「domain」の検索結果

Knowledge base from MIL-HDBK-516C (Airworthiness Certification Criteria). Use for DoD air-system airworthiness planning: tailoring a certification basis, systems engineering criteria, and domain clusters for structures, flight technology, propulsion/installation, avionics/electrical/E3/diagnostics, computer systems/software, and crew systems (including applicable UAS control-station elements). Qualitative guidance handbook — not raw contractual requirements. Does not replace service airworthiness authority policy, civil FAA certification rules as authorities, or detailed JSSG/MIL performance specs.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Knowledge base from NASA-STD-7009B (Standard for Models and Simulations) with implementation depth from NASA-HDBK-7009B. Use for M&S criticality and programmatics, development evidence and capability assessment, verification/validation domains, uncertainty and sensitivity, use-phase results assessment, risk-informed decision reporting, and handbook life-cycle products. Covers STD-7009B (2024-03-05) + HDBK-7009B (2026-02-03) synthesized notes only; does not replace program-specific TA direction, NPR 7150.2 software requirements detail, or full PRA methodology.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Knowledge base from NASA Risk Management Handbook (NASA/SP-2011-3422). Use for risk-informed decision making, continuous risk management, performance commitments, risk scenario diagrams, risk disposition types, risk burn-down schedules, objectives hierarchies, deliberation and alternative selection, risk driver identification, and RM planning for space and safety-critical programmes. Does not cover domain-specific PRA methods (fault trees, event trees) in procedural depth — see NASA PRA Procedures Guide for those.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Knowledge base from the FAA Human Factors Design Standard (HF-STD-001B, 2016) — the FAA's consolidated human-factors / human-systems-integration design criteria for systems it manages, operates, or maintains. Use for requirement-level design rules on: general human-factors design principles; automation and function allocation; designing equipment for maintenance; displays, controls, and visual indicators; alarms, audio, and voice communications; the computer-human interface (information presentation, coding, interaction styles, windows, dialogue); keyboards, input devices, and workstation/workplace ergonomics; system security, personnel safety, environment, anthropometry, and user documentation; plus intended-use and tailoring guidance. It is a quantified, source-attributed synthesis (heavily citing MIL-STD-1472G, MIL-HDBK-759C, DOD-HFDG-ATCCS, NUREG-0700, NASA-STD-3000, ANSI, OSHA, ISO 9241). Complements nasa-hsi as a parallel HSI tradition from the civil-aviation domain. Scope limits: it is design criteria, NOT an HSI lifecycle/process model (use nasa-hsi, nasa-npr-7123, or dau-se-guidebook for process); it does NOT reproduce the third-party standards it cites; it is FAA-acquisition-oriented (ATC, towers, TRACONs, airway facilities), not a general consumer-UX guide; and it is thin on modern touchscreen/mobile, web, and AI-driven interface patterns and on quantitative human-reliability analysis.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Knowledge base from the FAA System Safety Handbook (Dec 30, 2000). Use for system safety as a specialty within systems engineering: the five-step safety risk management process (mandated by FAA Order 8040.4 and the AMS), the severity-by-likelihood risk matrix and acceptance bands, the Safety Order of Precedence, system-description models (5M, SHEL(L)), the hazard-analysis activities (PHL/PHA/RHA/SSHA/SHA/O&SHA/HHA), integrated system hazard analysis, the analysis techniques (FTA, FMEA/FMECA, Fault Hazard, Common Cause, Sneak Circuit, Energy Trace), closed-loop hazard tracking (Safety Action Record), and the specialty domains the handbook covers — acquisition-lifecycle safety and contracting (OSA/CSA/SSPP/ISSPP), software safety (control-capability ranking, SHCM, DO-178B), test & evaluation safety, facilities safety, commercial launch safety (AST licensing, expected casualty, MPL/DAMP), system safety training, and Operational Risk Management (ORM) with human/organizational factors. Scope limits: this is a year-2000 FAA how-to; it predates the modern FAA/ICAO Safety Management System (SMS) and Just Culture regulatory frameworks, and many cited orders, advisory circulars, and launch-licensing rules have since been restructured. It is FAA/NAS-centric, leans on MIL-STD-882C, and does not define the SE life-cycle processes themselves (use nasa-npr-7123 / dau-se-guidebook) or reproduce third-party standard text (MIL-STD-882, DO-178B, ISO/IEC/IEEE).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

ドメイン定義書の新規作成・更新・レビューを支援する。AI駆動開発成果物フローのビジネス要求(D1)に位置する成果物で、本プロダクトを構成する業務領域(ドメイン)を網羅・分類する文書。問題空間(プロダクトが扱う業務領域)の整理であり、DDDにおけるBounded Context(解空間としての実装上の境界)とは別レイヤーで扱う。BRDの下流に位置する成果物。後続のプロダクト要求仕様書、ドメイン要求仕様書群(各ドメインごとに1つ)など、様々な成果物から参照される。BRD策定後、ドメイン整理の段階で呼び出す。

ドメイン共通要求仕様書の新規作成・更新・レビューを支援する。AI駆動開発成果物フローのビジネス要求(D1)に位置する成果物で、プロダクト要求仕様書(PRD)が方針・概念を扱うのに対し、本書は **3 ドメイン以上で横断的に効く具体的な要求(水準・方針・原則)** を集約する文書。**ドメイン要求仕様書群(個別)とは並列の関係にあり、横断的な水準・方針・原則は本書が単独で責務を持つ(=厳密な MECE。個別ドメインで言い換えない)。** 機能要求・非機能要求・UI/UX 方針・セキュリティ要求・データアクセス要求・法務/コンプライアンス要求 の各節を持つ。PRD・アクター一覧・ドメイン定義書 を上流とし、PRD策定後、ドメイン要求仕様書群(個別)の作成前に呼び出す。

ドメイン要求仕様書の新規作成・更新・レビューを支援する。AI駆動開発成果物フローのビジネス要求(D1)に位置する成果物で、プロダクト要求仕様書(PRD)を親文書とし、ドメイン定義書で定義された各ドメインごとに1冊作成される。**ドメイン共通要求仕様書(横断的な水準・方針・原則)とは並列の関係にあり、当該ドメイン固有の業務ルール・業務状態遷移・業務運用(イレギュラー対応)のみを扱う(共通要求と内容が重なる要求は本書に書かない=厳密な MECE)。** PRD・ドメイン定義書の策定後、ドメインごとの業務要求を具体化する段階で呼び出す。下流のユーザーストーリー一覧・ユースケース一覧・機能一覧(D2)・画面要件群(D2)・L1/L2シーケンス図の起点となる。

- Recover deleted, edited or historical web content using the Wayback Machine and its CDX API, archive.today, Common Crawl… Use when a page is deleted, changed or 404s, checking what a site used to say, finding old team or staff pages, prior pricing, removed posts, pre-redaction wording or old contact details, enumerating every archived URL for a domain, or preserving evidence before it disappears

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

- Start-here router and tradecraft baseline for any investigation into a person, company, domain, image or selector.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Tidy an agent's always-loaded memory index (MEMORY.md) on macOS or Linux: trim long lines, move closed entries to an archive, fold domains into hub files, restore dropped pins and add pointers for orphan memory files. Use when the index is over budget or has orphans. Triggers: /memory-tidy, /mt, tidy memory.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Sweep every external pointer to you (profiles, READMEs, bios, link pages) after a rename of a repo, org, domain, handle or account, and fix the dead ones. Use right after any public rename and once a quarter as hygiene. Triggers: /link-rot, /lr, check links, broken profile links, after the rename, link rot.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

- Build an entity-relationship link-analysis graph of an investigation — nodes, typed edges carrying source and confidence, aliases, and temporal validity — to expose shared infrastructure, bridging nodes and the real principal behind a [человек]. Use when an investigation has outgrown a list and needs a graph, or when asked how a set of people, companies and domains connect

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

- Find leaked or mentioned selectors circulating in pastes, leak forums, Telegram channels and dump markets, and judge whether a claimed leak is genuine or a recycled combolist. Use when checking whether a name, email, domain or credential is circulating, verifying a breach claim made against your organisation, or setting up ongoing leak monitoring

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Remote-sensing literature search, citation verification, sensor/platform/dataset query strategy, citation file management (.ris/.bib/.enw conversion), and reference management (BibTeX, related articles, DOI/arXiv lookup) across CrossRef, arXiv, Scopus, ScienceDirect, Semantic Scholar, and domain web sources. Use when the user needs coordinated multi-step literature workflows for remote sensing, Earth observation, geospatial AI, GIScience, photogrammetry, SAR, hyperspectral imaging, LiDAR, satellite missions, benchmark datasets, land-cover mapping, change detection, object detection, segmentation, retrieval, or multimodal remote-sensing foundation models. Also trigger on general literature-search needs during academic writing even without the word "Nature", such as searching for papers/literature, doing a literature review, verifying a citation, converting citation files, and Chinese phrasings like 文献检索、查文献、找文献、 文献综述检索、查论文、引文核对、参考文献管理、文献去重.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Ask real executives and domain experts a question through Instant Expert for a written answer or short call: practitioner knowledge, customer discovery. Free test mode; live sends need approval.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Programmatically clear WP Rocket cache from a third-party plugin / theme when data changes — the public rocket_clean_* function family (rocket_clean_post, rocket_clean_files, rocket_clean_term, rocket_clean_user, rocket_clean_home, rocket_clean_minify, rocket_clean_cache_busting, rocket_clean_domain, rocket_clean_cache_dir). Critical detection rule — WP Rocket is a PAID plugin not on Packagist; always feature-detect via function_exists('rocket_clean_post') OR defined('WP_ROCKET_VERSION') before calling, since not every site has it. Never raw-unlink the cache directory or call wp_cache_flush() expecting it to clear WP Rocket — wp_cache_flush is WP object cache, WP Rocket is FILE cache. The before_*_clean_* / after_*_clean_* action lifecycle hooks fire around every clean — useful for audit logging, monitoring, custom invalidation chains. Use when integrating cache invalidation in a companion plugin, WC integration, custom data plugin. Triggers on rocket_clean_, before_rocket_clean, af...

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Design and review native presenter classes in WordPress plugins without requiring better-data - converting DTOs or domain objects into REST arrays, admin table rows, JS config payloads, email variables, and public view models with allowlisted fields, context methods, redaction by default, locale/date/number formatting, no DTO mutation, and correct WordPress escaping boundaries. Use when adding FooPresenter, response mappers, admin-row arrays, wp_send_json payloads, rest_ensure_response data, wp_add_inline_script config, or when code returns raw DTOs, WP_Post, WC_Order, get_object_vars, json_encode, or unescaped HTML from controllers.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Master proven backend architecture patterns including Clean Architecture, Hexagonal Architecture, and Domain-Driven Design to build maintainable, testable, and scalable systems.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Generates complete, production-ready REST API endpoint specifications for any system or domain the user describes.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when asked to ship a SaaS MVP, audit application security, build an AI agent, run browser QA, or design a domain model with multiple skills and verified checkpoints.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Automate SEO research with Ahrefs -- analyze backlink profiles, research keywords, track domain metrics history, audit organic rankings, and perform batch URL analysis through the Composio Ahrefs inte

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Analyze live Ahrefs backlink, referring-domain, organic-keyword, and content data when an authorized Ahrefs connector is available. Use for Ahrefs-specific SEO evidence, not for estimates when no live connection exists.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when the user asks to "analyze backlinks", "analyze my off-site signals", or "track AI traffic / ChatGPT / Perplexity referrals"; profiles referring domains, anchor-text mix, toxic links, and disavow candidates (backlinks mode) or isolates AI-assistant referral sessions in GA4/GSC/logs and reports their trend, landing pages, and AI-vs-organic conversion (ai-referrals mode). Not for internal links — use site-structure-optimizer; not for keyword positions — use rank-tracker; not for multi-metric stakeholder reports — use performance-monitor. 外链分析/反向链接/AI流量/AI引荐/ChatGPT流量/AI转化

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。