「best」の検索結果

Review code against language-specific best practices

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Idiomatic Go patterns from Effective Go

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Docker patterns for optimized containerization

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Go backend patterns from Uber style and standard layout

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Alembic migration patterns for naming conventions, safety checks, expand-contract, env.py configuration, and CI integration

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Idiomatic Kotlin patterns from JetBrains conventions

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

FastAPI patterns for high-performance async APIs

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

AWS patterns from Well-Architected Framework

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

React and Next.js performance optimization guidelines from Vercel Engineering. This skill should be used when writing, reviewing, or refactoring React/Next.js code to ensure optimal performance patterns. Triggers on tasks involving React components, Next.js pages, data fetching, bundle optimization, or performance improvements.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Reflect subskill for simmer. Records iteration results in trajectory table, tracks best candidate, handles regression rollback, and passes ASI forward to the next round. Supports both single-file and workspace modes. Do not invoke directly — called by simmer orchestrator after each judge round.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Finish an authorized security research task with a durable solved, abstained, or blocked outcome. Use when evidence is sufficient, a stop condition is reached, a tool budget is nearly exhausted, or the agent must commit its best supported answer.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

This skill should be used when the user asks to "create a plugin", "scaffold a plugin", "understand plugin structure", "organize plugin components", "set up plugin.json", "use ${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}", "add commands/agents/skills/hooks", "configure auto-discovery", or needs guidance on plugin directory layout, manifest configuration, component organization, file naming conventions, or Claude Code plugin architecture best practices.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Call germline SNPs and indels with GATK HaplotypeCaller and the GVCF joint-genotyping workflow. Covers the local-reassembly + PairHMM mechanism (why HC beats pileup callers on indels), the -ERC GVCF reference-confidence model and <NON_REF> allele, BQSR-vs-DRAGSTR and --dragen-mode error modeling, allele-specific (AS_) annotations, and edge cases (ploidy, Mutect2 mitochondria mode, sex chromosomes/PAR, contamination gating). Use when deciding whether to use HaplotypeCaller vs a pileup or DRAGEN caller, whether BQSR still earns its place, whether to call per-sample GVCFs for a cohort, or how to handle non-diploid, mitochondrial, sex-chromosome, or contaminated samples. Not for post-calling filtering depth (see variant-calling/filtering-best-practices) or cohort joint-genotyping scaling (see variant-calling/joint-calling).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Call copy number variants with the GATK best-practices workflows — the somatic CNV pipeline (CollectReadCounts, DenoiseReadCounts with tangent normalization, ModelSegments, CallCopyRatioSegments) and the germline GATK-gCNV pipeline (DetermineGermlineContigPloidy, GermlineCNVCaller cohort/case mode, PostprocessGermlineCNVCalls). Covers panel-of-normals construction, AnnotateIntervals/FilterIntervals, allelic-count integration, and QS-based filtering. Use when integrating CNV calling into a GATK variant pipeline, calling rare germline CNVs from an exome cohort, deciding between the somatic and germline GATK workflows, or diagnosing why tangent normalization removed a real event or why gCNV output has low precision.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Cross-method decision tree for calling hits in pooled CRISPR screens. Catalogs statistical models (MAGeCK RRA, MAGeCK MLE, BAGEL2, drugZ, JACKS, Chronos, CERES), experimental designs each is built for, failure modes outside design domain, reconciliation when methods disagree, multiple-testing and effect-size thresholds, the order of operations (count -> QC -> CN-correct -> hit-call -> validate), the second-best-sgRNA conservative rule, and consensus-hit strategy. Use when choosing among MAGeCK / BAGEL2 / drugZ / JACKS / Chronos for a given design, reconciling disagreement across two or three methods on the same screen, deciding whether to require consensus, gating downstream validation by hit-confidence tier, or interpreting unstable hit lists across reruns.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

This skill provides AWS cost optimization, monitoring, and operational best practices with integrated MCP servers for billing analysis, cost estimation, observability, and security assessment.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

AWS serverless and event-driven architecture expert based on Well-Architected Framework. Use when building serverless APIs, Lambda functions, REST APIs, microservices, or async workflows. Covers Lambda with TypeScript/Python, API Gateway (REST/HTTP), DynamoDB, Step Functions, EventBridge, SQS, SNS, and serverless patterns. Essential when user mentions serverless, Lambda, API Gateway, event-driven, async processing, queues, pub/sub, or wants to build scalable serverless applications with AWS best practices.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Autonomously improve a real artifact (code, training recipe, agent harness, data pipeline, prompt) against an objective and an evaluator, using Hypothesis Tree Refinement (HTR) from the Arbor paper. Use this whenever someone wants to iteratively optimize something over many experiments without overfitting — e.g. "get my model's eval score up", "improve this agent/harness", "tune this pipeline", "beat the baseline on this benchmark", "run a search over approaches and keep the best", "do an MLE-bench / Kaggle-style optimization", or any long-horizon "make this artifact better and don't just memorize the dev set" task. Trigger it even when the user doesn't say "Arbor" or "hypothesis tree" but describes repeated experiment-and-evaluate loops, branching exploration of competing ideas, or worries about a dev/test gap. Runs Claude itself as the coordinator with subagent executors in isolated git worktrees; for the standalone `arbor` CLI tool see references/arbor-upstream.md.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

This skill should be used when the user asks to "create an agent", "add an agent", "write a subagent", "agent frontmatter", "when to use description", "agent examples", "agent tools", "agent colors", "autonomous agent", or needs guidance on agent structure, system prompts, triggering conditions, or agent development best practices for Claude Code plugins.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when the user describes a problem, decision or stuck situation but names no method: "how should I approach this?", "help me think this through", "we can't decide", "where do I start?". Picks the best-fit thinking method and runs it. Skip for plain execution tasks or when a method is named.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Build production-grade Azure Cosmos DB NoSQL services following clean code, security best practices, and TDD principles.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Comprehensive AWS security posture assessment using AWS CLI and security best practices

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

IAM policy review, hardening, and least privilege implementation

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Build secure, scalable authentication and authorization systems using industry-standard patterns and modern best practices.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。