fine-tuning, prompt engineering, agents, or LLM deployment and asks "review this paper", "what do you make of this", "is this worth adopting", or "summarise the method and its limits". The subject matter must itself be machine learning.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Generate navigable semantic maps from PDF documents. Extracts section structure via font analysis, then runs LLM extraction per section for claims, symbols, and dependencies — all page-anchored. Produces _MAP.md (progressive disclosure), .symbols.json (definition index), .anchors.json (claim references), and a _USAGE.md snippet for CLAUDE.md. Use when analyzing papers, specs, or legal docs; when asked to "map this document", "index this PDF", "what does this paper say"; or when a coding agent needs grounded reference material from a PDF source. Analogous to tree-sitting but for prose documents.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
The secret-source gate. Routed to when changed code reads, writes, or passes a secret — API key, token, password, connection string, signing key, certificate, or any value that grants access. Validates that every secret comes from the approved store and never lands in source, log, test fixture, error response, image, or LLM prompt. The auth-crypto-reviewer agent is dispatched as the reviewer.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Run a one-shot or flat parallel batch of provider LLM subagents (headless `cc-fleet subagent`) that return a result. Use when fanning out N independent tasks, doing bulk per-file work, or calling a specialized provider model (DeepSeek / GLM / Kimi / Qwen / MiniMax). NOT a long-lived collaborator you message back and forth (that is /cc-fleet:team); NOT a multi-phase pipeline with dependencies or resume (that is /cc-fleet:workflow); NOT trivial work the main session should just do.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Start long-lived provider LLM teammates as native Claude Code agent-team members (the native Agent tool with a ccf-<provider> type) that you message with SendMessage — multi-turn, collaborative, watchable in tmux panes. Use for sustained parallel build/work ("start 3 glm teammates", N teammates on N files), or when you need a collaborator you message across turns, from a terminal `claude` session. NOT a fire-and-forget one-shot or a flat batch of independent prompts — that is /cc-fleet:subagent. NOT a scripted multi-phase run — that is /cc-fleet:workflow.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when code needs a judgment about natural language that rules or regex cannot make (classify, route, triage, moderate, score, rank, match, dedupe, filter, extract, verify, or gate an action), when brainstorming where AI could fit in an app, when an LLM call exists only to pick a label, score, or yes/no, or when code uses TypeSafe AI, Jev, System One, typesafe-sdk, or @typesafe-ai/sdk.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Behavioral guidelines to reduce common LLM coding mistakes. Use when writing, reviewing, or refactoring code to avoid overcomplication, make surgical changes, surface assumptions, and define verifiable success criteria.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Guide for creating high-quality MCP (Model Context Protocol) servers that enable LLMs to interact with external services through well-designed tools. Use when building MCP servers to integrate external APIs or services, whether in Python (FastMCP) or Node/TypeScript (MCP SDK).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Scan a site for agent readiness via isitagentready.com — for 'make this site agent-ready' or 'scan this site', incl. localhost. Plans the 0-5 gaps and files issues via /plan-to-issues. Not for SEO/llms.txt fixes or app-store ASO.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。