2,446 件 ・ 関連度順
概要と使いどころ
Suggests that clinicians continue CSII in hospitalized patients with type 1 or type 2 diabetes when the institution has clear protocols for evaluating pump candidates and appropriate monitoring and safety procedures. Trigger phrases include: 'Admitted patient on pump, check hospital pump policy' and 'Inpatient with diabetes using pump, verify institutional guidelines'.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Assesses patient's ability to identify the receiver, sensor, and transmitter components of a real-time CGM system. Triggered by clinician requests to review CGM parts or verify patient can name sensor, transmitter, and receiver.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Workflow Phase 6 — TDD coordinator. Decides the scenario recipe and the implementation contract in main context, writes them to a state file, seeds per-worker tasks (scenario, implement, verify-tick, design-ui-tick) into the TaskList, and yields with harness_state continue so the harness invokes each worker as its own tick. No subagent delegation; no nested Skill calls.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Workflow Phase 7 — Mechanical cleanup pass over the branch diff, followed by a `code-structure` review pass and a `verify` re-stamp. Shadows the global `simplify` skill at project scope; the cleanup pass is performed inline rather than via Skill self-call.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Find and evaluate influencers for brand partnerships, verify authenticity, and track collaboration performance across Instagram, Facebook, YouTube, and TikTok.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Find and fix WCAG 2.2 accessibility issues. Two modes — report (sweep a codebase or page, produce a prioritized written report, no edits) and fix (audit→edit→verify loop on a target). Prefers direct-CDP live-DOM auditing; falls back to a browser-MCP composition or HTML-string audits.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Accessibility audit skill for scanning, fixing, and verifying WCAG 2.2 Level A and AA compliance across React, Next.js, Vue, Angular, Svelte, and plain HTML codebases. Use when auditing accessibility, fixing a11y violations, checking color contrast, generating compliance reports, or integrating accessibility checks into CI/CD pipelines.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use this skill when asked to "validate plugin", "check plugin structure", "verify plugin", "audit plugin", "is my plugin correct", "plugin issues", or when troubleshooting plugin problems.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Verify every claim from multiple independent angles -- code, docs, tests, git history. Use when you need high confidence that something is correct before acting on it.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Complete methodology for preventing AI hallucinations. Use when accuracy is critical and you need Claude to verify before claiming, cite before asserting, and admit uncertainty instead of guessing.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Verify that a requested bug fix changes observable behavior with a failing-before, passing-after reproduction and honest execution evidence.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use this skill when the user wants to inspect, search, export, verify, clean up, delete, restore, or purge local Codex sessions stored under ~/.codex.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when completing tasks, implementing major features, or before merging to verify work meets requirements
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when creating new skills, editing existing skills, or verifying skills work before deployment
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Tests in real browsers. Use when building or debugging anything that runs in a browser. Use when you need to inspect the DOM, capture console errors, analyze network requests, profile performance, or verify visual output with real runtime data via Chrome DevTools MCP.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Subjects every non-trivial decision to a fresh-context adversarial review before it stands. Use when correctness matters more than speed, when working in unfamiliar code, when stakes are high (production, security-sensitive logic, irreversible operations), or any time a confident output would be cheaper to verify now than to debug later.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Set up and end-to-end test the peoplereadme CLI (init, validate, schema changes). Use when verifying changes to src/peoplereadme/, schemas/persona.schema.json, or persona package scaffolding.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Deep enrichment for community-sourced enterprise PROSPECTS (the 🎯 Prospective enterprise customers subsection). For each prospect, resolve their LinkedIn from their GitHub self-linked accounts FIRST (search only if none is self-linked), verify the employer matches, capture their full name, then list the company website + company size (ARR / latest funding round / employee count). Runs as a general-purpose subagent (many web searches) so the orchestrator's context stays small. Invoked by weekly-report (enterprise section) and the enterprise skill.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Search the web and open-source code for library usage, API syntax, and documentation via Exa. Use this whenever verifying an API signature, looking up how a library is used, checking a config file format, or resolving an error from a third-party dependency -- including when you think you already know the answer, since library APIs drift. Also use for questions documentation cannot answer: release timing, breaking changes, "is X still maintained", licensing, security advisories, and ecosystem comparisons.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when completing tasks, implementing major features, or before merging to verify work meets requirements
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Move issues and external PRs through a state machine of triage roles — categorise, verify, grill if needed, and write agent-ready briefs.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Perform a non-destructive post-implementation verification gate validating the implementation against spec.md, plan.md, tasks.md, and constitution.md.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Diagnose GitHub bug reports in openai/codex. Use when given a GitHub issue URL from openai/codex and asked to decide next steps such as verifying against the repo, requesting more info, or explaining why it is not a bug; follow any additional user-provided instructions.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Systematic testing methodology for exhaustive branch coverage, edge case identification, and production bug prevention. Use when PR review reveals incomplete test coverage, when tests pass but users report bugs, when code changes break existing features, when verifying all branches and edge cases before merge, when analyzing "it works on my machine" issues, when planning test strategy for new features, or when debugging flaky tests and race conditions.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。