「assess」の検索結果

Comprehensive market environment analysis and reporting tool. Analyzes global markets including US, European, Asian markets, forex, commodities, and economic indicators. Provides risk-on/risk-off assessment, sector analysis, and technical indicator interpretation. Triggers on keywords like market analysis, market environment, global markets, trading environment, market conditions, investment climate, market sentiment, forex analysis, stock market analysis, 相場環境, 市場分析, マーケット状況, 投資環境.

Configures AWS Resilience Hub v2 for multi-account resilience management across an AWS Organization. Covers the per-service cross-account permission model, cross-account IAM roles, and centralized assessment from a single account. Applies when the user wants to set up org-wide resilience or assess workloads that span multiple AWS accounts.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Guides the end-to-end AWS resilience lifecycle integrating Resilience Hub v2, Fault Injection Service, and Application Recovery Controller. Covers the Define → Test → Operate workflow: from policy creation through failure mode assessment, to FIS experiment validation, to ARC operational controls. Applicable when the user wants a complete resilience strategy, needs to connect findings to experiments to controls, or is planning a resilience program. Also applicable for the meta question of whether marking NGRH findings as resolved is enough, whether they are "done" after resolving findings, or how to validate findings before resolving them. Not applicable for resolving or remediating a specific individual finding (see resilience-hub-failure-mode-assessment), or when a single service is explicitly named (e.g. "what FIS experiment should I run").

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Sets up AWS Resilience Hub v2 from scratch: creates resilience policies with SLO targets, registers systems and user journeys, onboards services with input sources, and runs a first failure mode assessment. Applies when the user wants to get started with Resilience Hub v2, create a policy, onboard a service, or run an assessment — including creating one concrete policy with specific availability/RTO/RPO targets and a DR approach for a single service (even a tier-1 one). Does not apply to FIS experiments or ARC routing controls.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Build quiz and assessment funnels that generate qualified leads at 30-50% conversion. Use when the user mentions "quiz funnel", "scorecard", "lead magnet", "score-based segmentation", or "lead qualification". Also trigger when designing self-assessment tools, building calculators or graders for marketing, or creating personalized result pages that drive conversions. Covers concept hooks, question design, dynamic results by tier, and automated follow-up sequences. For landing page conversion, see cro-methodology. For full marketing plans, see one-page-marketing.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Build empowered product teams using discovery and delivery dual-track. Use when the user mentions "product discovery", "empowered teams", "feature factory", "opportunity assessment", "product vision", "product strategy", "what should we build", or "our roadmap is just a feature list". Also trigger when restructuring teams away from output-driven models, or deciding what to build next based on outcomes. Covers discovery techniques, team structure, opportunity assessment, vision/strategy, and continuous delivery. For customer interviews, see mom-test. For ongoing discovery systems, see continuous-discovery.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Assesses and improves how personal data is collected, used, shared, and retained — data mapping, lawful basis, consent, processor agreements, subject rights, and breach obligations. Use this before launching anything that handles personal data, when adding a vendor that will process it, when a data subject request arrives, when assessing exposure under GDPR or US state privacy laws, or when preparing for a privacy review.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Identifies, assesses, and tracks organizational risk — building and maintaining a risk register, scoring exposure, assigning owners and treatments, and preparing for audit. Use this to stand up a risk program, assess the risk in a decision or initiative, prepare for a certification or audit, decide whether a risk should be accepted, mitigated, transferred, or avoided, or report risk posture to leadership.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Evaluates the quality of cohort studies using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS). Use when the user provides a cohort study article or text and needs a quality assessment report.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Perform quantitative meta-analysis with effect size calculation, forest plots, funnel plots, and heterogeneity assessment. Use when: user asks to combine results from multiple studies, calculate pooled effect sizes, assess publication bias, or create forest/funnel plots. NOT f...

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Assesses whether a medical research topic is worth starting now by separating true novelty from pseudo-novelty, auditing real feasibility under stated resource constraints, and forcing a concrete start / narrow / redesign / stop decision. Always require explicit assumptions and never fabricate references, datasets, resource availability, precedent studies, or publication claims.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Assesses whether and how an existing mobile product should migrate to React Native. Use when auditing one or more product repositories for migration readiness, including products whose iOS, Android, and other clients live in separate directories or repositories; choosing brownfield, greenfield, or a checkpoint-based path; defining a representative trial; or preparing a baseline and ROI decision before implementation. When product scope or material evidence is unavailable, grills the stakeholder with exactly one question per turn instead of sending a questionnaire.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Assess and improve the reliability posture of PaaS Applications (Azure Functions and Azure App Service). Scans deployed resources for zone redundancy, ZRS storage, health probes, and multi-region failover. Presents a feature-pivoted checklist, then drives staged remediation (CLI or IaC patches) end-to-end with user confirmation. WHEN: "assess reliability", "check reliability", "zone redundant", "multi-region failover", "high availability", "disaster recovery", "single points of failure", "reliability posture", "resiliency".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Assess Kubernetes workloads and cluster configuration for AKS Automatic compatibility. Identifies incompatibilities, generates fixes, and guides migration from AKS Standard to AKS Automatic. WHEN: migrate to AKS Automatic, check AKS Automatic readiness, validate manifests for Automatic, assess cluster for Automatic compatibility, fix deployment for Automatic compatibility, identify AKS Automatic migration blockers, is my cluster ready for AKS Automatic.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Run Azure compliance and security audits with azqr plus Key Vault expiration checks. Covers best-practice assessment, resource review, policy/compliance validation, and security posture checks. WHEN: compliance scan, security audit, BEFORE running azqr (compliance cli tool), Azure best practices, Key Vault expiration check, expired certificates, expiring secrets, orphaned resources, compliance assessment.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when asked 个人信息保护影响评估怎么做, 写一份 PIA, 处理敏感个人信息要评估吗, 自动化决策评估, PIPL 第五十五条, or assess a processing activity under China's Personal Information Protection Law. Produces a personal information protection impact assessment (个人信息保护影响评估) covering the PIPL Article 55 triggers, the Article 56 questions (lawful, legitimate and necessary; impact and risk; adequacy of protection), a risk register with mitigations and owners, and a record kept for at least three years.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when asked 等保怎么做, 等保 2.0 定级, 等保备案和测评流程, 等保三级要求, 我们的系统需要过等保吗, or prepare an information system for China's Multi-Level Protection Scheme (MLPS 2.0, 网络安全等级保护). Produces a grading recommendation (定级) with the reasoning for the expert review, the filing (备案) and assessment (测评) steps and their usual timing, a gap checklist across the ten control areas of GB/T 22239-2019, and a remediation plan, marked as preparation for a licensed assessor.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Conduct a structured ethical review of an AI or ML feature, model, or product. Use when preparing to deploy an AI system, assessing algorithmic risk, auditing a model for bias, or producing a responsible AI impact assessment. Produces a structured ethics review covering fairness, transparency, privacy, safety, accountability, and societal impact with a risk tier score, pre-deployment checklist, and prioritised mitigations.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Systematic strategic planning framework for philosophy and interdisciplinary academic papers targeting preprint platforms (PhilArchive, arXiv, PhilSci-Archive). Use when users want to: (1) plan a paper on a specific topic, (2) identify research gaps and assess originality, (3) develop optimized paper outlines, (4) prepare for preprint submission, or (5) understand platform requirements and writing standards. Triggered by phrases like 'plan a paper on,' 'help me design a paper about,' 'identify research gaps in,' 'is this idea original,' or when users need structured research planning. The skill guides through three phases: Platform Analysis (identifying target venue and studying sample papers), Theoretical Framework (AI-driven literature search and gap identification), and Outline Optimization (structured design with reviewer-perspective self-assessment). Each phase includes quality evaluation standards and validation checkpoints. Output: optimized detailed outline ready for systematic writing (use with academic-paper-composer skill).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Collect and assess quality metrics for Simulink models using the metric.Engine API. Use when evaluating model design quality (maintainability, complexity, architecture) or testing completeness (unit testing, SIL, PIL, coverage, pass rates) after edits or test runs. Covers metric discovery, collection, report generation, and diagnostics. Triggers on: "collect metrics", "quality metrics", "metric.Engine", "testing metrics", "maintainability metrics", "SIL metrics", "PIL metrics", "what metrics are available", "assess quality", "coverage metrics", "generate metric report", "diagnose metric errors".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Nominates and assesses CRISPR off-target sites genome-wide. Enumerates candidate sites by mismatch and bulge tolerance with Cas-OFFinder/CRISPRitz, ranks them with the published CFD score (SpCas9-only, relative ranker) or MIT/CRISTA/energy models, runs variant-aware screening against gnomAD/individual genomes (CRISPRme), and frames the empirical genome-wide discovery assays (GUIDE-seq, CIRCLE-seq, CHANGE-seq, DISCOVER-seq, Digenome-seq) and high-fidelity nuclease choice (HiFi Cas9, Sniper-Cas9, eSpCas9, SpCas9-HF1). Use when assessing guide RNA specificity, choosing among candidate guides, screening a therapeutic guide against population variation, or planning empirical off-target validation. Distinguishes predicted vs detected vs validated. On-target activity scoring and deaminase (Cas-independent) base/prime-editor off-targets are separate skills.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Detects and removes contamination in genome assemblies via two disjoint workflows - foreign-sequence screening of a single-organism (eukaryote/isolate) assembly with NCBI FCS-GX (GenBank-submission-mandatory), FCS-adaptor, and BlobToolKit blob plots; and MAG/bin quality assessment with CheckM2 plus GUNC (chimerism) plus GTDB-Tk taxonomy, judged against MIMAG. Covers why CheckM2 alone is blind to disjoint-marker chimeras, the FCS-GX RAM wall, organelle/NUMT triage, strain heterogeneity, and the HGT-vs-contamination (tardigrade) trap. Use when screening an assembly for foreign contamination before GenBank submission, assessing MAG completeness/contamination/chimerism, deciding which contigs to remove, or distinguishing real HGT from contaminant contigs.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Generate Euro NCAP test scenarios and variants using the ADT Euro NCAP support package. Use when creating NCAP seed scenarios, generating variants, translating between drivingScenario and RoadRunner, plotting scenario descriptors, computing NCAP scores, or exporting reports. Triggers on: ncapScenario, euroAssessment, getScenario, getScenarioDescriptor, generateVariants, ScenarioDescriptor, ScenarioDescriptorPlot, ncapScore, ncapReport, exportReport, configureVUT, assessmentTable, Euro NCAP, CCRs, CCRm, CCRb, CCFtap, CCCscp, CPNA, CPFA, CBNA, variant generation.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Conduct threat modeling using STRIDE methodology. Identify threats, assess risks, and design security controls. Use when designing secure systems or assessing application security.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。