「conflict」の検索結果

Audits Convex performance for reads, subscriptions, write contention, and function limits. Use for slow features, insights findings, OCC conflicts, or read amplification.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

数据科学家与产品经理在向高管汇报或制作投资者演示时，当面临数据枯燥难懂的痛点，使用此技能可套用“Setup-Conflict-Resolution”叙事框架，自动生成结合可视化与业务上下文的洞察报告，让非技术受众秒懂结论并驱动决策。

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Review auto-memory entries and propose promotions to OPENSPACE.md, OPENSPACE.local.md, or retained auto-memory topics; detect duplicates, stale facts, conflicts, and ambiguous entries before making changes.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Verify delegated file-edit results directly in the target workspace before accepting success, and rerun with absolute paths if the delegate's report conflicts with reality.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Interprets Culture Index (CI) surveys, behavioral profiles, and personality assessment data. Supports individual profile interpretation, team composition analysis (gas/brake/glue), burnout detection, profile comparison, hiring profiles, manager coaching, interview transcript analysis for trait prediction, candidate debrief, onboarding planning, and conflict mediation. Accepts extracted JSON or PDF input via OpenCV extraction script. Use when the user shares a Culture Index PDF or JSON profile, asks what someone's CI traits mean, compares Culture Index profiles across a team or against a hiring profile, or asks about burnout risk from Survey-versus-Job gaps.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Assess whether structured data, query results, dashboards, or analytical evidence are trustworthy enough to use. Use when the task is to check data quality, reconcile conflicting sources or metric definitions, or decide whether evidence is safe to cite.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Implement and review macOS SwiftUI Liquid Glass UI. Use when adopting system glass, removing conflicting custom chrome, or building glass surfaces.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Evidence-first pull request judge that reviews a PR and posts one consolidated GitHub review with inline comments via the gh CLI. Runs the repo's own deterministic checks first, researches current official docs before any claim about external libraries or APIs, then reviews correctness, security, structural quality (code judo, spaghetti growth, file-size limits), and AI slop including useless code comments. Every finding must carry evidence, every comment passes a deterministic noise gate before posting, and the verdict (APPROVE, COMMENT, REQUEST_CHANGES) is weighed by findings. Use when asked to review a PR, judge this PR, review this branch or diff before merge, run the-judge, "revise esse PR", "faca o code review", or "julgue esse PR". Do NOT use for reviewing prose or documents, fixing CI failures, resolving merge conflicts, writing the fix itself, or responding to review comments (use gh-address-comments).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when preparing iPolloWork local changes for GitHub: stash or preserve local edits, sync the current personal branch with remote main, re-apply local work, diagnose conflicts, commit in English, push to the current remote branch, and open a PR to main without creating extra branches.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Ship every change the way the user requires, with the guardrails. Take screenshots of the start, the key moment and the result; give the change its own changelog version with pictures; verify with tests; commit only your own files; merge with the latest main and push as a fast-forward; publish that exact main live; confirm each step; and report measured sizes, asking before any upload over 50 MB. Use at the end of every change (feature, fix, tweak, art, balance, polish) and whenever the user says "ship it", "commit", "push", "merge", "publish", "deploy", "go live" or "update the changelog". Project specifics (hosting, the changelog pipeline, merge conflicts) go in an optional local references/<project>.md next to this skill.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

This skill should be used when the user asks to "create git commit", "manage branches", "follow git workflow", "use Conventional Commits", "handle merge conflicts", or asks about git branching strategies, version control best practices, pull request workflows. Provides comprehensive Git workflow guidance for team collaboration.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Coordinate access to shared task directories using .processing marker files. Use before accessing a Worker's workspace to prevent conflicts when both Manager and Worker might modify files simultaneously.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Identify a .NET project's test platform, framework, command mode, and SDK-style vs classic project system. Use only for "which test platform/framework?", "VSTest or MTP?", or "what runner does this project use?", including bridge settings, UseVSTest opt-outs, and incompatible or conflicting VSTest/MTP configuration. Resolves global.json, project, packages.config, Directory.Build.props, and Directory.Packages.props precedence for MSTest/xUnit/NUnit/TUnit. DO NOT USE when the user asks to run/filter tests or for commands, flags, TRX/dumps, or test-command/filter errors; use run-tests directly. Do not route hot-reload or migration requests here as the entry skill; mtp-hot-reload may use this skill internally for platform detection.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Detects MSBuild projects with conflicting OutputPath or IntermediateOutputPath. USE FOR: builds failing with 'Cannot create a file when that file already exists', 'The process cannot access the file because it is being used by another process', intermittent build failures that succeed on retry, or missing/overwritten outputs in multi-project or multi-targeting builds where bin/obj (or project.assets.json) collide. Common causes: shared OutputPath, missing AppendTargetFrameworkToOutputPath, extra global properties (e.g. PublishReadyToRun), or SetTargetFramework on a ProjectReference to a single-targeting project. DO NOT USE FOR: file access errors unrelated to MSBuild (OS-level locking), single-project single-TFM builds, non-MSBuild build systems.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

This skill should be used when the user asks to "create git commit", "manage branches", "follow git workflow", "use Conventional Commits", "handle merge conflicts", or asks about git branching strategies, version control best practices, pull request workflows. Provides comprehensive Git workflow guidance for team collaboration.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

International / multilingual SEO audit focused on hreflang correctness: missing or broken return tags, wrong language/region codes, missing x-default, self-referencing errors, hreflang vs canonical conflicts, and inconsistent signals across HTML head, HTTP headers and XML sitemap. Also reviews URL structure (ccTLD vs subdirectory vs subdomain), language targeting and geo signals. Use whenever the user runs a multi-language or multi-region site and asks about hreflang, international or multilingual SEO, the wrong-language page showing in search, or duplicate content across country versions. Trigger on: "hreflang", "international SEO", "multilingual SEO", "multi-region", "wrong language in Google", "x-default", "ccTLD vs subdirectory", "geo targeting", "language targeting", "my English page shows for Thai users", "th/en page ranking in the wrong country", or any cross-language/cross-country ranking question. For full-site audits use /seo-analysis; for a single URL use /seo-page.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

统筹兼顾：当多个目标、指标或利益方相互制约、优化一项会伤害另一项时，识别全部辩证关系对，检查片面性，为每对关系定出当前阶段的侧重与底线，评估系统性影响，并设失衡预警。触发信号包括 trade-off、目标冲突、速度 vs 质量、短期 vs 长期、"顾此失彼"；只有单一目标、用户已定取舍、或属硬性二选一时不触发。 English: Overall planning. When several goals, metrics, or stakeholders constrain each other and optimizing one harms another, map every dialectical pair, check for one-sidedness, set the current emphasis and floor for each pair, assess system-wide effects, and define imbalance alarms. Triggers include trade-offs, goal conflicts, speed vs quality, short vs long term; skip for single-goal work, decisions the user already made, or hard either/or constraints.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

群众路线：从持有真实情况的多方（用户、使用者、代码库、日志、运行结果）收集分散意见，系统化为方案，再带回去对齐与检验，循环改进。当多方意见分歧、需要汇总零散反馈、方案要拿回给真实使用者确认、或你发觉自己在闭门造车时触发；信息源单一且完整、处于执行阶段时不触发。 English: Mass line. Collect scattered input from everyone who holds ground truth (users, operators, codebase, logs, runtime results), synthesize it into a coherent plan, take it back for alignment and validation, and iterate. Trigger when inputs conflict, feedback must be consolidated, a plan needs sign-off from real users, or you sense you are designing in isolation; skip when there is a single complete source and the work is pure execution.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Ingest external plans with conflict detection against project decisions before writing anything.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Scan a repo for mixed ADRs, PRDs, SPECs, and DOCs and bootstrap or merge the full .planning/ setup from them. Classifies each doc in parallel, synthesizes a consolidated context with a conflicts report, and routes to new-project or merge-milestone depending on whether .planning/ already exists.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Autonomous PR merge pipeline. Scans all repos for open PRs, dispatches subagents to fix CI, resolve conflicts, address review comments, then merges. Use --main to also sync dev↔main branches.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Analyzes meeting transcripts and recordings to uncover behavioral patterns, communication insights, and actionable feedback. Identifies when you avoid conflict, use filler words, dominate conversations, or miss opportunities to listen. Perfect for professionals seeking to improve their communication and leadership skills.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Route open-ended NVFLARE advice and only conversion requests whose preliminary source inspection reports unresolved or conflicting ownership; never load this skill merely to inspect a concrete conversion request before selecting its detected framework converter.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Install or repair the FoundationPose perception pipeline and build its FoundationStereo TensorRT engines. Use for SAM3/TAO dependency conflicts, CUDA library failures, and depth-engine shape or precision decisions.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。