「analyse」の検索結果

Generate professional clinical decision support (CDS) documents for pharmaceutical and clinical research settings, including patient cohort analyses (biomarker-stratified with outcomes) and treatment recommendation reports (evidence-based guidelines with decision algorithms). Supports GRADE evidence grading, statistical analysis (hazard ratios, survival curves, waterfall plots), biomarker integration, and regulatory compliance. Outputs publication-ready LaTeX/PDF format optimized for drug development, clinical research, and evidence synthesis.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Builds or audits a literature review, producing an evidence map, the closest prior work, source clusters, a gap verdict, and a synthesis plan for the introduction. Use when the user asks whether a contribution is novel, who has studied a question, what the literature establishes, or how to organize a review, or wants a reading list, Zotero export, or pile of papers turned into one. For systematic reviews or meta-analyses it produces the protocol scaffold and routes registration (PROSPERO or OSF) and screening to dedicated tools.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Plans a research project as a decision map that persists across sessions, resolving one ticket per session until the design is defensible and pre-registerable. The map lives as Markdown in the repository, literature sweeps run as parallel research tickets, and the resolved map compiles into a pre-analysis plan. Use at project start, when a design has more open decisions than one conversation can hold, or when planning restarts each session. Not for executing analyses or writing the paper.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Plans a research project as a durable decision map, resolving one design decision per session until the design is defensible and pre-registerable. Use at project start, when a design has more open decisions than one conversation holds, or when planning keeps restarting. Not for running analyses or writing the paper.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Write or rewrite prose so it sounds like a human wrote it — not a frontier model. Named in homage to Rabindranath Tagore, whose prose carried what frontier models reach for and miss: a point of view, specificity over abstraction, and restraint over puffery. Merges two complementary approaches: a 29-pattern catalog of AI tells (from humanizer) plus an 8-rule operating system with an 8-dimension scoring gate (extending stop-slop). Use when drafting, editing, or reviewing any prose: essays, posts, docs, reports, emails. Detects and removes inflated symbolism, promotional language, superficial -ing analyses, vague attributions, em dash overuse, rule of three, AI vocabulary, passive voice, negative parallelisms, filler phrases, inanimate-verb constructions, narrator-from-a-distance voice, and metronomic rhythm. Adds back the things AI writing usually lacks: point of view, stakes, specificity, restraint, varied rhythm, and trust in the reader.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Analyse files for ArchitectKB template repository suitability

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Analyse architecture diagrams and flowcharts

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Decompose dense codebase-wide, multi-document, PDF, and aggregation work even when the input fits the context window, following Recursive Language Models (Zhang, Kraska, Khattab, 2025). Use when the user asks to analyse all files, a whole repo, all docs, large PDFs, or to aggregate or multi-hop across scattered sources. Skip one file, one function, a single needle, or a one-page PDF conversion. Triggers: long context, context rot, large codebase, many files, all files, big document, multi-document, PDF, aggregate, summarize everything, codebase-wide, multi-hop, recursive, sub-agents, map-reduce.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Evaluates corporate vulnerability to shareholder activism with governance assessment, valuation gaps, and operational improvement opportunities. Use when assessing activist risk, identifying vulnerabilities, or preparing defensive analyses.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Tested output format specifications for Claude prompts. Use when the user wants a specific deliverable structure — retrieving, reviewing, customizing, or building output formatting. Trigger on: "give me the Executive Brief format," "show me the output template for," "I need the Decision Matrix structure," "show me available output formats," "build a custom output format for." Provides 10 ready-to-use structures (executive briefs, technical designs, research summaries, implementation plans, decision matrices, competitive analyses, post-mortems, stakeholder updates, strategic memos, process documentation) plus a custom template, with per-section length guidance and format constraints tested against Claude formatting defaults. If unsure which format fits, use rootnode-block-selection first if available. Do NOT use for evaluating existing prompts (use rootnode-prompt-validation if available) or choosing reasoning/identity approaches (use rootnode-block-selection if available).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Plan a comprehensive spectroscopic analysis campaign by defining the analytical question, assessing sample characteristics, selecting appropriate techniques using a decision matrix, planning sample preparation for each technique, sequencing analyses from non-destructive to destructive, and defining success criteria with a cross-validation strategy.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Compute relative and absolute binding free energies with the Open Free Energy toolkit — the rigorous alchemical alternative to docking scores when a congeneric series needs reliable potency ranking. Use this skill to plan a perturbation network over a ligand set, choose atom mappings, run hybrid-topology or separated-topology protocols, and analyse the result — per-edge ΔΔG with uncertainty, cycle-closure error, and mean unsigned error against measured affinities. Also trigger on OpenFE, alchemical transformation, thermodynamic cycle, RBFE, ABFE, SepTop, lambda window, MBAR, cycle closure, or perturbation map.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Shows you how to use Cowork's parallel workers to run multiple tasks at the same time instead of one after another — dramatically cutting the time on batch work. For processing large batches of files or research tasks, when running multiple independent analyses simultaneously, or during a performance optimization session. Use when the user says "speed up", "parallel workers", "batch task", "process multiple files", "why is cowork so slow", "faster", "do several things at once", or "can cowork multitask".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when characterising a malware sample, the user asks "what does this binary do?" / "analyse this hash deeply", or `/hash-investigation` flags a novel sample warranting deeper review. Static + dynamic methodology, behavioural indicators, sandbox interpretation.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Generate a detailed Buy/Sell/Hold equity research report for Indian stock market (NSE/BSE listed companies). Use this skill whenever the user asks for a stock analysis, equity research, investment recommendation, target price, fundamental analysis, technical analysis, or buy/sell/hold opinion on any Indian company or stock. Triggers on phrases like "analyse [stock]", "should I buy [stock]", "research report for [company]", "target price for [stock]", "is [stock] a good buy", "NSE/BSE stock analysis", etc. Always use this skill for any Indian equity research request — even if the user just names a stock ticker or company and asks "what do you think?"

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when the user wants a complete SPSS or SPSS-MCP empirical research workflow: organize source data, prepare datasets, design variables and models, run SPSS analyses, export Chinese result paragraphs and tables, write a Chinese LaTeX paper, and compile the final PDF.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Answer data questions -- from quick lookups to full analyses. Use when looking up a single metric, investigating what's driving a trend or drop, comparing segments over time, or preparing a formal data report for stakeholders.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Maakt regelrecht-scenario's vindbaar en hun norm-ketens leesbaar/geassert. Aan de invoerkant — vertaal een platte lijst leaf-parameters naar benoemde casus-assen + een herbruikbare persona-bibliotheek, met een reverse-lookup casus-matrix. Aan de uitvoerkant — maak de norm-keten zichtbaar via keten-checkpoints (assert elke knoop op het kritieke pad, niet alleen de endpoint) en golden-trace-snapshots + branch-coverage. Gebruik dit bij het schrijven of opschonen van scenario-/feature-files, het terugvinden of ontwerpen van een specifieke casus in een grote variabelenlijst, het reviewen van engine-traces, of het regressie-bestendig maken van cross-law-ketens zodat een ketenfout niet stil achter een correcte endpoint verdwijnt. Dossier-agnostisch; de regelrecht-methode is de vaste taal. Haakt aan op regelrecht-stelselanalyse (engine-tests / meta-check) en regelrecht-audit-products (testcase-scenario's).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Front-door router voor het werken aan een regelrecht-dossier. Gebruik dit aan het begin van een dossier, of bij twijfel over waar te beginnen — het triageert de situatie en routeert naar de juiste skill (regelrecht-stelselanalyse voor desk-review/corpus-completion, regelrecht-audit-products voor live expert-validatie) en de juiste volgorde. Bevat het routeringsprincipe: feitelijke defecten routeren naar de desk, oordeels-/praktijkvragen naar de workshop. Dossier-agnostisch.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when running or wiring OpenScientist for AI Gene Review gene-function hypotheses, especially blinded comparisons against local bioinformatics analyses.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Provide constructive, evidence-based research mentoring feedback on student manuscripts, proposals, analyses, code, figures, and presentations. Use for advisor-style review that teaches the next improvement without impersonating an advisor or making unsupported scientific judgments.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Working with observational climate data — reanalyses, station records, anomalies, trends, and honest uncertainty.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Remove signs of AI-generated writing from text. Use when editing or reviewing text to make it sound more natural and human-written. Based on Wikipedia's comprehensive "Signs of AI writing" guide. Detects and fixes patterns including: inflated symbolism, promotional language, superficial -ing analyses, vague attributions, em dash overuse, rule of three, AI vocabulary words, passive voice, negative parallelisms, and filler phrases.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when adversarially reviewing a document that makes formal or technical claims — math derivations, physics papers, statistical analyses, benchmark reports, whitepapers. Inventories every equation and quantitative claim, verifies each AS NAMED in the text (never a paraphrase or a neighboring statement), and classifies VERIFIED / REFUTED / UNVERIFIABLE / VACUOUS. Triggers on "check this paper", "verify these claims", "is this derivation right", "review this proof", "audit this benchmark", "does the math hold up". For source-code review see code-review-and-quality; for skill/agent library audits see skill-library-review; for content quality scoring see content-ops.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。