「scope」の検索結果

Make a short product film (website hero loop, landing section, launch film, feature walkthrough, store-listing promo, social cut, illustrated story film) in which the product appears as its own real UI, drawn frame by frame from an HTML timeline, rendered with Playwright and cut with ffmpeg. Four routes: licensed footage cut against cinematic product beats, product beats only, a pointer-driven walkthrough with captions or text cards (plain or kinetic), or a cut-paper collage in which an illustrated cast tells a story over real UI captured from the code with fictional data. Use when asked for a product film, hero video, promo or demo video, launch film, explainer, walkthrough video, paper or collage film, or to recut one. Not for plain screen recordings or voice-over walkthroughs; laying a supplied music track under a finished cut is in scope.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Fetch and display diffs for various scopes (PR, commit, branch, staged, working tree). Used by other skills that need to analyze changes.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

REQUIRED before writing code for any feature touching auth, payments, credentials, tokens, sessions, file upload, user data, untrusted input, deserialization, network endpoints, or data deletion. Scope by that surface, not the task label — a research/experimental/local-only feature with none of it doesn't need this. Invoke it, record answers inline in the design doc or PR description, then write the code. Skipping this is how auth bypass, token leakage, and delete-the-wrong-record bugs ship. If the feature touches any of those surfaces and this hasn't run, the design is incomplete — do not proceed to implementation.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Entry point for rafter. Invoke when a sub-skill is unclear, or when the task needs `rafter run` (remote SAST+SCA), `rafter secrets` (local secrets-only), `rafter audit`, policy checks, or command-risk evaluation. Scope by security surface, not task label: engage when the diff touches auth, credentials/secrets/tokens, untrusted input, SQL, shell/exec, file paths, deserialization, crypto, network endpoints, data deletion, or dependencies; for research/experimental/local-only code with none of that, a quick surface check is enough. When such surface IS present and no rafter skill or CLI call has been made, invoke this before handing the task off — an un-evaluated "done" on genuine security surface is not done.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

ALWAYS use this skill when committing changes. Applies Shipfox agent sequencing for branch checks, scoped validation, and commit creation. Trigger on commit, commit changes, save changes, make a commit, or create commit.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Structured cross-review protocol between specialized agents. Ensures scope alignment, priority calibration, and domain-aware feedback. Use when one agent reviews another's work, during handoffs, or when validating cross-cutting concerns.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Inspect Orchestra projects and tasks, assign workers, queue planning, approve exact plans only on human instruction, request replanning with feedback, show stored PR linkages, reconcile receipts, and scope native agent/skill authoring. Orca-managed worktrees use the separate Orca CLI skill.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Guide Maestro's Linear issue/task journeys using exact team and issue identities, source-scoped controls, state mappings, and repository PR linkage.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Investigates phishing email incidents from initial user report through header analysis, URL/attachment detonation, impacted user identification, and containment actions using SOC tools like Splunk, Microsoft Defender, and sandbox analysis platforms. Use when a reported phishing email requires full incident investigation to determine scope and impact.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Red team engagement planning is the foundational phase that defines scope, objectives, rules of engagement (ROE), threat model selection, and operational timelines before any offensive testing begins.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Executes comprehensive red team exercises that simulate real-world adversary operations against an organization's people, processes, and technology. The red team operates with stealth as a primary objective, employing the full attack lifecycle from initial reconnaissance through objective completion while testing the organization's detection and response capabilities. This differs from penetration testing by focusing on adversary emulation rather than vulnerability identification. Activates for requests involving red team exercise, adversary simulation, adversary emulation, or full-scope offensive security assessment.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

X/Twitter browser operations. Use for X browsing, analysis, bookmark management, content and profile operations, or browser-driven troubleshooting. Require explicit confirmation for outbound posts, DMs, engagement, follows, blocks, mutes, and list edits. Out of scope: keyword/hashtag research of public posts traced to primary sources.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Analyze historical VS Code GitHub Copilot Chat sessions by model, reasoning effort, AIU, time, reliability, workflow behavior, and external quality evidence, or safely prune workspace-scoped local chat history by age. Use for session analysis, repeated-task retrospectives, model evaluation, cost/performance analysis, and old session cleanup.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Synchronize curated Agent Skills across approved repositories with policy checks and verification. Use when publishing or updating managed skills, validating a repository mirror, or selecting a safe sync scope. Triggers on "sync public skills", "publish skills", "public 公開", "skill sync", "repository mirror".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Reflect reusable learnings into a private Agent Skills repository with scoped safety gates and same-run private commit/push. Not for ~/.copilot personal assets, VS Code User Data assets, or workspace/repository assets. Use when: skill retro, private skill authoring, skill repository fix, create or update SKILL.md.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Take one new feature slice from idea to reviewed, committed code in a single guided pass — scope it into the smallest shippable slice, build it test-first with strict TDD, review and fix the diff, then commit it. Chains slice → test-driven-development → the built-in /code-review → git-commit. Not for reviewing an existing PR, upgrades, or open-ended design questions.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when asked to review a plan, challenge a proposal, run a CEO review, poke holes in an approach, think bigger about scope, or decide whether to expand or reduce the plan.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

"Full safety mode: destructive command warnings + directory-scoped edits. (gstack)".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Ask the minimum clarifying questions before implementing when scope, constraints, or success criteria are unclear. Use when a request has multiple plausible interpretations, missing acceptance criteria, or ambiguous environment constraints.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

"Net-zero transition playbook: GHG inventory (ISO 14064-1, GHG Protocol Scope 1/2/3), science-based targets (SBTi), TCFD and ISSB S1/S2 climate disclosure, Taiwan carbon fee, decarbonization roadmap, internal carbon pricing, supply-chain carbon, product carbon footprint, green electricity and T-REC. Use for corporate decarbonization roadmap, carbon inventory, carbon-fee response, TCFD/ISSB reporting, supply-chain decarbonization, or responding to international customers (Apple, RE100). Triggers: 『碳盤查』『SBTi』『碳費』『TCFD』『淨零路徑』『範疇 3』『綠電』『CBAM』『ISO 14064』『ISSB』『T-REC』. For Taiwan EMBA ESG/sustainability/operations/strategy/finance cases. Focuses on Taiwan listed-company and supply-chain practice; sustainability strategy theory: use Asgard `grad-sustainability`; ERM 框架整合氣候風險: use `biz-erm`; 董事會 ESG 委員會結構設計: use `biz-corporate-governance`; 併購 ESG 盡職調查: use `fin-m-and-a`.".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Analyze feature requirements, dependencies, and security considerations. Use when starting feature implementation from GitHub issues to understand scope, technical feasibility, and risks.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Plan version scope, verify release integrity (commit↔CHANGELOG, tag↔artifacts), generate changelogs, and run full releases. Use when cutting a release or bumping a version. Trigger on "cut a release", "bump the version", "generate changelog", "release plan", "verify the release".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Bouwt de audit- en workshop-producten waarmee juridische experts een machine-leesbare (regelrecht-YAML) vertaling van wet- en regelgeving valideren in een live sessie. Gebruik dit bij het voorbereiden van een expert-workshop of validatie-sessie over een dossier, het maken van een scope-/stelselanalyse, per-artikel audit-checklists, facilitator-materiaal, testcase-scenario's, of sessie-verslagen (intern + extern). Dossier-agnostisch; de regelrecht-methode (YAML, formules, untranslatables, source/override, legal_basis, engine-trace) is de vaste taal. Voor analytische desk-review van een corpus zonder live sessie (wetgevings-/stelselfouten, coverage, multi-agent review): zie de zusterskill regelrecht-stelselanalyse.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when diagnosing or fixing user-reported application bugs. Guides evidence-backed root-cause analysis from symptoms, screenshots, logs, provider failures, background tasks, storage, or desktop lifecycle behavior through a scoped patch and regression tests.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。