「choice」の検索結果

Owns where the business plays and how it wins over a multi-year horizon — portfolio choices, corporate development, strategic partnerships, and planning under uncertainty. Use this for a decision about which markets or businesses to be in, whether to build, buy, or partner, how to allocate capital across business lines, or when a long-horizon bet needs framing. Distinct from `chief-executive`, which arbitrates present-quarter conflicts.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Designs complete integrated research plans for bulk transcriptomics, proteomics, metabolomics, and related omics from a user-provided biomedical direction. Always use this skill whenever a user wants to design, scope, or structure a bulk multi-omics or single-omics-plus-clinical study — including disease-focused, mechanism-focused, biomarker-focused, stratification-oriented, or translational projects. It should define the research question, choose the best-fit study pattern, recommend example datasets as reference candidates only, specify the core analysis modules and method choices, propose a validation ladder, and output four workload configurations (Lite / Standard / Advanced / Publication+). Never fabricate datasets, accession numbers, sample counts, metadata completeness, cohort availability, assay coverage, literature references, PMIDs, DOIs, or validation status. Always include the mandatory Dataset Disclaimer immediately before any workflow section that mentions datasets or public resources.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Configure which models pstack uses per role. Detects available models and writes the current runtime's override sheet. Use for /setup-pstack, "configure pstack models", changing pstack's model choices, or turning the SessionStart hook on or off.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Create Architecture Decision Records (ADRs) documenting significant technical choices with context, options, consequences, and sequential numbering.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

List cities for a given state using the bundled background data. Use this skill to validate state inputs or expand destination choices before flight/restaurant/attraction/driving/accommodation lookups.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Configure which models pstack uses per role and at what reasoning budget. Detects your available models and writes an always-applied rule that overrides the skill defaults. Use for /setup-pstack, "configure pstack models", "pstack budget", or changing pstack's model choices.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Evaluate and improve Claude Code commands, skills, and agents. Use when testing prompt effectiveness, validating context engineering choices, or measuring improvement quality.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Write and maintain Architecture Decision Records (ADRs) following best practices for technical decision documentation. Use when documenting significant technical decisions, reviewing past architectural choices, or establishing decision processes.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Adversarial 5-7 question challenge to a deck's pedagogical choices — ordering, prerequisites, cognitive load, motivation. Use when user says "devil's advocate", "poke holes in this deck", "push back on my slides", "stress-test the design", "what would a skeptical student ask?". Read-only; surfaces questions to force rethinking. Lighter than `/pedagogy-review`.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Root-cause a failing or wrong empirical result with a disciplined reproduce → minimise → hypothesise → instrument → fix loop, instead of guessing-and-poking. Use when the user says "why is my regression wrong", "this number changed", "my script errors out", "the result won't reproduce", "debug this", "this estimate looks wrong", or "it worked yesterday". Tuned for research code (R/Stata/Python): type coercion, NA/merge blow-ups, factor levels, clustering/SE choices, weighting, collinearity/convergence, seeds, package-version drift. Use `--no-fix` to localize the root cause without editing shared or load-bearing files.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Stress-test a finding against the choices you did not make. Enumerates the discrete forks a competent analyst could have taken (measure definition, sample filter, control set, clustering level, weighting, functional form), runs the specification grid, and reports the distribution rather than a point estimate — then attacks the identifying assumption with named, computable sensitivity statistics. Use when the user says "is this robust", "challenge this result", "specification curve", "multiverse", "how sensitive is this", "what if I'd used a different measure", "stress-test my estimate", or before a result becomes a headline claim. NOT a reviewer of prose or code — it challenges the CLAIM.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

AI DevKit · Use when the user asks to brainstorm, ideate, generate ideas, expand options, challenge ideas, pressure-test ideas, compare concepts, narrow choices, name something, plan content angles, explore strategy, evaluate product ideas, technical approaches, experiments, or decisions.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Motion-first AI video director for topic-to-video creation. Use when the user gives a theme, idea, article, script, or brief and wants AI to freely create a real animated video instead of a PPT/slideshow-style explainer; when deciding visual metaphors, motion grammar, scene beats, component choices, generated image needs, HyperFrames/Remotion implementation strategy, and anti-PPT QC.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when a selective defect needs IS/IS-NOT difference analysis or a consequential option choice needs must/want weighting and adverse-consequence comparison.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Build a visual novel: a branching script, character and background display, a text box with choices, save/load, backlog, and skip/auto. Use for a VN, dating sim, or branching story game.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Gated checklist to choose or review a library, framework, storage, data format, model, build-vs-buy or architecture. Run favorites-search before external research when installed. Compare candidates and trade-offs; select within authorization or return user-owned choices. Use for 用哪个 / 选什么框架 / 要不要自建 / A 还是 B / 这个方案行不行 and before committing to one. Research reports → deep-research.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Creates reusable, source-traced research reports and coordinates provider/mode lanes with original exports. Use for 深度研究, 调研报告, literature reviews, market or company research, and ChatGPT/Kimi/UniFuncs research routes. Technology choice uses tech-selection; competitor code uses competitors-analysis.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Produce a CV shaped for one target company and role: its applicant tracking system, the country's conventions, the sector's norms, its published values and the job ad, with every choice explained. Use when asked to write my CV for a specific company, tailor my CV to Google, Amazon or any named employer, make my CV fit this company's format, or turn my experience into a CV for this job. Produces the tailored CV, a short format rationale citing public sources with dates, and a list of claims the person must be ready to defend. Never invents experience or insider knowledge.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Run a company event — the launch party, the customer day, the team celebration — as the operation it is: the goal that shapes every choice, the budget with its forgotten lines, the vendor and venue coordination, the run-of-show with owners, and the day-of roles that keep hosts hosting. Use when asked plan the company event, organize our customer day/holiday party/launch event, what am I forgetting for this event, or be the run-of-show for Thursday. Produces the goal-shaped plan, the budget with the forgotten lines, the run-of-show, and the day-of role card.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Pick the chart the data and the point actually need — the question-to-chart mapping (comparison, trend, composition, distribution, relationship), the honesty rules (axes, baselines, dual-axis traps), and the one-chart-one-point discipline. Use when asked what chart should I use, make this data visual, why does this chart feel misleading, or fix this graph for the deck. Produces the chart verdict with its reasoning, the honesty checklist applied, and the labeling that lets the chart travel without its author.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Help a student and family plan university applications after the 高考 (gaokao): use the student's provincial rank rather than raw score, build a 冲 / 稳 / 保 (reach, match, safe) list from official historical admission data, check subject requirements under the new gaokao, and weigh major against university. Use when asked 帮我填高考志愿, 志愿怎么填, 冲稳保怎么排, 这个分数能上什么学校, or plan gaokao applications. Produces a structured application list with the reasoning for each choice, a risk check of the whole list, and the questions to settle as a family. Never guarantees admission.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when asked 兴趣班怎么选, 孩子报几个兴趣班合适, 课外班规划, 双减后还能报什么班, 寒暑假怎么安排, 预付费培训退费, or plan a child's out-of-school activities in mainland China. Produces a weekly timetable that protects sleep, homework and free play, a choice framework (the child's interest, purpose, cost, travel), a term budget, a check of each class against the 双减 rules on academic training and prepaid fees, contract questions to ask a provider, and a review point to drop what is not working, with rules marked to confirm locally.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Create an Architecture Decision Record (ADR) for any technical decision. Use when asked to document a technical decision, write an ADR, record an architecture choice, or capture why a technology or approach was selected. Produces a structured ADR with context, decision, consequences, and tradeoffs.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Answer in the Rundown briefing style (TL;DR + checklist + numbered choices).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。