「repo」の検索結果

Expert 5-dimension design critique — philosophical, scored, actionable. Use when asked to "critique this design", "expert review", "score my design", "how does this look", "is this good design", "design feedback", or "review this UI". Different from /form-audit (which is technical QA for consistency/compliance) — form-critique evaluates design as a craft object: philosophy, hierarchy, execution, function, and innovation each scored 0–10 with a punch list. Add "as a report" or "give me a visual report" to produce an HTML file with SVG radar chart, evidence cards, and Keep/Fix/Quick-wins action lists — useful for design reviews and stakeholder presentations instead of CLI output.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Maintain per-repo and cross-repo changelogs — append structured entries after agent work. Use when asked to "log this change", "update changelog", "what changed", "change history".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Orchestrates Multi-Page Application (MPA) architecture within a single repository, integrating with relevant skills / Mengorkestrasi arsitektur Multi-Page Application (MPA) dalam satu repositori, terintegrasi dengan skill relevan lainnya.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Summarise the job search from the markdown tracker - funnel, response rate, what's working, where applications come from, what's pending on the user. Use when the user runs /seekter-report or asks how the search is going, for weekly numbers, or what to change.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Power Platform ソリューションの全体アーキテクチャを設計する。Copilot Studio / Power Automate / Code Apps / Copilot Managed Runtime / Power Pages / AI Builder の使い分け判断、コンポーネント選定、統合パターンを決定する。社内向け画面は利用者のライセンス（Power Apps Premium か、Copilot Credits の従量課金か）と利用頻度をヒアリングし、Code Apps と Copilot Managed Runtime を使い分ける。構成が確定したら、実装着手前に admin スキルで環境チェック（既定環境ではないか・マネージド環境・Code Apps / MCP の有効化・セキュリティ ロール）と DLP 事前チェック（使用コネクタがブロックされていないか・Business / Non-business が混在しないか）を実行して結果をユーザーに提示する。Agent 365 の AI チームメイトを採用する場合はライト実装（PoC）と本格実装（private リポジトリ + CI/CD + Agent Evals）を AskUserQuestion で選ばせ、Git ホスティング（GitHub / Azure DevOps Repos / その他）も確定してから実装へ進む。外部の文章を読むエージェントではプロンプト インジェクション対策を設計段階で工数に含める。

Technical writing, engineering specifications, reports, presentations, and documentation standards for engineering practice. Covers document types (requirements documents, test reports, design rationale, operations manuals), writing style, data visualization, engineering drawing standards, and oral presentation techniques. Use when writing engineering documents, presenting technical results, creating specifications, or learning documentation best practices.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when reviewing, shipping, or regression-testing a SKILL.md and you hold one or more captured trajectories where that skill was actually loaded. Translates the skill's instructions into behavior constraints, then reports which were EXERCISED (coverage) versus untested, and flags any that were in-scope but VIOLATED (compliance) — a cheap single-trajectory test-adequacy gate. It surfaces untested instructions rather than auto-blocking, and escalates fail-closed only when a violation touches shared repo state, never-surface memory, or self-modification. Complements skill-counterfactual-audit (which measures EFFECT) and skill-causal-curation (which measures contribution); this one asks ADEQUACY. Backed by the agent-skill-coverage metric (arxiv 2606.20659v2). Triggers on skill review, ship gating, and regression-testing a skill against its trajectories.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Deterministic git operations with state verification for skill-creator managed repos. Use when managing repos, branches, worktrees, or contribution workflows.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

bmorphism's GitHub stars (2155 repos) and created repos - a curated index of applied category theory, MCP servers, and xenomodern tooling.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Build an interactive account org chart, leadership map, buying committee, or manager/report neighborhood around a person. Use for decision makers, reporting-line candidates, stakeholder mapping, and warm intro paths. Skip standalone email lookup and unrelated cross-company prospecting.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Reviews a whole deliverable (talk, course module, paper, chapter, or referee report) against its manifest without rewriting it. Runs a deterministic gate for build, citations, numbers, facts, and leaks and stops on failure, then runs a finder over each section and a strong-model pass over the whole work, and adjudicates into checks/<date>/findings.json and report.md with anchored findings, severities, and honest NOT CHECKED coverage within a dollar budget. Use when asked to lint or review the whole talk, module, or paper, for a pre-ship review, or for the night shift. Revision stays serial and author-led.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

End-of-session closure for a research or code repository. Records what changed into the project's own handoff and log files, separating verified work from work merely attempted, and reports what is left uncommitted. Use when wrapping up a session so the next one can resume without re-deriving state. Its start-of-session twin is sitrep.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Runs several language models as independent coders on one labeling or discovery task and treats disagreement as data. Covers diverse panel assembly, independent voting, consensus rules, Cohen’s and Fleiss kappa, Krippendorff’s alpha, correlated-error limits on validity claims, human validation, and reporting. Use when the user asks about a council, panel, ensemble, or jury of models, how to combine model labels, or what kappa or alpha to report for model coders. Single-model codebook and validation work goes to text-classification, per-item confidence to llm-calibration-logprobs.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Runs several language models as independent coders on the same labeling or discovery task and reads their disagreement as data — panel assembly for model diversity, keeping votes independent, consensus rules, agreement statistics (Cohen's and Fleiss kappa, Krippendorff's alpha), the correlated-errors caveat that stops agreement being mistaken for validity, human validation beyond the panel, and reporting. Use when the user asks about a council, panel, ensemble, or jury of models, asks how to combine several models' labels, or asks what kappa or alpha to report for model coders. Single-model codebook and validation work goes to text-classification, per-item confidence to llm-calibration-logprobs.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Format and score completed plugin assessment findings, including whether evidence admits a finding to the requested outcome. Use when a plugin assessment or review needs the standard report structure, scoring criteria, severity breakdown, marketplace-readiness result, or finding admission.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Runs the description-drift experiment — spawns all Claude Code agents simultaneously to collect self-reported capabilities, then compares them against static frontmatter descriptions to reveal how reliable orchestrator routing based on descriptions actually is. Use when measuring description drift across the agent fleet, re-running the capability collection experiment, analyzing a specific agent's self-reported capabilities, or auditing whether frontmatter descriptions accurately reflect agent behavior.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Register a plan artifact via the MCP backlog server. Use when you produce a document or report that downstream agents or worktree-isolated environments need to retrieve — feature-context, codebase-analysis, architect, T0-baseline, TN-verification, or research artifacts. Triggers include "store an artifact", "register a plan artifact", "write a report to the backlog", "upload artifact content".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Fetch and report current API syntax, changelog entries, and breaking changes for a specific library or protocol version. One research angle within a parallel technical-research set — runs independently and returns a structured cited report. Invoke when a specific library name and version are the target.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Install and configure the GitHub CLI (gh) for AI agent environments where gh may not be pre-installed and git remotes use local proxies instead of github.com. Use when gh command not found, shutil.which returns None, need GitHub API access for issues or PRs or releases or workflow runs, or repository operations fail with 'failed to determine base repo' error. Provides auto-install script with SHA256 verification, GITHUB_TOKEN auth with anonymous fallback, and the required -R flag pattern for proxy environments. Covers project management via GitHub Projects V2, milestones via REST API, issue lifecycle templates, and label taxonomy management.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Manages the research/ knowledge base of verified tool and library research entries via knowledge-explorer.py. Commands — list (browse by category or SDLC layer), fetch-github (draft entry from GitHub repo), add (validate and route to category dir), update-append (append dated revision), generate-descriptions (repair missing or low-quality descriptions), migrate (convert inline-header entries to frontmatter). Use when browsing KB topics, adding or updating research entries, fetching GitHub repo metadata, generating descriptions in parallel via Haiku subagents, or migrating old-format entries to skill-spec frontmatter.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when an existing repository contains agents, prompts, workflows, playbooks, commands, or Skills and you need to identify which capabilities are worth converting into a ChatGPT/Codex Plugin.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Launches and configures the standalone presubmit CLI, an API-driven adversarial peer-review pipeline with 30-plus stages, including Red Team finders, Blue Team defence, verification cascade, legal pass, and copyedit, producing one consolidated report on disk. Verifies installation and API key, chooses the output location and smoke, standard, or custom mode, launches the run, and reports the result path. Use when the user asks to run presubmit, wants a deep unattended pre-submission audit, or needs a math or replication-code audit. Everyday self-audits go to paper-review-lite, and external refereeing to journal-review.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Designs multi-country survey experiments, covering case selection with a stated comparative logic, instrument localization and TRAPD translation, stimulus calibration, per-country power, and pooled versus per-country analysis with measurement-equivalence checks. Use when the user fields the same experiment in several countries, asks which countries to include, how to adapt an instrument without breaking comparability, whether to pool, or how large each country sample must be. Question wording goes to survey-design, reporting to methods-reporting, the study plan to pre-registration-writing.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when skillsaw reports a likely false positive, misses an edge case, behaves incorrectly, or needs an RFE. Gather a safe report and, only with explicit user permission, create a feedback bundle or open a GitHub issue.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。