203 件 ・ 関連度順
概要と使いどころ
Spot-check citations in library files for obvious hallucinations. Resolves DOIs against the DOI registry, validates arXiv IDs, checks the format of journal references. Soft-fails on transient lookup failures rather than blocking. Recommended after kb-ingest and as part of periodic library hygiene.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Create, merge, and deduplicate BibTeX bibliography files using R packages (RefManageR, bibtex). Parse .bib files into structured R objects, merge multiple bibliographies with deduplication by DOI or title similarity, generate entries from DOI/ISBN/arXiv ID, and export clean sorted .bib files. Use when creating a new .bib file for an R Markdown or Quarto project, merging bibliographies from multiple collaborators, deduplicating a .bib that has grown through copy-paste accumulation, or generating BibTeX entries programmatically from DOIs or other identifiers.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Look up any arxiv paper on alphaxiv.org to get a structured AI-generated overview. This is faster and more reliable than trying to read a raw PDF.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Analyzes research papers (PDF/arXiv URL) and converts them into executable code. Automatically activated upon requests for paper replication, algorithm implementation, or research reproduction. Responds to requests like "Implement this paper", "paper2code", "Convert paper to code".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
根據使用者的文章或論文草稿，自動用 Semantic Scholar、Crossref、arXiv API 搜尋相關文獻，並查核既有引用(文獻是否真實存在、書目欄位是否正確、內容是否支持文中論點)，也能從主題出發寫出「每個宣稱都有真實文獻支撐」的帶引用文章；另含研究生工具組：文獻矩陣、領域地圖、research gap 偵測、閱讀筆記卡、引用完整性檢查、中英術語一致性、口試/審稿預演、新文獻追蹤、引用需求標記(annotate)、反面證據搜尋(counter)、證據強度評級(strength)、claim-evidence 總表(claims)、撤稿查詢(retract)。凡是使用者提到找文獻、找 paper、補參考文獻、查核引用、檢查 citation、驗證參考文獻、related work、literature review，貼文章要求配文獻、問「這段話有沒有文獻支持」、要求「寫一篇帶參考文獻的文章」、要整理文獻比較表、問已指名兩概念的交集有沒有人做過、要準備口試文獻答辯時，都要使用本 skill。本 skill 的 gap 指令只查證使用者已指名的 X 與 Y 交集；若使用者連題目都還沒有、需要生成並逐一淘汰候選方向，那是題目生成，不在本 skill 範圍(環境裝有 research-gap-hunter 時交給它，沒有就如實說明本 skill 只能查證已指名的交集)。本 skill 的 map 指令盤的是**文獻**——奠基文獻是哪幾篇、關鍵作者是誰、近三年往哪走；若使用者要的是「這個領域現在有哪些**做法**、每一種買到什麼付出什麼、哪些已經飽和」，那是技術盤點不是文獻盤點，交給 research-gap-hunter 的 landscape，沒有那個 skill 就如實說明本 skill 的 map 只回答文獻層的問題。
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use this skill when the user wants to download paper PDFs by DOI(s). Triggers: "下载这个/这几个 DOI的 PDF/全文", "把这个 DOI 列表全部下下来", "批量下 dois.txt", "download paper(s) for DOI(s) …", "bulk-download from this Web of Science / WoS savedrecs export". Routes each DOI through publisher TDM APIs (Wiley/Elsevier/Springer) then OA fallbacks (OpenAlex/Crossref/Unpaywall), and — when --use-browser-fallback is set — a final Playwright pass that reuses institutional cookies for ACS/RSC/IEEE/AIP/IOP/APS/Science. DO NOT use for paper *search* (use Semantic Scholar / arXiv instead), Zotero import / metadata sync, or downloading *all references of* a single paper (use the ref-downloader skill).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
专业技术选型与方案调研顾问。当用户需要做技术选型决策、调研某项技术方向、评估候选方案、寻找最优解时使用。支持：学术论文检索（ArXiv/Google Scholar）、大厂工程博客分析、竞品/开源方案对比、跨行业类比迁移、多维评估打分矩阵、结合业务约束给出可落地的双方案推荐。触发词：技术选型、技术调研、方案调研、技术评估、调研一下、研究一下技术方案、怎么做比较好、业界怎么做、有哪些方案、选哪个好。
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Радар фундаментальных публикаций про автономных AI-агентов в блогах AI-лабораторий и продуктовых команд (Anthropic, Claude, OpenAI, Cursor, LangChain, Amp, Cognition). Собирает ленты и HTML-индексы за окно дат, отсеивает продуктовые анонсы и релизы моделей, оставляет глубокие посты про архитектуру агентов: память и контекст, long-running циклы, self-improvement, оркестрация, экономика прогона, эвалы, риски длинных горизонтов. Отдаёт дайджест со ссылками, сутью каждого поста и тем, что забрать в свою работу. Use when (используй когда): пользователь хочет узнать, что нового вышло в блогах про AI-агентов, собрать дайджест за неделю или период, отследить исследования про агентную память. Триггерится на: "радар", "дайджест", "что нового в блогах", "публикации про агентов", "agent research", "что вышло за неделю", "блог Anthropic", "cursor blog", "langchain blog", "long-running agents", "research digest". Do NOT use for (не для): корпоративные вики и трекеры; arXiv; доставка сообщений.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when the user wants to add source identity from PDF, URL, arXiv, DOI, note, experiment result, manual reference, or Zotero item into a Research Pilot project.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when the user wants an agent to create or update a project-local source/paper note from a PDF, URL, arXiv, DOI, manual source, or Zotero item.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Consult this skill BEFORE proposing a fix to any CLI gap or schema gap that touches evidence, trust magnitude, evidence types, evidence grades, the TM formula, or star-level promotion gates. Also read it whenever an issue mentions citations, stars, commits, contributors, views, reviewers, percentile, arxiv, github-stars-own, repo-own, social-signal, benchmark-result, peer-review, self-attestation, fusion-recipe, verifier-attestation, or proxy-containment — those are the 10 canonical evidence types and the raw inputs that feed their formulas. Also read it when asked whether a skill qualifies for a given star level (0★–6★): the Star Bar and promotion gates live in `META.md`, not in the TM methodology page. Reading both prevents proposing a calibration that satisfies the TM grade threshold but violates a Star Bar installability or link requirement.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Phase 1 of the Gaia evidence verification pipeline. Use this skill whenever you need to gather, consolidate, or refresh raw evidence for named skills in the registry. Trigger phrases: "collect evidence", "populate the data lake", "gather sources", "run ev-collection", "Phase 1", "compile the evidence index", "refresh the unified lake", "aggregate skill evidence", "build the evidence database". Also invoke as the first step before running ev-star-verification, ev-adversarial-audit, or ev-link-validation — nothing downstream is meaningful without a fresh, compiled index. Covers GitHub repo links, stargazer signals, YouTube showcases, arXiv papers, peer reviews, benchmark results, blog/newsletter posts, and self-attestation artifacts.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Skippable Phase 0 of the Gaia evidence verification pipeline. Use only on declared need for higher-quality Stage-2 evidence: a promotion candidate, or a skill that gaia-meta-sweep flagged as under-evidenced. Given a skill id, source repo/context, and needed evidence types (benchmark-result, arxiv, peer-review, social-signal), it runs Firecrawl searches, scrapes top hits to markdown, and appends discovered sources into Phase 1 inputs. Missing benchmark evidence is recorded as benchmark-source candidates first, not direct scoring rows. Trigger phrases: "discover evidence", "find new evidence", "Phase 0", "run ev-discovery", "search for benchmarks/papers", "under-evidenced", "promotion candidate needs stronger proof". This is the ONLY ev-* skill that searches the web for NEW evidence; other ev-* skills aggregate or verify known sources. Requires Firecrawl to be usable (`firecrawl --status` authenticated OR FIRECRAWL_API_KEY set); skips gracefully when neither holds.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
多源深度调研与专业报告生成。适用场景广泛——只要用户的问题涉及需要深度分析的专业话题，就应使用此技能。包括但不限于：(1) 用户明确要求调研/research/综述/报告/发现；(2) 用户提出一个技术或科学话题，话题复杂度需要多源深度分析；(3) 用户要求对比多种技术方案的优劣；(4) 涉及生物医药、蛋白质、基因、药物靶点等需要专业数据库支撑的问题。核心能力：根据问题性质自动组合 arXiv 论文检索 + ToolUniverse 科学工具（UniProt/OpenTargets/PubMed/FAERS 等 1000+ 工具）+ Web 搜索，多源采集数据，交叉分析，生成专业 PDF/DOCX 研究报告。
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Summarize and critically analyze academic papers supplied as PDFs, text, arXiv links, or journal URLs. Ground claims in the inspected version and source locations; support focused questions, deeper appraisal, and cross-paper comparison.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use this skill when users need to search academic papers, download research documents, extract citations, or gather scholarly information. Triggers include: requests to "find papers on", "search research about", "download academic articles", "get citations for", or any request involving academic databases like arXiv, PubMed, Semantic Scholar, or Google Scholar. Also use for literature reviews, bibliography generation, and research discovery. Requires OpenClawCLI installation from clawhub.ai.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Add abstracts to .bib file entries by searching academic databases (arXiv, Semantic Scholar, CrossRef) with browser fallback.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Align, run, audit, and publish GEODE benchmark comparisons against Agent-World arXiv 2604.18292v1 across MCP-Mark, BFCL V4, and tau2-bench. Use for Agent-World or AgentWorld comparison requests, cross-suite agent benchmark design, Tau2 comparator/profile diagnosis, paired thin-runtime-versus-GEODE experiments, mean-accuracy@8 replication, or benchmark comparability and artifact reviews.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Auto-search and summarize latest AI/agent papers.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Fetch external sources (web/arXiv/GitHub) into scanner-gated wiki CANDIDATES, never canonical pages: guarded, capped, scanned. NOT for local knowledge (mk:wiki) or markdown fetch (mk:web-to-markdown).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
SOP for locating, auditing, and importing production-tested reference patterns and peer-reviewed literature. Trigger when: - Designing or implementing non-trivial algorithms, system protocols, design patterns, or major library integrations. - Prompt contains: prior art, reference implementation, research patterns, standard implementation, arXiv, RFC.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Knowledge pack from 'Towards Digital Engineering: The Advent of Digital Systems Engineering' (Huang et al., Old Dominion University, arXiv:2002.11672, 2020). Use when reasoning about digital engineering, the DoD Digital Engineering Strategy and its five goals, the Authoritative Source of Truth, digitalization vs. digitization, digital augmentation, digitalized models, provenance, unique identification, and the four-level (vision/strategy/action/foundation) DSE research framework. Covers the conceptual/vision layer of the field. SCOPE LIMITS: this is a single ~28-page vision paper, not a methods handbook — it is thin on step-by-step procedures, tooling, case studies, and quantitative evaluation, and it predates 2020 so it does not cover later digital-engineering standards or recent AI/LLM advances. Use the sebok pack for established SE canon and MBSE depth.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Build full-paper Chinese-English side-by-side, figure/table-aware, source-grounded Markdown readers for journal or conference papers from PDF, DOI, arXiv, publisher HTML, or pasted text. Use whenever the user asks to translate or read a paper, make 中英文对照/原文对照/全文翻译解读, extract figures or tables into the right positions, preserve figure/table placement near relevant prose, or keep exact source anchors for every block. This skill must not degrade into a summary-only output unless the user explicitly asks for a summary. Also trigger on general paper-reading and translation requests even without the word "Nature", such as reading/translating an academic paper, literature reading, understanding a paper, and Chinese phrasings like 读论文、精读论文、论文翻译、文献翻译、文献阅读、学术阅读、帮我读这篇文章、翻译这篇paper.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
No thanks “Sebastian is an incredible educator and always has invaluable insights--do keep up with his work!
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。