「question」の検索結果

Design a conversion loop for a one-person company from reach to lead capture to purchase. Use when Codex needs to explain conversion concepts when needed, verify MVP prerequisites, ask one question at a time, present multiple conversion-path options, and write user-confirmed outputs into `opc-doc/`.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Find and position a viable niche market for a one-person company by combining market mapping and customer segmentation. Use when Codex needs to explain niche concepts when needed, check founder-resource prerequisites, ask one question at a time, generate multiple niche options, and write user-confirmed positioning outputs into `opc-doc/`.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Design value propositions for candidate customer segments and help the user choose the strongest one. Use when Codex needs to explain jobs, pains, and gains when needed, check niche-positioning prerequisites, ask one question at a time, present multiple value-proposition options, and write user-confirmed outputs into `opc-doc/`.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Review the operating health of a one-person company using lightweight metrics, bottleneck analysis, and stop-loss logic. Use when Codex needs to explain review concepts when needed, verify available outputs, ask one question at a time, present multiple bottleneck hypotheses, and write user-confirmed outputs into `opc-doc/`.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Define the smallest viable experiment and MVP for a selected one-person company opportunity. Use when Codex needs to explain what MVP means when needed, verify prerequisites, ask one question at a time, present multiple MVP options, and write user-confirmed outputs into `opc-doc/`.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Design a viable business model for a one-person company using Lean Canvas and a simplified Business Model Canvas. Use when Codex needs to explain the business-model concepts when needed, verify niche and value-proposition prerequisites, ask one question at a time, present multiple model choices, and write user-confirmed outputs into `opc-doc/`.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Turn repeatable outputs of a one-person company into compounding assets. Use when Codex needs to explain asset-compounding concepts when needed, verify prerequisite outputs, ask one question at a time, present multiple assetization priorities, and write user-confirmed outputs into `opc-doc/`.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Efficiently extract and convert the contents of any local file—such as PDF, DOCX, DOC, ODT, RTF, XLSX, XLS, or HTML—into clean, well-formatted markdown saved to disk. Use this skill whenever the user requests to parse, read, or extract information from a file on their computer, including phrases like “parse this PDF”, “convert this document”, “read this file”, “extract text from”, or when a local file path (not a URL) is provided. This skill offers advanced options like generating AI-powered summaries and answering questions based on the file's content. Prefer this tool over `scrape` when handling local files to deliver precise, structured outputs for downstream tasks.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when you need CrowdStrike Falcon Intelligence on an indicator (IOC reputation for an IP, domain, hash, or URL — malicious confidence, linked actors, malware families, reports) OR on an adversary (threat-actor profile, origin/target search, MITRE ATT&CK TTPs, finished intel reports). Answers questions like "look up 1.1.1.1", "what TTPs does Charming Kitten use?", "which threat actors operate from Russia?", and "latest report on Mustang Panda". Commonly invoked by the four /*-investigation skills, /ioc-enrichment-workflow, /threat-actor-profiling, and the regional espionage cells. Other agents/skills can chain this for vendor-authoritative actor and finished-intel context. Requires a Falcon Intelligence subscription.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when starting any conversation - establishes how to find and use skills, requiring Skill tool invocation before ANY response including clarifying questions

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when receiving code review feedback, before implementing suggestions, especially if feedback seems unclear or technically questionable - requires technical rigor and verification, not performative agreement or blind implementation

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Build a throwaway prototype to answer a design question. Use when the user wants to sanity-check whether a state model or logic feels right, or explore what a UI should look like.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Investigate a question against high-trust primary sources and capture the findings as a Markdown file in the repo. Use when the user wants a topic researched, docs or API facts gathered, or reading legwork delegated to a background agent.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when receiving code review feedback (especially if unclear or technically questionable), when completing tasks or major features requiring review before proceeding, or before making any completion/success claims. Covers three practices - receiving feedback with technical rigor over performative agreement, requesting reviews via code-reviewer subagent, and verification gates requiring evidence before any status claims. Essential for subagent-driven development, pull requests, and preventing false completion claims.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Guides agents and users to create standards-compliant agent definitions using templates in markdown frontmatter format, ensuring context gathering, clarity, and proper metadata. Forces agents to ask clarifying questions when context is insufficient. Token-efficient documentation required. All content must be in English. Trigger: When creating a new agent definition, setting up project agents, or documenting agent workflows.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Build custom AI agents in Claude Code from a user's problem statement. This skill analyzes the user's use case, asks smart clarifying questions, researches the internet for similar agents (GitHub repos, blogs, Claude Code community patterns), and then architects and builds production-ready Claude Code agents — including subagents, skills, hooks, slash commands, MCP integrations, and CLAUDE.md configuration. Use this skill whenever the user wants to create an agent, build an automation workflow, set up a Claude Code subagent, design a multi-agent system, or says things like 'build me an agent for...', 'automate this with Claude Code', 'I want a subagent that...', 'help me create a workflow', 'set up an agent pipeline', or any variation of wanting Claude Code to do something specialized. Also trigger when the user mentions agent architecture, agent SDK, agentic workflows, or task delegation in Claude Code — even if they don't use the word 'agent' explicitly.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when a task spans multiple steps, files, or unknowns — before planning the order of work, whenever about to report completion or success in any wording, and when picking the next action after a result, failure, or surprise. Also under deadline pressure, or when resuming work built on questionable foundations.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when receiving code review feedback, before implementing suggestions, especially if feedback seems unclear or technically questionable - requires technical rigor and verification, not performative agreement or blind implementation

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when starting any conversation - establishes how to find and use skills, requiring Skill tool invocation before ANY response including clarifying questions

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Open Source License guidance, selection, compliance review, and drafting. Use this skill when users ask about choosing open source licenses, checking license compatibility, reviewing projects for OSS compliance, generating LICENSE/NOTICE files, or understanding specific license terms. Triggers include questions about MIT, Apache, GPL, BSD, LGPL, AGPL, copyleft, permissive licenses, license compatibility, SPDX identifiers, or any OSS licensing topic.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Socratic code review and refactoring session — whether it's your own code, a teammate's PR, or something you inherited. Leads you to see the issues through questions, names smells and moves precisely, then closes with a concrete plan.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Take one new feature slice from idea to reviewed, committed code in a single guided pass — scope it into the smallest shippable slice, build it test-first with strict TDD, review and fix the diff, then commit it. Chains slice → test-driven-development → the built-in /code-review → git-commit. Not for reviewing an existing PR, upgrades, or open-ended design questions.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Writes expert academic paper summaries for social science research, particularly political science and applied statistics. Use when asked to summarize, review, or create a reading summary of an academic paper, PDF, or research article. Accepts a file (PDF or text format) or a directory of papers. Produces a structured markdown summary — approximately 400–600 words — covering primary contributions, major questions and answers with point estimates, methods and data, and limitations and robustness. Includes BibTeX citation retrieved from Google Scholar and keyword metadata.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Assesses a research paper outline (.qmd file) against structured criteria from Kosuke Imai's empirical research guide. Evaluates the abstract and section outline for: research question clarity, stated contributions, hypotheses and testable implications, data description, planned results and inferential approach, and robustness checks. Detects causal papers from the abstract and conditionally assesses identification strategy only when causal framing is present. Produces a structured markdown report with PASS/PARTIAL/FAIL assessments and actionable suggestions. Use when asked to assess, evaluate, review, or check a paper outline, abstract-and-outline, or research plan in a .qmd file.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。