「main」の検索結果

Comprehensive red team operations methodology covering full engagement lifecycle from planning through reporting. Addresses engagement scoping and rules of engagement negotiation, multi-tier C2 infrastructure design with redirectors and domain fronting, malleable traffic profiles and beacon tradecraft, OPSEC discipline including attribution avoidance and indicator management, EDR and AMSI evasion techniques using direct syscalls and unhooking, data collection with chain-of-custody controls, and structured reporting with purple team debrief workflows. Covers assumed-breach, external-to-internal, insider threat, and hybrid physical-cyber engagement scenarios with MITRE ATT&CK mapping throughout. Targets operators planning or executing adversary simulation engagements against mature defenders.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use this skill whenever the user asks about NetExec (nxc) — a network exploitation and post-exploitation tool for Active Directory environments. Triggers include: any mention of 'nxc', 'netexec', 'crackmapexec' successor questions, AD enumeration, SMB/LDAP/WinRM/MSSQL/SSH/RDP/VNC/WMI/FTP/NFS protocol attacks, password spraying, credential dumping (SAM, NTDS, LSASS, DPAPI), Kerberoasting, ASREPRoasting, lateral movement, BloodHound collection, module usage, or any pentest workflow involving Windows domain environments. This skill covers ALL protocols, ALL modules, and ALL core features of NetExec. Always provide full command examples with correct flags and options.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Comprehensive methodology for auditing and exploiting TLS/SSL implementations and misconfigurations across network services and mobile applications. Covers protocol downgrade attacks including POODLE (CVE-2014-3566) against SSLv3 CBC padding, DROWN (CVE-2016-0800) cross-protocol attack leveraging SSLv2 export ciphers to decrypt TLS sessions, and FREAK (CVE-2015-0204) forcing RSA export-grade key exchange. Addresses BEAST (CVE-2011-3389) exploiting CBC IV predictability in TLS 1.0, CRIME (CVE-2012-4929) and BREACH targeting TLS-level and HTTP-level compression oracles respectively, and Heartbleed (CVE-2014-0160) for OpenSSL memory disclosure. Covers certificate validation bypass techniques for applications with improper hostname verification or chain validation, certificate pinning bypass using Frida and Objection for mobile application interception, HSTS bypass via NTP manipulation and subdomain exploitation, TLS 1.3 0-RTT replay attacks against non-idempotent endpoints, mutual TLS (mTLS) authentication attacks including client certificate theft and relay, and Certificate Transparency log monitoring for reconnaissance. Primary tooling includes testssl.sh for comprehensive TLS auditing, sslyze for Python-integrated scanning, sslscan for quick cipher enumeration, and tlsx for high-speed TLS probing at scale. Maps to CWE-295 (Improper Certificate Validation), CWE-319 (Cleartext Transmission of Sensitive Information), and CWE-757 (Selection of Less-Secure Algorithm During Negotiation).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Dense methodology covering DNS exfiltration (dnscat2, iodine, dns2tcp), HTTPS tunneling (domain fronting, CDN abuse, legitimate service channels), ICMP tunneling (icmpsh, ptunnel-ng), cloud storage dead drops (S3 presigned URLs, Azure Blob SAS tokens, GCS signed URLs), email-based exfil (SMTP, EWS, draft method), steganography (image, audio, document metadata), encoding/encryption (base64 chunking, XOR, AES), covert channels (custom protocol tunneling, HTTP header encoding, timing channels), and data staging (compression, splitting, encryption). Tools: dnscat2, iodine, dns2tcp, PacketWhisper, chisel, stunnel, icmpsh, ptunnel-ng, steghide, zsteg, OpenStego. MITRE ATT&CK: T1048 (Exfiltration Over Alternative Protocol), T1041 (Exfiltration Over C2 Channel), T1567 (Exfiltration Over Web Service), T1029 (Scheduled Transfer), T1030 (Data Transfer Size Limits), T1132 (Data Encoding), T1001 (Data Obfuscation). Use when planning or executing data exfiltration during authorized red team engagements or post-exploitation.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

WPA/WPA2/WPA3-Enterprise (802.1X / EAP) attack methodology — EAP method identification (PEAP-MSCHAPv2, EAP-TTLS, EAP-TLS, EAP-GTC, EAP-PWD, EAP-FAST), evil-twin RADIUS attacks with eaphammer for credential capture, MSCHAPv2 challenge-response cracking, EAP-TLS client certificate theft paths (DPAPI, NDES, AD CS auto-enrollment), supplicant validation bypass (missing server cert validation, missing CN pinning, BYOD misconfigurations), and post-capture pivots into AD via cracked domain credentials. Use for corporate Wi-Fi engagements where the network is 802.1X authenticated.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Comprehensive offensive methodology for software supply chain attacks covering the full kill chain from reconnaissance through exploitation. Addresses dependency confusion across npm, PyPI, and NuGet ecosystems where internal registry override allows an attacker to inject malicious packages that shadow private dependencies. Covers typosquatting techniques for popular packages, compromised package injection via maintainer account takeover or social engineering, and build system attacks through Makefile injection, setup.py install hooks, and npm postinstall scripts. Extends into CI/CD artifact tampering where build outputs are replaced or modified in transit, code signing abuse through stolen or self-signed certificates, upstream repository compromise via commit injection or force-push to trusted repos, and container image supply chain attacks including base image trojaning and registry confusion. Maps to MITRE ATT&CK T1195.001 (Supply Chain Compromise: Compromise Software Dependencies and Development Tools) and T1195.002 (Supply Chain Compromise: Compromise Software Supply Chain). Integrates tooling such as confused for dependency confusion scanning and dependency-check for known vulnerable component detection. Each technique section provides reproducible proof-of-concept patterns, detection guidance for defenders, and engagement-safe execution notes for authorized red team operations.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Build, scaffold, refactor, and troubleshoot ChatGPT Apps SDK applications that combine an MCP server and widget UI. Use when Codex needs to design tools, register UI resources, wire the MCP Apps bridge or ChatGPT compatibility APIs, apply Apps SDK metadata or CSP or domain settings, or produce a docs-aligned project scaffold. Prefer a docs-first workflow by invoking the openai-docs skill or OpenAI developer docs MCP tools before generating code.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when Product Design is explicitly invoked, or when the user's main goal is to explore a design, research UX, audit or critique a flow, faithfully clone a visual source, check a built design, or share a prototype. Do not use Product Design for ordinary implementation unless the user explicitly asks for it.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Creates and maintains Figma Code Connect template files that map Figma components to code snippets. Use when the user mentions Code Connect, Figma component mapping, design-to-code translation, or asks to create/update .figma.ts or .figma.js files.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Optimize CircleCI configuration for speed, reliability, and maintainability. Use when users ask to improve `.circleci/config.yml`, reduce CI runtime, tune caching/workspaces/parallelism, remove pipeline waste, or fix flaky pipeline behavior caused by configuration choices.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Build typed data visualizations in TypeScript. Use when the user wants TypeScript visualization code, typed data models, browser visualization components, UML-like diagram models, interactive graph or architecture diagram contracts, scroll-driven scene contracts, library selection guidance, or a maintainable visualization architecture beyond React- or Next-specific concerns.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Choose, lay out, critique, and explain data visualizations. Use when the user asks what visualization fits a dataset or goal, how a chart, dashboard, operational workspace, UML-like diagram, or software architecture diagram should be composed or interacted with, asks for visual page design, a layout mockup, generated large-screen and mobile concept images, or to be shown what a visualization could look like, when domain-native contextual surfaces or graphical backgrounds may help, when scrollytelling or parallax might be appropriate, wants a critique of an existing visualization, or needs guidance grounded in trusted visualization theory and practice. For advanced visual design or page-layout prompts where composition affects understanding, Codex must generate and show both large-screen and mobile portrait image concepts before implementation or text-only design handoff, plus mobile landscape when needed.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Build custom data visualizations with D3. Use when the user needs SVG or DOM-based charts, rich annotation, domain-native contextual backgrounds, data joins, custom scales or interactions, scroll-driven SVG scene states, or precise control over browser visualization behavior.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Audits agent config, instruction drift, hooks or MCP, and AI maintainability. Use when Claude, Codex, or Pi setup looks wrong. Not for application bugs or PR review.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Runs a six-phase research workflow from source bundle to publish-ready output. Use when researching an unfamiliar domain or compiling materials into one reference. Not for quick lookups or single-file reads.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Perform comprehensive code reviews focusing on best practices, security vulnerabilities, performance optimization, and maintainability

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Specialist in designing and implementing scalable modular monolith architectures using NestJS with DDD, Clean Architecture, and CQRS patterns. Use when building modular monolith backends, designing bounded contexts, creating domain modules, implementing event-driven module communication, or when user mentions "modular monolith", "bounded contexts", "module boundaries", "DDD", "CQRS", "clean architecture NestJS", or "monolith to microservices". Do NOT use for simple CRUD APIs, frontend work, general NestJS questions without architectural context, or stack-agnostic evolutionary modular monolith design (use evolutionary-modular-architecture).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Your pathfinder for navigating unknown codebases. Investigates with precision, implements surgically, and never assumes — if it doesn't know, it says so. Maintains a .notebook/ knowledge base that grows across sessions, turning every discovery into lasting intelligence. Summons available skills, MCPs, and docs when the mission demands. Use when fixing bugs, implementing features, refactoring, investigating flows, or any development task in unfamiliar territory. Triggers on "fix this", "implement this", "how does this work", "investigate this flow", "help me with this code". Do NOT use for greenfield scaffolding, CI/CD, or infrastructure provisioning.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Guides design and implementation of evolutionary modular-monolith platforms with DDD (strategic + tactical), flat-by-aggregate organization, an Anti-Corruption Layer for vendor independence, a transactional outbox for events, smart resilience (backoff with jitter, circuit breakers, idempotency), and a polished architecture HTML document with elegant SVG diagrams. Use when designing a platform or backend, defining bounded contexts, organizing modules and folders, choosing monolith vs microservices, decoupling from an external service (ERP, storage, AI), making calls resilient, adding real-time push, picking a 2026 TypeScript stack (Nx, NestJS, React), or producing an architecture document or diagram. Also triggers on 'modular monolith', 'bounded contexts', 'flat-by-aggregate', 'ports and adapters', 'architecture diagram'. Do NOT use for simple CRUD, NestJS-only deep implementation (use nestjs-modular-monolith), or pure domain-model review (use tactical-ddd).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when a question, decision, plan, tradeoff, or claim needs a rigorous verdict and one perspective is not enough. Spawns a panel of 3 to 5 subagent jurors that form independent blind opinions, deliberate anonymously under an anti-anchoring and anti-sycophancy protocol, and return one committed verdict with confidence, preserved dissent, and a concrete next action. Domain-agnostic across engineering, architecture, data, product, hiring, strategy, vendor choice, build-vs-buy, and research design. Trigger phrases include "convene a jury", "have agents debate and decide", "get a panel to decide", "multi-agent decision", "stress-test this and decide", "monte um juri", "tribunal de agentes", "painel para decidir". Do NOT use to only critique without deciding (use the-fool for that), to build a plan or write the solution itself, or for simple factual lookups.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Mandatory iPolloWork code-change gate for modern, minimal, performant, reuse-first implementation and clean repository ownership. Use whenever AI creates, edits, deletes, or refactors application code, server code, packages, scripts, tests, dependencies, schemas, routes, UI, or generated-file workflows. Reuse existing code before creating files, keep one source of truth, prevent parallel implementations and junk directories, justify every new file or dependency, and audit the current change before completion.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Creates and maintains Figma Code Connect template files that map Figma components to code snippets. Use when the user mentions Code Connect, Figma component mapping, design-to-code translation, or asks to create/update .figma.ts or .figma.js files.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when the user explicitly chooses iPollo Onto or starts an Onto workbench task. Build and maintain business systems directly in its connected tables, relationships and documents, saving useful results progressively. A generic CRM, search or writing request alone does not activate this workflow.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Turn project evidence into maintainable Notion briefs, decision records, runbooks, and status documents without overwriting unrelated content.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。