「failures」の検索結果

Diagnoses and resolves Filestore client mount failures on Google Cloud, permission errors (EACCES), and network timeouts (ETIMEDOUT). Use when an NFS mount hangs or fails from a Compute Engine VM, GKE pod, Cloud Run service, or Vertex AI workload, when `mount.nfs` reports "Connection timed out" or "access denied by server", when checking whether VPC ingress firewall rules or `nfsExportOptions` allow a client IP, or when a previously working Filestore share suddenly stops mounting after an administrative change. Don't use for Cloud Storage (GCS) buckets, Persistent Disk, or Cloud NetApp Volumes, and don't use for Filestore capacity scaling or backup and export-policy auditing.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Configures and diagnoses Workload Identity Federation for GKE authentication failures for Pods (403 "iam.serviceAccounts.getAccessToken" / permission denied, "could not find default credentials", or GKE metadata server unreachable) by verifying cluster and node-pool Workload Identity configuration, the Kubernetes ServiceAccount (KSA) to IAM binding (direct principal binding and legacy Google ServiceAccount impersonation), target-resource IAM roles, and gke-metadata-server health. Use when setting up KSA/GSA bindings (`roles/iam.workloadIdentityUser`, `iam.gke.io/gcp-service-account`) or when a Pod cannot authenticate to Google Cloud APIs. Don't use for in-cluster Kubernetes RBAC errors (API-server authorization), general workload crashes (use gke-workload-troubleshooting), or Pod Security Standards and NetworkPolicies (use gke-workload-security).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Manages GKE storage, including PVCs, PersistentVolumes, and Filestore. Use when configuring GKE storage or creating PVCs. For GCS FUSE mounts, use google-cloud-storage-fuse. For diagnosing storage failures (volume attach/mount errors, disk performance/node storage pressure, or Cloud Storage FUSE OOM), use gke-storage-troubleshooting. Don't use for database administration or replication strategies outside volume provisioning context.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Configures GKE observability, including Cloud Logging, Cloud Monitoring, and managed Prometheus. Use when configuring GKE monitoring, setting up GKE logging, or configuring Prometheus metrics collection, and to troubleshoot Managed Service for Prometheus (GMP) issues such as missing metrics, unhealthy scrape targets, PodMonitoring misconfiguration, rule/alert evaluation failures, and monitoring permission errors. Don't use to configure local application logging frameworks or external APMs outside GKE.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Monitors, troubleshoots, and manages GKE TPU Dynamic Slices custom resources. Use when checking TPU slice lifecycle states, troubleshooting slice provisioning failures, validating single-slice or multi-slice (JobSet) workload manifests, or safely patching stuck finalizers and disabling the slice controller. Don't use for generic GKE cluster node pool creation or standard non-TPU workload management (use gke-basics or gke-cluster-creation instead).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Configures GKE edge networking, traffic routing, load balancing, and private service endpoints. Use when configuring Gateway API manifests, standard Ingress, Cloud Armor WAF security policies, Container-Native Load Balancing (NEGs), Private Service Connect (PSC), or Google-managed SSL certificates on GKE, and to troubleshoot Ingress and load-balancer 502/5xx errors, backend health-check failures, connection draining, and TLS/SSL policy enforcement. Don't use for core cluster IP planning, Dataplane V2 network policies, or node NAT egress (use gke-networking instead).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Diagnoses GKE HorizontalPodAutoscaler (HPA) failures — metrics showing as <unknown>, FailedGetResourceMetric / FailedGetScale / FailedComputeMetricsReplicas events, missing Pod resource requests, custom/external metrics-pipeline breakage (FailedGetExternalMetric / FailedGetCustomMetric, unavailable metrics adapter, control-plane firewall blocking the adapter), HPA that won't scale up or down (tolerance / stabilization window / unavailable rate metrics), scale-to/from-zero problems, and slow HPA reaction on large clusters. Use when an HPA isn't scaling a workload as expected or reports metric errors. Don't use for configuring or authoring new HPA/VPA objects or scaling best practices (see the gke-workload-scaling skill), or for Cluster Autoscaler / node-pool sizing.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Diagnoses GKE JobSet interruptions, restarts, and preemptions for AI/ML training workloads autonomously. Use when troubleshooting JobSet restart loops, spot VM preemptions, node readiness failures, host VM issues, or coordinator worker crashes. Don't use for general GKE cluster creation, basic workload deployment, or non-JobSet application issues.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Diagnoses GKE nodes reporting NotReady or Unknown status by inspecting node conditions, events, kubelet/containerd logs, and node metrics, then proposing safe remediations. Use when nodes show NotReady, when the kubelet stops posting node status, or when workloads are evicted or stuck Pending due to node health. Don't use for pod-level application failures (use gke-workload-troubleshooting), autoscaler scale-up/scale-down decisions (use gke-cluster-autoscaler), or non-GKE compute.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Diagnoses and prevents vbar_control_agent segfaults, out-of-memory (OOM) errors, and TPU device initialization failures on TPU v6e nodes in GKE caused by race conditions during TPU device resets or high-frequency metrics polling. Use when troubleshooting vbar_control_agent crashes, memory cgroup OOMs in serial console logs, tpu-device-plugin metrics checksum corruption errors, or custom TPU metrics collection conflicts on GKE TPU v6e nodes. Don't use for general non-TPU container OOM troubleshooting or standard GKE node lifecycle operations.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Processes GCP infrastructure design and deployment workflows within Application Design Center (ADC). Use when: - Designing GCP infrastructure with Terraform. - Validating local HCL. - Performing best-practice plan scans. - Importing templates to Application Design Center (ADC). - Deploying templates. - Troubleshooting deployment failures. Boundaries: - Only use for GCP-specific cloud infrastructure. - Only use for Terraform coding within the ADC context.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Measures and improves the quality of AI models and agents on Google Cloud using the Eval Quality Flywheel methodology. Use when generating synthetic user scenarios, evaluating an agent or model, building an eval dataset, picking or writing evaluation metrics, analyzing failures, comparing results before and after a fix, or when guidance is needed on Agent Platform eval methodology — including dataset schema, LLM-as-judge scoring, and common failure causes. For fine-tuning, use agent-platform-tuning. For general production deployment, use agent-platform-deploy.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Trae-compatible English PUA/PIP high-agency governance skill. Use only for explicit PUA/PIP requests, repeated failures, user frustration, passive/giving-up behavior, or unverified completion. Not for normal first-attempt tasks.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Performance-coaching mode for repeated failures, passive behavior, completion-quality issues, or explicit try-harder requests. Uses structured troubleshooting and evidence-first delivery habits.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Trae-optimized PUA high-agency governance skill for npx skills installs. Use only for explicit PUA requests, repeated failures, user frustration, giving-up/passive behavior, or unverified completion. Do not trigger for normal first-attempt tasks.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Pi-compatible PUA high-agency governance skill. Use for explicit PUA/PIP requests, repeated failures, passive/giving-up behavior, user frustration, or unverified completion. Pair with /pua-on extension command when persistent pressure is desired.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Trae-compatible PUA high-agency governance skill. Use only for explicit PUA requests, repeated failures, user frustration, giving-up/passive behavior, or unverified completion. Do not trigger for normal first-attempt tasks.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Structured incident investigation using Five Whys, Fishbone, blameless Postmortem, Fault Tree, Kepner-Tregoe, and FMEA — traces failures to systemic root causes rather than blaming humans. USE WHEN root cause, RCA, 5 whys, fishbone, postmortem, incident analysis, fault tree, why does this keep failing, blameless, recurring bug. NOT FOR systemic loops (use SystemsThinking).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Handle iii engine and SDK errors across Node, Python, Rust, and browser workers. Use when interpreting error codes, retryability, RBAC denial, timeouts, handler failures, or SDK-specific exception surfaces.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

DeepEval evaluation workflow for AI agents and LLM applications. TRIGGER when the user wants to evaluate or improve an AI agent, tool-using workflow, multi-turn chatbot, RAG pipeline, or LLM app; add evals; generate datasets or goldens; use deepeval generate; use deepeval test run; send results to Confident AI; monitor production; run online evals; inspect traces; or iterate on prompts, tools, retrieval, or agent behavior from eval failures. AI agents are the primary use case. Covers Python SDK, pytest eval suites, CLI generation, traced evals, Confident AI reporting, and agent-driven improvement loops. DO NOT TRIGGER for unrelated generic pytest, non-AI test setup, or non-DeepEval observability work unless the user asks to compare or migrate to DeepEval; for instrumenting an app with DeepEval tracing, @observe, or framework integrations (use the `deepeval-tracing` skill); or for raw OpenTelemetry / OTLP export without the deepeval package (use the `deepeval-otel` skill).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Debug and optimize AI agents by analyzing reasoning traces, context degradation, tool confusion, instruction drift, repeated task failures, and performance regressions.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

This skill should be used when the harness, scaffold, workflow, or optimizer itself is the optimization target: recursive self-improvement (RSI) loops, meta-harnesses, self-improving harnesses that mine their own failures and propose bounded edits, evolutionary or population-based search over agent scaffolds, acceptance gates for self-modifying systems, and agentic context evolution where the mechanism that produces context is versioned and evolved. Route governance of a single autonomous loop (locked surfaces, durable logs, rollback, novelty gates, approval boundaries) to harness-engineering, measurement and quality-gate design to evaluation, judge design to advanced-evaluation, and remote sandbox infrastructure to hosted-agents.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

This skill should be used for diagnosing and mitigating context degradation: lost-in-middle failures, context poisoning, context clash, context confusion, attention-pattern issues, and agent performance degradation caused by accumulated or conflicting context.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

This skill should be used to explain or reason about the foundational concepts of context engineering: what context is, the anatomy of a context window, how attention mechanics work, the U-shaped attention curve, why context quality matters more than quantity, and the mental models needed to interpret every other context-engineering decision. Use this for conceptual explanation, onboarding, and background reading. Route operational work to the specialized skills: debugging attention failures goes to context-degradation, token-efficiency work goes to context-optimization, conversation summarization goes to context-compression, and project-shape decisions go to project-development.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。