4,820 件 ・ 関連度順
概要と使いどころ
poteto's agent style for concise, detailed responses, deliberate subagents, unslopped prose, simple code, and verified work. Use for poteto, /poteto-mode, or requests to work in this style.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Interrogate the brief before a line is built — ask only the questions whose answers change the work, and put every unasked decision on the record as a stated assumption.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Write or review UI copy — buttons, errors, empty states, microcopy, notifications, labels — using the voice & tone system (clear, concise, useful, human, honest) with the what→why→how error formula and inclusive-language rules. Use when the user needs interface copy, error messages, empty-state text, or a copy review.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
PaddleOCR document parsing skill based on PaddleOCR-VL-1.5. Provides SOTA-level document understanding with ultra-high precision recognition and parsing. Use when user needs to parse, extract, or understand document content.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Guide users through a structured workflow for co-authoring documentation. Use when user wants to write documentation, proposals, technical specs, decision docs, PRDs, RFCs, or similar structured content. This workflow helps users efficiently transfer context, refine content through iteration, and verify the doc works for readers. Trigger when user mentions writing docs, creating proposals, drafting specs, or similar documentation tasks.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Draft cold emails, warm intro blurbs, follow-ups, update emails, and investor communications for fundraising. Use when the user wants outreach to angels, VCs, strategic investors, or accelerators and needs concise, personalized, investor-facing messaging.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Review a change to the ffmpeg-skill repository for the failures its own contract makes possible — a claim in a result document that is true at one layer and false at the layer a caller reads, a new flag that reaches the code but not the contract/docs/demo surfaces, a "bug" that docs/design-decisions.md already decided with a pinning test, a fix with no regression test, a new runtime dependency or a raw ffmpeg shell call that breaks the scope boundary, a SKILL.md line added without one trimmed, a review that re-derives findings from a summary instead of the tree at the reviewed commit. Use when asked to review a PR or diff in this repository, when authoring code here and needing a pre-commit check, or when triaging an external review or audit report about this codebase.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Generate radial plots (Radial Plot/Galbraith Plot) for heterogeneity analysis. Visually assess heterogeneity across studies by displaying the relationship between standardized effect sizes and precision. Input: Meta-analysis data in CSV format; Output: Radial plot PNG and data CSV.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Screens research papers based on title/abstract and inclusion criteria, providing a structured Yes/No/Maybe decision. Use when you need to filter literature for meta-analysis or systematic reviews.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Polish reviewer-response letters by softening defensive language, preserving factual meaning, and keeping responses professional, concise, and publication-appropriate.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Creates academic-poster writing packages for LaTeX using beamerposter, tikzposter, or baposter. Use when a user needs poster-ready section copy, figure plans, captions, and package-specific layout decisions for conference or thesis posters.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Generates submission-ready Elsevier/SCI Highlights from manuscript text or extracted PDF/DOCX/TXT content. Use when a user needs 3-5 concise, evidence-grounded highlight bullets for a research paper, review, meta-analysis, case report, or bioinformatics manuscript.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Builds clear, executable, and auditable inclusion and exclusion criteria for biomedical and clinical research protocols. Always use this skill when a user needs to translate a target population into operational screening rules tied to chart fields, time windows, tests, procedures, prior therapies, exclusions, and reviewable edge cases. Focus on protocol-stage precision, ambiguity reduction, auditability, and screening reproducibility rather than generic study design advice.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Designs primary, secondary, and exploratory endpoints for biomedical and clinical research protocols. Always use this skill when a user needs to translate study aims into operational endpoint definitions with event rules, assessment timing, composite logic, interpretability, and protocol-stage auditability. Focus on endpoint precision, feasibility, clinical meaning, ambiguity reduction, and implementation readiness rather than generic study design advice.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Design a structured case-control study framework with explicit source population logic, control selection rules, matching decisions, exposure measurement planning, and bias-control checkpoints.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Transform lengthy academic papers into concise, structured 250-word abstracts.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Precision editing tool that reduces abstract word count through intelligent compression techniques, maintaining scientific rigor while meeting strict journal and conference requirements.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when estimating immune infiltration from bulk RNA-seq expression matrices with ssGSEA/GSVA, comparing case versus control groups, and generating downstream immune-score visualizations. NOT for single-cell RNA-seq, absolute cell proportion estimation, or clinical decision making.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Evidence-based medical knowledge and research mentor grounded in the Bian Que tradition. Covers clinical reasoning, diagnostic thinking (望闻问切), pharmacology, pathology, differential diagnosis, medical literature appraisal, and the philosophy of early intervention. Trigger whenever users ask about medicine, clinical science, drugs, disease mechanisms, diagnosis, lab interpretation, treatment comparison, or health sciences. Even without explicit research framing, trigger on any topic touching disease, therapeutics, or clinical decision-making. Part of the AIPOCH Medical Research Skill Hub.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Detects overlooked, underrepresented, weakly resolved, or poorly validated populations and subgroups within a biomedical research area so users can identify more precise and meaningful study populations. Always use this skill when the real question is not just what is under-studied, but which populations, strata, or subgroups are missing, thinly represented, superficially analyzed, pooled without resolution, or insufficiently validated in the current evidence base. Focus on meaningful subgroup gaps rather than generic calls for diversity.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
A medical-research-native literature reading skill for users with clinical, bioinformatics, translational, and basic experimental backgrounds. Use this skill whenever a user wants to read, analyze, critique, or interpret a medical or scientific paper — whether they provide a PDF, abstract, DOI, PMID, or just a title. Triggers include requests like \"analyze this paper\", \"critique this study\", \"is this a strong paper?\", \"give me similar studies\", \"prepare me for journal club\", \"help me understand this bioinformatics paper\", \"what are the weaknesses here?\", or \"turn this into a mind map\". Also activate for any downstream deliverables such as journal club kits, comparison tables, PI decision briefs, replication starters, or follow-up experiment designs. Do NOT treat as a generic summarizer — this skill performs structured evidence-type classification, track-specific critical appraisal, interpretation-boundary judgment, and research-grade follow-up generation.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Assesses whether a medical research topic is worth starting now by separating true novelty from pseudo-novelty, auditing real feasibility under stated resource constraints, and forcing a concrete start / narrow / redesign / stop decision. Always require explicit assumptions and never fabricate references, datasets, resource availability, precedent studies, or publication claims.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when assessing how well a survival model's predicted probabilities agree with observed outcomes by fitting a Cox model and generating bootstrap calibration curves at one or more prediction horizons from a clinical CSV file. NOT for: nomogram construction, univariate Cox screening, ROC analysis, or decision-curve analysis.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when constructing a prognosis nomogram from survival-related clinical predictors, exporting the nomogram bundle and C-index table, and optionally rendering the final nomogram PDF. NOT for: univariate/multivariable Cox feature screening, calibration curves, ROC analysis, decision-curve analysis, or non-survival outcomes.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。