「feed」の検索結果

This skill is designed to help users automatically extract reviews from Google Maps via the Google Maps Reviews API. Agent should proactively apply this skill when users request to find reviews for local businesses (e.g., coffee shops, clinics), monitor customer feedback for a specific brand or location, analyze sentiment of reviews for competitors, extract reviews for a chain of stores or services, track reputation of a local restaurant, gather user testimonials for a specific venue, conduct market research on service quality of local businesses, monitor reviews for a new retail location, collect feedback on public attractions or parks, identify common complaints for a specific service provider, research the best-rated places in a city, analyze recurring themes in reviews for a specific industry.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Extract seller or merchant profile data from marketplace platform seller pages. Returns seller name, rating, review count, positive feedback percentage, joined date, and return policy. Works on Amazon seller pages, eBay seller pages, and any e-commerce site with seller profiles. Use when: seller information, merchant profile, seller rating, marketplace seller data, seller details, vendor profile, store information, seller feedback, merchant rating, seller review count, get seller info, ebay seller page, amazon seller profile, marketplace vendor analysis, seller research.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Evaluate design from a UX perspective, assessing visual hierarchy, information architecture, emotional resonance, cognitive load, and overall quality with quantitative scoring, persona-based testing, and actionable feedback. Use when the user asks to review, critique, evaluate, or give feedback on a design or component.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Submit feedback about a Weave Router decision or model performance.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Alias for router-feedback — submit feedback about a Weave Router decision or model performance.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Comprehensive manuscript review covering argument structure, econometric specification, citation completeness, and potential referee objections. Make sure to use this skill whenever the user wants substantive academic feedback on a paper — not just surface edits. Triggers include: "review my paper", "give me feedback on this draft", "what would a referee say", "anticipate referee objections", "act as a referee", "check my identification strategy", "is my argument convincing", "review this manuscript", "critique my paper", "will this pass review", or any request for deep critique of academic writing beyond typos and grammar.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Process screenshot-based UI/UX feedback to fix visual issues — use when users share screenshots of bugs

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when receiving code review feedback, before implementing suggestions, especially if feedback seems unclear or technically questionable - requires technical rigor and verification, not performative agreement or blind implementation

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Extract and analyze writing improvements from GitHub PR review comments. Use when asked to show review feedback, style changes, or editorial improvements from a GitHub pull request URL. Handles both explicit suggestions and plain text feedback. Produces structured output comparing original phrasing with reviewer suggestions to help refine future writing.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Read LinkedIn for financial research through opencli: the user's feed, and job search with location, seniority, job type, remote, company, and date filters. Use this skill whenever the user wants to check their LinkedIn feed, see what professionals or analysts are posting about a company, market, or earnings, gauge professional sentiment, or search finance and trading jobs on LinkedIn. Read-only: it cannot post, like, comment, connect, message, or apply.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when the user asks to process, triage, fetch, view, count, list, or resolve review feedback in a GitHub PR. Supports both CodeRabbit and Codex review workflows. In this workflow, “real review feedback” is strictly defined as actionable inline comments; for CodeRabbit, exclude review summaries and nitpicks, and for Codex, exclude review summary cards and use PR main-thread reactions only as status signals.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when receiving code review feedback, before implementing suggestions, especially if feedback seems unclear or technically questionable - requires technical rigor and verification, not performative agreement or blind implementation

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when the user asks to "triage our comments, DMs, and mentions", "draft replies to this thread", "can we repost this fan post", or "set up inbox SLAs and an escalation path"; produces a ranked triage queue with register detection (sincere / ironic / performative / parasocial, sentiment-inversion table included — "this is so bad" under a comedy register is praise), a commenter taxonomy (troll monitor-only / rager / misguided / unhappy-customer / advocate) with a response-tier ladder and per-channel SLAs, an escalation matrix ending at the crisis path, a moderation ladder plus house rules for owned spaces, and a UGC curation-and-rights mode whose dated permission entries route to the channel registry — every reply is a ranked DRAFT a human posts; nothing is ever auto-sent. Not for launch-window feedback triage — use launch-feedback-synthesizer. 评论私信提及分诊/语域识别/回复草稿/UGC授权

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Structured approach to workplace conflicts, performance discussions, and challenging feedback using preparation-delivery-followup framework. Use when preparing for tough conversations, addressing conflicts, giving critical feedback, or navigating sensitive workplace discussions.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Design scalable distributed systems using structured approaches for load balancing, caching, database scaling, and message queues. Use when the user mentions "system design", "scale this", "high availability", "rate limiter", "design a URL shortener", "design Twitter", "design Uber", "design a news feed", "system design interview", "capacity planning", or "distributed architecture". Also trigger when estimating infrastructure requirements, choosing between microservices and monoliths, or designing for millions of concurrent users. Covers common system designs (TinyURL, feeds, chat) and back-of-the-envelope estimation. For data fundamentals, see ddia-systems. For resilience, see release-it.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Talk to customers without leading them using Mom Test rules: discuss their life not your idea, ask about specifics in the past, and talk less. Use when the user mentions "customer interviews", "validate my idea", "users say they want it but dont buy", "leading questions", "The Mom Test", "customer feedback bias", or "interview script". Also trigger when preparing user-research questions, interpreting ambiguous feedback, or designing customer-discovery that avoids false positives. Covers commitment and advancement, avoiding compliments, and extracting signal from noise. For product-market fit, see jobs-to-be-done. For rapid prototype testing, see design-sprint.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when receiving code review feedback (especially if unclear or technically questionable), when completing tasks or major features requiring review before proceeding, or before making any completion/success claims. Covers three practices - receiving feedback with technical rigor over performative agreement, requesting reviews via code-reviewer subagent, and verification gates requiring evidence before any status claims. Essential for subagent-driven development, pull requests, and preventing false completion claims.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Runs performance systems that change behavior — expectations, feedback, review cycles, calibration, and handling underperformance. Use this to design or fix a review process, run calibration, write or coach on feedback, address sustained underperformance, or work out why reviews consume weeks and change nothing.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when receiving code review feedback, before implementing suggestions, especially if feedback seems unclear or technically questionable - requires technical rigor and verification, not performative agreement or blind implementation

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Assists in writing high-quality content by conducting research, adding citations, improving hooks, iterating on outlines, and providing real-time feedback on each section. Use when the user wants to write blog posts, articles, newsletters, tutorials, case studies, thought leadership pieces, or any long-form content that benefits from research and structured feedback.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Für Feedback Rechte: ordnet Norm, Beweislast und Gegenargument; Ergebnis: Prüfprodukt mit Risiko und nächstem Schritt.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Self-coaching analysis of your own behavior across meetings — talk-time ratio, filler words, hedging language, monologue length, energy patterns, and (when meetings are tagged via /minutes-tag) what your behavior in winning meetings looks like vs losing ones. Use this whenever the user says "how did I do", "review my last meeting", "mirror", "self-review", "show my patterns", "coach me", "where am I weak", "talk time", "am I improving", "what do I do in meetings I win", "feedback on me", or asks for any kind of personal feedback on their own meeting behavior. This is the rare skill that gives the user a mirror to their own habits — surface it whenever they show curiosity about their own performance, even if they don't use the word "mirror".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Add "juice" and game feel that makes actions satisfying — screen shake, hit-stop/freeze frames, tweened/eased motion, squash & stretch, knockback, and layered audio-visual feedback — as engine-neutral techniques that pair with the detected engine's tween, particle, and camera APIs. Use when the user mentions game feel, juice, "make it feel good/punchy", screen shake, hit stop, screen freeze, easing, squash and stretch, impact frames, or feedback/polish on hits, jumps, pickups, and deaths.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Review a pull request or diff like a thoughtful senior engineer — prioritized, kind, and focused on what matters. Use when reviewing code, giving PR feedback, or asked to 'review this change'. Produces a structured review: a correctness/design pass, comments ranked by severity (blocking → nit), what's done well, and a clear approve / request-changes call — feedback that improves the code and the author.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。