「review」の検索結果

Frame a new design proposal (RFC-shape) under proposals/ — problem before solution, named beneficiary and observable change, real alternatives, honest drawbacks, and a live open-questions backlog. Read when asked to frame a proposal, write an RFC, propose a design, pitch a change, draft a PRD-style design doc, or open a design proposal for review. Do NOT read to record a decision after it is accepted (use record-a-decision), to write an implementation spec (use write-a-spec), to write a postmortem (use write-a-postmortem), or to review or critique an existing design (use review-a-design).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Write a blameless incident postmortem under postmortems/ following the Google SRE shape — evidence-based timeline, trigger vs root cause vs symptom, contributing factors, what went well, and owned+dated+verifiable action items. Read when asked to write a postmortem, do an incident review, run a root cause analysis, write up the outage, retro on the outage, or when the user says we had an incident and wants it documented. Do NOT read to frame a proposal (use frame-a-proposal), write a spec (use write-a-spec), record a decision (use record-a-decision), or review a design (use review-a-design) — a postmortem documents an incident that already happened, it does not propose, specify, decide, or critique future work.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Comprehensive GitHub code review with AI-powered swarm coordination

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Launch an independent Meta Muse Wonder Max code review through Pi and OpenRouter, and return it verbatim. Use only when the user explicitly invokes /muse-review.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Launch an independent Fable code review and return it verbatim. Use only when the user explicitly invokes /fable-review.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Launch an independent GPT-6.1-Sol Max code review and return it verbatim. Use only when the user explicitly invokes /gpt-review.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Run five independent max-effort reviews (Fable 5.1, Opus 5.5, GPT-6 Astra, GPT-6.1 Sol, Muse Wonder), merge their findings, and fix only what the user approves. Manual only: run when a human types /total-review; agents must never invoke it on their own.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Taking a multi-PR feature from "shape unknown" to merged without five review rounds per PR: spike until interfaces stop moving, write the contract, cut PRs along contract seams, one review per PR. Use when starting a feature that touches more than one lifecycle object or public interface, when a PR review keeps changing interfaces, or when splitting a large branch.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Guide a Chinese-speaking user through code or a PR while reviewing correctness. Trigger on 帮我review, 带我读代码, or an explicit implementation walkthrough.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Review an explicitly identified Marin pull request as a whole change, asking whether it fits repository patterns, whether a better abstraction exists, and what breaks outside the diff; use for large or agent-authored PRs, after or alongside review-pr.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Comprehensive code review workflow - parallel specialized reviews → synthesis

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Review completed implementation changes before final verification. Use when repository policy requires independent review or the user explicitly requests it.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Review tutti git diffs for project structure, layering, module ownership, and duplicate event-center infrastructure by planning focused architecture review tasks, then having the main agent orchestrate sub-agents for only the changed areas.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

批评与自我批评：在工作完成、阶段验收、收到批评或同类错误反复出现时，对成果和过程做诚实、具体、基于事实的审视，输出可执行的改进项，并处理外来批评而不辩解。触发信号包括 review、复盘、审查、"帮我看看有没有问题"、"你确定吗"；任务刚开始或只是单步查询时不触发。 English: Criticism and self-criticism. After delivery, at a review checkpoint, on receiving criticism, or when the same mistake recurs, examine the result and the process honestly and concretely, produce actionable fixes, and accept valid criticism without defensiveness. Triggers include review, retrospective, audit, "check this for problems", "are you sure"; skip at the start of a task or for one-step lookups.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Dedicated security-audit route for OWASP-style risks, secret leaks, auth flaws, injection, unsafe input handling, SSRF/XSS, and sensitive-data exposure. Use instead of code-reviewer when the prompt explicitly asks for security, vulnerability, threat, auth, or OWASP review.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Perform language and framework specific security best-practice reviews and suggest improvements. Trigger only when the user explicitly requests security best practices guidance, a security review/report, or secure-by-default coding help. Trigger only for supported languages (python, javascript/typescript, go). Do not trigger for general code review, debugging, or non-security tasks.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Prepare and request a code review after implementation or before merge by assembling scope, requirements, git range, and reviewer instructions.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Conduct comprehensive, systematic literature reviews using multiple academic databases (PubMed, arXiv, bioRxiv, Semantic Scholar, etc.). This skill should be used when conducting systematic literature reviews, meta-analyses, research synthesis, or comprehensive literature searches across biomedical, scientific, and technical domains. Creates professionally formatted markdown documents and PDFs with verified citations in multiple citation styles (APA, Nature, Vancouver, etc.).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Review documentation changes for compliance with the Metabase writing style guide. Use when reviewing pull requests, files, or diffs containing documentation markdown files.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Triggered by "monthly recap", "how did I do this month", "spending summary", "financial review", "weekly recap", "quarterly review", "year in review"

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Addresses and fixes findings from a QA code review. Reads the review report, fixes critical and warning issues, and prepares for re-verification. Delegates to the Forja (Dev) agent.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Exhaustively review committed openai-go pull requests, branches, and commit ranges, or provide best-effort review of uncommitted local changes, for Go correctness, SDK compatibility, generated-code ownership, provider security, and repository-specific gotchas.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Build a pre-earnings briefing for a stock from Yahoo Finance data (yfinance): the upcoming report date and timing, consensus EPS and revenue estimates with their range, the beat/miss track record, analyst ratings and price targets, and what to watch in the print. Use this skill whenever the user is preparing for an upcoming earnings report or asks what the street expects — consensus or whisper numbers, EPS expectations, whether a company will beat, an earnings setup, or an earnings-season preview — and whenever a ticker comes up in the context of upcoming earnings, even without the word "preview". For results that are already out, use earnings-recap.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

[omh] Before data leaves the team -- a dataset, log, ticket export or transcript excerpt bound for a vendor, a public issue, a model provider or a training corpus: classify every field, minimize first, pseudonymize with the mapping kept local, and call it redacted only after an observed residual scan. Use when the user says: data-share-review, data share review, pii redaction, redact pii, pseudonymize, de-identify, anonymize the dataset, residual pii.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。