「lean」の検索結果

Checks bootstrap initialization order, graceful shutdown, resource cleanup, signal handling, liveness/readiness probes. Returns findings.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Coordinates code quality: ln-511 metrics, ln-512 cleanup, inline agent review (Codex + Gemini), ln-513 regression, ln-514 log analysis. Returns quality_verdict + aggregated results.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Generates .NET Clean Architecture backend structure from entity definitions

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Applies safe auto-fixes for low-risk audit findings (unused imports, dead code, commented-out code). Confidence >=90% only. Creates single commit with summary.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when implementation is complete, all tests pass, and you need to decide how to integrate the work - guides completion of development work by presenting structured options for merge, PR, or cleanup

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Research and normalize MotionSites-style prompt directions, then output a clean motion prompt brief for implementation.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Knip dead code detection best practices for JavaScript and TypeScript projects. Use when configuring Knip, analyzing unused code, setting up CI integration, or cleaning up codebases. Triggers on knip.json, dead code, unused exports, unused dependencies, bundle optimization.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Score a repository's agentic legibility from repo-visible evidence only. Use when Codex needs to audit how easy a codebase is for coding agents to discover, bootstrap, validate, and navigate, especially for harness-engineering reviews, developer-experience audits, repo cleanup, or before/after comparisons after improving docs, tooling, or architectural constraints.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Review a diff against dynamic-neural-field-composer's own standards - backwards compatibility, Clean Code, tools/ helper reuse, C++20 idiom, hot-path performance, and test coverage. Use before opening a PR or when asked to review a branch or change.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Test-driven development with a red-green-clean loop, running mix credo on the whole project at the end of every vertical slice so standards violations are fixed in the slice that introduced them instead of piling into a refactor at the end. Use when user wants to build features or fix bugs using TDD, mentions "red-green-refactor", wants integration tests, or asks for test-first development.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

named fixture 실행 전 Yardlet 바이너리 신선도를 판정하고 clean, rebuild, retry로 복구한다

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Opinionated house conventions for NestJS backends — module boundaries and layering, provider wiring and injection scopes, guards/interceptors/pipes/filters, DTOs and validation, domain exceptions, config, and the Nest 11 / Express 5 behaviour that compiles cleanly and fails at runtime. Use whenever the code is NestJS (`@nestjs/*` in package.json, or `@Module`/`@Injectable`/`@Controller`/`@Cron` in the file), including when the question sounds like plain TypeScript, an OOP refactor, a code review, or an ops problem — the Nest-specific answer differs from the generic one. Typical asks: scaffolding a module, adding a controller, provider, or endpoint, wiring an enhancer, a boot-time DI or circular-import failure, a response leaking entity fields despite `@Exclude()`, a cron job firing on every replica, upgrading NestJS, or reviewing a Nest diff. Not for plain Express or Fastify, Angular, frontend, SQL, or CI.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Capture a solved, verified problem as a durable learning in `docs/solutions/` so the next agent or engineer does not repeat the mistake or redo the investigation, and keep the `CONCEPTS.md` glossary in step. Use after a fix, debugging session, or design decision whose reasoning is not readable from the final code, tests, or existing docs — "document this", "write up what we learned", "capture this learning", "add it to solutions", "that worked, save it for next time". Writes nothing for routine fixes the code already explains. For auditing or cleaning up existing learnings, use `learn-with-docs-refresh`.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Audit and maintain the learnings in `docs/solutions/` against the current codebase — fix drifted paths and links, merge overlapping docs, replace guidance the code no longer supports, delete obsolete docs, reconcile the `CONCEPTS.md` glossary, then report and commit. Also bootstraps `CONCEPTS.md` on request and, when asked, culls docs whose reasoning the code already explains. Use for "refresh the learnings", "audit docs/solutions", "are our solution docs still accurate", "clean up / prune the learnings", "create a CONCEPTS.md", or after a refactor, rename, migration, or dependency upgrade that likely invalidated documented solutions. Not for capturing a new learning — use `learn-with-docs`.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Inspired by the ClawIntelligentMemory project, this skill ensures Kim Assistant's environment stays clean and its memory stays dense.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Produce a UGC-style talking-head video ad end to end on the MaxFusion MCP — research the product with user-supplied competitor leads, tear down 5 competitor Meta ads and 5 organic TikToks, write a pain-driven script that sounds like a person talking (never like an ad), reverse-prompt a rights-clean photoreal actor from a user-supplied reference photo, generate two chained 10-second Gemini Omni clips that play as one continuous take, and ship a single seamless 9:16 MP4. Use whenever the user wants a UGC ad, a talking-head ad, an ad for an app or product, mentions Omni or Gemini Omni Flash, drops an actor photo and asks for a video ad, or says anything like "make me some UGC", "let's make ads for X", or "another variation". Built for Claude Code (local ffmpeg); degrades to Claude app with documented fallbacks.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Label unlabeled GitHub issues with priority and type labels. Use when triaging issues, cleaning up the backlog, or when asked to label/triage issues.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use ONLY when the user explicitly says: 'use the skill web-to-markdown ...' (or 'use a skill web-to-markdown ...'). Converts webpage URLs to clean Markdown by calling the local web2md CLI (Puppeteer + Readability), suitable for JS-rendered pages.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Set up Claude Code hooks to block dangerous git commands (push, reset --hard, clean, branch -D, etc.) before they execute. Use when user wants to prevent destructive git operations, add git safety hooks, or block git push/reset in Claude Code.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Help founders and leaders define company values and culture for a minimalist, lean business. Use when setting up company culture, preparing to hire, or codifying what the company stands for.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Reference guide for using Xpoz effectively. Load this skill whenever working with Xpoz MCP tools, SDKs, or CLI — it ensures correct query syntax, optimal field selection, proper pagination, and best practices for every Xpoz interaction. Covers authentication, query syntax (boolean operators, date filtering), response modes (fast/paging/CSV), field selection, tracking setup, and all platform tool references (Twitter, Instagram, Reddit, TikTok). Use for ANY Xpoz-related work, not just explicit best-practices questions.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Preventive hygiene audit of your own Claude Code configuration — memory files, project context (CLAUDE.md), rules, permissions, skills — a deterministic scan of sizes / broken links / stale entries / excessive permissions / junk + interpretation + targeted fixes by agreement. Keeps the setup from rotting before it breaks. Triggers — "check the system", "system health", "workflow hygiene", "what to clean up", "audit memory", "optimize the system".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Security launch audit for a public web app BEFORE you ship or hand it to a client — "vibe coders are getting sued", systematized. An executable pipeline: classify (static / full-stack / AI) → run sections (secrets+supply-chain, DB, auth, infra+headers, legal, LLM/injection) orchestrating deterministic tools + manual checks → GO/NO-GO report. Adapted from Prajwal Tomar's playbook, extended with prompt-injection / supply-chain / secret-history / dependency-CVE layers. NOT the same as pre-push (that = clean push; this = is the product itself safe to launch). Triggers — "security checklist for the site", "audit before launch", "is the site safe", "check before handing to client".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Prepare GEODE worktrees, Korean PRs, CI-gated merges, and guarded cleanup. Use for repository branch, commit, PR, merge, or release work; apply only the stages the user authorized.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。