Propose a new change with all artifacts generated in one step. Use when the user wants to quickly describe what they want to build and get a complete proposal with design, specs, and tasks ready for implementation.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
3,684 件 ・ 関連度順
概要と使いどころ
Propose a new change with all artifacts generated in one step. Use when the user wants to quickly describe what they want to build and get a complete proposal with design, specs, and tasks ready for implementation.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Fast-forward through OpenSpec artifact creation. Use when the user wants to quickly create all artifacts needed for implementation without stepping through each one individually.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Phase E of a WinForms-to-Avalonia migration: verify behavioral parity against Phase A contracts, record intentional differences, validate supported environments and packaging, and make evidence-based legacy cutover decisions. Use only for an explicit migration when comparing the legacy and Avalonia implementations or when the orchestrator routes here. Do not delete legacy without the cutover checklist and explicit authorization.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use only after explicit Codex `$superloopy:superloopy-research` or Claude Code `/superloopy:superloopy-research` invocation, a research task started with a leading `loopy` or `루피` (such as `loopy research`), or an active Superloopy loop explicitly routing a research deliverable here. Evidence-backed Superloopy research orchestration with automatic advisory usage targets, parallel read-only lanes, per-retrieval verdicts, graded and dated sources, empirical verification, a priced claim ledger, cited synthesis, and optional reports. Do not activate from research, investigate, look-up, summarize, deep-dive, report, or similar vocabulary alone, in any language; ordinary questions, debugging, and implementation context-gathering stay with their primary workflows.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Audit and improve website readiness for AI agents using the Cloudflare "Is It Agent Ready?" scanner (isitagentready.com). Covers scanning via API, interpreting results, generating implementation prompts, and fixing every check. Use when the user mentions "agent ready", "isitagentready", "AI agent scan", "agent readiness", "agent-ready score", "MCP server card", "agent skills index", "markdown for agents", "content signals", "web bot auth", "agent discovery", "RFC 9727", "RFC 8288", "RFC 9728", "SEP-1649", "WebMCP", "ARD", "ai-catalog", "x402", "UCP", "ACP", or wants to make a website discoverable and usable by AI agents.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Automated iterative agent runner for spec-based development in Kiro. Wraps kiro-cli in a self-correcting bash loop that picks up tasks from a Kiro spec, implements them one at a time, verifies against exit criteria, and accumulates corrections and codebase patterns across iterations. Use this skill when the user mentions "ralph loop", "ralph", "spec loop", "iterative spec runner", "run my spec tasks automatically", "kiro spec automation", "self-correcting agent loop", "implement spec tasks in a loop", "run kiro-cli in a loop", "automated task implementation", or wants to drive a Kiro spec to completion through repeated agent iterations. Also use when the user wants to set up, configure, troubleshoot, or understand the Ralph Loop workflow — including progress tracking, corrections, codebase patterns, timing logs, and the summary dashboard.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Spec CLI surface area before implementation - command tree, flags, exit codes, I/O contract. Use when designing or planning a CLI interface.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Prepare independent review of a complete Guardrails change before pushing or updating a PR, using the repository adversarial-review procedure.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Audit NFR evidence for performance, security, reliability, and maintainability. Use when implementation evidence exists and the user says "audit NFR evidence", "audit NFRs", or "evaluate non-functional requirements"
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
When the user wants to plan, design, or implement an A/B test or experiment. Also use when the user mentions "A/B test," "split test," "experiment," "test this change," "variant copy," "multivariate test," or "hypothesis." For tracking implementation, see data-and-funnel-analytics.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Turn a feature request into a minimal, file-level implementation plan before any code.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Before the first commit of a session, check that commit signing will work — the key is loaded and unlocked — and ask the operator to unlock it once, up front, instead of discovering it after a hundred unsigned commits. Never disables signing silently, never re-signs history without asking. Use at the start of implementation work in a repo that signs commits ("коммиты не подписаны", "ssh-keygen висит", "gpg failed to sign"). Loaded by senior-dev, devops.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Writes implementation plans before coding: phases, plan files, specs, definition of done. Use when planning a multi-step feature or breaking a large refactor into phases.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
AI agent architecture, graph and loop composition, protocol choice, evaluation, and observability. Use when scoping or reviewing systems before implementation.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Creates reusable vector-brain implementations: repo, docs, compliance. Use when building pgvector SQL, manifests, ingest scripts. Not for context design (dev-context-engineering).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Validate that a story file is implementation-ready. Checks for embedded GDD requirements, ADR references, engine notes, clear acceptance criteria, and no open design questions. Produces READY / NEEDS WORK / BLOCKED verdict with specific gaps. Use when user says 'is this story ready', 'can I start on this story', 'is story X ready to implement'.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Validates a UX spec, HUD design, or interaction pattern library for completeness, accessibility compliance, GDD alignment, and implementation readiness. Produces APPROVED / NEEDS REVISION / MAJOR REVISION NEEDED verdict with specific gaps.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
End-of-story completion review. Reads the story file, verifies each acceptance criterion against the implementation, checks for GDD/ADR deviations, prompts code review, updates story status to Complete, and surfaces the next ready story from the sprint.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Orchestrate audio team: audio-director + sound-designer + technical-artist + gameplay-programmer for full audio pipeline from direction to implementation.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Orchestrate the UI team through the full UX pipeline: from UX spec authoring through visual design, implementation, review, and polish. Integrates with /ux-design, /ux-review, and studio UX templates.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Generate design or architecture documents from existing implementation. Works backwards from code/prototypes to create missing planning docs.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Read a story file and implement it. Loads the full context (story, GDD requirement, ADR guidelines, control manifest), routes to the right programmer agent for the system and engine, implements the code and test, and confirms each acceptance criterion. The core implementation skill — run after /story-readiness, before /code-review and /story-done.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when optimizing, auditing, or preparing to ship web animations or rendering performance work: frame loops, scroll/viewport reveals, mount/unmount transitions, canvas/WebGL lifecycles, reduced motion, lazy rendering, and deferred off-screen work. Use for jank, per-frame allocations, forced reflows, render loops, animations that do not pause off-screen, content-visibility, requestIdleCallback, analyzing Chrome DevTools performance traces for animation or rendering issues, or choosing between browser-driven CSS/WAAPI, minimal JS, phase, and Motion/GSAP. Use when the user explicitly asks about phase APIs or behavior. Do not use during exploratory animation ideation, prototyping, visual iteration, or trying variants, even when the code already imports phase; wait until the user asks for performance guidance, an audit, production implementation, ship-readiness review, or about phase itself.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Plan mode only — write an actionable markdown plan under `plans/`, no execution. Bite-sized tasks, exact paths, complete code. Trigger when the user wants a plan instead of implementation.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。