「each」の検索結果

When the user wants to plan cold start, get first users, or launch a new product with zero traction. Also use when the user mentions "cold start," "cold start problem," "first users," "seed users," "finding users," "finding early users," "Fiverr Upwork," "comment outreach," "Twitter search users," "product launch strategy," "0 to 1 growth," "early-stage acquisition," "launch channels," "get first customers," "Product Hunt launch," "AppSumo," "LTD," "indie hacker," "bootstrapping," or "solo founder." For directory listing copy and submissions, use directory-submission. For Product Hunt day-of execution, use product-hunt-launch. For GTM motion design, use gtm-strategy.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

When the user wants to plan, implement, or optimize influencer marketing strategy. Also use when the user mentions "influencer marketing," "KOL," "creator partnership," "brand ambassador," "sponsored content," "influencer campaign," "micro-influencer," "influencer outreach," "creator collaboration," or "influencer deal." For creator programs, use creator-program.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when building or fixing game UI in Godot 4.7: main menu, settings screen, HUD (health bar, ammo, minimap frame), Control layout, containers, anchors, themes in code, 'UI scales wrong on phones', 'text too small on 4K', notch or safe area, stretch mode and aspect, gamepad or keyboard menu navigation, focus lost, input rebinding screen, localization (CSV, PO, tr_n plurals, Arabic RTL, CJK fonts, pseudolocalization), screen reader accessibility, UI scale slider, or clicks not reaching the game.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when building or debugging Geometry Nodes, headless or live: procedural modeling, scattering objects on a surface, arrays along a curve, repeat or for-each loops, simulation zones, 5.2 physics (cloth, colliders, forces, effectors), closures, bundles, matrices, node-group assets with gizmos. Also when a GN script links nothing, shows red links, ignores modifier inputs, loses instances in a bounding box, or a simulation resets or jumps.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Create the release notes and upgrade guide for a mariadb-operator release. Given the release PR whose body lists every PR included in the release, it gathers each PR, groups the changes by relevance, and produces `docs/releases/RELEASE_<version>_HEADER.md.gotmpl` and `docs/releases/UPGRADE_<version>.md` in the format the previous releases use, then opens a PR targeting `release-<version>`. If no release PR is provided it asks for the new version and infers the changes from git history since the last tag. Use whenever the user wants release notes, an upgrade/update guide, or docs for a new mariadb-operator version — "create the release notes for 26.10.0", "write the upgrade guide", "document this release", "prepare the release PR docs" — even if they don't mention a release PR.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Creates an ALM (Application Lifecycle Management) plan for deploying a Power Pages site across environments. Gathers your promotion strategy, target environments, and approval requirements upfront, then generates a visual HTML plan document for your review and approval. **plan-alm does not deploy anything itself** — it is a planner. After you approve the plan, run the individual ALM skills (setup-solution, setup-pipeline, deploy-pipeline, or export-solution/import-solution); each detects the approved plan and executes the right step in order, keeping the plan updated as it runs. Use when asked to: "plan my alm", "set up alm", "create deployment plan", "plan my deployments", "help me deploy to multiple environments", "set up promotion strategy", "create cicd plan", "plan site promotion", "help me go to production", "set up pipeline for my site".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Audits existing table permissions on a Power Pages site by analyzing them against site code and Dataverse metadata, then GRADES the configuration with deterministic 1–5 scores across 3 security/usability/correctness categories (9 dimensions). Detection is anchored by a recurring-issue catalog so findings and severities stay consistent run-to-run. Generates an HTML report with an at-a-glance verdict and per-category scores in the Overview plus a single list of **major/minor** issues (each major issue labelled permissions-only or upstream-caused with a short justification), and suggested fixes. Use when the user wants to review, verify, check, score, or grade table permissions for security issues.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when the user wants to seed Dataverse tables with realistic sample records so a freshly-scaffolded code app shows real-looking data on first launch. Generates contextually appropriate rows from each table's schema and inserts them in dependency order. Mirrors microsoft/power-platform-skills/power-pages/add-sample-data, adapted for mobile apps.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when the user has finished building a mobile app, started Metro with `npm run dev`, and wants the running app monitored for runtime errors AND silent failures (empty lists, blank screens, swallowed network errors) and fixed autonomously. Accepts a free-text symptom (e.g., `/debug-app "todos not appearing on home screen"`) to drive persisted-log diagnostics — injects temporary console.log statements at data-path boundaries, reads the sanitized `.powernative/metro-logs/` log, and cleans up logs after the root cause is fixed. Supports port/platform filtering, configurable clean-cycle and timeout limits, and watch-only `--no-fix` mode. Otherwise polls with a durable byte cursor, fixes inline or routes appropriately, verifies each fix from new output, and exits after the configured clean checks (default 3). Foreground loop — blocks the conversation while running. Run only after the app is loaded.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Designing in-product tours, tooltips, and contextual help that teach product capabilities without becoming friction. Trigger logic, tour architecture, contextual placement, completion tracking. Honest about tooltip-spam (visual noise that users develop blindness to), one-and-done (help invisible at the moment of need), and contextual-when-needed (surfaces help at the moment friction occurs) patterns. Triggers on product tour, in-product tooltip, contextual help, walkthrough, feature tour, hint system, in-app guidance, tour platform. Also triggers when feature adoption is low, when users miss key product capabilities, or when an in-product help system is being scoped for the first time.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Designing forms with multiple steps, progress indicators, conditional logic, and save-and-resume mechanics. The discipline of breaking complex data collection into stages that respect cognitive load while maintaining completion intent. Honest about kitchen-sink-single-page (overwhelms before the user starts), progress-theater (steps without genuine staging), and genuinely-staged (each step earns its own page) patterns. Triggers on multi-step form, multi-page form, form wizard, signup wizard, lead form, application form, intake form, configurator, onboarding form. Also triggers when a long form is converting poorly, when an audience is dropping off mid-form, or when a multi-step form is being scoped for the first time.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Pre-publish QA framework for content. Brief adherence, voice consistency, fact accuracy, structure and clarity, AI-content audit, SEO and AEO compliance, internal linking and schema validation, QA at scale via sampling, the QA workflow, and the discipline that distinguishes catch-problems QA from checkbox QA. Triggers on editorial QA, content review, pre-publish review, content audit, content QA process, AI-content audit, hallucination check, content sampling, programmatic QA, voice consistency check, brief adherence check. Also triggers when a content team is shipping sloppy work, when AI-co-authored content is reaching publish unaudited, when a QA process burns reviewers out, or when a programmatic SEO set needs sampling discipline. On a voice consistency check, this skill owns checking a draft against an existing voice system at the publish gate; use `brand-voice` when the voice system itself needs defining or documenting.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Content distribution as a discipline. Owned channels (newsletter, blog, social), earned channels (PR, syndication, mentions), paid channels (boosted posts, syndication networks), and the channel-fit decisions that distinguish strategic distribution from spam-everywhere. Audience-channel matching, content-channel matching, distribution cadence. Triggers on content distribution, channel strategy for content, owned earned paid channels, content amplification, content promotion, audience-channel matching, content-channel matching, distribution cadence, syndication strategy, organic distribution. Also triggers when content is publishing but reach is low, when the team is distributing on every channel without strategy, or when the content program needs a distribution discipline rather than just publication.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Adversarial "perfection" review — hold a change to an *ideal* bar, not just a correct one, assuming eternal time, unlimited energy, and no ship pressure. Use when the user asks to review "for perfection", to make a defect "impossible to express", or to hunt where a defect "relocates" across review rounds. Grounds every claim in the diff, fans out adversarial verifiers via Workflow, and reports residual surfaces with a structural fix for each. ONLY invoke when the user explicitly asks for a perfection / ideal-bar review.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Run a structural-review debate between two lenses — lowy (volatility-based decomposition) and hickey (structural simplicity) — on the current diff. Each reviews independently, then they cross-examine every finding until they agree per-finding, and the agreed fixes are applied. Use when the user types `/lens-debate`, or asks to "have lowy and hickey review this", "run the lens debate", "debate this diff structurally", or "argue the structure of this PR until the lenses agree".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

How a downstream app consumes the shared @kolu/surface stack (@kolu/surface · surface-app · surface-nix-host · surface-mcp) — declaring a typed reactive surface, serving it, consuming it (SolidJS hooks or a CLI), and mirroring a remote surface over ssh. Grounded in the real consumers: kolu, pulam-web, drishti, odu, and the TUIs. Load when wiring a surface server/client/mirror, or reaching for getHostSession / a link / the `.use()` hooks. CHANGING the framework is gated separately — `.claude/rules/surface.md` (a paired, CI-green drishti PR pinned to final kolu HEAD).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Write engaging PR titles and descriptions for any forge (GitHub today; Bitbucket planned). Use when creating or updating PRs. Leads with narrative paragraphs and reaches for lists, tables, and diagrams when content is genuinely structured.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Run /be's review gauntlet SERIALLY — /lens-debate (lowy ⇄ hickey), then /codex-debate, then /simplify, then code-police, each editing and committing on the live branch in turn. Use from /be §4, or when the user asks to "run the review gauntlet". Requires Claude Code's Skill tool.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Run an automated codex⇄Claude debate to consensus — no round cap, no deadlock exit. Two explicit subcommands. `review` (also the bare/back-compat default) — codex (reviewer) critiques the current diff and a Claude subagent (author) fixes/disputes, looping until they agree. `answer` — Claude and codex each answer a freeform prompt in parallel, then cross-check until they agree, and a unified answer is returned. Use when the user types `/codex-debate`, asks to "have codex review this", "run the codex debate", "review this PR with codex", "argue this with codex until you agree", or passes a question to "have Claude and codex debate/answer until they agree".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Modern, interactive alternative to `/do` — clarify intent up front, then take a task end-to-end with a serial AI review gauntlet (lens debate (lowy ⇄ hickey) → codex debate → simplify → code-police, each editing the branch in turn) → CI → evidence. ONLY invoke when the user explicitly types `/be` or `$be`; never auto-select from a natural-language request.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Iteratively study and apply elegant coding patterns. Each iteration - understand the code, research what simple and elegant code looks like, apply learnings, verify with CI. Use as a standalone refactoring pass or when the user asks to make code more elegant, simple, or idiomatic.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Capture a hard-won "golden path" from the current session as a reusable Agent Skill, so future sessions start already knowing it. Use it (1) right after non-trivial debugging, after working out a multi-step operational workflow, or after rediscovering project facts you didn't know up front — e.g. how to reach the dev/prod database, where credentials and env vars live, how to deploy, run migrations, or verify a change live; and (2) whenever the user says "remember this", "save this as a skill", "make a skill for this", "don't make me re-explain this next time", or otherwise wants a workflow preserved across sessions. Proactively recognize the moment even when unprompted: if a task took several attempts before it worked, used non-obvious tooling, or is likely to recur, harvest it without asking first. Delegates to a subagent when your tool supports one, or works inline, to extract the proven procedure into a new project-local or global skill.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Saudi Arabia Governance, Risk & Compliance advisor — a compliance router that first determines WHICH Saudi regulations apply (NCA ECC-2:2024, Saudi PDPL, NCA Cloud Cybersecurity Controls, SAMA Cyber Security Framework, CST cloud framework, DCC/OTCC/TCC), then guides framework-specific compliance. Use for any Saudi Arabia / KSA compliance question: NCA Essential Cybersecurity Controls, SDAIA and the Personal Data Protection Law (نظام حماية البيانات الشخصية), PDPL breach notification and data transfers, SAMA compliance for banks/insurers/fintechs, cloud data residency in the Kingdom, CST CSP registration, government/CNI cybersecurity obligations, market-entry compliance ("expanding to Saudi Arabia"), gap assessments, and mapping Saudi requirements to ISO 27001 / NIST CSF / SOC 2. Trigger for any KSA, Riyadh, Vision 2030 compliance, NCA, SDAIA, SAMA, or Saudi data protection question even if no framework is named.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Expert GDPR compliance assistant covering all four core workflows: (1) auditing code and systems for GDPR violations, (2) drafting GDPR-compliant documents such as privacy policies, Data Processing Agreements (DPAs), and consent notices, (3) answering GDPR compliance questions with authoritative article citations, and (4) reviewing data flows and PII handling practices. Use this skill whenever the user mentions GDPR, data protection, privacy compliance, lawful basis, data subject rights, DPA, privacy notices, consent management, data breaches, DPIAs, controller/ processor relationships, cross-border data transfers, or any EU/UK data privacy topic. Also trigger for questions like "is this GDPR compliant?", "how do I handle personal data?", "what does a privacy policy need?", or any request involving PII, personal data, or data retention in a regulatory context.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。