「behavior」の検索結果

Analyze failing tests to detect functional bugs in code. Takes repository and failing test output as input, analyzes execution behavior, assertions, and stack traces to identify suspicious code regions and root causes. Use when debugging test failures, investigating regression bugs, or understanding why tests fail. Explains the bug mechanism, identifies affected code, and suggests fixes based on test expectations vs actual behavior.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Validate API consistency between two versions of Python libraries. Use when you need to compare API behavior, signatures, and exceptions between library versions to identify breaking changes, incompatible modifications, and behavior differences. The skill performs static analysis of Python code, compares function signatures, class definitions, parameter types, return types, and generates a detailed JSON report with breaking changes, warnings, and migration guidance. Supports Python libraries and packages.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Check behavioral consistency between high-level hardware specifications and RTL implementations. Use when asked to check RTL consistency, verify RTL against spec, check hardware specification compliance, validate RTL implementation, find spec violations in RTL, check behavioral consistency, or when working with hardware designs that need verification against protocol specifications, timing requirements, or functional specifications in Verilog, VHDL, or SystemVerilog.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Validate API consistency between two versions of Java libraries. Use when you need to compare API behavior, signatures, and exceptions between Java library versions to identify breaking changes, incompatible modifications, and behavior differences. The skill performs static analysis of Java code, compares method signatures, class definitions, interface changes, parameter types, return types, exception declarations, and generates a detailed JSON report with breaking changes, warnings, and migration guidance. Supports Java libraries and packages.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Automatically infer loop invariants for code verification and correctness proofs. Use when analyzing loops to identify properties that hold throughout execution, generating assertions for verification, proving loop correctness, or documenting loop behavior. Supports Python, Java, C/C++, and language-agnostic analysis. Generates invariants as code assertions (assert statements). Triggers when users ask to infer invariants, find loop properties, generate loop assertions, prove loop correctness, or verify loop behavior.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Performs abstract interpretation to produce summarized execution traces and high-level program behavior representations. Highlights key control flow paths, variable relationships, loop invariants, function summaries, and potential runtime states using abstract domains (intervals, signs, nullness, etc.). Use when analyzing program behavior, understanding execution paths, computing loop invariants, tracking variable ranges, detecting potential runtime errors, or generating program summaries without concrete execution.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Deep behavioral audit of a Lattice skill — proposes 3 review personas relevant to the skill, runs independent scenario analysis from each persona's perspective, then merges only the high-confidence, practical findings into a severity-ordered gap report with proposed fixes. Structural validation (conventions, cross-references) is skill-validate's job — this skill finds gaps that would realistically surface when someone actually uses the skill: missing scenario handling, ambiguous instructions, silent failure cases, and behavioral inconsistencies. Filters out theoretical edge cases, low-likelihood speculation, and findings owned by other skills. Use after writing or significantly changing any skill, or when the user says 'review this skill', 'deep review', 'does this skill work', 'find gaps in this skill', 'stress test this skill', 'review from different angles', or 'skill review'. Standalone — does not call other skills.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Synthesize behavioral personas from prior stage evidence for journey mapping and marketing during PRD v0.4 User Journeys. Triggers on requests to define personas, create user profiles, identify target users, or when user asks "who are our users?", "define personas", "user profiles", "target users", "persona creation", "who uses this product?". Consumes CFD- (v0.1-v0.3), BR- (targeting from v0.3 Moat), FEA- (v0.3 Feature Value Planning). Outputs PER- entries with behavioral profiles and feature relationships. Feeds v0.4 User Journey Mapping.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Cucumber runs behavior-driven (BDD) tests written as plain-language Gherkin feature files and matches each Given/When/Then step to code. Use when the user wants to write feature files, implement step definitions in JavaScript or TypeScript with cucumber-js, share state through a World, add hooks, tags and profiles, or run BDD scenarios in CI. Also use when the user mentions "cucumber," "BDD," "Gherkin," "feature files," "given-when-then," "step definitions," or "behavior-driven." For contract testing, see pact.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

The practice of collecting, analyzing, and acting on data to drive product decisions. Great analytics isn't about dashboards—it's about insights that lead to action. Every metric should answer a question that changes behavior. This skill covers event tracking, metrics design, dashboards, user behavior analysis, and data-driven decision making. The best analytics teams measure what matters, not what's easy to measure. Use when "analytics, metrics, tracking, dashboard, funnel, cohort, retention, events, KPI, measure, data, insights, conversion, engagement, analytics, metrics, data, dashboards, tracking, funnels, cohorts, KPIs, insights" mentioned.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Design and implement agent-based models (ABM) for simulating complex systems with emergent behavior from individual agent interactions. Use when "agent-based, multi-agent, emergent behavior, swarm simulation, social simulation, crowd modeling, population dynamics, individual-based, " mentioned.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Avalonia Zafiro Development workflow skill. Use this skill when the user needs Mandatory skills, conventions, and behavioral rules for Avalonia UI development using the Zafiro toolkit and the operator should preserve the upstream workflow, copied support files, and provenance before merging or handing off.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Avalonia Zafiro Development workflow skill. Use this skill when the user needs Mandatory skills, conventions, and behavioral rules for Avalonia UI development using the Zafiro toolkit and the operator should preserve the upstream workflow, copied support files, and provenance before merging or handing off.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Audience Analysis workflow skill. Use this skill when the user needs Understand audience demographics, preferences, behavior patterns, and engagement quality across Facebook, Instagram, YouTube, and TikTok and the operator should preserve the upstream workflow, copied support files, and provenance before merging or handing off.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Audience Analysis workflow skill. Use this skill when the user needs Understand audience demographics, preferences, behavior patterns, and engagement quality across Facebook, Instagram, YouTube, and TikTok and the operator should preserve the upstream workflow, copied support files, and provenance before merging or handing off.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Agent Evaluation workflow skill. Use this skill when the user needs Testing and benchmarking LLM agents including behavioral testing, and the operator should preserve the upstream workflow, copied support files, and provenance before merging or handing off.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Agent Evaluation workflow skill. Use this skill when the user needs Testing and benchmarking LLM agents including behavioral testing, and the operator should preserve the upstream workflow, copied support files, and provenance before merging or handing off.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Agent Evaluation workflow skill. Use this skill when the user needs Testing and benchmarking LLM agents including behavioral testing, and the operator should preserve the upstream workflow, copied support files, and provenance before merging or handing off.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

产品设计 / UX 设计 (产品设计 / UX 设计 (Product Design / UX Design) — 数字产品的用户体验设计：从用户研究 → 信息架构 → 交互设计 → 视觉/UI → 可用性测试 → 设计系统的认知操作系统，面向 UX designer / product designer / interaction designer / UX researcher / design systems engineer / design lead，以及想入行、转岗、服务这行(设计外包、设计工具厂商、研究平台)的视角。覆盖: (a) 第一性张力 — **用户中心/研究驱动 (user-centered, 'you are not the user', research before pixels, observe behavior not opinions) ⇄ 商业目标/约束/交付 (business goals, north-star metrics, ship it, designer 服务于产品成功不是个人作品集)**; **设计直觉/品味/craft (taste, aesthetics, 'attractive things work better' — Norman 情感化设计) ⇄ 数据/实验/A-B 测试 (data-driven, metrics, experimentation, 'opinions are not data')**; **用户说的 (stated preference, 访谈里说喜欢) ⇄ 用户做的 (revealed behavior, 行为观察 > 自陈, usability test 看人真实卡在哪)**; **一致性/设计系统/规范 (consistency, design system, Jakob's law 用户带着别处的习惯来, 复用组件) ⇄ 创新/打破模式 (innovation, 该不该破规范)**; **减法/简化 (simplicity, Krug 'Don't Make Me Think', less but better — Dieter Rams) ⇄ 功能丰富/利益相关者塞需求 (feature creep, stakeholder pressure)**; **UX(体验/流程/研究) ⇄ UI(视觉/像素/组件)** 的职责之争, **designer 该不该写代码 (design engineer / 'should designers code')**; (b) 核心工作流 / pipeline (最标准、最易蒸高质量+CLI 化) — Double Diamond (发现 discover → 定义 define → 开发 develop → 交付 deliver) / Design Thinking (共情 empathize → 定义 → 构思 ideate → 原型 prototype → 测试 test) / Design Sprint (Jake Knapp 5 天冲刺); 完整链: 用户研究 (访谈/问卷/可用性测试/卡片分类) → persona / journey map / JTBD → 信息架构 IA + 用户流 user flow → 线框 wireframe (低保真) → 交互/原型 prototype (高保真) → 视觉 UI / 设计系统落地 → 可用性测试 usability testing → handoff 给开发 → 度量迭代 (北极星 / HEART 框架); (c) 工具栈 — 设计/原型 (Figma 绝对主导 / Sketch 衰退 / Adobe XD 已停更 / Framer 高保真+建站 / Penpot 开源 / Principle / ProtoPie 微交互); 协作白板 (FigJam / Miro / Mural); 用户研究 (Maze / UserTesting / Lookback / Dovetail 研究库 / Optimal Workshop 卡片分类树测试 / Hotjar / Microsoft Clarity 热图); 设计系统/交付 (Storybook / 蓝湖(中) / Zeplin / design tokens / Tokens Studio); 度量 (Amplitude / Mixpanel / 北极星指标); AI 新兴 (Figma AI / v0 by Vercel / Galileo AI / Uizard / Cursor 给 design engineer); (d) 知识正典 — Don Norman《The Design of Everyday Things》(affordance/signifier/mapping 圣经)、Steve Krug《Don't Make Me Think》(可用性入门)、Alan Cooper《About Face》《The Inmates Are Running the Asylum》(交互设计/persona 起源)、Jakob Nielsen 10 Usability Heuristics + NN/g 文章库、Jake Knapp《Sprint》、Jeff Gothelf《Lean UX》、Teresa Torres《Continuous Discovery Habits》、Erika Hall《Just Enough Research》、Julie Zhuo《The Making of a Manager》、《Refactoring UI》(Adam Wathan/Steve Schoger)、《Universal Principles of Design》、Laws of UX (Jon Yablonski)、《100 Things Every Designer Needs to Know About People》(Susan Weinschenk)、IDEO/Stanford d.school 设计思维材料; (e) figures/流派 — 认知心理/人因派 (Don Norman 认知科学奠基、Susan Weinschenk 行为心理、Kathryn Whitenton); 可用性工程派 (Jakob Nielsen 启发式/折扣可用性、Steve Krug、Jared Spool UIE); 交互设计/目标导向派 (Alan Cooper goal-directed/persona、Kim Goodwin); 设计思维派 (IDEO Tim Brown、David Kelley d.school); 精益/持续探索派 (Jeff Gothelf Lean UX、Teresa Torres continuous discovery、Marty Cagan《Inspired》产品发现); 设计系统/系统化派 (Brad Frost Atomic Design、Nathan Curtis design tokens、Alla Kholmatova); 视觉/UI craft 派 (Adam Wathan & Steve Schoger Refactoring UI、Dieter Rams 'less but better' 工业设计遗产); 设计领导/职业派 (Julie Zhuo、Aarron Walter 情感化设计、John Maeda); 移动优先 (Luke Wroblewski 'Mobile First'); (f) 行业话术/黑话 — affordance 可供性 / signifier 意符 / mental model 心智模型 / IA 信息架构 / heuristic evaluation 启发式评估 / usability 可用性 / a11y accessibility 无障碍 / WCAG / persona 用户画像 / journey map 用户旅程 / JTBD jobs-to-be-done / north-star metric 北极星 / HEART 框架 / wireframe 线框 / mockup / prototype 原型 / fidelity 保真度 (lo-fi/hi-fi) / design system 设计系统 / design token 设计令牌 / atomic design 原子设计 / component library 组件库 / handoff 交付 / red routes 关键路径 / dark pattern 暗黑模式 / Fitts's law / Hick's law / Jakob's law / Miller 7±2 / progressive disclosure 渐进披露 / above the fold / hamburger menu / skeuomorphism vs flat / micro-interaction / empty state / edge case / happy path / design debt 设计债 / dogfooding / dot voting / affinity mapping 亲和图 / card sorting 卡片分类 / tree testing / A/B test / NPS / SUS (System Usability Scale); (

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Restructure code without changing observable behavior: rename, extract, inline, move, deduplicate, or replace an internal implementation with an equivalent one. Prove parity through unchanged pre-existing tests. Not for new behavior, bug fixes, explanation-only questions, or committing finished work.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Restructure code without changing observable behavior: rename, extract, inline, move, deduplicate, or replace an internal implementation with an equivalent one. Prove parity through unchanged pre-existing tests. Not for new behavior, bug fixes, explanation-only questions, or committing finished work.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Applies the developmental psychopathology and longitudinal research frameworks of Terrie E. Moffitt (psychologist, Duke University). Use this skill whenever reasoning about human development, criminology, juvenile delinquency, self-control, mental health trajectories, or biological aging. Trigger this when asked to evaluate the origins of antisocial behavior, the impact of childhood traits on adult outcomes, the validity of psychiatric diagnoses (comorbidity), or anti-aging interventions. Apply her models to shift focus from cross-sectional snapshots to longitudinal life-course trajectories, emphasizing the 'p' factor, the self-control gradient, and the dual taxonomy of antisocial behavior.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Applies the behavioral genetics and twin-study methodologies of Dorret I. Boomsma (behavior geneticist, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam). Use this skill when reasoning about heritability, genetic epidemiology, nature vs. nurture debates, psychiatric genetics, or longitudinal phenotyping. Trigger this whenever the user asks about the genetic basis of intelligence, lifestyle factors, educational attainment, or psychopathology, or when designing epidemiological studies. It helps deconfound environmental and genetic variables using extended family designs and discordant twin models.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Suede AI eval design and coverage audit: AI-SPEC, failure-mode rubric with severity scoring, concrete pass/fail eval cases, coverage and infrastructure scores, and mechanical acceptance gates. Use when a change ships LLM, RAG, agent, classifier, prompt, or generated-media behavior, or when asked to write evals for an AI feature, design test cases for a model surface, audit existing eval coverage, or judge whether AI behavior is safe to ship. No AI-SPEC means no eval plan, and no eval plan holds the recommended ship verdict. NOT FOR: reviewing or grading the implementation code behind the AI surface (use suede-code); wiring a passing suite into CI as a required check (use suede-ci-gate); UAT of the built feature beyond the eval suite (a private Suede Labs companion, not in this pack).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。