「attack」の検索結果

Detect RDP brute force attacks by parsing Windows Security Event Logs (EVTX files, via python-evtx) for failed logon patterns (Event ID 4625, Logon Type 10/3), correlating with successful logons (Event ID 4624), and analyzing NLA failures and source IP frequency. Use when investigating exposed RDP endpoints, building SIEM detection rules for credential guessing, or confirming whether a compromised account followed a brute-force pattern.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Detect MITRE ATLAS AML.T0024 attacks (model stealing, inversion, membership inference) performed via inference-API abuse, by monitoring per-principal query volume/distribution, rate-limiting and perturbing outputs, and red-teaming your model's extractability. Use for a public or partner inference API needing cloning/inversion/membership-inference detection, or a pre-deployment red-team exercise to measure extraction risk.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Detects sophisticated cyber-physical attacks that follow the Stuxnet pattern of modifying PLC logic while spoofing sensor readings to hide the manipulation, using PLC logic integrity monitoring (Claroty xDome, Nozomi Guardian) and physics-based process anomaly detection. Use when hunting for IT-to-OT lateral movement or discrepancies between PLC program state and physical process behavior in ICS/SCADA environments.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Scans GitHub Actions workflows and CI/CD pipeline configurations for supply chain attack vectors including unpinned actions, script injection via expressions, dependency confusion, and secrets exposure. Uses PyGithub and YAML parsing for automated audit. Use when hardening CI/CD pipelines or investigating compromised build systems.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Detect Golden Ticket attacks in Active Directory using Splunk and KQL queries against domain controller event logs, looking for Kerberos TGT anomalies such as mismatched encryption types, impossible ticket lifetimes, non-existent accounts, and forged PAC signatures. Use when hunting for Kerberos ticket forgery or krbtgt-based persistence (MITRE T1558.001) in AD environments.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Detect malicious inbox/mail-flow forwarding rules that adversaries create to maintain persistent access to email communications for intelligence collection and business email compromise. Use when hunting for suspicious auto-forwarding, hidden mailbox rules, or T1114-style email collection persistence after a compromised account or BEC incident.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Detect cyber attacks on OT historian servers (OSIsoft PI, Ignition, GE Proficy, Wonderware InSQL) using a Python detector that flags unauthorized queries, data manipulation, and lateral-movement indicators as historians pivot between IT and OT networks. Use when monitoring historians bridging IT/OT zones for compromise, investigating historian-specific CVE exploitation, or validating historian data integrity after a suspected OT incident.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Detect API enumeration attacks (BOLA/IDOR, OWASP API1:2023) by writing SIEM detection rules that flag sequential or UUID identifier iteration, parameter tampering, and mixed 200/401/403 response patterns from API gateway and WAF logs. Use when investigating suspected object-level authorization abuse, building threat-hunting queries for API access-control bypass, or hardening API logging/rate-limiting against enumeration.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Detect DCSync attacks (MITRE T1003.006) where adversaries abuse Active Directory replication privileges to extract password hashes, by auditing Event ID 4662 for the DS-Replication-Get-Changes GUIDs and flagging non-domain-controller accounts issuing DsGetNCChanges RPC calls. Use when hunting for credential theft via Mimikatz lsadump::dcsync or Impacket secretsdump, investigating lateral movement with domain admin credentials, or auditing AD replication permissions.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Detect DLL side-loading and search-order hijacking (MITRE T1574) where adversaries plant malicious DLLs for legitimate signed applications to load, by analyzing Sysmon Event ID 7 DLL-load events, checking signatures/hashes against known-good versions, and flagging path anomalies with EDR tools like CrowdStrike, MDE, or SentinelOne. Use when investigating EDR alerts on unsigned DLLs, hunting for APT persistence via trojanized applications, or triaging incidents involving DLL hijacking.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Conducts authorized wireless network penetration tests to assess the security of WiFi infrastructure by testing for weak encryption protocols, captive portal bypasses, evil twin attacks, WPA2/WPA3 handshake capture, rogue access point detection, and client-side attacks. The tester evaluates wireless authentication, network segmentation, and the effectiveness of wireless intrusion detection systems. Activates for requests involving wireless pentest, WiFi security assessment, WPA2/WPA3 testing, or rogue access point detection.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Simulates man-in-the-middle attacks using Ettercap, mitmproxy, and Bettercap in authorized environments to intercept, analyze, and modify network traffic for testing encryption enforcement, certificate validation, and detection capabilities.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Perform Pass-the-Ticket (PtT) lateral movement by extracting Kerberos TGT/TGS tickets from LSASS memory on a compromised host and injecting them into another session to impersonate the ticket owner without knowing their password. Use during authorized post-exploitation to move laterally or escalate access via stolen Kerberos tickets, or to validate detections for Kerberos ticket theft and reuse.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

This skill outlines methodologies for performing authorized penetration testing against AWS, Azure, and GCP cloud environments. It covers understanding the shared responsibility model for testing scope, leveraging cloud-specific attack tools like Pacu and ScoutSuite, exploiting IAM misconfigurations, testing for SSRF to cloud metadata services, and reporting findings aligned to MITRE ATT&CK Cloud matrix.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Conduct external recon using OSINT techniques to map an organization's external attack surface without touching target systems, gathering DNS records, certificate transparency logs, search results, social media, code repositories, and breach databases into a target profile. Use for the passive info-gathering phase of a pentest, external footprinting, or collecting employee/email intel for a social engineering campaign.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Builds a structured SOC incident response playbook for ransomware attacks covering detection, containment, eradication, and recovery phases with specific SIEM queries, isolation procedures, and decision trees. Use when SOC teams need formalized response procedures for ransomware incidents aligned to NIST SP 800-61 and MITRE ATT&CK ransomware techniques.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Run OAuth 2.0 device-code and illicit-consent phishing attacks against Microsoft Entra ID, using TokenTactics-style tooling to steal access and refresh tokens, bypass MFA, and pivot across Microsoft 365 services. Use for authorized red-team engagements simulating device-code or consent-grant phishing against a tenant you have explicit written permission to test.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Systematically map threat actor behavior and observed IOCs to the MITRE ATT&CK framework, build technique coverage heatmaps with the ATT&CK Navigator, identify detection gaps, and produce actionable threat intelligence reports across the Enterprise, Mobile, and ICS matrices. Use when analyzing threat actor TTPs, correlating IOCs to specific ATT&CK techniques, or assessing defensive detection coverage against adversary behavior.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Analyzes Windows Security, System, and Sysmon event logs in Splunk to detect authentication attacks, privilege escalation, persistence mechanisms, and lateral movement using SPL queries mapped to MITRE ATT&CK techniques. Use when SOC analysts need to investigate Windows-based threats, build detection queries, or perform forensic timeline analysis of Windows endpoints and domain controllers.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Analyzes intrusion activity against the Lockheed Martin Cyber Kill Chain framework to identify which phases an adversary has completed, where defenses succeeded or failed, and what controls would have interrupted the attack at earlier phases. Use when conducting post-incident analysis, building prevention-focused security controls, or mapping detection gaps to kill chain phases. Activates for requests involving kill chain analysis, intrusion kill chain, attack phase mapping, or Lockheed Martin kill chain framework.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Red-team a PRD, roadmap, or strategy by attacking its load-bearing assumptions before reality does. Steelmans then attacks each claim, ranks failure modes by impact × likelihood × cheapness-to-test, and returns the cheapest test and kill criteria for each. Use when stress-testing a plan, pressure-testing a strategy, challenging assumptions, or preparing a doc for executive review.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Adversarial analysis deploying parallel expert agents to stress-test ideas, strategies, and plans — decomposes into atomic claims, attacks them, then steelmans and counter-argues, producing severity-ranked findings with remediation. USE WHEN red team, attack idea, counterarguments, critique, stress test, devil's advocate, find weaknesses, break this, poke holes, strongest objection. NOT FOR collaborative debate to find best path (use Council).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when Codex is already in the attack-path-analysis phase of a security scan or the user explicitly asks to trace a security finding from source to sink and calibrate severity. Do not use as the primary trigger for full PR, commit, branch, patch, or repository scans.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Compares Trailmark code graphs at two source code snapshots (git commits, tags, or directories) to surface security-relevant structural changes. Detects new attack paths, complexity shifts, blast radius growth, taint propagation changes, and privilege boundary modifications that text diffs miss. Use when comparing code between commits or tags, analyzing structural evolution, detecting attack surface growth, reviewing what changed between audit snapshots, or finding security-relevant changes that text diffs miss.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。