「repo」の検索結果

Create, poll, resume, download, and save Amazon Ads v3 reports.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Retrieve Amazon Ads Sponsored Products audience and search-term impression-share reports through Nexscope.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Planning releases and reporting delivery work from GitHub PR history. Use when versioning, CHANGELOGs, rollout or rollback plans, engineering metrics, retrospectives, or stakeholder reports are needed.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Designing and auditing repository structure for humans and LLM agents: layouts, monorepos, docs/tests/scripts, progressive disclosure, prompt-cache topology, and safe migrations.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Generate a session report with token usage estimates, work summary, and outcomes

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Scan a repo for mixed ADRs, PRDs, SPECs, and DOCs and bootstrap or merge the full .planning/ setup from them. Classifies each doc in parallel, synthesizes a consolidated context with a conflicts report, and routes to new-project or merge-milestone depending on whether .planning/ already exists.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Bug-fix routine that fixes the whole class of bug, not just the reported instance. Use for any bug report, failing production behaviour, monitoring alert, audit finding or review finding that does real harm (a smaller review finding goes on the item's list, as ship-check says), and whenever the same kind of bug has been seen before. Reproduces it with a failing test, names the failure class, searches the task's scope for the same pattern (the whole codebase when the user's own prompt asks for the fix, not when it is picked from a task's list), fixes or records every hit, and adds the rule, invariant, helper or check that stops it coming back.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Implement bounded features and fixes in existing or new mini-program codebases while preserving repository rules, user-owned changes, approved behavior, assets, framework conventions, and evidence boundaries. Use when users ask to write or modify mini-program code, implement a confirmed specification or architecture, add a scoped feature, remove behavior semantically, update internal documentation required by a change, or carry out a well-defined small fix that does not require root-cause investigation. Establishes a baseline and change boundary, applies test-driven small steps, distinguishes source from generators and build artifacts, verifies the affected contract, and never reports source completion as device validation, formal acceptance, upload, or release.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use this when summarizing analysis results, writing reports, documenting experiment outcomes, or presenting model evaluation — including structuring findings in Japanese with conclusions, facts, assumptions, interpretations, and caveats.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

When the user wants help with public relations, earned media, press coverage, journalist outreach, or media strategy (not pull requests). Also use when the user mentions 'PR,' 'public relations,' 'press,' 'press release,' 'press coverage,' 'media outreach,' 'pitch a journalist,' 'get featured,' 'media list,' 'media kit,' 'press kit,' 'newsjacking,' 'news hijack,' 'HARO,' 'Qwoted,' 'Featured,' 'Help A Reporter,' 'reporter request,' 'tech press,' 'TechCrunch,' 'earned media,' 'thought leadership placement,' 'op-ed,' 'guest article,' 'press contacts,' or 'how do I get press.' Use this for earned media work — finding journalists, pitching stories, newsjacking, and responding to press requests. For startup/SaaS/AI directory submissions, see directory-submissions. For product launches, see launch. For social-media engagement, see social. For cold-email outreach to prospects, see cold-email.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Research a topic to support a decision, three ways: draft a research prompt for the user to run in their own tool (ChatGPT, Gemini, Grok, Perplexity, …), turn a finished research report into a short summary with cited sources that other skills can use directly, or run the research here with parallel web searches. Built-in research types: market, domain, technical, competitive, user-voice, academic-lit; also supports choosing between candidates, and custom types via overrides. Use when the user says "deep recon", "research this", "draft a research prompt", "process this research report", "market research", "domain research", "technical research", "competitor research", "literature review", or "help me choose between"

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Set up, adopt, refresh, or audit a repository's agent instructions (the AGENTS.md block) so AI agents work well in that repo. Also records observed agent mistakes as pitfalls. Use when invoked by name

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Read a repository's tasks and binding constraints, claim work, and finish it with proof. Use when working in a repo that has a .ank/ directory.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

CVSS 3.1 vector examples, executive summary template, full technical finding template, and remediation language bank for pentest reports

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Clone, port, or convert features from any GitHub repo into your project. Use when stealing patterns from external repos or porting proven code. Understand before copy, challenge before implement. 4 modes: port (rewrite), compare (analysis), copy (transplant), improve (copy + optimize).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when the user asks for a literature review, academic deep dive, research report, state-of-the-art survey, topic scoping, comparative analysis of methods/papers, grant background, or any request that needs multi-source scholarly evidence with citations. Also trigger proactively when a user question clearly requires academic grounding (e.g. "what's known about X", "compare approach A vs B in the literature", "summarize the field of Y"). Runs an 8-phase (Phase 0..7), script-driven research workflow across 7 federated sources (OpenAlex, arXiv, Crossref, PubMed, DBLP, bioRxiv, Exa) with optional Semantic Scholar / Brave MCP enrichment, with deduplication, transparent ranking, dual-backend citation chasing (OpenAlex + Semantic Scholar), self-critique, and structured report output with verifiable citations.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Your competitor just launched. You have no idea how they grew so fast. Should you reverse-engineer their website? Track their social media? Map their growth flywheel? This gives you the complete SOP — from Wayback Machine snapshots to X/Twitter propagation analysis to growth flywheel scoring. Built from 150+ AI startup competitive analyses including the Lovable case study (4.3M views, 229K impressions launch day). By @WeiYipei. Inside: 4-step research framework (website → social → traffic → ad spend) · 3-version Wayback evolution analysis · X/Twitter propagation-chain mapping · growth-flywheel 6-stage scoring · KOL identification · content-effectiveness ranking · ICP + freemium pricing teardown · self-check checklist. New in 1.2: time-machine competitor archaeology — Google date-range search back to pre-fame years, star-history launch-day reconstruction (AppFlowy ~40-channel zero-budget launch teardown), competitor funding news as a launch-timing signal, and the "open source alternative" positioning play. Sourced from first-hand founder interviews (AFFiNE co-founder, 2026-04, self-reported figures marked). 🇨🇳 你的竞品刚刚爆了。你完全不知道他们怎么做到的。该拆官网？盯社媒？画增长飞轮？这份 SOP 给你从 Wayback Machine 快照到 X/Twitter 传播链路还原到飞轮六阶段评分的完整方法论。基于 150+ AI 创业公司竞品分析实战，含 Lovable 完整案例。 🇯🇵 競合が突然バズった。どうやって成長したか全く分からない。このSOPは、Waybackスナップショットからツイッター伝播チェーン分析、フライホイール6段階スコアリングまでの完全な競合調査フレームワークを提供します。150以上のAIスタートアップ分析から構築。 🇰🇷 경쟁사가 갑자기 폭발적으로 성장했습니다. 어떻게 그렇게 빨리 성장했는지 모릅니다. 이 SOP는 Wayback 스냅샷부터 X/Twitter 전파 체인 분석, 플라이휠 6단계 스코어링까지 완전한 경쟁사 조사 프레임워크를 제공합니다. 150개 이상의 AI 스타트업 분석에서 구축. Triggers: "competitor research" | "competitive analysis" | "competitor analysis" | "growth flywheel" | "market research" | "竞品调研" | "竞品分析" | "增长飞轮" | "传播链路" | "競合分析" | "경쟁사 분석" | "social media teardown" | "Twitter propagation" | "content strategy analysis"

SEO/GEO Agent Operations SOP v2 — Rebuilt from real-world operations (analook.com 0→launch, GSC incident, DataForSEO monitoring, gingiris.tools post-migration recovery). What's new in v2: • Step-by-step onboarding (Q1→Q6), multiple choice wherever possible — no big forms • Mandatory daily SEO log — first item is always GSC token status check • Data cross-validation rule: any external metric must come from ≥2 sources before use • Backlink progress tracking (6-week wait → check → alert if not indexed) • New vs. established site strategy matrix (new site <6mo: KD≤20; mature: KD up to 35+) Real incidents baked in: GSC token expired silently for 2 weeks (analook.com), P0 keywords dropped out of Top 100 after domain migration (gingiris.tools), traffic data off by 17× from single-source DataForSEO. Triggers: "SEO agent" | "SEO daily report" | "GSC monitoring" | "DataForSEO" | "GEO agent" | "backlink tracking" | "IndexNow" | "competitor comparison page" | "SEO SOP" | "autonomous SEO" | "GEO triple combo" 🇨🇳 SEO/GEO Agent 运营 SOP v2 — 基于真实运营经验重写（analook.com 从零建站 + GSC 断档 2 周 + DataForSEO 监控 + gingiris.tools 迁移权重恢复）。 对话式开局、强制日报（GSC token 是第一项）、数据交叉验证铁律、外链进度追踪、新老站区分策略。

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Design and execute a 14-day GitHub repository growth sprint using README conversion, competitor-window research, Reddit, Hacker News, launch directories, community activation, and contributor loops. Use when launching an open-source repository, diagnosing weak star conversion, or building sustained GitHub discovery without buying stars.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when the user wants web research: gathering cited, multi-angle evidence on a specific question. Triggers on: "research X for me", "do web research on", "look up sources for", "find citations for", "gather evidence on", "what does the web say about X". Also invoked programmatically by other beagle skills (prfaq-beagle Ignition, brainstorm-beagle reference points, strategy-interview context grounding) via the companion contract. Does NOT trigger on codebase lookups ("find this function", "search the repo"), local file search, LLM-as-judge evaluation, or paywalled/auth-gated scraping. Produces a written plan, parallel-subagent findings, and a cited synthesis report on disk — never inline prose, never unsourced claims.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when the user wants a cited, structured read of local documents and project knowledge. Triggers on: "analyze these docs", "scan my project for context", "read the docs folder", "summarize what's in .beagle/concepts/", "extract context from docs/", "what's in this folder", "go read everything in X and tell me what's there". Also invoked programmatically by other beagle skills (prfaq-beagle Ignition, brainstorm-beagle reference points, strategy-interview context grounding) via the companion contract. Does NOT trigger on codebase lookups ("find this function", "search the repo"), web research (use web-research), LLM-as-judge evaluation (use llm-judge), or document editing (use humanize-beagle). Produces a written scan plan, parallel-subagent findings, and a cited synthesis report on disk — never inline prose, never unsourced claims.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when comparing two or more code implementations against a spec or requirements doc. Triggers on "which repo is better", "compare these implementations", "evaluate both solutions", "rank these codebases", or "judge which approach wins". Also covers choosing between competing PRs or vendor submissions solving the same problem. Does NOT review a single codebase for quality — use code review skills instead. Does NOT evaluate strategy docs — use strategy-review. Requires a spec file and 2+ repo paths.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Classify, write, and audit documentation per Diátaxis (diataxis.fr) — the four-quadrant method (tutorials · how-to guides · reference · explanation). Encodes the compass as a decision procedure, each quadrant's contract as hard rules, and an executable mixed-mode audit. Project-agnostic; the per-repo doc-location mapping lives in a repo rule of the project's own (kolu: `.apm/instructions/diataxis.instructions.md`). Use when writing any user-facing doc, structuring a docs site, or auditing existing docs for mixed modes.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Professional PDF financial plan generator. Scans current working directory for FINANCE-*.md files, extracts scores and financial data, then runs the bundled Python ReportLab script to produce a polished, client-ready PDF with cover page, Financial Health Score gauge, score breakdown, cash flow, debt, retirement, portfolio, and prioritized action plan. Output: FINANCE-PLAN.pdf.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。