「deep sea」の検索結果

Conduct comprehensive deep research on any topic using Dify-powered workflow - searches documentation, academic papers, tutorials, APIs, best practices, and returns structured analysis with insights.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Vulnerability-research loop toward a novel CVE. Target triage -> attack-surface map -> ranked hypotheses -> investigate (RE / fuzz / audit) -> a finding deepens the loop, a dead-end pivots to a new approach. Uses the full wiki + hunt skillset. Scaffolds and persists state under raw/research/<project>/. Triggers - "research", "find a cve", "analyze this binary/library", "audit this code for vulns".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Conduct in-depth, multi-step research on a given topic by decomposing queries, finding diverse sources, cross-referencing findings, and synthesizing a comprehensive report. Use when the user requests deep research or provides relevant inputs for this workflow.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Produce an intensive, cited analytical report: executive summary, multi-angle findings, contrarian views, open questions, and full sources. Use only when the user needs rigorous synthesis of a complex topic (scientific, technical, policy, or market-analytical) that cannot be answered with a short search, and wants a formal written report, not a recommendation list. Do not use for product picks, top-N lists, quick lookups, or routine "find out about X" tasks. If the request does not clearly need this kind of report, do not use this skill. Do not use for a literature review over published papers. This skill collects evidence from the open web. A request for the literature on a biomedical, clinical, life-science, or other scientific topic — papers, studies, trials, preprints — belongs to firecrawl-research-papers, which queries Firecrawl's paper index (PubMed, bioRxiv, medRxiv, arXiv) instead of searching websites.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Performs comprehensive, multi-layered research on any topic with structured analysis and synthesis of information from multiple sources. Use when the user needs thorough investigation, market research, technical deep-dives, due diligence, or comprehensive analysis on any subject.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Conduct deep OSINT research on individuals. Build full digital footprint, psychoprofile (MBTI/Big Five), career history, social graph with confidence scores. Recursive self-evaluation until completeness threshold is met. Includes internal intelligence (Telegram history, email, vault contacts) before going external. Use when: "osint", "досье", "research person", "find everything about", "пробей", "разведка", "due diligence", "background check", "digital footprint", "найди всё про", "собери информацию", "кто это", "профиль человека". NOT for: company/product research without a named person, competitive analysis, market research, content generation, or general web scraping tasks.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Produce an intensive, cited analytical report: executive summary, multi-angle findings, contrarian views, open questions, and full sources. Use only when the user needs rigorous synthesis of a complex topic (scientific, technical, policy, or market-analytical) that cannot be answered with a short search, and wants a formal written report, not a recommendation list. Do not use for product picks, top-N lists, quick lookups, or routine "find out about X" tasks. If the request does not clearly need this kind of report, do not use this skill. Do not use for a literature review over published papers. This skill collects evidence from the open web. A request for the literature on a biomedical, clinical, life-science, or other scientific topic — papers, studies, trials, preprints — belongs to firecrawl-research-papers, which queries Firecrawl's paper index (PubMed, bioRxiv, medRxiv, arXiv) instead of searching websites.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Run deep research on a topic. Web searches, data collection, source checking, and a structured report. Use when the user needs more than a quick answer.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Builds repeatable deep-research workflows for verified synthesis. Use when producing evidence-backed briefs, comparisons, dossiers, or research pipelines.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when the user asks for a literature review, academic deep dive, research report, state-of-the-art survey, topic scoping, comparative analysis of methods/papers, grant background, or any request that needs multi-source scholarly evidence with citations. Also trigger proactively when a user question clearly requires academic grounding (e.g. "what's known about X", "compare approach A vs B in the literature", "summarize the field of Y"). Runs an 8-phase (Phase 0..7), script-driven research workflow across 7 federated sources (OpenAlex, arXiv, Crossref, PubMed, DBLP, bioRxiv, Exa) with optional Semantic Scholar / Brave MCP enrichment, with deduplication, transparent ranking, dual-backend citation chasing (OpenAlex + Semantic Scholar), self-critique, and structured report output with verifiable citations.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Expert guide for autonomous deep research, iterative web search, citation verification, evidence graph synthesis, and hallucination mitigation / Panduan ahli riset mendalam otonom, pencarian web iteratif, verifikasi sitasi, dan mitigasi halusinasi.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Run deep research on a single competitor. Produces a dossier with executive summary, position + messaging, status-quo alternatives, key differentiators, pricing position, where-they-win / where-they-lose, threat assessment, and what to watch. Writes to marketing/competitors/MMYY-{competitor-slug}.md. Triggers - "competitor research", "competitive analysis", "research competitor X", "battlecard prep", "analyze [competitor name]

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Gathers information from multiple sources in parallel, compares what they say, flags where they agree or conflict, and delivers a clean synthesis with a confidence rating for each finding. Useful for making evidence-backed decisions, when evaluating competing claims, during due diligence on a vendor or market, and for building research briefs before strategy sessions. Use when the user says "research this", "synthesize multiple sources", "compare sources", "research report", "what does the evidence say", "gather information on", or "deep dive into".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

MUST USE when user wants to research/search/look up/find anything on the internet — e.g. "research this topic", "do a deep dive on X", "search the web for X", "see what people say about X", "look this up". Also MUST USE when user mentions any platform or shares any URL/link: Twitter/X, Reddit, Facebook, Instagram, YouTube, GitHub, Bilibili, XiaoHongShu, Xiaoyuzhou Podcast, LinkedIn/jobs/recruiting, V2EX, Xueqiu (stocks), RSS. 15 platforms, multi-backend routing (OpenCLI / per-platform CLIs / APIs). Zero config for 6 channels. Run `agent-reach doctor --json` to see which backend serves each platform right now. NOT for: writing reports/analysis/translation (this skill only FETCHES internet content); posting/commenting/liking (write operations); platforms that already have a dedicated skill installed (prefer that skill).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Solves complex, open-ended problems using an evolutionary search mechanism inspired by genetic algorithms. Generates a diverse population of candidate answers, scores them against a rubric, then iteratively applies selection, crossover, and mutation to breed progressively better solutions. Use this skill whenever the user wants to explore a solution space deeply, asks for the "best" answer to a subjective or multi-dimensional problem, wants to evaluate competing approaches and distill the strongest, or uses any of these triggers: "evolutionary search", "genetic algorithm", "evolve an answer", "breed solutions", "population-based search", or phrases like "give me multiple approaches and refine the best one". Also trigger when the problem is complex, open-ended, or has no obvious single correct answer and the user wants a high-quality, well-explored result, not just a quick response.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Deep research workflow that starts from a GitHub repo URL/slug, pulls upstream intel, then expands to Reddit + open web for community reception. Use whenever Ahmad gives a GitHub link and asks to understand it, see updates, audit the community, or compose a report. Trigger phrases include "research this repo", "report on this github", "what's happening upstream", "community reception", "compose a report on <repo>", and any message that contains a github.com URL plus a research/report ask.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

難しい意思決定や論点を、必要な探索・独立したコンテキストでの熟考・統合・十分性確認へ分けて考える。single/panelの方式を使い、親だけで熟考を完了させない。調査はresearch、実装やbug修正はpir2/debugを使う。ユーザーが /deepthink と入力したときに使う。

Deep, iterative internet research for current facts, source triangulation, contradiction checks, due diligence, competitive analysis, claim verification, "latest" lookups, and cited reports. Use when the user asks to browse, search, research the web, verify claims, compare sources, gather primary sources, investigate companies, people, products, technical topics, news, events, markets, or create AKBP-ready durable research evidence.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when working with Algolia Deep — advanced Algolia search platform management including indices, search analytics, A/B tests, query rules, synonyms, API key audit, and infrastructure monitoring. Covers search performance metrics, relevance tuning, click-through analysis, indexing health, and usage quota tracking.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Kelly's market-intelligence desk (Busabase App-in-Skill). Merges passive competitor monitoring (Radar), agent-run deep research with approved briefs and cited reports (Research), and keyword/topic demand signals (Trends) over one Busabase-backed snapshot, watchlist, and review model. Use when the user invokes $kelly-radar or /kelly-radar, or asks for competitor monitoring, market intelligence, market research, research reports, trends, rising keywords, pricing changes, product launches, changelog diffs, competitor reviews, funding or hiring news, or opportunity triage.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Deep literature review — PubMed, EuropePMC, bioRxiv preprints, citation networks, evidence synthesis. Disambiguates queries, runs collision-aware searches, grades evidence T1-T4, and produces structured reports. Use for systematic literature review, meta-analysis evidence collection, and detailed answer-with-citations workflows.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Metabolomics research — metabolite identification, study analysis, and database searches across HMDB, MetaboLights, Metabolomics Workbench, KEGG. Use for annotating mass-spec features to known metabolites, finding metabolomics studies of a disease, and structured metabolomics research reports with metabolite-pathway mapping.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Maps metabolomics results to biological pathways via over-representation (ORA), metabolite-set enrichment (MSEA/QEA), mummichog/PSEA on raw m/z peaks, and network-diffusion enrichment (FELLA), with correct background-set construction and honest interpretive ceilings. Use when interpreting differential metabolites or an untargeted LC-MS feature table in pathway context, choosing ORA vs MSEA vs mummichog vs topology, or setting the reference/background set. For annotation confidence levels feeding ORA see metabolomics/metabolite-annotation; for gene-set concepts see pathway-analysis/go-enrichment and pathway-analysis/gsea; for joint gene+metabolite pathways see multi-omics-integration/mofa-integration.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Targeted deep research to fill a specific gap in an existing thesis. Use when user says "deepen", "flesh out", "expand on", "fill in", or specifies a thesis section to improve. Also supports --sync-metrics mode — detects stale financial metrics across every in-scope analytical section of a thesis (not just Key Metrics or Summary) and coherently updates every sentence that depends on them, using a Key-Metrics-table / FMP / web-search waterfall. Use when user says "sync metrics", "update the numbers throughout the note", or "fix stale figures across the whole thesis". The batch form `--sync-metrics --all-flagged` syncs every thesis flagged by the latest `/numbers --all-open` in one operation — detection fanned out to capped READ-ONLY agents, one consolidated confirmation gate, direct sequential writes (agents never write).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。