「capability」の検索結果

Governs the Claude Code/Codex Skill surface: reconciles source/install/catalog-visibility drift without losing cold capability. Use when users ask how many Skills load, why the catalog is truncated, want routers visible while other bundles stay cold, or need duplicate/superseded-Skill or old-cache cleanup. Not for building a marketplace manifest (use marketplace-dev) or repo audits (use marketplace-health-check).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Write a PRD for an AI-powered feature, covering the things normal PRDs miss. Use when asked to spec an AI/LLM feature, write a PRD for a feature that uses a model, or plan an AI capability (assistant, summarizer, generator, classifier). Produces an AI feature PRD — problem & UX of uncertainty, model approach, eval criteria, guardrails, fallback behaviour, the data flywheel, and cost/latency budget.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Help users recruit compatible co-founders, sequence early leadership hires to fill capability gaps, and manage the evolution of the executive team as the company scales.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Maps intelligence for local SEO — geo-grid rank tracking, GBP profile auditing via API, review intelligence across Google/Tripadvisor/Trustpilot, cross-platform NAP verification (Google/Bing/Apple/OSM), competitor radius mapping, and LocalBusiness schema generation from API data. Three-tier capability: free (Overpass + Geoapify), DataForSEO (full intelligence), DataForSEO + Google (maximum coverage). Use when user says "maps", "geo-grid", "rank tracking", "GBP audit", "review velocity", "competitor radius", "maps analysis", "local rank tracking", "Share of Local Voice", or "SoLV".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Plan a feature or initiative through a computed route: the conductor derives the canon delta and assembles the document package — from a zero-document null route for small fixes to an umbrella PRD with one spec per capability for large initiatives. Modes, named as the first word: sdd (full package), sources (MRD → BRD → URD) for market research, customer discovery, and business or user requirements, iso (BRS → StRS → SyRS → SRS) for ISO 29148 and regulated work, research for a technical investigation — never market research — that the research instrument closes either by scope coverage (a research document) or by a recommendation (an rnd). Explicit form: plan research <topic>. Use for 'plan the X redesign', 'create a roadmap', 'plan a new feature', 'I need market research before we plan', 'we're regulated — start the ISO requirements cascade', 'investigate X before we plan', 'compare the alternatives for Y' — a new investigation, not a finished report already in hand. Not for recording a decision or documenting existing code — use /archcore:document. Not for checking docs against code — use /archcore:review.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Review generated or changed WordPress code — plugins, themes, and blocks — before it ships. Best used reactively after an agent writes, edits, or reviews code touching WordPress APIs: add_action/add_filter, shortcodes, meta boxes, AJAX handlers, REST routes, WP_Query or $wpdb, widgets, or WP-CLI commands. Use on 'review this plugin', 'is this safe to ship', 'make this translatable', 'speed up this query', or after tasks like 'write a plugin' or 'add an endpoint/shortcode/meta box'. Enforces escaping and sanitization, nonces plus capability checks, prepared database queries, core-API-first development, translation-ready strings, and query/caching discipline. DO NOT USE for WooCommerce-specific order, product, or checkout logic (use woo-guard), non-WordPress PHP, generic code quality review (use clean-code-guard), test code review (use test-guard), server or hosting configuration, or conceptual WordPress questions.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when deciding whether a security project fits ACM CCS versus IEEE S&P, USENIX Security, NDSS, PETS, or a crypto/theory venue, identifying the security contribution type, and sharpening the threat model and attacker capability before writing begins.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when revising an AAAI manuscript for broad-AI-audience fit, a first-page contribution statement legible to non-specialist Phase-1 reviewers, two-column readability, concise novelty claims, reproducibility-checklist alignment, hedged limitations and ethics, and policy-aware framing of AI-system and capability claims.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Assemble a ChatGPT chat-reveal video ad from a thread + timeline JSON — one continuous Playwright recording of a ChatGPT mobile chat (user types with the iOS keyboard up → taps send → keyboard slides down + header cluster swaps in one beat → one gray loading dot → the assistant answer streams in word-by-word) crossfaded into a designed end card, with subliminal ChatGPT SFX and an optional ducked music bed. FREE assembly (Playwright + ffmpeg); the recipe supplies the per-brand thread + timeline + end-card config and gates the paid music call to its own capability. The ChatGPT sibling of render-imessage-chat. Use for the chatgpt-chat format.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Assemble an Apple Notes list video ad from a note + end-card JSON — a frame-accurate fake iPhone screen recording of a short list being typed into Apple Notes (character by character, key pops, blinking caret, the note scrolling up as it fills) crossfaded into a checklist end card (the note's picks as ticked rows, real product photos, logo, CTA, in the brand's colours and fonts), with an optional music bed. FREE assembly (Playwright + ffmpeg); the recipe supplies the per-brand note + end card and gates the paid music call to its own capability. The Apple Notes sibling of render-imessage-chat and render-chatgpt-chat. Use for the apple-notes format.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Shared helper that routes ALL paid media generation (FAL image/video, ElevenLabs music) through the GooseWorks proxies so every call bills the Ads agent — never a provider SDK's default host. Host-swaps the FAL queue URLs, loads the agent token from the sandbox env (GW_MEDIA_PROXY_TOKEN) or ~/.gooseworks/credentials.json, and returns the result CDN URL. Every video-ad media capability imports this; templates never call a provider directly.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Build iOS App Clips with invocation URLs, App Clip Codes, NFC, QR codes, Safari banners, Maps, Messages, target setup, App Store Connect experiences, size/capability constraints, NSUserActivity routing, SKOverlay promotion, App Group/keychain handoff, ephemeral notifications, location confirmation, and full-app migration. Use when creating App Clips or wiring App Clip invocation, experience configuration, or full-app handoff.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use this skill when the user asks what information a Stripe Connect connected account must provide for verification, onboarding, KYC, or account requirements; when they need to compare requirements between connected-account setups; or when they ask which verification fields, documents, or business details are required for a particular platform country, account country, business type, dashboard, service agreement, or capability.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Apply step-by-step analysis for complex problems with revision capability. Use for multi-step reasoning, hypothesis verification, adaptive planning, problem decomposition, course correction.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

CloudBase platform overview and routing guide. This skill should be used when users need high-level capability selection, platform concepts, console navigation, realtime (broadcast / presence / live database changes), or cross-platform best practices before choosing a more specific implementation skill.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Author or revise a cloud-api-operations recipe (config/source/skills/cloud-api-operations/references/recipes/). Encodes why the long tail of control-plane capabilities is deliberately NOT wrapped as MCP/CLI tools, the API-first admission test for whether a capability deserves a recipe, the negative and positive lists, the fixed recipe structure, the writing rules distilled from writing-for-agents, the user-facing copy red lines, and the product regeneration/verification pipeline. Also routes contributors (and their agents) to the contribution flow and the pre-PR self-test protocol in references/contributing.md. Use when adding a recipe, judging whether a scenario belongs in the recipe set, updating the recipes index, re-checking existing recipes against the admission test, or onboarding someone who wants to submit one.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Give an AI agent persistent, cross-session long-term memory through MindMemOS. Covers installing and authenticating the mindmemos CLI, the full command interface (add / search / get / update / delete / feedback / dreaming) with parameters and examples, guidance on which capability to use when, plus a Python SDK example. To wire memory into a specific agent host (OpenClaw, DeepSeek Harness, Codex, Claude, etc.), see references/.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Plan and run backups, set recovery objectives, and run disaster recovery drills. Use this skill when defining RPO/RTO targets, designing backup architecture, deciding what to back up and how often, planning for full-region or platform outages, or running a restoration drill. Triggers on backup, restore, RPO, RTO, disaster recovery, DR, business continuity, what if the database is gone, what if our hosting goes down, recovery drill, ransomware planning. Also triggers when an incident reveals a gap in restoration capability.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Panel structure design, firm selection criteria, right-sourcing analysis, and coverage gap assessment for in-house legal teams. Build panel frameworks from scratch or formalise existing informal arrangements. Define weighted selection criteria for firm evaluation. Run right-sourcing analysis (ABC tiering) to identify work sent to expensive providers that doesn't require that level of resource. Assess existing panels for practice area, geographic, and capability gaps. Trigger on: 'design our panel', 'how many firms do we need', 'panel structure', 'firm selection criteria', 'which firms should we use', 'right-sourcing', 'are we sending work to the right firms', 'panel gaps', 'too many firms', 'consolidate our panel', 'we need a firm for', 'preferred provider', 'panel tiers', 'do we need BigLaw for this', 'convergence', 'D&I panel targets', 'how do we choose firms'.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Turn a lawyer's bounded expertise, workflow, review standard, or legal judgment pattern into a safe, inspectable legal AI skill. Use when a user provides legal memos, comments, checklists, negotiation notes, review habits, compliance playbooks, or professional feedback and wants a reusable Lawve-style skill. Do not impersonate the lawyer or claim to reproduce a person; distill only authorized, source-bounded capability.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Routes any legal task to the right LLM, like OpenRouter but for legal work and grounded in benchmarks instead of brand loyalty. Built from mid-2026 legal evals (legalbenchmarks.ai, Vals AI × Stanford LegalBench across 124 models, Harvey's Legal Agent Benchmark, the Atticus Project's CUAD/MAUD/ACORD) plus translation evidence (WMT25, SwiLTra-Bench, ArabLegalEval). Covers five verticals: contract drafting, info extraction, legal research, contract review, and legal translation (including Arabic/MENA). Each asks up to four questions (cost, speed, accuracy/stakes, privacy/jurisdiction/language), then returns a primary model, a fallback, what to avoid, and what a human must verify. Core principle: capability is not controllability, so every route ends with a verification step. Not legal advice; a lawyer owns the output.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

End-to-end external local counsel lifecycle management for multi-jurisdiction legal matters. LC selection criteria and capability assessment, engagement setup and instruction design, performance monitoring and check-in cadence, scope enforcement, and relationship escalation. Use when selecting local counsel for a jurisdiction, designing LC instructions, managing the LC check-in rhythm, enforcing scope boundaries when LC signals overreach, or escalating a performance or relationship issue beyond the matter team. Trigger on: 'which LC should we use', 'LC instruction', 'brief the local counsel', 'LC hasn't responded', 'LC is going off scope', 'LC scope dispute', 'confirm scope with LC', 'LC check-in', 'LC is slow', 'monitor the LC network', 'LC engagement letter', 'LC selection', 'what should we tell the local counsel', 'LC onboarding', 'LC performance issue', 'LC relationship problem'.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Maps intelligence for local SEO — geo-grid rank tracking, GBP profile auditing via API, review intelligence across Google/Tripadvisor/Trustpilot, cross-platform NAP verification (Google/Bing/Apple/OSM), competitor radius mapping, and LocalBusiness schema generation from API data. Three-tier capability: free (Overpass + Geoapify), DataForSEO (full intelligence), DataForSEO + Google (maximum coverage). Use when user says "maps", "geo-grid", "rank tracking", "GBP audit", "review velocity", "competitor radius", "maps analysis", "local rank tracking", "Share of Local Voice", or "SoLV".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Local user-profile maintenance skill for Codex, Claude Code, OpenClaw, OpenCode, and other agent harnesses. Use only when the user explicitly invokes $user-profile-keeper to create, initialize, update, query, correct, delete, export, or audit a local persistent user profile. It can extract durable collaboration preferences, requirement-expression habits, capability boundaries, recurring omissions, risk preferences, privacy boundaries, and typical events from the current session into auditable, confirmable, retractable local profile data. Do not auto-invoke, upload profile data, or replace task-clarifier's normal clarification flow.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。