「harden」の検索結果

Microsoft 365 / Entra ID red-team attack chain — current 2026 reality. AADSTS code reference, user enumeration vectors (with hardening status), Smart Lockout math, Conditional Access bypass options, ROPC + SAML SSO browser flow, Burp/Playwright templates. Built from authorized red-team work where ROPC spray surfaced pre-existing lockouts and CA-blocked credentials, plus real-time external attacker activity correlation. Use for any M365/Entra credential attack, password spray, user enumeration, CA-bypass exploration, or active-attacker-detection scenario.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when the user wants to set up, scale, validate, or harden NVIDIA physical AI infrastructure for synthetic data generation workflows across local MicroK8s or Azure AKS, including Kubernetes clusters, inference endpoint deployment, OSMO deployment, workload submission readiness, and infrastructure failure recovery. Trigger keywords: physical ai infrastructure, resilient scaling, SDG infrastructure, microk8s, azure aks, NVCF deployment, NIM Operator, OSMO deploy, workflow scaling. Don't trigger for: OSMO log summarization or workload-only operations unless infrastructure setup, scaling, validation, or recovery is requested.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

PLAINTEXT-ONLY: the shipped `doca_flow_grpc` server uses `grpc::InsecureServerCredentials()` with NO TLS / mTLS / token-auth knob on the binary — transport security must come from external infrastructure (e.g. an mTLS proxy / sidecar) on a trusted segment. Use this skill when bringing up, configuring, hardening, or debugging `doca_flow_grpc` — the DOCA-shipped gRPC remote-control surface in front of `doca-flow` that lets non-C++ clients (Python, Go, Rust, Java) program Flow pipes and entries over RPC instead of linking `libdoca_flow.so` directly. Trigger even when the user doesn't say 'doca-flow-grpc-server' or 'gRPC' — e.g. 'program Flow rules from Python on another host', 'remotely configure pipes on the BlueField', 'client times out connecting to the Flow server', 'where is the .proto for Flow', 'UNAUTHENTICATED / FAILED_PRECONDITION on a Flow RPC'. Route elsewhere for the underlying doca-flow API, generic gRPC tooling (protoc, language bindings), or DOCA install / BFB bring-up.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

SUPERSEDED by /claudex-loop (formerly /crucible; adds a Phase 0 research/recon pass + rebuilt interview) — prefer that skill unless you explicitly want this one. Two-act plan hardening. ACT 1 (you ↔ Claude) — Claude interviews you relentlessly about a plan or design, one question at a time, recommending an answer for each and exploring the codebase when it can answer itself, until every branch of the decision tree is resolved. ACT 2 (Claude ↔ Codex) — Claude writes the locked plan to PLAN.md and OpenAI Codex adversarially reviews it in a read-only sandbox (VERDICT:APPROVED/REVISE), Claude revises and re-submits to the SAME Codex session until APPROVED or a MAX_ROUNDS cap, then you sign off before any code. Use when the user says "/grill-me-codex", "grill me then have codex review", "grill me and stress-test the plan", "interview me about this plan then get a second model on it", or is about to build something high-stakes (auth, schema, concurrency, migrations, payments) and wants both alignment AND a cross-model sanity check before implementation. Builds on Matt Pocock's grill-me (MIT). For the docs-aware variant use /grill-with-docs-codex; if you already have a plan and want only the Codex review use /codex-review. NOT for reviewing already-written code (use /codex:review) and NOT for trivial changes.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Harden a plan with independent Claude/Codex review, then optionally build and cross-inspect it. Start in either Claude Code or Codex: the host plans and the other provider reviews. Use for claudex this plan, claudex-loop, or the legacy crucible trigger; not for trivial edits.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

SUPERSEDED by /claudex-loop (formerly /crucible; its docs-aware mode covers this variant) — prefer that skill unless you explicitly want this one. Two-act plan hardening with living documentation. ACT 1 (you ↔ Claude) — Claude interviews you relentlessly about a plan, one question at a time, challenging it against your project's existing domain model and glossary (CONTEXT.md), sharpening fuzzy terms, stress-testing with concrete scenarios, cross-referencing code, and updating CONTEXT.md + ADRs inline as decisions crystallise. ACT 2 (Claude ↔ Codex) — Claude writes the locked plan to PLAN.md and OpenAI Codex adversarially reviews it in a read-only sandbox (VERDICT:APPROVED/REVISE), Claude revises and re-submits to the SAME Codex session until APPROVED or a MAX_ROUNDS cap, then you sign off before any code. Use when the user says "/grill-with-docs-codex", "grill me against the docs then have codex review", "stress-test this against our domain model then get a second model on it", or is about to build something high-stakes in a project with established terminology/ADRs and wants alignment, documentation, AND a cross-model sanity check. Builds on Matt Pocock's grill-with-docs (MIT). NOT for reviewing already-written code (use /codex:review) and NOT for trivial changes.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when THIS agent needs to pay for x402-protected content at runtime: hitting a paywall mid-task, settling it via AgentCore Payments, and applying operator-defined spend limits. Covers payment setup, policy, session budgets, and troubleshooting. Triggers on: "my agent hit a 402 while calling an API", "a tool call returned 402 Payment Required", "my agent needs to pay for x402-protected content", "let the agent pay for content, capped at $5 per session", "set a spend limit for the agent", "ProcessPayment failed", or "why did my agent refuse to pay". Not for BUILDING payment capability for end users, including wallets and framework middleware; use agents-build and references/payments.md. For non-paid APIs via Gateway use agents-connect. For inbound auth use agents-harden. For project scaffolding use agents-get-started.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when connecting your agent to external APIs, tools, or services via Gateway, or restricting tool access with Cedar policies. Handles gateway setup, target types, outbound auth (OAuth, API key, IAM), credentials, and Cedar policy authoring. Triggers on: "connect to API", "add gateway", "connect to MCP server", "Lambda tools", "OpenAPI", "gateway target", "Cedar policy", "restrict tools", "policy engine", "gateway auth error", "store API key", "outbound credential", "env var API key", "API key None after deploy", "credential not available after deploy", "should this be a gateway target", "give my agent tools", "add tools to agent". Not for inbound auth (who can call your agent) — use agents-harden. Not for debugging agent behavior — use agents-debug. Not for VPC networking errors (agent can't reach APIs due to VPC) — use agents-build. Not for creating or hosting a new MCP server project — use agents-get-started.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Configures AWS Direct Connect: choosing a connection model (dedicated, hosted, or a link aggregation group) and completing the cross connect; creating private, public, and transit virtual interfaces and bringing up BGP; reaching many VPCs through a Direct Connect gateway including cross-account transit gateway associations; encrypting traffic with MACsec or a private IP Site-to-Site VPN; making the connection resilient and tuning failover; managing link aggregation groups; SiteLink; and migrating from a virtual private gateway to a transit gateway. Use when the user wants a private, consistent network link between a data center and AWS, or operates an existing Direct Connect setup and needs to extend, encrypt, or harden it. Routes to the right per-task procedure in references. Do NOT use for transit gateway route tables and attachments (transitgateway skill), Site-to-Site VPN without Direct Connect (sitetositevpn skill), or Route 53 DNS routing (route53 skill).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Connects an existing AWS Lambda function to Amazon API Gateway by creating a REST or HTTP API with resource/method setup, Lambda proxy integration, permissions, and deployment. Always use this skill when connecting Lambda to API Gateway — it handles CORS, throttling, access logging, and production security hardening that are easy to miss.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Launches an EC2 instance with secure, cost-efficient defaults including AMI selection, burstable instance sizing, least-privilege IAM roles, hardened security groups, encrypted EBS volumes, and comprehensive tagging. Use when deploying new EC2 instances following AWS best practices for security and cost optimization.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Manages Amazon DocumentDB end-to-end — serverless-on-8.0 cluster setup, TLS/VPC/driver config, flexible-schema and vector-search data modeling, MongoDB compatibility assessment, DMS-based migration, slow-query diagnosis, major version upgrades (4.0->5.0->8.0), Well-Architected reviews (41-check wa_review.py), cost estimation, and security hardening. Retrieve for every DocumentDB question and when the user asks to set up or migrate MongoDB to AWS — DocumentDB is AWS's MongoDB-compatible managed database. Triggers: JSON document store, document database, MongoDB on AWS, Nested fields, Lambda cannot connect, TLS handshake, VPC port 27017, IAM auth, Secrets Manager, encryption at rest, $graphLookup, flexible schema, COLLSCAN, compound index, DMS migration, CDC cutover, $vectorSearch, RAG, Global Clusters, DR replication, cost sizing, audit, health check, production-readiness.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Harden an Attio integration with least-privilege credentials, tenant isolation, log redaction, raw-body webhook verification, idempotency, and incident-ready rotation. Use when reviewing Attio security controls or preparing production access. Trigger with "Attio security", "secure Attio integration", or "Attio webhook signature".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Secure Apify API tokens, configure proxy access, and protect Actor data. Use when hardening API key management, setting up environment-specific tokens, rotating a leaked token, or auditing Apify security configuration. Trigger with "apify security", "apify secrets", "secure apify token", "apify API key security", "rotate apify token".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Audit and harden Algolia credentials, record exposure, index restrictions, and tenant search controls. Use when reviewing frontend keys, backend ACLs, key rotation, or data visibility. Trigger with "secure Algolia", "Algolia key audit", or "Algolia security review".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Gate Alchemy integration changes with deterministic unit, contract, fork, secret, and negative-path checks. Use when adding Alchemy to CI or hardening an existing pipeline. Trigger with "Alchemy CI", "Alchemy GitHub Actions", or "test Alchemy in CI".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Establish least privilege, credential rotation, webhook authenticity, signed-URL custody, log minimization, and destructive-action controls. Use when designing or hardening Adobe integrations. Trigger with "secure Adobe integration", "rotate Adobe secret", or "verify Adobe webhook".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Terminal security analysis for shell environments. This skill should be used when checking commands for supply-chain attacks before execution, scanning repositories for hidden content or config poisoning, scoring URLs for homograph attacks, setting up AI tool protection, inspecting Python package artifacts, governing untrusted tasks or Web3 commands, auditing browser extensions, creating provenance receipts, downloading and executing scripts safely, investigating why tirith blocked a command, managing trusted patterns, running security audits, configuring MCP gateway proxies, or working with threat intelligence databases. Also use when the user mentions "tirith", "pipe-to-shell", "homograph", "ANSI injection", "zero-width", "punycode", "terminal security", "shell hook", "cloaking detection", "supply chain attack", "bidi override", "invisible unicode", or "config poisoning". Even if the user does not explicitly name tirith, use this skill when they ask about protecting shell environments, intercepting dangerous commands, or hardening AI agent tool execution.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Application security covering input validation, auth, headers, secrets management, and dependency auditing

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Complete requested work while preventing speculative defenses and scope creep. Use when considering extra hardening, reviewing possible overengineering, resolving repeated verification loops, following explicit task boundaries, or when the user invokes Stop That Shit. Ordinary use of validation, retries, or dependencies alone is not a trigger.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Guided journey from a shipped app that works but feels rough to a product that fits the job, flows without friction, reads clearly, and persuades honestly. Orchestrates nine skills phase by phase - jobs-to-be-done, ux-heuristics, design-everyday-things, refactoring-ui, microinteractions, made-to-stick, influence-psychology, high-perf-browser, steve-jobs-design-review - asking the user questions at every decision point and recording results in the project docs/ folder (CUSTOMER.md, DESIGN.md, POSITIONING.md, IMPROVE-APP-PLAN.md) so the journey resumes across sessions. Use when the user wants to fix a clunky product, cut UX friction, sharpen in-app copy, or says 'the app works but feels rough'. Not for code, tests, or hardening - use improve-code-quality (fresh prototype) or remove-technical-debt (aged); no app yet, create-app; needs growth loops, grow-app; marketing-site friction, improve-website; one leaking flow, conversion-optimization. For one framework in isolation, invoke that skill directly.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Guided journey from a working-but-untested vibe-coded prototype to a production-ready product with tests, clean structure, a business-rules boundary, and resilience at scale. Orchestrates nine skills phase by phase - working-with-legacy-code, clean-code, refactoring-patterns, software-design-philosophy, clean-architecture, pragmatic-programmer, release-it, system-design, ddia-systems - asking the user questions at every decision point and recording results in the project docs/ folder (TESTING.md, TECH-DEBT.md, IMPROVE-CODE-QUALITY-PLAN.md) so the journey resumes across sessions. Use when the user wants to harden an AI-generated prototype, add tests before refactoring, make code safe to change, or says 'this works on my machine but I am scared to touch it'. For an aged codebase, remove-technical-debt; for greenfield structure, design-code-architecture; for a product and UX pass, improve-app; to optimize speed and structure, architecture-optimization. For one framework in isolation, invoke that skill directly.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

AIDefence security layer with prompt injection blocking, input validation, sandboxed execution, output sanitization, and STRIDE threat modeling.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when the user types /hep-storm or /agentlas-storm, says @Hephaestus storm <goal>, or asks to drive a goal to verified completion through a force-robust Stormbreaker loop. Stormbreaker routes the goal to real Agentlas specialists, materializes a dependency-ordered pipeline fabric, and runs each work packet as a verifier-first hardened loop that does not stall, run away, or claim false success. Use it for loop-worthy work — apps, sites, agents, automations, debugging, multi-step research, data/report generation. Trivial questions are answered directly, not stormed.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。