「db」の検索結果

Classify every destructive/gated action an agent body can attempt (git, filesystem, network, shell, github) into block/approve/allow tiers, and audit whether the pre-tool and post-tool governance backing that classification is real: blocked actions proven zero-side-effect by a negative fixture, every denial backed by a receipt and a transcript event, every block-tier denial paired with a safe alternative, and no unmanaged or same-UID body ever marked "contained." Use when building or reviewing Agent Harbor's C5 governance gate (destructive git blocker, approval request/result, denial receipts), gating a new tool surface before it can run destructive commands, or auditing whether an existing "destructive-action blocked" claim actually has evidence behind it. NOT for proving an existing sandbox boundary actually contains an adversary once an action is isolated (use sandboxed-adversarial-test-harness), deciding where in a DAG to place a human review node or designing the approval UX itself (use human-gate-designer), or designing the general work-receipt schema across an entire agent task (use agent-work-receipt-designer).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Manages agent isolation levels and resource boundaries. Specifies concrete controls and the evidence needed to assess their boundaries. Activate on 'isolation level', 'agent isolation', 'resource boundaries', 'sandboxing', 'agent containment'. NOT for permission validation (use dag-permission-validator) or runtime enforcement (use dag-scope-enforcer).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

OpenLineage, DataHub, Marquez for data lineage tracking and impact analysis. Activate on: data lineage, OpenLineage, DataHub, Marquez, impact analysis, data catalog, column lineage, data discovery. NOT for: data quality validation (use data-quality-guardian), dbt documentation (use dbt-analytics-engineer).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Diagnose when intuitive judgment, agent confidence, or expert routing can be trusted by classifying environment validity, feedback quality, and task-boundary fit. Use for confidence calibration, agent routing, expertise audits, and escalation design. NOT for deterministic implementation tasks, pure syntax debugging, or domains with explicit verifiable answers.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Diagnose when intuitive judgment, agent confidence, or expert routing can be trusted by classifying environment validity, feedback quality, and task-boundary fit. Use for confidence calibration, agent routing, expertise audits, and escalation design. NOT for deterministic implementation tasks, pure syntax debugging, or domains with explicit verifiable answers.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Cryptographic security for agentic systems — zero-trust agent networking, signed message envelopes (JWS/JWE), capability-based security (ocaps), Merkle tree audit trails, WASM sandboxing, and formal verification. Covers CLI dev tool security, mTLS between agents, permission boundaries (least privilege for AI agents), and supply chain security for skills/plugins. Activate on: "agent security", "zero trust agents", "secure agent communication", "capability-based security", "ocap", "signed messages between agents", "agent audit trail", "sandbox agent execution", "agent permissions", "mTLS agents", "cryptographic verification", "agent supply chain", "OWASP agentic", "prove agent did X", "tamper-proof agent logs". NOT for: application-level SAST scanning (use security-auditor), network firewall rules (use infrastructure), SOC2/HIPAA compliance (organizational), or prompt injection defense (use prompt-engineer).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Apache Airflow DAGs, operators, SLA monitoring, and workflow orchestration. Activate on: Airflow, DAG, operator, sensor, scheduler, task dependency, SLA, backfill, XCom. NOT for: dbt transformations (use dbt-analytics-engineer), streaming pipelines (use streaming-pipeline-architect).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Design RL simulation sandboxes, trajectory datasets, QLoRA/LoRA adaptation plans, eval harnesses, and rollback unhooks for agents learning specific coding behaviors beyond the base model. Use when building or reviewing tool-use training loops, offline trajectories, reward functions, self-improvement harnesses, or Port Daddy agent behavior curricula. NOT for generic ML tutorials, full model training operations, or production deployment without eval gates and safety unhooks.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Early-user discovery and feedback trials. Use when reviewing unfamiliar AI Matrx accounts, classifying owner relationships, recommending trial plans, or running approved outreach and reply checks.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Retiring a dead table by moving it to the deprecated schema and clearing every reference in both repos. Use when asked to deprecate or retire a table, when a table is no longer used, or to take a table offline without dropping it. NOT for relocating a still-used table (use db-move-table-schema).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Relocating a live, still-used table to another Postgres schema with every reference intact. Use when asked to move or rehome a table into a schema, or to pull a table out of public into a domain schema. NOT for retiring a table (use db-deprecate-table).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Bringing an existing table onto the platform base standard. Use when asked to canonicalize, retrofit, or 'Wave 3' a table, run apply_rls or an org backfill, retire a bespoke *_versions table, or move it onto platform comments/associations/permissions. NOT for a schema move (use db-move-table-schema).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

包括的なPerlセキュリティ — テイントモード、入力バリデーション、安全なプロセス実行、DBIパラメータ化クエリ、Webセキュリティ（XSS/SQLi/CSRF）、perlcriticセキュリティポリシー。

This skill should be used when the user wants to "stress-test a design", "challenge an idea", "red team a proposal", "get critical feedback on a design", "validate a design", "adversarial architecture review", "risk assessment", "設計を検証して", "反論をもらいたい", "設計を批判的にレビュー", "デビルズアドボケート", "ストレステスト", "弱点を指摘して", "穴を見つけて", "この設計で良いか", "リスク評価", "設計のアーキテクチャレビュー", or mentions structured adversarial review of a proposal or design. NOTE: Use this for validating PROPOSALS and DESIGNS through adversarial debate, NOT for generic code review, PR review, or normal review requests (use /codex:review or /codex:adversarial-review for those). Also NOT for investigating unknown bugs (use /agent-dialectics:strong-inference for that).

Evaluate design from a UX perspective, assessing visual hierarchy, information architecture, emotional resonance, cognitive load, and overall quality with quantitative scoring, persona-based testing, and actionable feedback. Use when the user asks to review, critique, evaluate, or give feedback on a design or component.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Expert guidance for reviewing academic manuscripts submitted to journals, particularly in political science, economics, and quantitative social sciences. Use when asked to review, critique, or provide feedback on academic papers, research designs, or empirical strategies. Emphasizes methodological rigor, causal identification strategies, and constructive feedback on research design.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Automate Abuselpdb tasks via Rube MCP (Composio). Always search tools first for current schemas.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Read analysis results. Use when user asks about maximum stress, extracting displacements, reaction forces, or exporting results. Post-processes ODB files.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

コードを実装・修正・リファクタリングするすべてのタスクで使うスキル。純粋関数を中心に設計し、副作用(DB、HTTP、ファイル、時刻、乱数、ログなど)を境界へ寄せ、データ変換、エラー表現、コレクション操作、可変状態の扱いを既存コードに合う形で整理する。ユーザーが明示的に指示しなくても、言語を問わず、コードを書き始める前に発火する。設定値やドキュメントだけの変更では不要。

Manage MongoDB Atlas Organizations as Azure ARM resources with unified billing through Azure Marketplace.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Azure Resource Manager SDK for Cosmos DB in .NET.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Build production-grade Azure Cosmos DB NoSQL services following clean code, security best practices, and TDD principles.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Presents a risk framework for every configurable security control in NemoClaw. Use when evaluating security posture, reviewing sandbox security defaults, or assessing control trade-offs. Trigger keywords - nemoclaw security best practices, sandbox security controls risk framework, nemoclaw credential storage, credentials.json, api key security, openclaw security controls, nemoclaw security boundary, prompt injection, tool access control.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Prefer native 1c-update-db. Обновление конфигурации базы данных 1С. Исп…

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。