「experiments」の検索結果

Performs deep Root Cause Analysis (RCA) on NVIDIA TAO Visual ChangeNet classification experiments with image-evidence-driven investigation. Use when analyzing ChangeNet model failures, investigating poor recall / FAR / PASS-NO_PASS metrics, auditing visual inspection pipeline quality, or running an RCA report for an AOI defect-detection model. Trigger phrases include "RCA on my ChangeNet model", "why is my AOI model failing", "audit ChangeNet predictions", "investigate FAR regressions", "root cause analysis on visual-changenet".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Brev instance operating guidance for NeMo-RL agents working in /home/ubuntu/RL with limited workspace disk, a larger /ephemeral volume, and optional /home/ubuntu/RL/.env secrets. Use when running nemo-rl-auto-research campaigns, experiments, training jobs, model or dataset downloads, shared cache-heavy commands, log-producing runs, checkpoint generation, W&B or Hugging Face authenticated workflows, or any workflow that may create large files on Brev.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Long-context MoE training guidance for Megatron Bridge. Covers CP sizing, selective recompute, dispatcher choices, and practical patterns from DSV3, Qwen3, and Qwen3-Next long-context experiments.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Practical guidance for training MoE VLMs in Megatron Bridge. Compares FSDP and 3D-parallel approaches, using rounded lessons from Qwen3-VL, Qwen3-Next, and other multimodal experiments.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when you want to search for or download experimentally-determined 3D structures for biomolecules (proteins, nucleic acids, bound ligands). Supports searching by sequence similarity, structure similarity, chemical and other attributes. Also use to get metadata about biomolecular structure experiments.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Query the ENCODE Registry of cis-Regulatory Elements (cCREs) via the SCREEN GraphQL API, or make custom queries to the ENCODE Portal REST API for experiments and files (ChIP-seq peaks, etc.). Use when you want to query regulatory annotations or raw experimental data across human cell types.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

CRISPResso2 for analyzing CRISPR gene editing outcomes. Quantifies indels, HDR efficiency, and generates comprehensive editing reports. Use when analyzing amplicon sequencing data from CRISPR editing experiments to assess editing efficiency.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

JACKS (Joint Analysis of CRISPR/Cas9 Knockout Screens) for modeling sgRNA efficacy and gene essentiality. Use when analyzing multiple CRISPR screens simultaneously or when accounting for variable sgRNA efficiency across experiments.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Design guides for cytosine and adenine base editing using editing window optimization and BE-Hive outcome prediction. Select optimal positions for C-to-T or A-to-G conversions without double-strand breaks. Use when designing base editor experiments for precise nucleotide changes.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Design pegRNAs for prime editing using PrimeDesign algorithms. Generate spacer, PBS, and RT template sequences for precise genomic modifications without double-strand breaks. Use when designing prime editing experiments for precise insertions, deletions, or point mutations.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Cloud laboratory platform for automated protein testing and validation. Use when designing proteins and needing experimental validation including binding assays, expression testing, thermostability measurements, enzyme activity assays, or protein sequence optimization. Also use for submitting experiments via API, tracking experiment status, downloading results, optimizing protein sequences for better expression using computational tools (NetSolP, SoluProt, SolubleMPNN, ESM), or managing protein design workflows with wet-lab validation.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Find differentially accessible chromatin regions between conditions using DiffBind or DESeq2. Use when comparing chromatin accessibility between treatment groups, cell types, or developmental stages in ATAC-seq experiments.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Design unbiased survey instruments — question wording, scales, and sampling — to measure attitudes at scale. Use when you need quantitative breadth. For behavioural experiments, use `a-b-test-design` (prototyping-testing).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Run repeated, measured Git experiments toward a numeric target; keep improvements and revert failures. Use for autonomous optimization or managing an autoresearch run, not one-shot edits.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Guides the end-to-end AWS resilience lifecycle integrating Resilience Hub v2, Fault Injection Service, and Application Recovery Controller. Covers the Define → Test → Operate workflow: from policy creation through failure mode assessment, to FIS experiment validation, to ARC operational controls. Applicable when the user wants a complete resilience strategy, needs to connect findings to experiments to controls, or is planning a resilience program. Also applicable for the meta question of whether marking NGRH findings as resolved is enough, whether they are "done" after resolving findings, or how to validate findings before resolving them. Not applicable for resolving or remediating a specific individual finding (see resilience-hub-failure-mode-assessment), or when a single service is explicitly named (e.g. "what FIS experiment should I run").

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Configures AWS Application Recovery Controller (ARC) for operational resilience: routing controls with safety rules for cross-Region failover, and zonal shift / zonal autoshift for AZ-impairment recovery. Applies when setting up failover routing, configuring safety rules, enabling zonal shift, or configuring zonal autoshift with practice runs. Also applies when shifting traffic out of a specific Availability Zone (AZ) for an ALB/NLB or other resource. For a broader "an AZ is impaired, what is my response across services" question, see aws-resilience-lifecycle. Does not apply to Resilience Hub setup or FIS experiments.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Runs and interprets AWS Resilience Hub v2 failure mode assessments. Covers starting assessments, understanding findings (severity, categories, recommendations), triaging by achievability, working with AI-generated service functions, and resolving findings. Applies when the user wants to run an assessment, review findings, or understand failure modes, or has a specific finding and asks how to resolve, remediate, or fix it. Does not apply to initial setup (use resilience-hub-getting-started) or FIS experiments.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Sets up AWS Resilience Hub v2 from scratch: creates resilience policies with SLO targets, registers systems and user journeys, onboards services with input sources, and runs a first failure mode assessment. Applies when the user wants to get started with Resilience Hub v2, create a policy, onboard a service, or run an assessment — including creating one concrete policy with specific availability/RTO/RPO targets and a DR approach for a single service (even a tier-1 one). Does not apply to FIS experiments or ARC routing controls.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Designs a resilience program: how to structure and standardize resilience policies across an organization, team, or portfolio (tiered policy model with availability/RTO/RPO targets and DR approach selection), and how often to run resilience activities (operational cadence). Applies when the user asks how to structure policies org-wide, what tiers/targets to set, which DR approach fits a tier, or how frequently to run assessments, FIS experiments, GameDays, or autoshift practice. Does not apply to creating or configuring a specific policy or resource for a single workload (use resilience-hub-getting-started), to step-by-step lifecycle execution (see aws-resilience-lifecycle), or to service-specific setup.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Guide for creating and writing Expo native modules and views using the Expo Modules API (Swift, Kotlin, TypeScript). Covers module definition DSL, native views, shared objects, config plugins, lifecycle hooks, autolinking, and type system. Use when building or modifying native modules for Expo. Not for migrating an existing Swift module from the definition DSL to the Expo Modules API 2.0 macros; use expo-migrate-module (from the expo-experiments plugin) for that.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Guided journey from a raw app idea to a validated, cleanly architected first version that ships on a sustainable cadence. Orchestrates ten skills phase by phase - lean-startup, design-sprint, clean-architecture, domain-driven-design, clean-code, pragmatic-programmer, system-design, ios-hig-design, 37signals-way, software-design-philosophy - asking the user questions at every decision point and recording results in the project docs/ folder (PRODUCT.md, ARCHITECTURE.md, EXPERIMENTS.md, CREATE-APP-PLAN.md) so the journey resumes across sessions. Use when the user wants to build a new app, validate an idea before writing code, architect an MVP that will not need a rewrite, or says 'help me build my app the right way'. App already exists: use improve-app or grow-app. Business idea not yet validated: run create-business first. Marketing site only: use create-website. Architecture-only question: design-code-architecture. For one framework in isolation, invoke that skill directly.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Build a weekly cadence of customer touchpoints using Opportunity Solution Trees, assumption mapping, and interview snapshots. Use when the user mentions "continuous discovery", "opportunity solution tree", "weekly interviews", "assumption testing", "discovery habits", "product trio", "outcome-based roadmap", "how do I talk to customers regularly", "we keep building things nobody uses", or "connect research to the roadmap". Also trigger when setting up regular customer feedback loops, prioritizing which experiments to run, or tying discovery insights to delivery work. Covers experience mapping, co-creation, and prioritizing opportunities. For interview technique, see mom-test. For team structure, see inspired-product.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Guided journey from a leaking conversion flow - landing page, signup, checkout, or in-app onboarding - to a measured, tested funnel. Orchestrates six skills phase by phase - lean-analytics, cro-methodology, storybrand-messaging, hundred-million-offers, influence-psychology, design-everyday-things - each phase carries its full method inline so it runs standalone, asking the user questions at every decision point and recording results in the project docs/ folder (FUNNEL.md, METRICS.md, EXPERIMENTS.md, CONVERSION-OPTIMIZATION-PLAN.md) so the journey resumes across sessions. Use when the user wants to raise conversion on a specific flow, fix checkout or signup abandonment, diagnose onboarding drop-off, or says 'people start but never finish'. With no site yet, use create-website; for a whole-site look, message, and speed audit, improve-website; if the flow converts but needs traffic, grow-website; for in-product engagement and retention, improve-app. For one framework in isolation, invoke that skill directly.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Design MVPs, validated learning experiments, and pivot-or-persevere decisions using Build-Measure-Learn. Use when the user mentions "MVP scope", "validated learning", "pivot or persevere", "vanity metrics", "test assumptions", "innovation accounting", "build-measure-learn", "minimum viable experiment", "should we pivot", "test a business idea cheaply", or "build the smallest version first". Also trigger when deciding what to include in a first version, measuring startup progress, or evaluating whether to change direction on a product bet. Covers innovation accounting and actionable metrics. For 5-day prototype testing, see design-sprint. For customer motivation analysis, see jobs-to-be-done.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。