1,245 件 ・ 関連度順
概要と使いどころ
Evaluates LLMs across 60+ academic benchmarks (MMLU, HumanEval, GSM8K, TruthfulQA, HellaSwag). Use when benchmarking model quality, comparing models, reporting academic results, or tracking training progress. Industry standard used by EleutherAI, HuggingFace, and major labs. Supports HuggingFace, vLLM, APIs.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Evaluates code generation models across HumanEval, MBPP, MultiPL-E, and 15+ benchmarks with pass@k metrics. Use when benchmarking code models, comparing coding abilities, testing multi-language support, or measuring code generation quality. Industry standard from BigCode Project used by HuggingFace leaderboards.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
End-to-end discipline for turning any large data source (audio libraries, email takeouts, document corpora, chat exports, API dumps) into brain pages at scale. The lifecycle spine: SCHEMA → ACCESS → TRIAL → EVALUATE → IMPROVE → CODIFY → TEST → SKILLIFY → BULK → MONITOR. State is tracked in a durable JSON manifest (see MANIFEST-PATTERN.md) so any crash, session boundary, or subagent fan-out resumes from ground truth instead of memory.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Evaluate a vendor — cost analysis, risk assessment, and recommendation. Use when reviewing a new vendor proposal, deciding whether to renew or replace a contract, comparing two vendors side-by-side, or building a TCO breakdown and negotiation points before procurement sign-off.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Create or evaluate an architecture decision record (ADR). Use when choosing between technologies (e.g., Kafka vs SQS), documenting a design decision with trade-offs and consequences, reviewing a system design proposal, or designing a new component from requirements and constraints.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Produce a rigorous, sector-relative, multi-factor fundamental analysis of a publicly listed company — Indian (NSE/BSE) or US/global. Use when the user asks to analyse, research, evaluate, or value a stock, ticker, or listed company; asks whether a business is fundamentally strong, cheap, or expensive; compares companies or benchmarks one against its sector; or mentions OPM, ROCE, ROE, ROIC, P/E, EV/EBITDA, free cash flow, NIM, GNPA, CASA, promoter holding or pledging. Use it for accounting-quality and forensic questions — "is the profit real", "why is profit rising but cash isn't", auditor qualifications, related-party concerns — which route to the forensic-only mode, and for IPOs and not-yet-listed companies — "should I apply to this IPO", DRHP/RHP or S-1 questions, price band, grey market premium — which route to the IPO mode. Use it even when the request sounds casual ("is Infosys any good?"). Do not use it for personalised investment advice, portfolio allocation, or trading signals.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Honestly evaluate AI work quality using a two-axis scoring system. Use after completing a task, code review, or work session to get an unbiased assessment. Detects score inflation, forces devil's advocate reasoning, and persists scores across sessions.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
This skill should be used when the user asks to "design system architecture", "evaluate microservices vs monolith", "create architecture diagrams", "analyze dependencies", "choose a database", "plan for scalability", "make technical decisions", or "review system design". Use for architecture decision records (ADRs), tech stack evaluation, system design reviews, dependency analysis, and generating architecture diagrams in Mermaid, PlantUML, or ASCII format.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when the user asks to optimize prompts, design prompt templates, evaluate LLM outputs with an eval set, measure RAG retrieval quality, validate agent/tool configurations, analyze token usage, or design structured-output contracts. Covers eval-driven prompt iteration, RAG metrics (relevance, faithfulness, coverage), agent workflow validation, and token/cost budgeting — all model-agnostic, with three stdlib Python tools.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when the user asks to design a multi-agent system, pick an orchestration pattern (supervisor/swarm/pipeline), generate tool schemas for agents, or evaluate agent execution logs for cost, latency, and failure bottlenecks. Examples: 'design an agent architecture for research automation', 'generate Anthropic tool schemas from these tool descriptions', 'analyze these agent run logs for bottlenecks'. NOT for Claude Code workflow files (use workflow-builder) or single-agent prompt design (use agent-workflow-designer).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Identify the first beachhead market segment for a product launch. Evaluates segments against burning pain, willingness to pay, winnable market share, and referral potential. Use when choosing a first market, targeting an initial customer segment, or planning market entry strategy.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Identify growth loops (flywheels) for sustainable traction. Evaluates 5 loop types: Viral, Usage, Collaboration, User-Generated, and Referral. Use when designing growth mechanisms, building product-led traction, or understanding how growth loops work.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Quality review of test files and evidence — goes beyond existence, evaluates assertion coverage. ADEQUATE/INCOMPLETE/MISSING/NOT ASSESSED per story.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Re-evaluate open bugs — priority vs severity, assign to sprints, surface systemic trends. Run when the count grows.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Generate and evaluate grounded ideas. Use when the user wants ideas, improvements, or surprising directions before choosing one to develop. Not for refining an idea they already have (ce-brainstorm) or judging one already on the table (ce-pov).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Drive a running OpenWork desktop window over CDP from the shell. Evaluate JS, take screenshots, open a new session, send a prompt with a chosen model, wait for the run to finish. Use when checking a UI change by hand in a world or pnpm dev, or when reproducing a chat state.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Discover keyword opportunities, evaluate metrics and SERPs, and save/tag promising terms.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Test a candidate OpenSEO skill end to end by running fresh, isolated Codex sessions against the local backend and scoring the reports they save. Use when editing a product skill (seo-audit, keyword-research, ...) and you need evidence that the new instructions produce better output, not just a cleaner file.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Author, validate, test, and deploy YARA-L 2.0 detection rules and evaluate end-to-end detection coverage gaps in Google SecOps. Use when writing new detection rules, tuning existing rules, validating syntax, testing logic against historical telemetry, or evaluating detection coverage against threat intelligence blogs, CVE disclosures, and Threat Detection Opportunities (TDOs) using synthetic UDM events and long-running coverage analysis. Don't use for alert triage (use secops-triage), deep forensic event reconstruction on infected hosts (use secops-investigate), or case management operations (use secops-cases).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Onboarding entrypoint for agents-cli in Agent Platform. It should be used when the user wants to "create a new agent", "develop an agent", "build an agent using ADK", "run the agent locally", "debug agent code", "test an agent", "evaluate an agent", "deploy an agent", "publish an agent", "monitor an agent", or needs the ADK (Agent Development Kit) development lifecycle.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Generates security-focused guidance for Google Cloud workloads based on the design principles and recommendations in the Google Cloud Well-Architected Framework (WAF). Use this skill to evaluate workloads, identify security requirements, and provide actionable recommendations for IAM, network security, data protection, and operational security.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Generates operations-focused guidance for Google Cloud workloads based on the design principles and recommendations in the Operational Excellence pillar of the Google Cloud Well-Architected Framework (WAF). Use this skill to evaluate a workload, identify operational requirements, and provide actionable recommendations for deployment, monitoring, and incident management.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Generates performance-focused guidance for Google Cloud workloads based on the design principles and recommendations in the Performance Optimization pillar of the Google Cloud Well-Architected Framework (WAF). Use this skill to evaluate a workload, identify performance requirements, and provide actionable recommendations for resource allocation, modular design, and elasticity.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Generates guidance for reliability, resilience, availability, redundancy, fault-tolerance, and disaster recovery (DR) for Google Cloud workloads based on the design principles and recommendations in the Google Cloud Well-Architected Framework. Use when the user asks to evaluate, design, or improve the reliability, resilience, availability, or disaster recovery capabilities of Google Cloud workloads.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。