Orchestrate iterative visual style searches with branch prompts, decision graphs, feedback loops, and final direction selection.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
3,329 件 ・ 関連度順
概要と使いどころ
Orchestrate iterative visual style searches with branch prompts, decision graphs, feedback loops, and final direction selection.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Генерирует структурированный PRD (Product Requirements Document) с шаблонами под тип продукта (B2C / B2B / внутренний инструмент / платформа) — фон, цели, детальный дизайн фич, acceptance criteria в Given-When-Then, аналитика и 10-пунктовый чеклист качества. User-invoked only — do NOT auto-trigger. Triggers on /pm-prd, "сделай PRD", "напиши PRD", "продуктовые требования", "make a PRD", "write a PRD", "draft requirements doc".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when creating or refactoring CLAUDE.md files - enforces best practices for size, structure, and content organization
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when optimizing a bundle-plugin or single skill — improving descriptions, reducing tokens, fixing audit findings, restructuring workflows, adding skills to fill gaps, or iterating on user feedback
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Expert guidance for writing secure, reliable, and performant Claude Code hooks - validates design decisions, enforces best practices, and prevents common pitfalls. Use when creating, reviewing, or debugging Claude Code hooks.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Bun shell scripting with Bun.$, Bun.spawn, subprocess management. Use for shell commands, template literals, or command execution.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Inspect an unfamiliar repository, turn a focused Markdown behavior scenario into a deterministic test in the repository's native test stack, run it, and preserve traceability between intent and code. Use when asked to add scenario tests, compile acceptance criteria or Given/When/Then Markdown into executable tests, reproduce a user-visible regression, or convert a narrow workflow specification into stable web, API, CLI, desktop, or mobile interaction coverage. Do not use for broad exploratory journeys or agent-judged smoke tests.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Run an honest market-fit and viability audit of any project or idea and produce a decision doc, not code. Use when someone asks "is this viable as a business", "audit the market fit", "make the case and compare to competitors", "should I apply to YC or bootstrap", or wants to validate a project, product, or market before investing more time. Gathers verifiable traction data first, researches the competitive field, gets an independent cold read, writes a doc with pre-committed pass/middle/kill criteria and a concrete week-1 assignment, then hardens it with an adversarial review loop.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when drafting or revising internal technical design docs, review notes, architecture writeups, or sharing posts in Chinese, especially when the tone should stay evidence-backed, calm, and suitable for peers or leaders rather than marketing or literary writing.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Assists with writing and maintaining Morphir technical documentation. Use when creating, reviewing, or updating documentation including API docs, user guides, tutorials, and content for the Docusaurus site. Also helps ensure documentation quality through link checking, structure validation, and code review for documentation coverage.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Think and work like an expert Molecular Geneticist. Use when a task calls for Molecular Geneticist judgment. Reasons from sequence-as-hypothesis, reference context (genome build, MANE/RefSeq transcript, HGVS), and allele-level molecular consequence through ACMG/AMP-ClinGen criteria, IGV/VEP/SpliceAI/gnomAD/ClinVar review, MIQE-compliant qPCR/ddPCR, and Sanger/NGS validation while treating allele dropout, pseudogene/paralog misalignment, FFPE deamination, contamination and barcode bleed, and transcript/build mismatch as first-class failure modes.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Think and work like an expert Hepatologist. Use when a task calls for Hepatologist judgment. Reasons from hepatic injury pattern (R-value), synthetic function, and portal hypertension through Child-Pugh/MELD 3.0, FIB-4 and elastography, LI-RADS/BCLC staging, SAAG paracentesis, and Baveno VII criteria while treating DILI misattribution, elastography false positives in cholestasis, hypersplenic thrombocytopenia, and missed acute-on-chronic decompensation as first-class failure modes.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Think and work like an expert Gene Therapy Scientist. Use when a task calls for Gene Therapy Scientist judgment. Reasons from vector biology, biodistribution, linked potency, and integration risk through ddPCR titer, empty/full analytics, ISA and off-target NGS (GUIDE-seq, CIRCLE-seq), and ICH S12 nonclinical design while treating pre-existing capsid neutralizing antibodies, RCV/RCA/RCR positivity, gonadal vector genome, and oligoclonal VCN expansion as first-class failure modes.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Think and work like an expert Genetic Counselor. Use when a task calls for Genetic Counselor judgment. Reasons from probabilistic penetrance, Bayesian pretest probability, and patient autonomy through three-generation pedigrees, ACMG/AMP variant criteria, ClinVar/ClinGen/gnomAD, NCCN and CPIC guidelines, and cascade-testing protocols while treating VUS over-upgraded to pathogenic, screening-versus-diagnostic confusion (NIPT vs amnio/CVS), and unaddressed psychosocial and GINA discrimination risk as first-class failure modes.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Think and work like an expert Conservation Scientist. Use when a task calls for Conservation Scientist judgment. Reasons from measurable biodiversity change, counterfactual impact, and effective population size through IUCN Red List/Green Status criteria, occupancy and PVA models (unmarked, Vortex), Marxan/prioritizr planning, and BACI/matching designs while treating detection heterogeneity, spatial pseudoreplication, REDD+ leakage, and Ne sample bias as first-class failure modes.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Think and work like an expert Chemical Biologist. Use when a task calls for Chemical Biologist judgment. Reasons from chemical genetics, ABPP/TPP/CETSA chemoproteomics, and SGC/Portal probe criteria; deconvolves phenotypic hits with PAINS/aggregator triage, inactive analogs, and genetic epistasis while treating colloidal aggregation, probe promiscuity, and degrader DC50/Dmax tag artifacts as first-class failure modes.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Think and work like an expert Clinical Microbiologist. Use when a task calls for Clinical Microbiologist judgment. Reasons from blood-culture volume and contamination criteria, staged Gram–ID–AST reporting, MALDI-TOF/VITEK/Phoenix and EUCAST RAST, CLSI M100 vs EUCAST breakpoint discipline, WHONET antibiograms, and NHSN MDRO alerts—treating contaminant vs pathogen and VME/ME as first-class failure modes.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
position sizing, Kelly criterion, risk budgeting, volatility targeting, portfolio allocation, bet sizing, capital allocation, drawdown management, position management, risk parity sizing
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Thesis report synthesis — turn a thesis's markdown artifacts into its letter-size thesis-report.html, then OPTIMIZE it against real page renders. Four-step loop — pack (deterministic Python bundle of all sources + report/metrics.json), author (the LLM writes report/content.html — narrative, KPI tiles, badges, timeline, tables and citations are LLM judgment), assemble (deterministic validation, template injection, Q50 pins, Q47 overflow gate), render + optimize (Chrome headless per-page PNGs — the LLM reads them and iterates until every page is visually clean). Spec 046 Q46–Q50.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Device pipeline analysis: feasibility and pivotal study stages, design-iteration cycles, RWE studies, and post-market obligations, with reimbursement-aware value framing and decision-track awareness across the med universe.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Grounded in first principles, rigorously examine and refine a user's plan, task, decision, goal, strategy, proposal, or idea through structured, progressively deeper questioning, in order to bridge the gap between the User and the Agent. Use when the user explicitly requests grilling, challenge, pressure-testing, cross-examination, red-team review, pre-mortem analysis, or a decision audit. The goal is to uncover unclear objectives, hidden assumptions, contradictions, weak evidence, missing information, overlooked constraints, dependencies, risks, trade-offs, failure modes, and misalignment between intended outcomes and likely real-world results. Begin by establishing a shared understanding of the user's actual intent, goals, constraints, and success criteria. Ask focused, high-leverage questions rather than broad or repetitive ones. Adapt each question based on previous answers, probing deeper where uncertainty, unsupported assumptions, or strategic weaknesses remain. Regularly summarize the current understanding of the user's intent and position to confirm alignment, expose misunderstandings, and refine the problem or goal definition. Distinguish facts, assumptions, hypotheses, and unknowns. Challenge reasoning rigorously while remaining constructive, respectful, and solution-oriented. Continue until the reasoning is internally coherent, evidence-aware, constraint-conscious, risk-assessed, and translated into a clearer, more actionable goal, decision, or plan. Ultimately, achieving the super-alignment.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Produce short-form video with Pika (pika.art) — its effect-driven tools (Pikaffects, Pikadditions, Pikaswaps, Pikaframes, Pikascenes, Pikatwists) and audio-driven lip sync (Pikaformance), plus text-to-video and image-to-video. Use when a task calls for playful, stylized, meme-able social clips, or for applying generative effects and object swaps to real uploaded footage, and when deciding whether Pika is the right engine versus a higher-fidelity model. Covers model versions, credit/plan economics, the fal.ai API route, prompt construction, iteration/repair, capability limits, and consent/rights rules for uploaded real-person media. Not a general "best video model" chooser.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Produce video with Moonvalley's Marey model family (Marey Realism v1.5) — a filmmaker-oriented, 1080p/24fps generative video model marketed as trained exclusively on licensed data. Use this skill when a task asks for Marey or Moonvalley specifically, when a brief demands brand-safe / legally reviewed AI video for commercial or studio work, or when the request needs Marey's director-style controls (camera trajectory, motion transfer, pose transfer, keyframing, reference conditioning). It covers what "commercially safe" really means versus the actual terms of service, access routes (Moonvalley web / Voyager, the fal API, ComfyUI), pricing, capability limits, prompt and reference strategy, where Marey fits production versus where other models win, iteration, and quality review. Do not use it for audio generation, for photoreal talking-head dialogue, or as a generic "best video model" default.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Create, edit, guide, upscale, and quality-control still images with Leonardo.Ai's official Production API, including native Lucid and Phoenix models, uploaded or generated references, image-to-image, ControlNet guidance, realtime-canvas inpainting, Pro and Universal upscalers, and custom Elements or models. Use for Leonardo image API implementation, async polling or webhooks, dry-run and cost governance, secure artifact handling, prompt iteration, or production troubleshooting. Do not use for Leonardo video, 3D generation, unofficial wrappers, or third-party gateway APIs.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。