2,383 件 ・ 関連度順
概要と使いどころ
Full ASVS 5.0 compliance assessment against a codebase and/or architecture diagrams. Reads all 346 controls from the companion CSV, performs targeted code analysis per control, and produces a complete matrix marked COMPLIANT / NON_COMPLIANT / NOT_RELEVANT — with per-control reasoning and evidence (code snippets, file:line references, diagram observations). Outputs a reviewed CSV matrix and a self-contained HTML evidence report.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Authentication bypass testing playbook. Use when assessing login flows, password reset logic, account recovery, MFA bypass, token predictability, brute-force resistance, and session boundary flaws.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Cloud security posture assessment for AWS, Azure, and GCP. Tests IAM privilege escalation paths, public storage exposure, serverless attack surface, database exposure, logging gaps, container registry security, and cloud-specific attacks. Both authenticated (with cloud credentials) and unauthenticated (external) modes. Uses nuclei cloud templates, Prowler, ScoutSuite, manual IMDS/metadata probing, and deep AWS/Azure/GCP CLI enumeration. Produces: cloud architecture diagram, attack path map, findings per category, compliance mapping (SOC 2, PCI DSS 4.0, HIPAA, CIS), PoCs for confirmed exploits. Chains into /gh-export for issue filing.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
White-box source code security review structured around OWASP ASVS 5.0 (427 verification requirements across 16 chapters). Reads and understands application source code to build a security-aware knowledge base that enriches all downstream skills. Covers: tech stack identification, route/endpoint mapping, authentication and authorization architecture, dangerous function patterns, source-to-sink data flow tracing, IaC review, dependency analysis, ASVS compliance mapping, and LLM integration security (prompt injection, tool abuse, output handling, RAG poisoning, MCP server patterns). When LLM/AI framework usage is detected, automatically reviews OWASP LLM Top 10 patterns from source code and chains into /ai-redteam with white-box context for live endpoint testing. Chains into /pentester, /threat-modeling, /web-exploit, /api-security, /cloud-security, /analyze-cve, /credential-audit, and /ai-redteam — providing white-box context that transforms black-box testing into targeted, informed assessment.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Test AI agent systems for tool abuse, unauthorized actions, privilege escalation through tool chaining, and safety bypass via agentic workflows. Use this skill when assessing autonomous AI agents that use tool-calling (function calling, plugins, actions) to interact with external systems. Covers multi-step attack chains, implicit trust exploitation, and capability boundary testing for AI agents.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Analyzes CVE vulnerabilities in project dependencies with code path tracing and PoC generation for Burp Suite. Traces vulnerable code from user input to sink, assesses exploitability, and generates HTTP requests for testing.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Test APIs for authentication and authorization bypass vulnerabilities including JWT manipulation, OAuth2 flaws, API key leakage, broken authentication, and token forgery. Use this skill when assessing REST/GraphQL APIs for access control weaknesses, session management flaws, or credential handling issues. Covers JWT algorithm confusion, OAuth redirect manipulation, and rate limit bypass.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Deep API security assessment beyond surface scanning. Covers the full OWASP API Security Top 10 (2023): Broken Object Level Authorization (BOLA / IDOR), Broken Authentication, Broken Object Property Level Authorization (mass assignment + excessive data exposure), Unrestricted Resource Consumption, Broken Function Level Authorization (BFLA / vertical privilege escalation), Unrestricted Access to Sensitive Business Flows, Server-Side Request Forgery via API parameters, Security Misconfiguration, Improper Inventory Management (shadow/zombie/deprecated endpoints, v1/v2 drift), and Unsafe Consumption of third-party APIs. Works across REST, GraphQL, gRPC, SOAP, and MCP servers. Discovers APIs from OpenAPI/Swagger specs, GraphQL introspection, gRPC reflection, .well-known endpoints, JS bundles, and traffic capture. Uses kiterunner, ffuf, schemathesis, restler-fuzzer, openapi-fuzzer, graphql-cop, clairvoyance, batchql, inql, jwt_tool, postman, mitmproxy, and manual http(action="request", ...) payloads. Every technique includes actual payloads, commands, and verification logic. Chains from /pentester or /codebase when API endpoints are discovered, chains into /web-exploit when classic injection points are found in API parameters, chains into /post-exploit when RCE is achieved, and chains into /ai-redteam when an LLM/AI endpoint is discovered (chat APIs, completion endpoints, RAG search, agentic tool-use, MCP servers).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
AI/ML security playbook. Use when assessing model supply chain attacks (pickle RCE, poisoned weights), adversarial examples, model poisoning, model stealing, data privacy attacks (membership inference, model inversion), and autonomous agent security risks.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
AI/LLM red-team assessment using the OWASP LLM Top 10 (2025) + OWASP AI Testing Guide (AITG v1, Nov 2025) frameworks, plus OWASP MCP Top 10 runtime testing for agentic/MCP targets. Tests prompt injection, jailbreaks, system prompt leakage, sensitive data extraction, excessive agency, improper output handling, model extraction, content bias, evasion, membership inference, MCP token exposure, MCP command injection, and more. Uses four tools in combination: FuzzyAI (single-turn jailbreak fuzzing), PyRIT (multi-turn orchestrated attacks), Garak (probe-based vulnerability scanning), and promptfoo (plugin-based red-team evaluation). Each tool covers different OWASP categories; running them together gives systematic coverage. Includes a conditional MCP reconnaissance phase and a post-access AI infrastructure phase (chained from /post-exploit). Produces: OWASP LLM Top 10 + AITG + MCP coverage matrix, findings per category, architecture diagram of the AI system, PoCs for confirmed exploits. Chains into /gh-export for issue filing.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Active Directory security audit using the MITRE ATT&CK framework. Full domain enumeration, trust mapping, GPO analysis, ACL abuse paths, ADCS attacks (ESC1-ESC8), delegation abuse (constrained/unconstrained/RBCD), fine-grained password policies, LAPS deployment, service account security, and Kerberos configuration. Uses enum4linux-ng, netexec, impacket, ldapsearch, certipy-ad, bloodhound-python, and rpcclient. Produces attack path diagrams, prioritized risk register, and PoCs. Chains into /gh-export for issue filing.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Execute a complete Active Directory penetration test from initial enumeration to domain dominance. Use this skill for AD security assessments including LDAP enumeration, Kerberos attacks (Kerberoasting, AS-REP roasting), BloodHound attack path analysis, credential dumping with Mimikatz, lateral movement via PsExec/WMI/DCOM, DCSync for NTDS extraction, and Golden/Silver ticket forging. Covers the full kill chain from domain user to domain admin.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Android pentesting playbook. Use when testing Android applications for SSL pinning bypass, exported component abuse, WebView vulnerabilities, intent redirection, root detection bypass, tapjacking, and backup extraction during authorized mobile security assessments.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use this agent when you need to review UniProt annotation rules (ARBA, UniRule) for quality, biological accuracy, and GO annotation appropriateness. This agent performs comprehensive analysis of rule condition sets, evaluates literature support, assesses taxonomic scope, and recommends curation actions.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Interview the user to surface experience that is real but undocumented, mapped against a specific role's requirements, then update the profile. Use when a fit assessment or an adversarial review flags a section as thin.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Open the warm channel for a role the pipeline already assessed. Finds who the user already knows at the company, researches named targets from public professional presence when they know nobody, grades each path honestly, drafts the ask through the voice agent, and writes the contacts into the Referrals table in job_search.md.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Search a named company's careers board, or resolve a natural-language query into a company list and search each. Extract job descriptions, score pool-anchored and channel-conditional fit against the user's profile, run a contrarian gate before tiers are finalized, and create role folders with assessments. Updates the job search tracker.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Frappe LMS customization guidance for courses, batches, lessons, quizzes, assessments, enrollment, progress, certificates, portals, and learning workflows. Use when work touches Frappe LMS or education/training flows.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Perform a direct five-axis code review across correctness, security, performance, readability, and maintainability. Use when the user asks for `/review`, PR review, security review, pre-merge review, production readiness review, or blocking issue assessment.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
In-house legal workflows for contract review against playbooks, NDA triage with GREEN/YELLOW/RED ratings, compliance briefings, and vendor checks. Use when the user invokes /review-contract, /triage-nda, /legal-risk-assessment, or /vendor-check for organisation-standard legal analysis.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Post-mortem analysis of a PhysicsIntern workspace run (Claude Code, Pi, Codex, or OpenCode host). Reconstructs the trajectory from the session record — JSONL file(s) for Claude/Pi/Codex, the SQLite store for OpenCode — audits methodology adherence against the workspace's own CLAUDE.md / AGENTS.md and skill/agent prompts, checks commit discipline and flag dispositions, and assesses substantive quality. Produces a thorough evidence-anchored markdown report. Use after a workspace has been worked on to identify what went well, where the methodology slipped, and what prompts to improve.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when the user wants their way of working with Claude assessed — "review my session", "how am I using Claude Code", "audit my setup / workflow", "am I following best practices", "coach me", "what should I improve" — or pastes a Claude.ai/Cowork/Tag transcript and asks how they could have worked better. Do NOT use for reviewing code changes (that is code review) or for teaching a product from scratch (use academy-learn); this skill only reviews how the human works with Claude.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Performs fast first-pass triage of an unknown file to decide depth of analysis: file type identification, hashing, reputation lookup, packing/entropy check, and string review. Activates for requests to triage, classify, or do initial assessment of an unknown or suspicious file.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Detects packing and encryption by measuring Shannon entropy across a binary's sections and regions: flagging high-entropy executable sections, entropy spikes, and size/raw-vs-virtual anomalies that indicate compression or encryption. Activates for requests to measure entropy, detect packing, or assess whether a sample is compressed/encrypted.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。