615 件 ・ 関連度順
概要と使いどころ
Use when receiving code review feedback, before implementing suggestions, especially if feedback seems unclear or technically questionable - requires technical rigor and verification, not performative agreement or blind implementation
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Review code changes for correctness, security, and maintainability. Supports local git diffs (staged or working tree) and remote Pull Requests (by ID or URL). Use when the user asks to review code, check a PR, audit changes, or wants feedback on code quality before merging.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when receiving code review feedback, before implementing suggestions. Requires technical rigor and verification, not blind implementation.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when completing tasks, implementing major features, or before merging to verify work meets requirements.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Architect code review with DRY, YAGNI, abstraction, and test coverage principle enforcement
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Structured code quality assessment with Conventional Comments format, scaled review depth, and soft-gating verdicts preserving user autonomy.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
6-agent parallel code review orchestration covering architecture, security, performance, testing, quality, and documentation dimensions with weighted scoring.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Multi-dimensional code assessment across security, quality, performance, and maintainability with confidence-gated reporting (>=80%) and Router Contract generation.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Multi-dimensional code review across correctness, security, performance, and maintainability with confidence-gated reporting and remediation loops.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Master effective code review practices to provide constructive feedback, catch bugs early, and foster knowledge sharing while maintaining team morale. Use when reviewing pull requests, establishing review standards, or mentoring developers.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Elite code review expert specializing in modern AI-powered code analysis, security vulnerabilities, performance optimization, and production reliability. Masters static analysis tools, security scanning, and configuration review with 2024/2025 best practices. Use PROACTIVELY for code quality assurance.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
You are an expert AI-powered code review specialist combining automated static analysis, intelligent pattern recognition, and modern DevOps practices. Leverage AI tools (GitHub Copilot, Qodo, GPT-5, C
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Review code changes from multiple perspectives with context bootstrap, depth-tier rigor, and structured findings output.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Finds Skills in configured local repositories before searching CCPM. Use when discovering or reusing a Skill, finding PDF/code-review tools, inspecting a Skill, listing installed/popular/recent Skills, or installing/updating/removing Claude Code Skills/plugins.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Review a pull request or diff like a thoughtful senior engineer — prioritized, kind, and focused on what matters. Use when reviewing code, giving PR feedback, or asked to 'review this change'. Produces a structured review: a correctness/design pass, comments ranked by severity (blocking → nit), what's done well, and a clear approve / request-changes call — feedback that improves the code and the author.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Generate a tailored code review checklist for any pull request based on the language, type of change, and risk level. Use when asked to review code, check a PR, review a pull request, or generate a code review checklist. Produces a focused checklist with language-specific checks, risk-level-appropriate depth, and a clear approve/request-changes recommendation.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Apache Struts pull request review guide. Use when reviewing pull requests in this repository to check test conventions, security-sensitive framework code, PR and commit hygiene, and Struts-specific implementation patterns.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when receiving code review feedback before implementing suggestions, especially when feedback is unclear, risky, disputed, or technically questionable.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when requesting independent code review, after implementation slices, before merging high-risk work, or when verification exposes evidence, baseline, architecture, compatibility, or retirement uncertainty.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Review changed code for naming, stale references, unnecessary complexity, and comment quality. Use after completing implementation work, before committing, or when the user asks to review or audit code.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Break large features into independently verifiable, human-reviewable slices under a feature directory in specs/. Use for risky or multi-step feature work that needs upfront questioning, API seams, browser-playable checkpoints, HTML visualizations, screenshot gates, staged implementation plans, recursive fog-of-war reslicing, or proactive research into reference implementations/best practices before slicing. Pairs with your project's verification harness and screenshot gates (the browser checkpoints), [refactor-clean](../refactor-clean/SKILL.md) (review the materialized spec so the plan describes one-owner architecture, not the feature bolted on), [screenshot-critique](../../visual/screenshot-critique/SKILL.md) and [compare-screenshots](../../visual/compare-screenshots/SKILL.md) (the visual gates), and a code-review pass (audit each slice before it lands).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Code review and validation for CloudBase projects. After writing code for Web / miniprogram / CloudRun / cloud-function projects, call this skill to check for known pitfalls — auth guard misuse, missing database tables, RLS misconfiguration, storage domain setup, and SDK API misuse. Supports automated lint scripts (regex-based) + LLM semantic review.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Review code for quality, security, and best practices. Use when the user asks for code review, wants feedback on their code, mentions reviewing changes, or asks about code quality.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Systematic code review for bugs, security, style, and performance
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。