2,446 件 ・ 関連度順
概要と使いどころ
Run a Mixture of Experts (MoE) audit on any topic, plan, codebase, evidence archive, or process. Dynamically spawns specialized subagents with different critical lenses to cross-reference findings and detect flaws, overlap, retention issues, or drift. Use when designing architectures, analyzing complex code, verifying multi-step plans, classifying evidence artifacts, or looking for duplicated intent in a repo.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when shipping a macOS app outside the App Store — Developer ID signing with hardened runtime, notarization with notarytool, stapling, building a clean drag-to-Applications DMG, and verifying the result launches on a stranger's Mac.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Move issues and external PRs through a state machine of triage roles — categorise, verify, grill if needed, and write agent-ready briefs.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when creating new skills, editing existing skills, or verifying skills work before deployment
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Project-level workflow for turning GitHub repositories, URLs, local product materials, or markdown drafts into WeChat Official Account articles and draft-box submissions. Use when the user asks to write, adapt, illustrate, verify, or publish a WeChat/公众号 article, especially from a GitHub repo or existing technical/product material.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when completing tasks, implementing major features, or before merging to verify work meets requirements
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Manage agent-skill lifecycles across local, global, project, Skill Hub, skills.sh, GitHub, plugin-cache, and system roots. Use when searching, recommending, installing, updating, upgrading, syncing, merging, auditing, deduplicating, cleaning, packaging, publishing, or validating skills; choosing project versus global scope; verifying upstream source, stars, or installs; or working with skill-upgrade, check_upstreams.ps1, sync-pull/push, junctions, skills-lock.json, or skill-upstreams.json. Do not use for ordinary software-package upgrades or non-skill file cleanup.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when writing, moving, reviewing, or auditing documentation in the deepseek-harness repo — choosing hierarchy and detail, separating tutorials from references, checking tutorial progression, trimming doc slop, responding to a verify-doc-budgets failure, or requests like "improve the docs", "audit the docs", "where should this be documented", or "this doc is too long".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Cite-or-Block 架构的基石原子 skill。把报告里的 citation 锚点 (例如 [guideline:CSCO-2024-NSCLC:§5.5.2] / [pmid:12345678:abstract]) 解析为源文件片段,并核对事实声明里的关键词是否在引用源原文里出现。 Foundation atomic skill for the Cite-or-Block architecture. Resolves citation anchors (e.g. [guideline:CSCO-2024-NSCLC:§5.5.2] / [pmid:12345678:abstract]) to raw source text fragments, and verifies whether claim keywords actually appear in the cited source. 使用场景 / Use when: 1. 报告生成后要做 fact-check (resolve_citation + verify_claim_against_source) 2. content-verification-layer 要扫全报告锚点 (parse_citations_in_text) 3. drug-citation-verifier / 任何 cross-check skill 需要"锚点 → 源原文" P0 守护:本 skill **绝不维护任何已知字典**。源里没有 = verified=False, 无例外、无 fallback、无"已知答案兜底"。 P0 guard: this skill **never maintains any built-in dictionary**. Not in source = verified=False. No fallback, no built-in answers.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Evidence-grounded AI research workflow for turning supplied economics, finance, management, and social-science papers or structured records into versioned PaperReading artifacts. Use when Codex must ingest text, Markdown, or a text-based PDF; separate source-grounded claims from researcher analysis; bind findings to evidence IDs and locators; review extraction candidates; migrate v0.2 PaperRecord JSON; validate or verify a v0.3 PaperPackage; generate research extensions; export reviewable JSON or Markdown; or safely update a compatible 13-field literature workbook.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Generic read-only checklist for preparing an application deployment by verifying host, artifacts, backups, service state, configuration, dependencies, and rollback readiness before any write action.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Structured Domain Modeling Architecture (SDMA) principles. Trigger when: - Designing domain models, building ologs (ontological graphs), verifying protocol equivalence, selecting schemas, or measuring architectural entropy. - Modeling structures using Category Theory, Coalgebra, or Information Theory. - Prompt contains keywords: sdma, olog, Category Theory, Coalgebra, Information Theory, entropy, schema, pullback, functor, monad.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Mathematical foundations, logical structures, and formal verification guidance. Trigger when: - Designing protocol contracts, formal specifications, verifying state spaces, or using proof assistants. - Tasks involve: TLA+, Alloy, Lean, Coq, model checkers, invariants, temporal logic. - Prompt contains keywords: formal verification, alloy, tla+, lean, coq, invariant, state machine, model checker, liveness, safety.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Trigger when auditing documentation, checking markdown link integrity, formatting tables, checking headers, or verifying absolute/relative paths.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
SOP for normative specification and behavioral contracts. Trigger when: - Defining invariants, permitted transitions, and forbidden states. - Navigating steps: Identify, Formalize, Verify, Record, Connect. - Prompt contains: /spec, spec workflow, normative constraint, invariant, BCP 14.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
At the close of an epic (or a difficult issue), post a postmortem roundup comment — what went well, what was hard (backed by evidence), and 1–3 concrete proposals to improve the skills/flows — then offer to turn accepted proposals into their own `workflow`-labeled tasks, and end with a `🔭 Next` handoff (a paste-ready next-session prompt + the next epic to start). Use at epic close, after the "verify the whole thing" rollup, or when asked to "do a retro", "postmortem this epic", "what did we learn", "how do we improve the workflow".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Run the Playwright fixture smoke harness to prove a real generated crouton app still boots, authenticates, and does CRUD after a dependency bump or package change. Use when asked to "smoke test", "run e2e", "verify against a fixture", or to check that a packages/ change doesn't break consuming apps.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Process the batch of incoming Bridge Classroom feedback. Pull open `classroom-feedback` issues from the PBS repo, cluster them by defect class, verify each against the actual board, and fix at the right altitude — patch a single board, or (when a class recurs) build a gate, sweep the whole corpus, and regenerate/drop collectively. Engine bugs route to the Classroom repo; bridge-judgment calls go to Rick. Nothing leaves the machine without David's OK. Invoke as `/issue` (optionally with an issue number or scenario to restrict the run).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
End-of-session wrap-up. Save what was learned this session to auto-memory, verify the working tree is committed/pushed, and emit a brief resume prompt the user can paste next time. Invoke as /done to close a work session. Wrap-up is auto-memory ONLY — never writes a handoff.md or any handoff file.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when inspecting or editing Blender scenes through the official Blender Lab MCP server. Check the add-on connection, read the scene first, and verify edits.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Review an author's manuscript, its argument and paragraph structure, analyze reviewer comments, draft rebuttals, and verify revisions. Use for self-review, structural edit plans, simulated reviewer objections, author responses, revision closure, and submission-readiness assessment. Formal assigned peer review is outside this skill; manuscript edits and final figures/tables use their owning skills.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when the user asks for QA analysis, test planning, test cases, or root-cause analysis of a defect. Also use for post-merge PR review analysis: auditing recent closed PRs for Devin/GitHub/security bot comments, verifying whether requested corrections were applied, and turning pending fixes into SPECs.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Control the user's existing Safari 26 session through a persistent script-driven JavaScript REPL. Use for inspecting, navigating, clicking, filling, selecting, uploading, or verifying webpages in Safari when an MCP/plugin transport is unavailable.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Control the user's existing Safari 26 tabs through a persistent JavaScript REPL with a Playwright-style browser API. Use when a task must inspect, navigate, click, fill, select, or verify a page in Safari while preserving the user's current logins and browser state.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。