「comparisons」の検索結果

Analyze queried data for trends, week-over-week comparisons, distributions, funnels, cohorts, top-N lists, anomalies, sanity checks, and report-ready findings. Use after or alongside ClickHouse queries when the user wants insight rather than raw rows.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Analyze queried data for trends, week-over-week comparisons, distributions, funnels, cohorts, top-N lists, anomalies, sanity checks, and report-ready findings. Use after or alongside ClickHouse queries when the user wants insight rather than raw rows.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Create standardized charts and visual assets from analytics query results. Prefer dependency-free plain HTML/CSS/JavaScript/SVG for interactive exploratory charts; use local plotting tools such as matplotlib, seaborn, or Plotly when static/report-ready exports or specialized charting libraries are more appropriate. Use for trends, comparisons, distributions, report assets, CSV-to-chart work, and presentation-ready data visuals.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Deep-dive ONE competitor's organic footprint — exact ranking keywords and URLs, content themes, backlink profile, and exploitable gaps — with findings written into brand/competitors.md. Use this skill when the user names a competitor and wants to know what to learn from them, counter, or outrank, including head-to-head comparisons against the user's own domain. For market-level mapping first, use openseo-competitive-landscape. Triggers: "analyze competitor", "competitor keywords", "competitor backlinks", "beat <competitor>", "competitor seo teardown".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Design, run, and review fair performance, token, and cost comparisons across GitHub Copilot CLI, Codex CLI, and direct model APIs. Use for AI CLI benchmark, Copilot vs Codex, prompt-cache diagnosis, cache read/write analysis, fresh-process latency measurement, token-cost comparison, or when a benchmark must separate provider caching from local CLI caches.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

"Implement Elo rating system to rank items or players from pairwise comparison outcomes. Use this skill when the user needs to rank items from head-to-head matchups, build a competitive rating system, or evaluate relative quality from comparison data — even if they say 'player rating', 'ranking from comparisons', or 'competitive scoring system'.".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Provides context about the regelrecht Figma design system and helps with Figma-related tasks like component lookups and design comparisons. Use this skill proactively when: implementing UI components, looking up Figma node IDs, comparing code with Figma designs, downloading Figma assets, or working with design tokens. Activate automatically when user mentions Figma, design system, component styling, or asks about RR-Components.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Search, screen, deeply read, synthesize, and publish recent research papers for a user-specified topic, window, count, quality/attention balance, and language. Use for evidence-anchored literature digests, cross-paper comparisons, original-language excerpts, Chinese explanations, guided Feishu setup, or Feishu research reports.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Analyze survey and feedback data with statistical distributions, cross-tabulations, significance testing, and open-ended theme extraction. Produces executive-ready survey reports with segment comparisons and action recommendations. Use when processing NPS, CSAT, employee engagement, or market research surveys.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when running or wiring OpenScientist for AI Gene Review gene-function hypotheses, especially blinded comparisons against local bioinformatics analyses.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Audit technical, on-page, and AI-search SEO for pages, sites, and content. Use when the user asks for `/seo-audit`, `/ai-seo`, SEO review, keyword targeting, heading structure, metadata, internal linking, content gaps, AEO, GEO, LLMO, or competitor SEO comparisons.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Query and answer questions about Volcengine API specifications. Use when the user asks about API parameters, error codes, request methods, enum values, required fields, response structures, pagination, parameter dependencies, service capability lists, API availability, or API comparisons, even if they do not explicitly say "API". Typical intent includes checking what an action supports, which fields are required, what values a parameter accepts, why an API returns a specific error, how to pass nested or body parameters, how pagination works, what an API response contains, whether a batch operation exists, what services or versions expose an operation, or how two APIs differ. Use API Explorer data as the authoritative source and preserve constraints, examples, and caveats found in the spec. Answer in Chinese or English. When the user needs runnable SDK code, language-specific examples, or SDK configuration, hand off to volcengine-sdk-generator. When they need CLI operations, hand off to volcengine-cli.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Generate accurate Volcengine SDK examples by locating an API through API Explorer search, fetching its swagger, and calling api/common/explorer/make-code with user-provided Params. Use when the user asks how to write Volcengine SDK code, generate SDK samples, or call a Volcengine API in Python, Go, Java, PHP, cURL, Node.js. Supports Chinese and English API names such as "角色扮演", "AssumeRole", or "STS AssumeRole". Also use for explicit SDK configuration questions about retry, timeout, AK/SK, STS, AssumeRole, temporary credentials, proxy, connection pooling, SSL, debug mode, request signing, response parsing, and error handling. If the user only needs API parameters, enum values, required fields, error codes, response schemas, pagination, or API comparisons, hand off to volcengine-api. If they need CLI-based operations, hand off to volcengine-cli.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Help authors learn from exemplary ICLR, ICML, and NeurIPS papers through source-linked manuscript comparisons, concrete writing and experiment suggestions, and guided reflection. Use for research storytelling, contribution framing, paper comparison, figure planning, or research retrospectives. Not an acceptance predictor or a routine grammar/citation formatter.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Searches, retrieves, and synthesizes official Google developer documentation across Google Cloud, AI/Gemini, Android, Chrome, Web, Flutter, Go, Firebase, and other Google developer platforms. Integrates with the Developer Knowledge MCP server (search_documents, get_documents, answer_query) or the Developer Knowledge REST API fallback. Use when searching for gcloud CLI commands, API syntax, IAM permissions, official documentation, architectural comparisons, or product choice overviews. Don't use for local filesystem lookups or non-Google documentation.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Write and maintain end-to-end tests with Playwright. Use when someone asks to "add e2e tests", "test my web app", "set up Playwright", "write browser tests", "test login flow", "visual regression testing", "test across browsers", or "automate UI testing". Covers test setup, page objects, authentication, API mocking, visual comparisons, and CI integration.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Structured multi-hop web research with explicit confidence gating — plan the inquiry, search (WebSearch/WebFetch), score your own confidence, and keep digging until the answer is well-supported or a hop cap is hit, then emit a cited synthesis. Learns across sessions by storing each research case to memory and reusing prior strategies. Use when a question needs more than one search — comparisons, current-best-practice questions, anything where a single lookup leaves you unsure.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Score a repository's agentic legibility from repo-visible evidence only. Use when Codex needs to audit how easy a codebase is for coding agents to discover, bootstrap, validate, and navigate, especially for harness-engineering reviews, developer-experience audits, repo cleanup, or before/after comparisons after improving docs, tooling, or architectural constraints.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Align, run, audit, and publish GEODE benchmark comparisons against Agent-World arXiv 2604.18292v1 across MCP-Mark, BFCL V4, and tau2-bench. Use for Agent-World or AgentWorld comparison requests, cross-suite agent benchmark design, Tau2 comparator/profile diagnosis, paired thin-runtime-versus-GEODE experiments, mean-accuracy@8 replication, or benchmark comparability and artifact reviews.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Ground GEODE design and evaluation work in Stanford CS329A Parts 2 and 5. Use for test-time compute, planning, multi-step reasoning, deep research, LATS, independent subplans, best-of-N, repair depth, measurement replication, verifier authority, and GEODE/Eco²/SIL/Crucible comparisons.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Technical blog post writing guide. rooftopsnow.tistory.com style — Korean formal technical prose, architecture diagrams, code blocks + design intent commentary, table comparisons, checklist wrap-up. Triggers on "blog", "포스팅", "블로그", "기술 글", "tech blog".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Scope, preregister, execute, audit, normalize, and publish GEODE evaluations with research-question, reproduction, attempt-lineage, trajectory, verifier-receipt, and immutable artifact contracts. Use for benchmark runs or comparisons, eval-artifact and cache-accounting audits, GPT or subscription result normalization, research question or hypothesis framing, retry diagnosis, trajectory publication, DPO or reward-data readiness reviews, and requests involving MCPMark, tau2, BFCL, Agent-World, HAL, Terminal-Bench, or Toolathlon.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Monitor reviewed Grafana telemetry and freshness evidence for IoT devices and edge fleets. Use for smart devices, home automation sensors, remote equipment, wind turbines, space hardware, device-fleet freshness, missing telemetry, and bounded edge-health comparisons.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Inspect reviewed Grafana infrastructure evidence for host or fleet CPU usage, memory load, disk space, and system load. Use for server-health checks, capacity symptoms, resource saturation, disk pressure, cloud or local host comparisons, and bounded infrastructure triage.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。