Use for complex coding requests that need a structured implementation plan with dependencies, checkpoints, and verification criteria.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
194 件 ・ 関連度順
概要と使いどころ
Use for complex coding requests that need a structured implementation plan with dependencies, checkpoints, and verification criteria.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Produces a DRAFT 30-60-90 day onboarding plan for a new hire from the role, the team context and the systems list: phase outcomes traced to the role, activities with a named owner and due window, an access and equipment request table, learning items, manager checkpoints and the items the manager must confirm. Use when the user asks to "build an onboarding plan for our new hire", "draft the induction plan for this role", "write a first 90 days plan", "put together a new starter plan with owners", "create a ramp plan from this job description" or "plan the integration of an internal mover". Do not use for writing the job description itself, use job-description-drafter instead; for interview questions or a scorecard, use interview-scorecard-builder. Drafts for human review; never approves, authorises or signs off.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Get a second opinion from an external LLM at three checkpoints: T1 is the plan valid, T2 which path at a fork, T3 finish plus a QA breaker that tries to break the result. One structured move per exchange (PROPOSE, COUNTER, VERIFY, ACCEPT, BLOCK) with memory across turns, and every exchange mirrored into a human-visible channel. Supports a multi-vendor panel instead of a single reviewer. Triggers: "/secondop", "get a second opinion", "run the review panel".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Run operational infrastructure verification gates for workspace/infrastructure/auth checkpoints and emit pass/fail audit report
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when an agent, harness, gateway, MCP workflow, or multi-step automation claims completion and the available traces, checkpoints, approvals, tool calls, or deployment records must be judged without
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when asked to ship a SaaS MVP, audit application security, build an AI agent, run browser QA, or design a domain model with multiple skills and verified checkpoints.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Autonomous build-ship-verify loop that ends with code committed, deployed, and confirmed live. Triggers on: "$ownership", "execute X with ownership", "build this overnight", or any request for an autonomous product loop with no human checkpoints until production is verified. NOT for: one-off tasks, quick fixes, or supervised dev work (use devprocess for those).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Systematic strategic planning framework for philosophy and interdisciplinary academic papers targeting preprint platforms (PhilArchive, arXiv, PhilSci-Archive). Use when users want to: (1) plan a paper on a specific topic, (2) identify research gaps and assess originality, (3) develop optimized paper outlines, (4) prepare for preprint submission, or (5) understand platform requirements and writing standards. Triggered by phrases like 'plan a paper on,' 'help me design a paper about,' 'identify research gaps in,' 'is this idea original,' or when users need structured research planning. The skill guides through three phases: Platform Analysis (identifying target venue and studying sample papers), Theoretical Framework (AI-driven literature search and gap identification), and Outline Optimization (structured design with reviewer-perspective self-assessment). Each phase includes quality evaluation standards and validation checkpoints.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Run an iterative Stitch website-building loop using `.stitch/next-prompt.md`, SITE.md, DESIGN.md, generated pages, and verification checkpoints.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Execute detailed plans in batches with review checkpoints
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when you have a written implementation plan to execute in a separate session with review checkpoints
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when you have a written implementation plan to execute in a separate session with review checkpoints
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Guide for checkpointing — saving, loading, and resuming training with CheckpointRecord. Use when the user asks about saving weights, resuming training, checkpoint management, or the checkpoint lifecycle.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Multi-agent autonomous startup system for Claude Code. Triggers on "Loki Mode". Orchestrates 100+ specialized agents across engineering, QA, DevOps, security, data/ML, business operations, marketing, HR, and customer success. Takes PRD to fully deployed, revenue-generating product with zero human intervention. Features Task tool for subagent dispatch, parallel code review with 3 specialized reviewers, severity-based issue triage, distributed task queue with dead letter handling, automatic deployment to cloud providers, A/B testing, customer feedback loops, incident response, circuit breakers, and self-healing. Handles rate limits via distributed state checkpoints and auto-resume with exponential backoff. Requires --dangerously-skip-permissions flag.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when you have a written implementation plan to execute in a separate session with review checkpoints
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Iterative session history with timestamped checkpoints and LATEST.md symlink
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
This skill should be used when the user says "add a billing agent", "add a bookkeeping agent", "set up a support tier-1 agent", "add a recruiting agent", "add a compliance agent", "add a CRM agent", "add a contracts agent", "add an analytics agent", "add a marketing email agent", "add a CMS agent", "scaffold a function-specific agent", or wants to add a single business-function agent backed by a verified-write MCP integration. Each agent ships with explicit scope, "what this will NOT do" constraints, and recommended human-in-the-loop checkpoints.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Build a personalized learning roadmap with milestones and practice checkpoints
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Transparent, rigorous research with full methodology — not a black-box API wrapper. Conducts exhaustive investigation through mandated 2-cycle research per theme, APA 7th citations, evidence hierarchy, and 3 user checkpoints. Self-contained using native OpenClaw tools (web_search, web_fetch, sessions_spawn). Use for literature reviews, competitive intelligence, or any research requiring academic rigor and reproducibility.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when you have a written implementation plan to execute in a separate session with review checkpoints
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Run a bounded, governed iteration — "loop", "iterate until", "keep going until", "sweep", "ratchet", "until it passes", "coverage to 100". Turns an open-ended autonomous run into a finite loop with checkpoints and explicit stopping conditions.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Phase 2 of the Forge pipeline. Turn a research document into an implementation plan that is built around Beads issues and TDD. Reads plans/research/<slug>.md, designs the build, sets up red-green-refactor test strategy using the tdd skill, materializes a Beads epic/feature/tasks with dependencies and priorities, and defines demo/test checkpoints. Use when starting /forge-plan or the plan step of /forgemaster.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Creates or updates the active planning artifact under planning/active/ for any change-bearing workstream. Consumes the active spec when one exists. Defines ordered tasks, target paths, commands, and checkpoints.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when you have a written implementation plan to execute in a separate session with review checkpoints
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。