379 件 ・ 関連度順
概要と使いどころ
Track parallel work sessions and prevent confusion across multiple Claude Code instances. Every major step ends with a status line. Every question re-states project, branch, and task.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Linux kernel exploitation playbook. Use when exploiting kernel vulnerabilities (UAF, OOB, race condition, type confusion) for privilege escalation via commit_creds, modprobe_path overwrite, or kernel ROP chains in CTF and real-world scenarios.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Web cache deception and poisoning playbook. Use when CDN, reverse proxy, or application caching may serve sensitive authenticated content to other users due to path confusion or cache key manipulation.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
HTTP Parameter Pollution (HPP): duplicate query/body keys parsed differently by servers, proxies, WAFs, and app frameworks. Use when filters and application layers disagree on which value wins, enabling bypass, SSRF second URL, logic abuse, or CSRF token confusion.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Browser and V8 exploitation playbook. Use when exploiting JavaScript engine vulnerabilities including JIT type confusion, incorrect bounds elimination, and V8 sandbox bypass to achieve renderer RCE and sandbox escape in Chrome/Chromium.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Designs complete research plans that integrate clinical variables with multi-omics data from a user-provided biomedical direction. Always use this skill whenever a user wants to design, scope, or structure a study that combines clinical variables with transcriptomics, proteomics, metabolomics, epigenomics, or related omics layers for mechanism interpretation, biomarker development, risk stratification, treatment-response analysis, or translational use. It should define the clinical use case, alignment across data layers, feature-reduction and fusion logic, modeling route, mechanism-interpretation layer, validation ladder, and four workload configurations (Lite / Standard / Advanced / Publication+). Never fabricate datasets, accession numbers, sample counts, metadata completeness, platform coverage, literature references, PMIDs, DOIs, or validation status. Always include the mandatory Dataset Disclaimer immediately before any workflow section that mentions datasets or public resources.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Recommend suitable prompts from 10,000+ Nano Banana Pro image generation prompts based on user needs. Optimized for Nano Banana Pro (Gemini), but prompts also work with Nano Banana 2, Seedream 5.0, GPT Image 1.5, Midjourney, DALL-E, Flux, Stable Diffusion, and any text-to-image AI model. Use this skill when users want to: - Generate images with AI (any model — Nano Banana Pro, Gemini, GPT Image, Seedream, etc.) - Find proven AI image generation prompts and prompt templates - Get prompt recommendations for specific use cases (portraits, products, social media, posters, etc.) - Create illustrations for articles, videos, podcasts, or marketing content - Browse a curated prompt library with sample images - Translate and understand prompt techniques Also available: "ai-image-prompts" skill — a model-agnostic version of this library for universal image generation.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Hybrid search combining semantic and keyword retrieval for RAG pipelines. Implement BM25 + dense vector search with fusion strategies.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Combine visual features (face detection, lip movement analysis) with audio features to improve speaker diarization accuracy in video files. Use OpenCV for face detection and lip movement tracking, then fuse visual cues with audio-based speaker embeddings. Essential when processing video files with multiple visible speakers or when audio-only diarization needs visual validation.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Detect insecure JWT (JSON Web Token) implementations in a codebase using a two-phase approach: first map all JWT issuance and verification sites to understand the token lifecycle and signing configuration, then check each verification site for exploitable weaknesses such as algorithm confusion, missing signature verification, weak secrets, header injection, and missing claim validation. Requires sast/architecture.md (run sast-analysis first). Outputs findings to sast/jwt-results.md. If no JWT usage is found in Phase 1, Phase 2 is skipped. Use when asked to find JWT, token forgery, or authentication bypass bugs.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when picking the next Spark expression to implement natively in Comet, or when asked whether a specific codegen-dispatched expression is worth a native Rust implementation. Scores the candidate on how likely a native path can be 100% Spark-compatible and how much throughput or allocation it would save versus the JVM codegen dispatcher, records the verdict in the per-expression audit log so disqualified candidates are not re-litigated, and files a GitHub issue for the recommendation.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Triage open Comet issues marked `requires-triage` per the project bug triage guide. Classifies each issue as a bug or an enhancement, applies the recommended type (`bug`/`enhancement`), priority, and area labels, removes `requires-triage`, and files a dated summary issue listing what was done. A human reviews the summary issue and closes it when satisfied.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when designing or auditing the experiments of an ACM MM (ACM Multimedia) paper — matched baselines per modality, ablations that isolate the cross-modal fusion, user studies or QoE measurement where the claim is subjective, dataset and media licensing, and honest compute reporting, so evidence supports a multimedia claim.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when revising an ACM MM (ACM Multimedia) paper for house style — putting the cross-modal contribution on the first page, framing media (figures, video, audio) as evidence rather than decoration, making the fusion the visible claim, and compressing the argument into a 6-8 page ACM sigconf body with references-only overflow.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Profiles a genome from raw reads BEFORE assembly with a k-mer spectrum (KMC or Jellyfish histogram), then models it with GenomeScope2 to estimate genome size, heterozygosity, repeat content, and ploidy, and Smudgeplot to infer ploidy from heterozygous k-mer pairs (diploid AB vs triploid AAB vs tetraploid AABB). Covers choosing k via Merqury best_k.sh, the k-mer-coverage vs sequencing-coverage confusion, reading het/repeat/contamination/organelle peaks, why noisy ONT must not be used for counting, and how the estimate becomes the NG50 denominator, the Flye -g value, the hifiasm --hom-cov/purge setting, and the 1.5-2x-too-big haplotig sanity check. Use when starting any de novo assembly, deciding whether short reads can work, estimating genome size for an unknown organism, diagnosing ploidy, or sanity-checking an assembly's size against expectation.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Map N6-methyladenosine (m6A) RNA modifications at single-nucleotide resolution using miCLIP (Linder 2015), miCLIP2 + m6Aboost machine learning (Kortel 2021), GLORI (Liu 2023, antibody-free chemical conversion), DART-seq (Meyer 2019, APOBEC1-YTH fusion), m6Anet (nanopore direct RNA), or MeRIP-seq with calibration. Use when distinguishing antibody-based from antibody-free m6A detection methods, applying the DRACH motif constraint, reconciling cross-method disagreements (DART 44% in DRACH vs GLORI), or detecting m6Am at the cap.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Resolve the architecture of focal oncogene amplifications — extrachromosomal DNA (ecDNA), breakage-fusion-bridge (BFB) cycles, homogeneously staining regions (HSR), and linear amplification — from whole-genome sequencing with AmpliconArchitect, the AmpliconSuite pipeline, and AmpliconClassifier. Covers copy-number seed selection, breakpoint-graph reconstruction, balanced-flow optimization, ecDNA classification, and the limits of depth-only amplification calls. Use when a focal amplification needs structural characterization, when distinguishing ecDNA from chromosomal amplification, suspecting ecDNA-driven oncogene amplification or therapy resistance, or selecting copy-number seeds for amplicon reconstruction.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Profiles RNA-binding protein targets without antibody or UV crosslinking using STAMP (APOBEC1-RBP fusion, C-to-U editing), scSTAMP (single-cell), TRIBE/HyperTRIBE (ADAR-RBP, A-to-I editing), DART-seq (APOBEC1-YTH for m6A), or Bullseye/SAILOR edit-site detection pipelines. Use when antibody is unavailable or specificity is doubtful, when single-cell RBP profiling is needed (scSTAMP), or when in vivo RBP profiling without UV is preferred.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Designs novel molecules using REINVENT 4 (de novo, scaffold decoration, linker design, R-group, molecular optimization), MolMIM, Diffusion-based generators (DiGress, DiffSMol), and JT-VAE with explicit handling of multi-parameter optimization (MPO), goal-directed scoring functions, transfer/reinforcement/curriculum learning, synthetic accessibility scoring, and chemical space exploration vs exploitation. Use when designing new chemical matter against a target, decorating a scaffold, linking fragments, or optimizing a hit for multiple ADMET / activity properties simultaneously.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Performs ML-based protein-ligand pose prediction and scoring using DiffDock-L (diffusion-based), Boltz-1 / Boltz-2 (foundation model with affinity), Chai-1, AlphaFold3 ligand, EquiBind, TANKBind, NeuralPLexer, and hybrid workflows (DiffDock pose + GNINA rescore + PoseBusters QC). Explicit handling of when ML beats classical docking, when classical beats ML, the PB-invalid pose problem, and rescoring as the standard production hybrid. Use when modern docking is needed: foundation-model ligand-pose prediction, AI rescoring of classical poses, or scaffold-hopping in cross-docking scenarios.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Performs gene-level association from GWAS summary statistics via genetically predicted tissue expression using FUSION, PrediXcan, S-PrediXcan, S-MultiXcan, UTMOST, MOSTWAS, kTWAS, EpiXcan, TIGAR-V2, and probabilistic fine-mapping with FOCUS and MA-FOCUS. Use when running TWAS from GWAS sumstats, prioritising candidate causal genes from a GWAS lead locus, picking single-tissue vs cross-tissue models, identifying LD-induced TWAS false positives, choosing ancestry-matched prediction weights, fine-mapping co-regulated TWAS hits, or triangulating TWAS with cis-eQTL Mendelian randomization and colocalization to nominate a causal gene.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Computes multi-constellation Global Positioning System (GPS) or Global Navigation Satellite System (GNSS) positions from RINEX v3 data using rinexread, gnssmeasurements, receiverposition, and gnssoptions. Filters by constellation, elevation mask, C/N0, and observation code. Reports DOP, scatter RMS, and satellite count. Use when processing GNSS data, computing positions from RINEX files, analyzing accuracy, comparing constellations, or evaluating satellite geometry. Do NOT use for carrier-phase RTK/PPP, IMU fusion, orbit propagation, NMEA streaming, or RINEX v4.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Import raw data (CSV, XLSX, TXT, or MATLAB tables) into formats used by Sensor Fusion and Tracking Toolbox. Handles both ground truth trajectories and sensor detection data. For truth: builds trackingScenarioRecording, tuning timetable, truthlog, or converted table. For sensor data: builds task-oriented dataFormat structs (preferred) or objectDetection arrays (legacy). Use when importing flight logs, GPS logs, radar detections, IR measurements, lidar/camera bounding boxes, ADS-B data, AIS ship tracks, or any recorded data for use with trackers, filter tuning, or tracker evaluation.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Generate driving scenes, scenarios, road surfaces, and 3D content from scenariobuilder.* sensor data (GPS, camera, lidar, actor tracks) using Scenario Builder for Automated Driving Toolbox. BUILD, EXPORT, or AUGMENT a virtual scenario/scene/map: ego or actor trajectories, trajectory smoothing, OpenCRG road-surface extraction, 3D asset generation, static-object placement, point-cloud georeferencing + elevation, lane-based ego localization, sensor-fusion tracking, scenario-event extraction (cut-ins, hard brakes, near-misses, ADAS disengagements), or export to RoadRunner, drivingScenario, OpenDRIVE, OpenCRG, OpenSCENARIO, or Unreal Engine. Also: log-to-scenario, scenario harvesting, accident/near-miss reconstruction, SOTIF (ISO 21448) and ISO 26262 scenario coverage, USGS-aerial-lidar augmentation, traffic-sign placement, vision-based vehicle classification for actor assets. NOT for raw-data import or multi-sensor sync/crop/offset/timestamp normalization — route those to matlab-import-driving-data.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。