「enterprise」の検索結果

Helps DevOps engineers configure mirrord Operator's Kafka queue splitting feature end-to-end. Generates the MirrordSplitConfig and MirrordPropertyList Kubernetes CRD YAMLs (the current resources; MirrordKafkaTopicsConsumer + MirrordKafkaClientConfig are deprecated but still supported), the matching mirrord.json split_queues section with message_filter and jq_filter, and Helm value guidance. Use this skill whenever the user mentions Kafka splitting with mirrord, MirrordSplitConfig, MirrordPropertyList, MirrordKafkaClientConfig, MirrordKafkaTopicsConsumer, Kafka queue/topic splitting, configuring mirrord with Kafka, Kafka Streams splitting, MSK IAM auth, or troubleshooting Kafka splitting sessions. Also trigger on split_queues with queue_type Kafka, or connecting mirrord to a Kafka cluster. This is a Team/Enterprise feature of mirrord.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Helps DevOps engineers configure mirrord Operator's Temporal task queue splitting feature end-to-end. Generates the MirrordSplitConfig and MirrordPropertyList Kubernetes CRD YAMLs, the matching mirrord.json split_queues section with message_filter and jq_filter, and Helm value guidance. Use this skill whenever the user mentions Temporal splitting with mirrord, Temporal task queue splitting, splitting a Temporal worker, configuring mirrord with Temporal or Temporal Cloud, routing Temporal workflow or activity tasks to a local worker, or troubleshooting Temporal splitting sessions. Also trigger on split_queues with queue_type Temporal, or connecting mirrord to a Temporal frontend. This is an alpha Team/Enterprise feature of mirrord.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Client-facing red-team deliverable format — codifies the Subject / Observations / Description / Impact / Recommendation / PoC structure used for external red-team engagements (not bug-bounty platform reports). Different audience, different tone, different cadence. Built from an authorized engagement deliverable where 14 findings were packaged into a 52KB MD + 2.2MB DOCX with 16 embedded screenshots. Use when the engagement is "external red team for an enterprise client" (not H1/Bugcrowd/Intigriti), when generating the final report, when the client has specified a custom report format, or when packaging findings into DOCX/PDF.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Okta-as-IdP red-team attack chain — tenant discovery, user enumeration (multiple vectors), authentication flow analysis (factors enumeration, push-notification fatigue, SMS bypass), password spray with lockout discipline, Okta-specific phishing primitives (kits, FastPass abuse, OIDC redirect_uri tampering), MFA enumeration, post-compromise admin API surface. Many enterprise orgs use Okta instead of (or alongside) Entra ID. Distinct endpoints, distinct rate-limiting, distinct factor flows. Use when recon shows `<tenant>.okta.com`, `<tenant>.okta-emea.com`, `<tenant>.oktapreview.com`, or autodiscover-style records pointing at Okta IdP.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Hunting skill for auth bypass vulnerabilities. Built from 12 public bug bounty reports across SAML XSW / parser-differential (GitHub Enterprise CVE-2025-25291/25292), SAML signature stripping (Uber, Rocket.Chat, samlify CVE-2025-47949), SAML domain enforcement bypass via control characters (HackerOne 2024), partner-portal cross-IdP assertion reuse (Slack), WordPress XMLRPC bypassing SSO (Uber), JWT alg-confusion HS256/RS256 (Jitsi), JWT signature-validation skip (Linktree, Newspack), and token-audience confusion (Argo CD CVE-2023-22482). For standalone JWT signature/crypto forging (alg:none, key confusion, kid/jku) see hunt-jwt-crypto; this skill covers JWT only inside SSO/SAML/token-trust bypass chains. SAML assertion-layer attacks (XSW, comment injection, signature stripping, XXE-in-assertion) are owned by hunt-saml; this skill owns the broader cross-protocol auth-bypass taxonomy. Use when hunting auth bypass — see the Legacy-Protocol Matrix for branded-UI vs legacy-endpoint patterns.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Hunting skill for csrf vulnerabilities. Built from 15 public bug bounty reports including modern variants — SameSite=Lax sibling-subdomain bypass (Argo CD CVE-2024-22424), GraphQL mutations-via-GET (GitLab $3,370), framework-wide CSRF middleware disabled (Stripe Dashboard $5,000), path-traversal CSRF-token bypass (GitHub Enterprise CVE-2022-23732 $10k), Origin-omission bypass (TikTok $2,500), OAuth-state null-byte (Streamlabs), WebSocket CSRF / CSWSH (Coda), default-SameSite email-change → ATO (YoYo Games $400), social-account-link CSRF (HackerOne), JSON-CSRF via text/plain on email-change (TikTok $500). Use when hunting modern CSRF — heavy emphasis on chain-to-ATO patterns.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Generate an enterprise-style changelog for a PipesHub GitHub release. Takes a release URL or tag (e.g. https://github.com/pipeshub-ai/pipeshub-ai/releases/tag/v0.5.0 or v0.5.0), writes the detailed per-release changelog to changelog/<version>.md, and registers it in the repo-root CHANGELOG.md (condensed entry + link) and the changelog/README.md index.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Clean, high-contrast enterprise design for data-driven workflows with intuitive drag-and-drop patterns and structured layouts.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Dark-themed cloud-platform aesthetic with modular grids, glass-like panels, and strong data hierarchy for productivity dashboards.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Professional, brand-aligned design with structured grids, minimalist layouts, and consistent enterprise patterns.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Structured, enterprise-focused design system emphasizing clarity, consistency, and efficiency for data-dense web applications.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Conduct enterprise-grade research with multi-source synthesis, citation tracking, and verification. Use when user needs comprehensive analysis requiring 10+ sources, verified claims, or comparison of approaches. Triggers include "deep research", "comprehensive analysis", "research report", "compare X vs Y", or "analyze trends". Do NOT use for simple lookups, debugging, or questions answerable with 1-2 searches.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Build messaging applications using Azure Service Bus SDK for JavaScript (@azure/service-bus). Use when implementing queues, topics/subscriptions, message sessions, dead-letter handling, or enterprise messaging patterns.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Azure Service Bus SDK for Python messaging. Use for queues, topics, subscriptions, and enterprise messaging patterns. Triggers: "service bus", "ServiceBusClient", "queue", "topic", "subscription", "message broker".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Azure Service Bus SDK for .NET. Enterprise messaging with queues, topics, subscriptions, and sessions. Use for reliable message delivery, pub/sub patterns, dead letter handling, and background processing. Triggers: "Service Bus", "ServiceBusClient", "ServiceBusSender", "ServiceBusReceiver", "ServiceBusProcessor", "message queue", "pub/sub .NET", "dead letter queue".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Selects, investigates, and compares AWS object, file, and block storage services, and answers cost, performance, configuration, security, and troubleshooting questions about storage services. Applies when a user asks where to store or archive data based on their usage patterns; which storage service to choose or how two compare; how to migrate data from on-premises or between AWS services; how to protect, replicate, or recover data; how to optimize storage costs; where to deploy shared NFS, SMB, or POSIX file systems; where to store vector embeddings or tabular data; what storage backs enterprise file shares, self-managed databases on EC2, VMware, or stateful containers; or asks what an AWS storage service can do or how it works. Relevant for storage needs for workloads such as AI/ML, analytics, EDA, HPC, media, genomics, or financial trading. Not applicable for SQL query engines (Athena, Spark, Redshift, EMR), ETL (Glue), streaming (Kafka, MSK, Kinesis), or managed database services (RDS, Aurora, DynamoDB).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Implement access control for multi-user Apple Notes automation. Trigger: "apple notes access control".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Map workforce roles and application actors to Algolia team permissions, API-key ACLs, and secured-key restrictions. Use when reviewing least privilege, tenancy, SSO requirements, or access rotation. Trigger with "Algolia RBAC", "Algolia SSO", or "Algolia tenant access".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Define an Abridge reference architecture that separates vendor, EHR, identity, device, customer, and clinical authority boundaries. Use when reviewing an enterprise Abridge design. Trigger with "design the Abridge architecture".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Working pattern for enterprise-edition features in Grida — the commercial/hosted concerns (entitlement, BYOD, billing) on top of the OSS core. Anchor for the `GRIDA-EE: <surface>` grep marker, `(ee)` route group, `*-hosted` package suffix, and namespaced `grida_*` schema. Use when adding or touching an EE-only feature, or deciding whether a feature is EE territory. Surface skills (`platform-consumers`) are siblings.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

SAML SSO assertion attack playbook. Use when testing signature validation, assertion wrapping, audience restrictions, ACS handling, XML trust boundaries, and enterprise SSO flaws.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Entry P1 category router for authentication and authorization. Use when testing login flows, sessions, object authorization, JWT, OAuth, CORS, CSRF, and enterprise SSO weaknesses before any deeper auth topic skill.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Owns legal, contracts, intellectual property, regulatory compliance, privacy, security governance, enterprise risk, and audit readiness. Use this to review a contract or commitment, assess regulatory or privacy exposure, evaluate an IP or licensing question, judge the risk in a business decision, prepare for an audit or certification, or when a plan may create obligations the business cannot meet. Also use to decide whether a risk should be accepted, mitigated, or refused.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Identifies, assesses, and tracks organizational risk — building and maintaining a risk register, scoring exposure, assigning owners and treatments, and preparing for audit. Use this to stand up a risk program, assess the risk in a decision or initiative, prepare for a certification or audit, decide whether a risk should be accepted, mitigated, transferred, or avoided, or report risk posture to leadership.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。