「hn」の検索結果

Create a persistent HeyGen avatar — a reusable face + voice identity for the agent, the user, or any named character — powered by HeyGen Avatar V technology. Prompt-based creation by default (description → HeyGen builds it); photo upload is optional for real-person digital twins. Use when: (1) giving the agent a face + voice so it can present videos ("bring yourself to life", "create your avatar", "give yourself an avatar", "design a presenter", "set up an avatar", "let's make an avatar"), (2) the user wants to appear in videos as themselves ("create my avatar", "I want my face in a video", "digital twin of me", "build me an avatar"), (3) building a named character presenter ("create an avatar called Cleo", "design a character named X"), (4) establishing HeyGen identity before making videos — the correct FIRST step when no avatar exists yet. Chain signal: when the user says both an identity/avatar action AND a video action in the same request ("create an avatar AND make a video", "set up identity THEN create a video", "design a presenter AND immediately record"), run heygen-avatar first, then heygen-video. Returns avatar_id + voice_id — pass directly to heygen-video to create HeyGen videos. NOT for: generating videos (use heygen-video), translating videos, or TTS-only tasks.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Operational Technology and industrial control system security — Purdue model segmentation, industrial protocol analysis (Modbus, DNP3, S7, EtherNet/IP), PLC/HMI exposure, IEC 62443 alignment, and MITRE ATT&CK for ICS, for authorized and safety-conscious assessments

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Passive and active reconnaissance, subdomain enumeration, DNS analysis, technology fingerprinting, and OSINT data correlation for authorized security assessments

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Proof-of-concept development, payload crafting, shellcode analysis, and exploitation technique research for authorized security testing

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Comprehensive data quality assessment against business rules, schema constraints, and freshness expectations. Activate when validating data pipeline outputs before production use, auditing a dataset against defined business rules, or producing a quality scorecard for a data asset.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Translate SQL queries into plain language business logic. Use when documenting queries, explaining analysis to non-technical stakeholders, code reviewing for correctness, or building a query catalog.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

ByteHouse 多模态检索 Skill，支持文本、图片、视频的向量化存储与多模态混合检索（向量检索、以文搜图、以图搜文、混合关键词 + 向量检索）。当用户提到 "ByteHouse 向量检索"、"多模态检索"、"混合检索"、"以文搜图"、"以图搜图"、"文搜视频"、"多模态知识库"、"HNSW / 向量索引" 等诉求时使用本 Skill。

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Answer a hard question by fanning it out to a PANEL of models running in parallel — each answering independently with web search and bash, none seeing the others' work — then having Opus 4.8 judge every response into a structured analysis (consensus, contradictions, partial coverage, unique insights, blind spots) and write a final answer grounded in it. The panel is two independent Opus 4.8 runs (slug opus4.8-4.8), Opus 4.8 + GPT-5.5 via codex (opus4.8-gpt5.5), Opus 4.8 + Gemini 3.1 Pro via agy (opus4.8-gemini3.1pro), or all three (opus4.8-gpt5.5-gemini3.1pro). Opus always judges and writes the final answer — the pipeline can't be reversed. Runs on local CLI subscriptions (no metered API), and saves a timestamped provenance .md per run. Use this whenever the user asks to "run it through Fusion", says /fusion, wants a multi-model / panel / ensemble answer, wants a question cross-checked across models, or wants a higher-confidence answer with consensus and blind spots surfaced — even if they don't say "fusion". General-purpose: any topic (research, law, strategy, technical, personal). Best for high-stakes research, design calls, and debugging where being confidently wrong is expensive.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Render an interactive, self-contained HTML companion for a GEO content brief (04-content-brief) or a publish-ready draft (05-production), so a NON-technical client reviewer (founder, organizer staff, the domain expert filling slots) can fill REQUIRED-FILL slots, leave section-level comments, and approve/return work in the browser instead of editing Markdown. Use when a brief or draft needs to go to a client/expert for review, or when building the briefs/index.html entry page for a client folder. The reviewer's input comes back as a JSON file that 04-content-brief Step 9 ingests. Visual quality is delegated to the frontend-design skill.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when you need to add or review fuzz testing for Java APIs with CATS — including contract-driven negative testing, malformed payload validation, boundary input exploration, CI integration, reproducible failures, and local execution guidance. This should trigger for requests such as Add fuzz testing to a Java project; Use CATS for API negative testing; Review CI quality gates for API contract robustness; Improve boundary and malformed input test coverage; Run CATS fuzz tests against an OpenAPI contract. Part of Plinth Toolkit

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when you need framework-agnostic Docker and container image guidance for Java projects - Dockerfile design, multi-stage Maven builds, jlink custom runtimes, micro runtime distributions such as Alpaquita, JVM container ergonomics, non-root execution, image metadata, .dockerignore, reproducible builds, vulnerability scanning, SBOM awareness, and production-safe container defaults. This should trigger for requests such as Review Java Dockerfile; Improve Docker image security; Add jlink runtime to a Java container; Add containerization to a Java project; Optimize Java container image size; Review Docker build reproducibility. Part of Plinth Toolkit

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when you need framework-agnostic OpenAPI 3.x guidance — spec structure, metadata and versioning, paths and operations, reusable schemas, security schemes, examples, documentation quality, contract validation (e.g. Spectral), breaking-change awareness, and handoffs to codegen — without choosing Spring Boot, Quarkus, or Micronaut. This should trigger for requests such as Review an OpenAPI; Improve an OpenAPI; Improve API contract; Improve API schema design. Part of Plinth Toolkit

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when you need framework-agnostic MongoDB and non-relational database query guidance — document schema design, collection modeling, JSON Schema validation, indexes, aggregation pipelines, query performance, consistency trade-offs, transactions, and operational safety — without choosing Spring Boot, Quarkus, or Micronaut. This should trigger for requests such as Design MongoDB document schemas; Review MongoDB queries and indexes; Improve aggregation pipeline performance; Model non-relational data access patterns; Review NoSQL consistency and transaction trade-offs. Part of Plinth Toolkit

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when you need framework-agnostic Hexagonal architecture guidance for Java projects - ports and adapters boundaries, application core independence, driving and driven adapters, dependency direction, infrastructure leakage detection, optional architecture tests, and evidence-backed remediation. This should trigger for requests such as Review Hexagonal architecture; Review ports and adapters boundaries; Enforce dependency direction; Add ArchUnit architecture tests; Detect infrastructure leakage in domain code; Improve ports and adapters boundaries. Part of Plinth Toolkit

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when you need framework-agnostic SQL guidance — schema naming, relational table design, query readability, indexes, transactions, database security, migrations, testing, and monitoring — without choosing Spring Boot, Quarkus, or Micronaut. This should trigger for requests such as Review SQL schema or migrations; Improve SQL query performance and readability; Design relational tables and indexes; Review database transaction, security, or monitoring practices. Part of Plinth Toolkit

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when you need framework-agnostic WireMock guidance — stub design, JSON or programmatic mappings, precise request matching, response bodies and faults, classpath fixtures, isolation and reset between tests, verification of calls, dynamic ports and base URLs, and avoiding flaky stubs — without choosing Spring Boot, Quarkus, or Micronaut. This should trigger for requests such as Design or review WireMock stubs (JSON mappings or Java DSL); Improve request matching, isolation, or reset strategy for HTTP mocks; Add or fix verification of outbound HTTP calls to a WireMock server; Debug flaky tests involving WireMock or unmatched request journals. Part of Plinth Toolkit

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Writes you a ready-to-use script for a feedback or hard conversation, then rehearses the pushback. Use when you need to give tough feedback, confront a peer, tell a report they are underperforming, deny a promotion, prepare to fire someone, say no to your boss, ask for feedback, or repair a conversation that went badly. Draws on 66 Lenny's Podcast guests including Kim Scott, Carole Robin and Alisa Cohn.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Collect, filter, and freshness-qualify news items.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Audit CVE/vulnerability source coverage for a technology stack. Maps each component (container, library, base image, runtime) to authoritative CVE feeds, flags gaps, and produces audit-ready reports. Generic: works for any service or stack.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Business operations: strategy, technology, growth, competitive intelligence, support, finance, HR, legal, operations, sales, productivity, product management.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Execute autonomous multi-step research using Google Gemini Deep Research Agent. Use for: market analysis, competitive landscaping, literature reviews, technical research, due diligence. Takes 2-10 minutes but produces detailed, cited reports. Costs $2-5 per task.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

SEO analysis and optimization specialist. Use when conducting technical SEO audits, optimizing meta tags, analyzing Core Web Vitals, or improving search engine rankings. Focuses on actionable recommendations.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Comprehensive documentation specialist covering API documentation, technical writing, design documentation, migration guides, and changelog generation. Use when creating OpenAPI/Swagger specs, generating SDKs, writing user guides, creating README files, documenting architecture, writing design specs, creating ADRs, writing migration guides, or generating changelogs from git commits. Handles versioning, examples, developer experience, and user-facing documentation.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Go performance optimization techniques including profiling with pprof, memory optimization, concurrency patterns, and escape analysis.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。