「rev」の検索結果

Hard readiness gate before implementation begins — cross-checks the constitution, feature spec, plan, and tasks for consistency, traceability, and unresolved ambiguity. Returns PASS or FAIL with specific findings. Load when the spec-driven-development orchestrator routes /analyze, when the user asks to cross-check spec vs plan, audit traceability, verify spec readiness, gate-check before implementation, or says "is this spec implementation-ready", "trace requirements to tasks", "/analyze", "spec sanity check", "spec readiness gate", "spec consistency check". Output: docs/reviews/YYYY-MM-DD-<slug>-spec-crosscheck.md.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Validate process decomposition and architecture design quality before execution begins. Load when the setup-evaluator agent fires (automatic for agent-chain tasks), or when user says "evaluate this setup", "check the decomposition", "validate the architecture", "is this plan sound", "review the agent design". Catches structural errors, missing knowledge, unrealistic step ordering, and topology mismatches. Does NOT modify — only evaluates.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Compress bloated project or global memory while preserving decisions, rationale, revisit triggers, provenance, and active user preferences. Load when memory exceeds budget, global memory is too large, session logs are repetitive, or before appending to an over-budget memory file.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Score an unbuilt business idea on desirability, viability, feasibility, distribution wedge, why-now, founder-market-fit, market size, alternatives, defensibility, capital intensity, and regulatory/ethical risk — and return a GO / ITERATE / KILL verdict with kill criteria and a next kill test. Load when the user asks to evaluate a business idea, score a startup idea, screen an idea, decide whether to pursue this venture, do an idea review, or says "is this a good business idea", "should I build this", "evaluate this startup", "screen this idea", "go/no-go on this idea", "kill or pursue". Sub-skill of `venture-exploration`. Calls `fermi` for sizing, `assumption-mapping` for hidden beliefs, optional `pre-mortem` / `adversarial-hat` for high-stakes ideas. Does NOT evaluate built products — for that use `reality-check`.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Flip a problem, goal, or decision 180 degrees to find what forward thinking misses. Asks what would guarantee failure, then works backward to what must be avoided or changed. Load when the user says "invert this", "flip this problem", "what would guarantee failure", "think backward", "reverse engineer the goal", "think about it backwards", or when deep-thinking diagnoses an inversion frame. Also triggers on "what's the opposite of success here", "how would we sabotage this". Two methods: Failure Inversion and Opposite Goal. Max 2 clarifying questions before inverting. Always returns forward actions. For broader analysis, deep-thinking calls this.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Author pull requests with intent-separated commits, blast-radius disclosure, and verification evidence. Load when opening a PR, writing a PR description, separating refactor from feature commits, or summarizing a change set for review. Also triggers on "write the PR", "PR body", "intent-separated commits", "split refactor from feature", "pr summary", or after safe-change cycles complete. Extends git-workflow-and-versioning — does not replace it.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Bootstrap full agent infrastructure for an existing, already-coded project without modifying a single line of source code. Surveys the repo, infers conventions from manifests, README, git history, and source samples, then generates the missing AGENTS.md, docs/architecture.md, docs/product-soul.md, ADR backfill, and seeded docs/memory/ files. Asks the user only about gaps the repo cannot reveal. Load when the user asks to "retroactive project setup", "backfill agent infrastructure", "bootstrap agents for this existing repo", "onboard agents to a legacy codebase", "set up agents without touching code", or "fill in missing agent context for this project".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Capture actionable learnings that emerge during conversation — when the agent or user discovers that a skill, a set of skills, or a process needs to be updated based on what's happening in the current chat. Sub-skill of the learn-from orchestrator. Load when the user says "we should update the skill for this", "this should be a skill rule", "add this as a gotcha", "the skill should know about this", "update the process for this", "remember this for next time", "this is important for the skill". Also triggers when the agent notices a skill's guidance was wrong or incomplete, a process step failed or was unnecessary, a new pattern emerged, a guardrail was missing, a workaround became a pattern, or a debugging session reveals a gap.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Measure, profile, and fix performance bottlenecks — Core Web Vitals, backend latency, bundle size, and database queries. Load when performance requirements exist, users report slowness, profiling reveals bottlenecks, or the user asks to optimize load time, LCP, INP, CLS, or response time. Not for premature optimization without evidence. Pairs with browser-testing-with-devtools and ci-cd-and-automation for regression guards.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Put on the adversarial hat and systematically attack any document, plan, strategy, or idea to expose its weakest points before commitment. Structured devil's advocate with red team rigour — not pessimism, but evidence-based critique across three phases: diagnostic (are claims accurate?), creative (is the problem artificially constrained?), challenge (are solutions robust?). Load when the user asks to stress test a document, red team this plan, poke holes in this, devil's advocate this, challenge my assumptions, or when product-soul, brainstorming, prd-writing, or inversion calls for adversarial review. Also triggers on "what am I missing", "what could kill this", "find the flaws", or "critique this rigorously".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Structure git work with atomic commits, conventional messages, short-lived branches, and pre-commit hygiene. Load when committing, branching, resolving merge conflicts, organizing parallel work, or reviewing git history. Also triggers on "git workflow", "commit message", "conventional commits", "atomic commit", "branch strategy", "git worktree", "how should I commit this". Does not replace project-specific hook policies — complements them.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Simplify application code for clarity without changing behavior — refactor after tests pass, reduce nesting and duplication, match project conventions. Load when refactoring for readability, cleaning up after a feature ships, or when code review flags complexity. Also triggers on "simplify this code", "code simplification", "make this easier to read", "reduce complexity", "refactor for clarity". Not for compress/split/prune-skill (skill-library files). Pairs with technical-debt-audit.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Write the executable feature specification — the WHAT and WHY artifact that agents and reviewers treat as source of truth. Owns both /specify and /clarify modes. Load when the user asks to write a feature spec, write a specification, write an executable spec, define functional requirements, capture acceptance criteria as Given/When/Then, or when the spec-driven-development orchestrator routes here. Also triggers on "feature spec", "executable spec", "/specify", "/clarify", "write the spec for this feature", "specification for", "spec-driven", "machine-readable spec". Output: docs/specs/YYYY-MM-DD-<slug>-feature-spec.md. Hard gate: cannot Approve while [NEEDS CLARIFICATION] markers remain.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Capture the "why" behind technical choices to prevent architectural drift. Load when the user makes a major technical decision, chooses a library/framework, defines a system boundary, or changes a core architectural pattern. Also triggers on "record a decision", "write an ADR", "why did we do this", "document this architectural choice", or "architectural decision record". Supports `SYNTHESIS=true` mode for retrospective ADR backfill from observed repo state — used by `retroactive-project-setup` and any future backfill skill. Essential for long-term project maintainability and agent alignment.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Map symbol dependencies, callers, and blast radius before editing code. Load when the user asks what depends on a symbol, what breaks if they change something, blast radius of a change, reverse dependencies, or which tests cover a function. Also triggers on "who calls this", "impact of changing", "dependency map", "what uses this", "find callers", or before any non-trivial edit when safe-change is not yet active. Pairs with codebase-understanding for broad architecture; this skill is symbol-scoped and edit-gated.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Apple's approach to interface design and fluid, physical motion, translated for the web. Use when building or reviewing gesture-driven UI, spring animations, drag/swipe/sheet interactions, momentum and interruptible transitions, translucent materials and depth, typography (optical sizing, tracking, leading), reduced-motion, or the design foundations (feedback, spatial consistency, restraint) behind Apple-style interfaces.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Delegate coding tasks to OpenCode CLI agent for feature implementation, refactoring, PR review, and long-running autonomous sessions. Requires the opencode CLI installed and authenticated.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Delegate coding tasks to OpenAI Codex CLI agent. Use for building features, refactoring, PR reviews, and batch issue fixing. Requires the codex CLI and a git repository.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Delegate coding tasks to Claude Code (Anthropic's CLI agent). Use for building features, refactoring, PR reviews, and iterative coding. Requires the claude CLI installed.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Draft, rewrite, or condense emails with target tone, length, and audience; use for cold outreach, replies, status updates, or escalations where clarity and brevity matter.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Help address review/issue comments on the open GitHub PR for the current branch using gh CLI; verify gh auth first and prompt the user to authenticate if not logged in.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

AI operational modes (brainstorm, implement, debug, review, teach, ship, orchestrate). Use to adapt behavior based on task type.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

This skill ensures all code follows security best practices and identifies potential vulnerabilities. Use when implementing authentication or authorization, handling user input or file uploads, or creating new API endpoints.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Systematically finds and fixes bugs using proven debugging techniques. Traces from symptoms to root cause, implements fixes, and prevents regression.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。