「coding」の検索結果

Expert knowledge for Azure Queue Storage development including best practices, limits & quotas, security, configuration, and integrations & coding patterns. Use when configuring queue auth/encryption, monitoring metrics/logs, handling limits, or coding with Azure Queue SDKs, and other Azure Queue Storage related development tasks. Not for Azure Service Bus (use azure-service-bus), Azure Event Hubs (use azure-event-hubs), Azure Table Storage (use azure-table-storage).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Expert knowledge for Azure Maps development including best practices, decision making, architecture & design patterns, limits & quotas, security, configuration, and integrations & coding patterns. Use when using Azure Maps Web/REST SDKs, geocoding, routing, traffic, weather tiles, or Power BI visual integrations, and other Azure Maps related development tasks.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Set up and run an Aeon agent instance - get started from scratch, pick which skills to turn on or install more from packs, reschedule or change what runs, edit what an existing skill does, fix a skill that isn't firing, set the STRATEGY.md north star and soul/ voice, turn a coding-agent chat into a scheduled Aeon skill, and mine past coding-agent conversations for recurring work worth automating as a skill. Use when the user mentions Aeon, aeon.yml, an Aeon skill / instance / routine / pack, asks to schedule, enable, edit, or debug an agent that runs on a cron, or asks what of their repeated/manual work Aeon could take over.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

AGENTS.md / CLAUDE.md 最佳实践顾问。用于用户询问 agents markdown、AGENTS.md、CLAUDE.md、Claude Code memory、AI coding agent 指令文件的格式、结构、最佳实践；也用于审查、诊断、重写、优化或从零创建 AGENTS.md、CLAUDE.md、CLAUDE.local.md、.claude/rules 等 agent 指令文件。不适用于通用 README 写作，除非目标是给 AI coding agent 提供项目上下文。

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Java coding standards for Spring Boot services: naming, immutability, Optional usage, streams, exceptions, generics, and project layout.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Universal coding standards - naming, formatting, error handling, immutability, SOLID principles

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Run Open Claude Code (OCC) for coding tasks and verify its CLI installation. Use when asked to use OCC, select its provider, or perform a bounded coding task through its CLI.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when writing an OpenCLI adapter for a new site or adding a new command to an existing site. Guides end-to-end from first recon through field decoding, adapter coding, and verify. Replaces opencli-oneshot / opencli-explorer. For ad-hoc browser driving (no adapter), see opencli-browser instead; for a top-level orientation to opencli, see opencli-usage.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Manual QA harness for the senpi coding agent itself. MUST USE after changing packages/ai, packages/agent, packages/coding-agent, or packages/tui — a green typecheck and `npm test` are NOT QA. Drives the real CLI from source in an isolated sandbox (never touches ~/.senpi or real credentials) across four channels: remote RPC (--mode rpc JSONL stdio), TUI smoke (node-pty on Windows, tmux on POSIX), mock loop (a local fake model server for deterministic, zero-token agent-loop runs), and CLI smoke (--help/--print/--list-models). Every helper ships a --self-test. Use whenever someone says qa senpi, test the agent, verify my change, rpc qa, tui qa, mock-loop qa, smoke the cli, or needs evidence that an agent-loop, tool, keybinding, or provider change works end to end. Capture evidence to local-ignore/qa-evidence/.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Decision rubric for when an LM agent should write-and-run code (Program-of-Thought / code interpreter) versus reason in natural language: classify each step as deterministic- computable (emit + execute code, feed the result back) vs judgment (stay in prose). Use when designing or debugging an agent step that does arithmetic/parsing/data transforms, when prose reasoning hallucinates a computation (under-coding), or when a sandbox round- trip is wasted on a judgment task (over-coding). Search keywords: code interpreter, agent does math wrong, calculator hallucination, when to run code vs reason, program of thought, PoT, tool vs reasoning.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Orchestrate coding work by delegating well-specified implementation tasks to xAI's Grok Build CLI (grok) running headlessly, while the coding assistant plans, writes the task specs, reviews every diff, and owns the result. Use when user says: 'use grok', 'grok build', 'delegate to grok', 'have grok implement', 'have grok execute', 'have grok build', 'send to grok', 'execute this plan with grok'. Executes a Markdown implementation plan task-by-task, or ad-hoc tasks with an inline spec.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Project-wide coding standards and conventions specialist. Use PROACTIVELY when writing code, making architectural decisions, or establishing project conventions. Covers coding style, commenting, error handling, validation, tech stack consistency, and project conventions across all languages and frameworks.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

React 19 and TypeScript coding standards for Portfolio Buddy 2. Use when: writing new components, reviewing code, refactoring, or ensuring consistency. Contains component patterns, TypeScript rules, and best practices.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

AI-assisted coding with Claude Code, Cursor, Copilot, Codex, Aider, or Windsurf. Use to build or debug generated code.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when an AI coding agent is writing or refactoring production code and its known failure modes need to be held in check — over-engineering, silent scope creep, invented APIs, claiming work is done without checking, deleting tests to make them pass. Trigger when the user asks for careful, production-grade, or reviewed code, or when a previous agent run produced confident output that turned out wrong.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use audio-diffusion-pytorch for PyTorch waveform diffusion generators, text-conditioned audio generation, inpainting, upsampling, vocoding, and diffusion autoencoding.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Reconstruct workflow behind a past coding-agent artifact using local ax sessions/commits/skills/tool traces. Use when asked how X was built.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Audit local AI coding-agent sessions with agenttrace for cost, tool failures, latency, anomalies, health, diffs, and CI gates.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Secure AI coding agents (Claude Code, Cursor, Codex, Copilot) with permission boundaries, secret protection, code review gates, and safe sandbox configurations for team environments.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Route substantial coding or repository-review work through a two-stage Sol commander/verifier and separate Luna Max CLI worker. Use when the user explicitly asks Sol to direct or supervise Luna, explicitly requests this router, needs an isolated auditable Luna-owned implementation with a Sol review loop, or asks to diagnose or measure the router itself. Do not use merely because a task involves coding, verification, progress reporting, or token saving. For small or straightforward tasks, keep work in Sol unless the user explicitly requests Luna; router configuration, usage, and efficiency questions should use read-only inspection without launching a worker.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Creates or updates project documentation for a feature, system, or component and publishes it to a user-specified Confluence location. Use when the user wants feature or system documentation written to Confluence, posted to a Confluence space or page, or synced to a Confluence location. Requires a configured Atlassian MCP server. Does not document to local files only — use project-documentation for that. Does not publish an arbitrary existing markdown file — use markdown-to-confluence for that. Does not plan or specify a new feature to Confluence — use plan-a-feature-to-confluence for that. Does not create architectural decision records — use architectural-decision-record. Does not create coding standards — use coding-standard. Does not produce runbooks — use runbook.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Researches an open-ended question — options, possible solutions, prior art, trade-offs, or how something works — and produces a durable, evidence-backed, adversarially-validated report that recommends an option without committing the team to any artifact. Use when you want to research approaches, weigh options, survey prior art or the state of the art, or understand how something works before committing to a direction. Does not diagnose a bug, failure, or root cause — use investigate. Does not specify a feature — use plan-a-feature. Does not create or update a coding standard — use coding-standard. Does not compare two concrete artifacts for gaps — use gap-analysis. Does not assess an existing module's architecture — use architectural-analysis. Does not capture feedback on Han's own skills — use han-feedback.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Create or update a runbook for an operational scenario — an incident an alert fires for, a recurring scheduled task, or a known failure mode on a live service — using a consistent template. Use when writing, drafting, authoring, or updating a runbook for an alert, incident, on-call procedure, scheduled maintenance, or operational SOP. Applies a YAGNI preflight requiring the scenario to be real before producing the runbook. Does not produce feature or system documentation — use project-documentation. Does not record architectural decisions — use architectural-decision-record. Does not create coding standards — use coding-standard.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Creates and maintains project documentation for features, systems, and components. Use when documenting how a feature, system, or component works — including writing, updating, or organizing docs. Does not scan or detect the project's technology stack — use project-discovery for repository analysis and config detection. Does not create architectural decision records — use architectural-decision-record for ADRs. Does not create or update coding standards — use coding-standard instead. Does not generate PR descriptions — use update-pr-description for that. Does not produce runbooks for operational scenarios — use runbook for that. Does not rewrite existing prose for readability — use edit-for-readability for that. Does not produce an ephemeral, understand-now overview of code or a PR — use code-overview for that.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。