「enforcement」の検索結果

Run all 5 decomposition validators (req-has-module, code-annotation-maps-to-module, visibility-rule-enforcement, anaemic-context-detection, granularity-match) on the project, reporting violations.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Monitor, cap, and recover from context accumulation in agentic systems. Covers per-cycle cost tracking, context window auditing, budget caps with enforcement policies, emergency pruning when approaching limits, and progressive disclosure integration to minimize token spend on routing. Use when running long-lived agent loops (heartbeats, polling, autonomous workflows), when context windows are growing unpredictably between cycles, when API costs spike beyond expected baselines, when designing new agentic workflows that need cost guardrails from the start, or when post-mortem analysis reveals a cost incident caused by context accumulation.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Implement policy-as-code enforcement using OPA Gatekeeper or Kyverno to validate and mutate Kubernetes resources according to organizational policies. Covers constraint templates, admission control, audit mode, reporting violations, and integrating with CI/CD pipelines for shift-left policy validation. Use when enforcing resource configuration standards, preventing security misconfigurations such as privileged containers, ensuring compliance before deployment, standardizing naming conventions, or auditing existing cluster resources against policies.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Design serialization schemas using JSON Schema, Protocol Buffer definitions, or Apache Avro. Covers schema versioning, backwards compatibility, validation rules, and evolution strategies for long-lived data formats. Use when defining a new API contract or data interchange format, adding fields to an existing schema without breaking consumers, migrating between schema versions, choosing between schema systems, or documenting data validation rules for automated enforcement.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Query the FDA's public openFDA APIs for post-market drug data — FAERS adverse-event reports, Drugs@FDA approval and submission history, Structured Product Labels including boxed warnings, the National Drug Code directory, recall enforcement reports, and drug shortages. Use this skill to check what a regulator has already concluded about a molecule or its class, to date an approval and count its efficacy supplements, to read an approved indication or boxed warning, and to score a drug-event pair for disproportionate reporting with PRR, ROR, and chi-squared. Also trigger on openFDA, api.fda.gov, FAERS, Drugs@FDA, SPL, NDC, pharmacovigilance, boxed warning, adverse event report, drug recall, or safety signal.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use the free first-party `dotnet format` CLI for .NET formatting and analyzer fixes. Use when a .NET repo needs formatting commands, `--verify-no-changes` CI checks, or `.editorconfig`-driven code style enforcement.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use this skill when routing adversary findings in Phase 4. Provides routing logic, iteration limit enforcement, and escalation protocols.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use this skill when running or interpreting VCSDD adversarial reviews. Provides calibration guidance for the Adversary agent, finding severity classification, and anti-leniency enforcement patterns.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Elite UX/UI & Advanced GSAP Motion Engineer. Enforces Python-driven true randomization for layout variance, strict AIDA page structure, wide editorial typography (bans 6-line wraps), gapless bento grids, strict GSAP ScrollTriggers (pinning, stacking, scrubbing), inline micro-images, and massive section spacing. Use when building motion-rich frontend pages with stricter GPT/Codex design enforcement.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Overrides default LLM truncation behavior. Enforces complete code generation, bans placeholder patterns, and handles token-limit splits cleanly. Apply to any task requiring exhaustive, unabridged output. Use when a task requires complete code or exhaustive unabridged output without placeholders.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Detects code quality vulnerabilities in mobile apps (Android/iOS). Trigger on: SQL injection in SQLite, JavaScript injection in WebViews, intent injection, unsafe deserialization, NSKeyedUnarchiver, NSCoding, Java serialization, Parcelable, buffer overflow, JNI native code, PIE disabled, NX disabled, stack canary absent, RELRO, ARC disabled, third-party library CVE, vulnerable dependency, outdated SDK, targetSdkVersion, update enforcement missing, implicit Intent, URL loading in WebView, object persistence, memory corruption, OWASP dependency check. Covers MASVS-CODE-1/2/3/4.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Identify and exploit flaws in API rate limiting enforcement. Use this skill when encountering HTTP 429 Too Many Requests errors during password brute-forcing, OTP validation, credential stuffing, or enumeration attacks. These bypasses leverage IP spoofing, parameter manipulation, and edge-case application logic.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when a task needs the judgment of a Criminal Justice and Law Enforcement Teacher, Postsecondary — grading or defending a crime-trend assignment that must distinguish rate from raw count, mapping a CJ curriculum against ACJS certification standards or a state POST lesson-plan hour requirement, screening a student research protocol involving parolees, probationers, or incarcerated subjects for IRB Subpart C, or setting the liability and confidentiality terms for a ride-along or corrections practicum placement.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when a task needs the judgment of an Aviation Inspector — determining whether an air carrier's fleet is in compliance with an Airworthiness Directive across a maintenance-records sample, deciding where the FAA's compliance-and-enforcement ladder places a finding (compliance action vs. Letter of Correction vs. civil penalty vs. certificate action), auditing a Safety Management System for a functioning safety-assurance loop rather than paperwork completeness, scoping a records-sampling strategy across a fleet under surveillance, or deciding whether to ground an aircraft pending an AD compliance finding.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Type design analysis — encapsulation, invariant expression, usefulness, and enforcement.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Design data loss prevention — data discovery, classification, policy enforcement across endpoint, network, and cloud.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Analyze vendor management systems for performance scorecards, third-party risk assessment, SLA enforcement, vendor rationalization, and relationship governance.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Analyze grant management and sponsored research operations including proposal lifecycle tracking, pre-award routing and budget development, post-award expenditure monitoring and burn rate analysis, 2 CFR 200 Uniform Guidance cost allowability enforcement.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Analyze food supply chain systems for waste reduction opportunities including shelf life prediction models, FIFO and FEFO inventory rotation enforcement, demand forecasting accuracy and bias, donation logistics workflows, cold chain temperature monitoring, and sustainability reporting against EPA Food Recovery Hierarchy and UN SDG 12.3 targets.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Audit mental health crisis monitoring systems for risk signal detection accuracy, escalation protocol completeness, safety planning integration, crisis team coordination, and ethical guardrail enforcement..

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Full-pipeline orchestrator. Runs all 7 roles (BA → TechLead → PM → BE Dev → FE Dev → Tester → QA/QC) in sequence by loading and following each per-role skill. Uses pre_write_validator.py hook enforcement and each role's self-validation. Use per-agent commands ($team-ba, $team-techlead, etc.) for manual control.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Full-pipeline orchestrator. Runs all 7 agents (BA → TechLead → PM → BE Dev → FE Dev → Tester → QA/QC) in sequence by invoking each per-agent skill via the Skill tool. All writes go through the pre_write_validator.py hook for hard enforcement. Use per-agent commands (/team-ba, /team-techlead, etc.) for manual control.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when setting the default filtered set of records a user sees in list views, reports and SOQL without removing their access. Trigger keywords: scoping rule, Filter by scope, default record scope, RestrictionRule enforcementType Scoping, Object Manager scoping rule, recordFilter. NOT for the SOQL USING SCOPE clause - use apex/soql-using-scope-clause. NOT for blocking record access - use admin/restriction-rules.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when configuring org-wide platform settings: MFA enforcement, My Domain setup and deployment, session timeout and security settings, password policies, trusted IP ranges (Network Access), and CSP Trusted Sites. Owns these settings as deployable Settings metadata (Security.settings, MyDomain.settings, Company.settings, Language.settings) and the order in which a new org is stood up. Trigger keywords: 'MFA setup', 'My Domain', 'session settings', 'password policy', 'trusted IP ranges', 'CSP trusted sites', 'Security.settings', 'SecuritySettings metadata', 'MyDomainSettings', 'settings-meta.xml', 'enhanced domains', 'deploy org settings', 'new org setup order', 'sessionTimeout enum', 'lockSessionsToIp', 'enableAdminLoginAsAnyUser'. NOT for user-level login restrictions (use user-management), NOT for permission model design (use permission-sets-vs-profiles), NOT for security audit and hardening review (use security/org-hardening-and-baseline-config).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。