「drafting」の検索結果

The clip lives or dies on the action loop. Write every link from run-up to landing in order, name the physics you want by part, and spend the negative list on flying, hovering and teleporting. Use when the user wants a Seedance 2.5 / 2.0 video prompt for this kind of clip (Sports and extreme stunts; 中文触发词: 体育与极限运动, 体育, 极限运动, 跑酷, 滑板), or asks how published cases of this type were prompted. Read references/cases.md before drafting.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Cooking close-ups, mukbang and eating vlogs. They work when every beat shows one visible change in the food and one matching sound, and the dish stays the same dish from first frame to last. Use when the user wants a Seedance 2.5 / 2.0 video prompt for this kind of clip (Food close-ups and eating ASMR; 中文触发词: 美食特写与吃播 ASMR, 美食, 吃播, ASMR, 烹饪), or asks how published cases of this type were prompted. Read references/cases.md before drafting.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Two stages: first a single-page sheet of numbered panels from an image model, then that sheet fed to Seedance as the reference. The sheet owns order, framing and timing, and the video prompt only has to connect the panels. Use when the user wants a Seedance 2.5 / 2.0 video prompt for this kind of clip (Storyboard grid to video; 中文触发词: 分镜网格转视频, 分镜图, 九宫格, 故事板), or asks how published cases of this type were prompted. Read references/cases.md before drafting.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Guide users through a structured workflow for co-authoring documentation. Use when user wants to write documentation, proposals, technical specs, decision docs, PRDs, RFCs, or similar structured content. This workflow helps users efficiently transfer context, refine content through iteration, and verify the doc works for readers. Trigger when user mentions writing docs, creating proposals, drafting specs, or similar documentation tasks.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Assists R&D teams with patent technical disclosure drafting and patent/novelty search analysis; use when users ask to write a patent disclosure, structure an invention description, search related patents, or assess novelty.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Assist in drafting professional peer review response letters. Trigger.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Structures and writes discussion sections for academic papers and research reports. Use when writing a discussion section, interpreting research results, connecting findings to existing literature, addressing study limitations, synthesizing conclusions, or drafting any part of...

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Assist with biomedical grant proposal drafting, structure, and revision; use when preparing fundable proposal sections, aligning aims and methods, or improving reviewer-facing clarity.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Assists researchers with Institutional Review Board (IRB) application tasks, including drafting informed consent documents, reviewing research protocols for compliance, generating application forms, and preparing submission checklists. Use when the user mentions IRB, Instituti...

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when drafting patient discharge summaries, creating personalized discharge instructions, simulating post-discharge outcomes, reducing hospital readmissions, or optimizing care transitions. Generates AI-enhanced discharge documentation with digital twin predictions for improved patient safety.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Compares multiple study-route options for the same biomedical research question and recommends one primary plan, while explicitly explaining why alternative routes are secondary, premature, weaker, or dependency-heavy. Always use this skill when the user already has a reasonably defined question but is unsure which main study route should anchor the project. Focus on plan comparison, route selection, dependency awareness, and primary-plan justification rather than full protocol drafting.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Writes Specific Aims pages for grant applications. Use when drafting or revising the Specific Aims page (NIH R01/R21/R03), NSF Project Summary, or equivalent for any major funding agency. Also triggers on "write my specific aims", "help me draft specific aims for NIH", "what should a specific aims page include", "NSF project summary", "write my grant aims", or "how do I structure an R01".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Reference for the standard clauses found in commercial non-disclosure agreements (mutual and one-way) — what each clause does, the surface forms it appears in, and how to recognise it in unfamiliar drafting. Use when reviewing, comparing, or extracting provisions from any confidentiality / NDA / mutual NDA / standstill-and-confidentiality agreement.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Create employment contracts, offer letters, and HR policy documents following legal best practices. Use when drafting employment agreements, creating HR policies, or standardizing employment documentation.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Extract a written voice profile from your own prior papers, then use it to keep new drafts sounding like you. Reads a corpus one document at a time via subagents, produces a reusable profile on disk (lexicon, sentence rhythm, how you open and close, hedging habits, deliberate quirks), and audits a draft against it. Use when the user says "make this sound like me", "match my voice", "profile my writing", "why does this draft not sound like my papers", or before drafting prose that will carry their name. The positive counterpart to /humanize, which only detects AI tells.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Triage inbound journalist source queries and draft a response only when the user's expertise is a real fit. Runs each query through proven source-request lenses (4-gate fit triage, credential-standing test, deadline read, BLUF/inverted-pyramid drafting), kills weak fits, asks for missing proof, and never auto-sends.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when a vulnerability or security report arrives for triage, when assessing a CVE/RCE/OGNL/injection claim against the code, or when drafting a reply to a security researcher — to research the claim from source without trusting the reporter and without fabricating your own facts.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when opening the formal release vote for a Struts release candidate on any maintenance line (6.x, 7.x) - composing and drafting the [VOTE] Apache Struts X.Y.Z mail to dev@ once the Version Notes page, GitHub release and staged artifacts are published.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when drafting, updating, or reviewing an S2-XXX security bulletin on the Struts cwiki, when preparing bulletin text ahead of a CVE request, when filling a CVE record in the ASF CVE tool (cveprocess.apache.org / Vulnogram), when deciding when to publish, when publishing a bulletin and announcing it to the ASF lists, when wrapping up after the advisory mails, or when deciding how much detail about a fixed vulnerability is safe to publish.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Write publication-ready ML/AI/Systems papers for NeurIPS, ICML, ICLR, ACL, AAAI, COLM, OSDI, NSDI, ASPLOS, SOSP. Use when drafting papers from research repos, structuring arguments, verifying citations, or preparing camera-ready submissions. Includes LaTeX templates, reviewer guidelines, and citation verification workflows.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Korean prose humanizer for Codex and Superloopy that rewrites Korean text so it sounds naturally human while preserving meaning, register, facts, protected tokens, and evidence. Use when the user asks to remove Korean AI tells, make Korean copy sound human, fix 번역투, remove ChatGPT/Claude/Gemini tone, polish Korean without changing meaning, or says "AI 티 없애줘", "AI 윤문", "번역투 고쳐", "사람이 쓴 것처럼", "humanize Korean", "한글 AI 티 제거", "글 자연스럽게 다듬어줘". Inspired by Korean AI-tell ideas from https://github.com/epoko77-ai/im-not-ai. Handles Korean rewriting only; not for translation, fact expansion, SEO rewriting, legal drafting, or generic proofreading.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when drafting or polishing an American Anthropologist (AA) manuscript so it reads across all four fields, follows AA house style (Chicago author-date; free-format submission accepted), fits the section word caps (Research Articles ≤ 8,000 words; abstract 200 words), and uses inclusive, care-ful language. Tightens prose and format; it does not invent content.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when drafting AISTATS author responses or author-reviewer discussion replies under OpenReview, covering text-only discussion, no-link guidance, no revised-paper upload, anonymity requirements, statistician-reviewer pushback patterns, and decision-focused clarification strategy for theory-plus-experiments papers.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when drafting the response letter and revision plan after an American Economic Journal: Microeconomics (AEJ: Micro) R&R. Structures the reply to theory referees (correctness, generality, exposition) and editor; it does not re-derive the result (see aejmic-theory-model).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。