「commit」の検索結果

Use when the user asks to "build our social posting calendar", "set weekly slots and queue depth per channel", or "plan the evergreen recycle rotation"; produces the always-on brand calendar — pillar allocation with hero/hub/help balance and give:ask targets (all labeled Estimated starting heuristics to calibrate against own analytics, never scored rules), per-channel recurring slots with queue depth, a batching workflow, an evergreen recycle cycle with freshness re-checks, deliberate open slots for realtime/trend moments fed by trend-spotter go/skip verdicts, and first-comment/publish-order ops — cadence commitments filed to the channel registry, and no batch ships to the queue without a SHIP verdict from social-quality-auditor pre-publish mode. Not for repurposing an existing asset or the paid-amplification calendar — use content-amplifier. 社媒排期/内容日历/栏目配比/常青循环复用

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when the user asks to "design an email A/B test", "set up a multivariate subject/CTA test", "run a send-time test", "build a hold-out group", or "is this email result statistically and practically material?"; produces a falsifiable hypothesis, one-variable-per-cell matrix, sample-size/MDE/duration/power plan, and an effect/uncertainty read from own ESP data. Applies only a precommitted owner-approved action rule; the helper never chooses a business action. Not for EQS/vetoes or writing the email. 邮件AB测试设计/多变量测试/发送时间测试/留出组/显著性判定

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when the user asks to "build our social crisis protocol", "mentions are exploding — what do we do first", or "when do we pause the posting queue"; produces a 1-5 severity ladder with tunable Estimated trigger thresholds (mention-velocity multiples vs the 7-day listening baseline, sentiment flip, journalist/regulator contact, employee-conduct class), the first-mechanical-action rule — pause ALL scheduled posts AND paid amplification, with dated state markers dropped to the channels proposal protocol and reconciled post-incident — a pre-approved holding-statement library with committed update cadences, when-NOT-to-post rules, a spokesperson/approval matrix, and a post-crisis retro template; re-runs the social-quality-auditor pre-publish gate before un-pausing the queue. Not for email deliverability incidents (blocklist, spam-rate spikes) — use deliverability-qa; inside a launch window launch-day-conductor owns incident handling. 社媒危机预案/暂停队列/声明库/发言人矩阵

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when the user asks to "design an A/B test", "set up a creative/landing test", "run an incrementality test", or "is this result statistically and practically material?"; produces a hypothesis, variant matrix, sample-size/duration/power plan, and a documented effect/uncertainty read from own exported results. It applies only a precommitted owner-approved action rule; the statistical helper never chooses a business action. Not for producing variants — use ad-creative-builder; not for reading back one shipped change — use paid-measurement-loop. 广告AB测试设计/实验设计/显著性判定/增效测试

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Partner, channel, and ecosystem marketing for B2B SaaS. Use this skill for co-marketing with technology alliances and channel partners, integration launches, joint campaigns and content, partner tiering and enablement, and cloud-marketplace go-to-market (AWS, Azure, GCP listings, private offers, committed-spend drawdown). Also triggers on: partner marketing, co-marketing, channel, reseller, alliance, ecosystem, integration launch, marketplace listing, AWS Marketplace, private offer, MDF, joint webinar, co-branded.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Stage files, run pre-commit, fix failures, loop until clean

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Ship current branch — CI, SonarCloud, code review, security review, fix all issues, merge. Assumes code is already committed and pushed.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Apply when facing a novel UI interaction or architectural decision with no precedent in the codebase. Build 2-3 competing prototypes and compare side by side before committing.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Keep a reviewable decision trail for long-running or unattended work: a TSV log with one row per decision (what, why, evidence, result). Local by default; commit it when a reviewer needs the trail to trust the result. Use for /show-me-your-work, autonomous or multi-phase runs, or work a human reviews after stepping away.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Layered technical-writing standard: Diátaxis structure, Google developer style sentences, STE instruction rules, Global English syntax. Use for /technical-writing or when writing or reviewing docs, RFCs, readmes, PR descriptions, or commit messages.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Apply to multi-step work (sweeps, migrations, runs of similar edits) and to how you stack commits and PRs. Break work into small units that each end in a verifiable state, check each before the next, and order delivery so the sequence proves itself to a reviewer.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Troubleshoot and inspect a BGW320 home network through this repo's TypeScript/Bun gateway CLI. Use when working on read-only router status checks, device inventory, broadband/fiber/firewall/Wi-Fi diagnostics, JSON capture, sweep/audit coverage, fixture capture, dry-run router mutations, guarded commits, and safe handling of secrets or device information.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Trace BIRD routing-daemon behavior through the actual C source tree. Use for implementation questions, suspected upstream bugs, parser/keyword origins, filter instructions, protocol state machines, route attributes, birdc commands, stack traces, or BIRD 2 versus BIRD 3 source comparisons. Prefer a local checkout or exact upstream tag/commit and cite concrete files, functions, and revisions. Route config linting to bird-agent and active incidents to bird-troubleshooting.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Review the changes since a fixed point (commit, branch, tag, or merge-base) along two axes: Standards (does the code follow this repo's documented coding standards?) and Spec (does the code match what the originating issue/spec asked for?). Runs both reviews in parallel sub-agents and reports them side by side. Use when the user wants to review a branch, a PR, work-in-progress changes, or asks to "review since X".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use for Nauthilus validation, guardrails, dependency patch refreshes, vendoring, generated-output checks, `make release-guardrails`, govulncheck-sensitive publishing, structured commits, branch/tag choreography, website-doc side effects, and final clean-state reporting.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Framework 저장소의 목적별 커밋 작성 시 한국어 제목과 변경 종류에 맞는 타입 적용.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Framework 저장소의 Draft PR 생성, 검증 결과와 체크리스트 갱신, merge commit 작성 시 공통 규칙 적용.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Senior Kotlin specialist code review — framework-agnostic. Use whenever the user asks to review, audit, critique, or get feedback on Kotlin code, a file, a class, a function, a module, a diff, a branch, a commit, or a pull request. Judges Kotlin language idioms, logic correctness, architecture and layering, concurrency (coroutines, Flow, structured concurrency, cancellation, race conditions), null safety, exception safety, testability, performance, and security. Detects force-unwraps, unchecked casts, GlobalScope, leaked mutability, broken structured concurrency, hidden side effects, weak abstractions, untestable seams, allocation hot spots, weak crypto, input-validation gaps, and PII logging. Outputs prioritized findings with file:line anchors and minimal-diff fixes. No assumptions about DI framework, UI framework, or build system.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Set up and optimize repositories for AI coding agents. Creates minimal AGENTS.md, CLAUDE.md symlink, docs/REQUIREMENTS.md, docs/BUSINESS-RULES.md, feedback loops, and deterministic enforcement (Claude Code hooks, OpenCode plugins). Use when user wants to make a repo AI-friendly, set up AGENTS.md/CLAUDE.md, document requirements/business rules for AI, add pre-commit hooks for AI workflows, or optimize codebase structure for coding agents.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Scheduled health sweep that closes the factory loop - reads CI failures, recent commits, dependency and security advisories, and live queue labels, then files issues and writes an immutable run record. Use for the nightly or weekly monitor routine.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Structured build workflow: branch, delegate to coding agent, test, screenshot, and commit. Triggers on: "$devprocess", "build this properly", "use the coding agent workflow", or any feature/refactor/infrastructure change that is too large for a direct edit. NOT for: one-line fixes, doc edits, prompt tweaks, or simple config changes — do those directly.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Autonomous build-ship-verify loop that ends with code committed, deployed, and confirmed live. Triggers on: "$ownership", "execute X with ownership", "build this overnight", or any request for an autonomous product loop with no human checkpoints until production is verified. NOT for: one-off tasks, quick fixes, or supervised dev work (use devprocess for those).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Pre-commit review: security scan, quality gates, auto-fix.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

GitHub PR lifecycle: branch, commit, open, CI, merge.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。