「guided」の検索結果

Build office space programs through guided workplace strategy: area splits, room schedules, and planned seat counts. Use to program or size a workplace; not for code occupant-load calculations.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Guided, hands-on course teaching architects how to use Codex or Claude Code — six short modules, each built around an exercise on a bundled sandbox project (a fictional Brooklyn art museum expansion). Resumable across sessions via PROGRESS.md. Use when the user runs $learn or /as:learn, says they're new to AI-assisted project work, or asks how to learn it.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use deep-daze for CLIP-guided Siren image generation through the imagine CLI and Python APIs, with runtime inspection and troubleshooting.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Automatically repair C/C++ code violations detected by TLA+ model checking. Takes a program, TLA+ specification, and TLC counterexample trace as input, then generates minimal code modifications to eliminate the violation. Use when: (1) TLC model checker reports an invariant violation, deadlock, or temporal property failure, (2) You have a counterexample trace and need to fix the corresponding code, (3) You need to understand how a TLA+ violation maps to program-level bugs, (4) You want to validate repairs by re-running TLC. Supports safety properties (invariants), liveness properties (temporal logic), and deadlock detection.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Analyze failing tests to detect functional bugs in code. Takes repository and failing test output as input, analyzes execution behavior, assertions, and stack traces to identify suspicious code regions and root causes. Use when debugging test failures, investigating regression bugs, or understanding why tests fail. Explains the bug mechanism, identifies affected code, and suggests fixes based on test expectations vs actual behavior.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Automatically updates regression tests based on interval analysis to maintain coverage of key program intervals. Use when code changes affect value ranges, conditionals, or control flow, and existing tests need updating to maintain interval coverage. Analyzes interval information from updated code, identifies coverage gaps, adjusts test inputs and assertions, removes redundant tests, and generates new tests for uncovered intervals. Supports Python, Java, JavaScript, and C/C++ with various test frameworks (pytest, JUnit, Jest, Google Test).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Automatically repair code violations of temporal properties using model-checking counterexamples as guidance. Use when working with formal verification results, temporal logic property violations (LTL, CTL), model checking counterexamples, or when asked to repair property violations, fix counterexamples, repair temporal properties, fix model checking violations, or repair code based on counterexamples. Applicable to concurrent systems, state machines, synchronization issues, safety/liveness properties, and resource management violations.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Define production-ready visual intent for Blender scenes and standalone assets, including focal hierarchy, depth layers, visual flow, scale and repetition rhythm, camera mobility, representation fidelity, and performance budgets. Use for original or reference-guided Blender work before construction choices are executed, especially environments, architecture, products, hero assets, or scenes whose modeling quality depends on coordinated spatial design rather than isolated objects.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Guide a user from an unclear idea to an actionable plan through the agent harness's native ask tool and clickable choices. Use when the user wants a guided requirements interview, step-by-step questions, help deciding what to build, or a button-led path from goals to scope, solution, and technology choices. Do not turn an ordinary implementation request or a single clarification into an interview.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Creates Excalidraw diagrams through guided or autonomous workflows. Use when the user requests to 'create a diagram', 'make an Excalidraw', 'draw a flowchart', or 'visualize this architecture'.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Automated and marker-guided single-cell cell type annotation using CellTypist, marker review, reference transfer, and confidence-aware label curation.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Structure retrieval, confidence-aware AlphaFold DB usage, coordinate download, PAE and pLDDT interpretation, and structure-guided biological annotation.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Proteina-Complexa flow-based protein backbone generation with fold-conditioned sampling guidance. Use this skill when: (1) Generating de novo protein backbones with hierarchical fold conditioning, (2) Exploring long-chain backbone generation beyond standard diffusion baselines, (3) Using NVIDIA Proteina-style flow matching workflows for controllable backbone design, (4) Comparing flow-based backbone generation against RFdiffusion or BoltzGen, (5) Prototyping fold-guided backbone campaigns before sequence design. This skill is based on the public NVIDIA Digital Bio Proteina project and uses "Proteina-Complexa" as the BioClaw-facing skill label. For sequence design after backbone generation, use proteinmpnn or solublempnn. For QC thresholds, use protein-design-qc.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Guided setup and upgrade-check experience for Lattice projects -- scans the repository, detects existing configuration and outdated conventions, suggests refiners and available upgrades in priority order, and creates or reconciles the .lattice/ config. Bridges the gap between installing skills and getting first value, and between upgrading Lattice and adopting its newest conventions. Use when the user says 'lattice init', 'set up lattice', 'initialize lattice', 'get started with lattice', 'configure lattice for this project', 'check for lattice upgrades', or 'upgrade lattice conventions'.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Apply systematic problem-solving methodologies to complex challenges. Use when the user says "guide me through structured problem solving" or "I want to crack this challenge with guided problem solving techniques"

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when tutoring a learner through MATLAB debugging, error interpretation, failed tests, incorrect outputs, array-shape problems, indexing mistakes, function argument issues, or code repair practice. Use for guided debugging sessions, debugging drills, teach-the-agent critique, and evidence-based MATLAB troubleshooting.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when prompting a learner to complete hands-on MATLAB coding exercises, guided practice, debugging drills, code tracing, small MATLAB projects, or MATLAB-script assessment during tutoring. Use when the tutor should create a complete runnable MATLAB script, execute it through MATLAB tools, compare the produced outputs with expected outputs, and evaluate MATLAB programming style.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use this skill for guided MBSE work in MATLAB — starting a new project, resuming work mid-workflow on an existing project, or answering orientation questions about how the MBSE skills fit together. Trigger when the user says they want to create, start, or set up a new MBSE project; work on a model-based systems engineering / RFLPV project; or asks which skill covers which phase. Walks through phases one at a time — propose → approve → generate → run → confirm. Use proactively whenever someone mentions starting or continuing an MBSE project.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Builds project visions through interactive guided conversation. Use when users have vague ideas needing structure. Triggers on: build vision, I have an idea, start new project, new idea.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Surface risks through guided questioning, helping users consider pivots, constraints, and prioritization during PRD v0.5 Red Team Review. Triggers on requests to identify risks, stress-test the idea, perform red team review, or when user asks "what could go wrong?", "identify risks", "red team", "risk assessment", "challenge assumptions", "stress test the idea". Consumes all prior IDs (CFD-, BR-, FEA-, PER-, UJ-, SCR-) as interview context. Outputs RISK- entries with owner decisions and mitigations. Feeds v0.5 Technical Stack Selection.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Sequenced launcher that bootstraps QA on a project with no QA in place. Chains qa-project-context → test-strategy → test-planning in one guided run, then points you at automation. Use when: "set up QA on a new project," "QA from scratch," "no QA exists yet," "/qa-start." Not for: onboarding a QA engineer to an existing team with existing tests — use qa-project-bootstrap. Not for: "which skill do I use" with no clear match — use qa-do. Related: qa-project-context, test-strategy, test-planning, qa-project-bootstrap, qa-do.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Interactive codebase orientation for a HUMAN who wants to learn the code. Runs the same tree-sitting + featuring pipeline as exploring-codebases but synthesizes it into guided exercises and an HTML teaching artifact rather than an analysis document. Use for "orient me to this repo", "teach me this codebase", "walk me through this code", "learning orientation", or when someone wants genuine comprehension rather than a task completed. The audience is the test: if nobody is being taught and the goal is to get work done, use exploring-codebases instead.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Design a new PM skill through guided conversation. Use when you have raw content or an idea and want to shape it into a compliant skill.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Applies the empiricist, skeptical, and practical reasoning of David Hume, 18th-century Scottish philosopher. Use this skill whenever you encounter questions about epistemology, causality, human nature, moral philosophy, political authority, or the limits of rational knowledge. Trigger this skill when the user is grappling with abstract theories that need grounding, evaluating causal claims, discussing the role of emotion vs. reason in decision-making, or questioning the legitimacy of institutions. Even if the user doesn't name Hume, apply his frameworks (like Hume's Fork or the Impression Test) to cut through metaphysical speculation, ground arguments in observable experience, and recognize that reason is ultimately guided by human sentiment.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。